1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science
  4. Volume 67, 2017
  5. Article

Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science

Volume 67, 2017

A New Paradigm for Hadronic Parity Nonconservation and Its Experimental Implications

Abstract

The primary experimental goal of studies of hadronic parity nonconservation (PNC) has long been the isolation of the isovector weak nucleon–nucleon interaction, expected to be dominated by long-range pion exchange and enhanced by the neutral current. In meson-exchange descriptions, this interaction, together with an isoscalar interaction generated by and exchange, dominates most observables. Both amplitudes have been used to compare and check the consistency of experiments, yet no evidence for isovector hadronic PNC has been found. We argue that the emphasis on isovector hadronic PNC was misplaced. The large- expansion provides an alternative and theoretically better-motivated simplification of effective field theories (EFTs) of hadronic PNC, separating the five low-energy constants (LECs) into two of leading order (LO) and three of next-to-next-to-leading order (NLO). We show that this large- LEC hierarchy accurately describes all existing data on hadronic PNC and discuss opportunities to further test the predicted large- LEC hierarchy. This formalism—combined with future experiments—could lead to rapid progress in the next 5 years. We discuss the impact of anticipated new results and describe future experiments that can yield more precise values of the LO LECs and help to isolate the NLO 10% corrections.

Keyword(s): effective field theory, hadronic parity nonconservation, hadronic parity violation
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-nucl-041917-033231
2017-10-12
2024-04-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/nucl/67/1/annurev-nucl-041917-033231.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-nucl-041917-033231&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Fry J. 1.  et al. Hyperfine Interact 238:111 2017.
  2. Kurth T. 2.  et al. Proc. Sci. LATTICE2015 329 2016.
  3. Haxton W, Holstein B. 3.  Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 71:185 2013.
  4. Phillips DR, Samart D, Schat C. 4.  Phys. Rev. Lett. 114:062301 2015.
  5. Schindler MR, Springer RP, Vanasse J. 5.  Phys. Rev. C 93:025502 2016.
  6. Donoghue JF, Golowich E, Holstein BR. 6.  Camb. Monogr. Part. Phys. Nucl. Phys. Cosmol. 2:1 1992.
  7. Maiani L.7.  Riv. Nuovo Cim. 34:679 2011.
  8. Desplanques B, Donoghue JF, Holstein BR. 8.  Ann. Phys. 124:449 1980.
  9. Barnes C. 9.  et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 40:840 1978.
  10. Bizetti PG. 10.  et al. Lett. Nuovo Cim. 29:167 1980.
  11. Ahrens G. 11.  et al. Nucl. Phys. A 390:486–508 1982.
  12. Bini M, Fazzini T, Poggi G, Taccetti N. 12.  Phys. Rev. Lett. 55:795 1985.
  13. Page S. 13.  et al. Phys. Rev. C 35:1119 1987.
  14. Haxton W.14.  Phys. Rev. Lett. 46:698 1981.
  15. Bennett C, Lowrey MM, Krien K. 15.  Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 25:486 1980.
  16. Adelberger E. 16.  et al. Phys. Rev. C 27:2833–56 1983.
  17. Adelberger EG, Haxton WC. 17.  Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 35:501 1985.
  18. Gericke M. 18.  et al. Phys. Rev. C 83:015505 2011.
  19. Page SA. 19.  et al. J. Res. Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. 110:195 2005.
  20. Caviagnac JF, Vignon B, Wilson R. 20.  Phys. Lett. B 67:149 1977.
  21. Zhu S-L. 21.  et al. Nucl. Phys. A 748:435 2005.
  22. Girlanda L.22.  Phys. Rev. C 77:067001 2008.
  23. Phillips DR, Schindler MR, Springer RP. 23.  Nucl. Phys. A 822:1 2009.
  24. Danilov G.24.  Phys. Lett. 18:40 1965.
  25. Danilov G.25.  Phys. Lett. B 35:579 1971.
  26. Danilov G.26.  Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 14:443 1972.
  27. Lee TD, Yang C-N. 27.  Phys. Rev. 104:254 1956.
  28. Wu CS. 28.  et al. Phys. Rev. 105:1413 1957.
  29. Tanner N.29.  Phys. Rev. 107:1203 1957.
  30. Haeberli W, Holstein BR. 30.  arXiv:nucl-th/ 9510062 1995.
  31. Ramsey-Musolf MJ, Page SA. 31.  Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 56:1 2006.
  32. Krane K, Olsen C, Sites JR, Steyert W. 32.  Phys. Rev. Lett. 26:1579 1971.
  33. Yuan V. 33.  et al. Phys. Rev. C 44:2187 1991.
  34. Dubovik VM, Zenkin SV. 34.  Ann. Phys. 172:100 1986.
  35. Feldman GB, Crawford GA, Dubach J, Holstein BR. 35.  Phys. Rev. C 43:863 1991.
  36. Schindler M, Springer R. 36.  Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 72:1 2013.
  37. Desplanques B, Missimer JH. 37.  Nucl. Phys. A 300:286 1978.
  38. Wasem J.38.  Phys. Rev. C 85:022501 2012.
  39. Carlson J, Schiavilla R, Brown V, Gibson B. 39.  Phys. Rev. C 65:035502 2002.
  40. Eversheim P. 40.  et al. Phys. Lett. B 256:11 1991.
  41. Nagle D. 41.  et al. AIP Conf. Proc. 51:224 1979.
  42. Balzer R. 42.  et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 44:699 1980.
  43. Balzer R. 43.  et al. Phys. Rev. C 30:1409 1984.
  44. Kistryn S. 44.  et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 58:1616 1987.
  45. Berdoz AR. 45.  et al. Phys. Rev. C 68:034004 2003.
  46. Berdoz AR. 46.  et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87:272301 2001.
  47. Lang J. 47.  et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 54:170 1985.
  48. Henneck R. 48.  et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 48:725 1982.
  49. Elsener K. 49.  et al. Nucl. Phys. A 461:579 1987.
  50. Elsener K. 50.  et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 52:1476 1984.
  51. Wood C. 51.  et al. Science 275:1759 1997.
  52. Snover KA. 52.  et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 41:145 1978.
  53. Earle ED. 53.  et al. Nucl. Phys. A 396:221C 1983.
  54. Snow W. 54.  et al. Phys. Rev. C 83:022501 2011.
  55. Knyaz'kov VA. 55.  et al. Nucl. Phys. A 417:209 1984.
  56. Avenier M. 56.  et al. Phys. Lett. B 137:125 1984.
  57. Desplanques B.57.  Nucl. Phys. A 335:147 1980.
  58. Liu CP.58.  Phys. Rev. C 75:065501 2007.
  59. de Vries J. 59.  et al. Phys. Lett. B 747:299 2015.
  60. McKellar B.60.  Phys. Lett. B 26:107 1967.
  61. Fischbach E.61.  Phys. Rev. 170:1398 1968.
  62. Tadić D.62.  Phys. Rev. 174:1694 1968.
  63. Kummer W, Schweda M. 63.  Acta Phys. Aust. 28:303 1968.
  64. Fischbach E, Tadić D. 64.  Phys. Rep. 6:123 1973.
  65. Box MA, McKellar BHJ, Pick P, Lassey KR. 65.  J. Phys. G 1:493 1975.
  66. Patrignani C. 66.  et al. (Part. Data Group) Chin. Phys. C 40:100001 2016.
  67. Donoghue JF, Golowich E, Holstein B. 67.  Phys. Rep. 131:319 1986.
  68. Barton G.68.  Nuovo Cim 19:512 1961.
  69. Glashow SL, Iliopoulos J, Maiani L. 69.  Phys. Rev. D 2:1285 1970.
  70. Kaplan DB, Savage MJ. 70.  Nucl. Phys. A 556:653 1993.
  71. Kaiser N, Meißner U-G. 71.  Nucl. Phys. A 489:671 1988.
  72. Meißner UG, Weigel H. 72.  Phys. Lett. B 447:1 1999.
  73. Freeman W, Toussaint D. 73.  (MILC Collab.) Phys. Rev. D 88:054503 2013.
  74. Ohki H. 74.  et al. (JLQCD Collab.) Phys. Rev. D 87:034509 2013.
  75. Junnarkar P, Walker-Loud A. 75.  Phys. Rev. D 87:114510 2013.
  76. Gong M. 76.  et al.(XQCD Collab.) Phys. Rev. D 88:014503 2013.
  77. Dai J, Savage MJ, Liu J, Springer RP. 77.  Phys. Lett. B 271:403 1991.
  78. Buchalla G, Buras AJ, Lautenbacher ME. 78.  Rev. Mod. Phys. 68:1125 1996.
  79. Boyle PA. 79.  et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110:152001 2013.
  80. Buras AJ, Gerard J-M, Bardeen WA. 80.  Eur. Phys. J. C 74:2871 2014.
  81. Maiani L, Testa M. 81.  Phys. Lett. B 245:585 1990.
  82. Huang K, Yang CN. 82.  Phys. Rev. 105:767 1957.
  83. Lee TD, Huang K, Yang CN. 83.  Phys. Rev. 106:1135 1957.
  84. Wu TT.84.  Phys. Rev. 115:1390 1959.
  85. Lüscher M.85.  Commun. Math. Phys. 105:153 1986.
  86. Lüscher M.86.  Nucl. Phys. B 354:531 1991.
  87. Berkowitz E. 87.  et al. Phys. Lett. B 765:285 2017.
  88. Tiburzi B.88.  Phys. Rev. D 86:097501 2012.
  89. Kaplan DB, Savage MJ, Wise MB. 89.  Phys. Lett. B 424:390 1998.
  90. Epelbaum E, Gloeckle W, Meißner U-G. 90.  Nucl. Phys. A 637:107 1998.
  91. Epelbaum E, Gloeckle W, Meißner U-G. 91.  Nucl. Phys. A 671:295 2000.
  92. van Kolck U.92.  Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 43:337 1999.
  93. Beane SR, Bedaque PF, Savage MJ, van Kolck U. 93.  Nucl. Phys. A 700:377 2002.
  94. Epelbaum E, Hammer H-W, Meißner U-G. 94.  Rev. Mod. Phys. 81:1773 2009.
  95. Beane SR, Savage MJ. 95.  Nucl. Phys. B 636:291 2002.
  96. Marcucci LE, Nollett KM, Schiavilla R, Wiringa RB. 96.  Nucl. Phys. A 777:111 2006.
  97. Viviani M. 97.  et al. Phys. Rev. C 82:044001 2010.
  98. Desplanques B, Benayoun JJ. 98.  Nucl. Phys. A 458:689 1986.
  99. Lobashov VM. 99.  et al. Nucl. Phys. A 197:241 1972.
  100. Snow WM. 100.  et al. Int. J. Mod. Phys. Conf. Ser. 40:1660002 2016.); Vanasse J, Schindler MR Phys. Rev. C 90:044001 2014. [Google Scholar]
  101. Avishai Y, Grange P. 101.  J. Phys. G 10:L263 1984.
  102. Heckel B.102.  Proceedings of the Workshop on the Investigation of Fundamental Interactions with Cold Neutrons GL Greene 90 Washington, DC: Natl. Bur. Stand 1986.
  103. Adelberger E. 103.  Proceedings of the Symposium/Workshop on Parity Violation in Hadronic Systems SA Page, WD Ramsay, WTH Van Oers 50 Vancouver, Can: TRIUMF 1987.
  104. Schiavilla R, Carlson J, Paris MW. 104.  Phys. Rev. C 70:044007 2004.
  105. Griesshammer HW, Schindler MR, Springer RP. 105.  Eur. Phys. J. A 48:7 2012.
  106. Schiavilla R. 106.  et al. Phys. Rev. C 78:014002 2008. Schiavilla R, et al. Erratum Phys. Rev. C 83:029902 (2011); Vanasse J Phys. Rev. C 86:014001 2012. Vanasse J Phys. Rev. C 88:044001 2013.
  107. Dmitriev VF, Flambaum VV, Sushkov OP, Telitsin VB. 107.  Phys. Lett. B 125:1 1983.
  108. Desplanques B, Benayoun JJ, Gignoux C. 108.  Nucl. Phys. A 324:221 1979.
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-nucl-041917-033231
Loading
A New Paradigm for Hadronic Parity Nonconservation and Its Experimental Implications
Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science 67, 69 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-nucl-041917-033231
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-nucl-041917-033231
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-nucl-041917-033231
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error