ABSTRACT
Healthcare information systems play an important role in improving healthcare quality. As providing healthcare increasingly changes from isolated treatment episodes towards a continuous medical process involving multiple healthcare professionals and institutions, there is an obvious need for an information system to support processes and span the whole healthcare network. A suitable architecture for such an information system must take into account that it has to work as an integral part of a complex socio-technical system with changing conditions and requirements. We have surveyed the core requirements of healthcare professionals and analysed the literature for known problems and information needs. We consolidated the results to define use cases for an integrated information system as communication patterns, from which general implications on the required properties of a helathcare network information system could be derived. Key issues are flexibility, adaptability, robustness, integration of existing systems and standards, semantic compatibility, security and process orientation. Based on these results an IT architecture is being designed that is capable of addressing the requirements mostly on the basis of well-established standards and concepts.
- J. G. Anderson. Clearing the way for physicians' use of clinical information systems. Communications of the ACM, 40(8):83--90, 1997. Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. W. Bates, M. Cohen, L. L. Leape, J. M. Overhage, M. M. Shabot, and T. Sheridan. Reducing the frequency of errors in medicine using information technology. J Am Med Inform Assoc, 8(4):299--308, 2001.Google ScholarCross Ref
- D. W. Bates, A. C. O'Neil, D. Boyle, J. Teich, G. M. Chertow, A. L. Komaroff, and T. A. Brennan. Potential identifiability and preventability of adverse events using information systems. J Am Med Inform Assoc, 1(5):404--411, 1994.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Bhasale. The wrong diagnosis: identifying causes of potentially adverse events in general practice using incident monitoring. Fam. Pract., 15(4):308--318, 1998.Google ScholarCross Ref
- P. Bolton, M. Mira, P. Kennedy, and M. M. Lahra. The quality of communication between hospitals and general practitioners: an assessment. J Qual Clin Pract, 18(4):241--247, 1998.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. O. Borchers. A pattern approach to interaction design. Proceedings of the conference on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques, 2002. Google ScholarDigital Library
- T. A. Brennan, L. L. Leape, N. M. Laird, L. Hebert, A. R. Localio, A. G. Lawthers, J. P. Newhouse, P. C. Weiler, and H. H. Hiatt. Incidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalized patients. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study I. N Engl J Med, 324(6):370--376, 1991.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. J. Cimino. From data to knowledge through concept-oriented terminologies: experience with the medical entities dictionary. J Am Med Inform Assoc, 7(3):288--297, 2000.Google ScholarCross Ref
- R. M. Colomb. Impact of semantic heterogeneity on federating databases. The Computer Journal, 40(5):235--244, 1997.Google ScholarCross Ref
- R. S. Dick and E. B. Steen, editors. The Computer-Based Patient Record. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 1991. Google ScholarDigital Library
- R. H. Dolin, L. Alschuler, C. Beebe, P. V. Biron, S. L. Boyer, D. Essin, E. Kimber, T. Lincoln, and J. E. Mattison. The HL7 Clinical Document Architecture. J Am Med Inform Assoc, 8(6):552--569, 2001.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Elmagarmid, M. Rusinkiewicz, and A. Sheth, editors. Management of Heterogeneous and Autonomous Database Systems. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco, California, 1999. Google ScholarDigital Library
- E. Gamma, R. Helm, R. Johnson, and J. Vlissides. Design Patterns. Addison-Wesley, 1995.Google ScholarDigital Library
- L. E. Garrett, Jr., W. E. Hammond, and W. W. Stead. The effects of computerized medical records on provider efficiency and quality of care. Methods Inf Med, 25(3):151--157, 1986.Google ScholarCross Ref
- (IJMI special issue on legacy systems). Int J Med Inf, 54:155--262, 1999.Google Scholar
- Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm. National Academic Press, Washington, D.C., 2001.Google Scholar
- S. Jablonski and C. Bussler. Workflow management -- modeling concepts, architecture and implementation. International Thomson Computer Press, London, 1996.Google Scholar
- S. Jablonski, R. Lay, and C. Meiler. Process-oriented web content management in e-healthcare. In Proceedings of e-Society 2003 IADIS International Conference, 2003.Google Scholar
- KBV (Kassenärztliche Bundesvereinigung Deutschland). {Table of interfaces} (german, 'Tabelle der Schnittstellen'). http://www.kbv.de/it/schnittstellen.htm, Jun 2003.Google Scholar
- KBV (Kassenärztliche Bundesvereinigung Deutschland). xDT -- Synonym für elektronischen Datenaustausch in der Arztpraxis (german). http://www.kbv.de/it/xdtinfo.htm, Jun 2003.Google Scholar
- K. A. Kuhn and D. A. Giuse. From hospital information systems to health information systems. Problems, challenges, perspectives. Methods Inf Med, 40(4):275--287, 2001.Google ScholarCross Ref
- K. A. Kuhn, D. A. Giuse, and J. L. Talmon. The Heidelberg Conference: Setting an agenda for the IMIA working group on health information systems. Int J Med Inf, 69(2--3):77--82, 2003.Google Scholar
- KV Nordrhein. D2D - Die Telematik-Initiative der KV Nordrhein (german). http://www.kvno.de/texte/kvno/d2d/idx_d2d.htm, Jun 2003.Google Scholar
- L. L. Leape, T. A. Brennan, N. Laird, A. G. Lawthers, A. R. Localio, B. A. Barnes, L. Hebert, J. P. Newhouse, P. C. Weiler, and H. Hiatt. The nature of adverse events in hospitalized patients. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study II. N Engl J Med, 324(6):377--384, 1991.Google ScholarCross Ref
- R. Lenz and K. A. Kuhn. Intranet meets hospital information systems: the solution to the integration problem? Methods Inf Med, 40(2):99--105, 2001.Google ScholarCross Ref
- C. J. McDonald. The barriers to electronic medical record systems and how to overcome them. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 4(3):213--221, 1997.Google ScholarCross Ref
- C. Moore, J. Wisnivesky, S. Williams, and T. McGinn. Medical errors related to discontinuity of care from an inpatient to an outpatient setting. J Gen Intern Med, 18(8):646--651, 2003.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. A. Musen. Domain ontologies in software engineering: use of Protege with the EON architecture. Methods Inf Med, 37(4--5):540--550, 1998.Google Scholar
- W. A. Nowlan, A. L. Rector, T. W. Rush, and W. D. Solomon. From terminology to terminology services. Proc. Annu. Symp. Comput. Appl. Med. Care, pages 150--154, 1994.Google Scholar
- PICNIC homepages. http://picnic.euspirit.org; http://www.medcom.dk/picnic, Jun 2003.Google Scholar
- E. Rahm and P. A. Bernstein. A survey of approaches to automatic schema matching. The VLDB Journal, 2001(10):334--350, 2001. Google ScholarDigital Library
- C. Safran, D. Z. Sands, and D. M. Rind. Online medical records: a decade of experience. Methods Inf Med, 38(4--5):308--312, 1999.Google Scholar
- N. Saranummi. Interim System Architecture for PICNIC (D2.3). http://www.medcom.dk/picnic/deliverables/d2.3%20int%20sysarch%20v20.doc, May 2003.Google Scholar
- G. Schadow, U. Fohring, and T. Tolxdorff. Implementing HL7: from the standard's specification to production application. Methods Inf Med, 37(1):119--123, 1998.Google ScholarCross Ref
- SCIPHOX homepage. http://www.sciphox.org, Jun 2003.Google Scholar
- A. Sheth and J. Larson. Federated database systems for managing distributed, heterogeneous, and autonomous databases. ACM Computing Surveys, 22(3):183--235, 1990. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. M. Teich. Clinical information systems for integrated healthcare networks. Proc. AMIA Symp., pages 19--28, 1998.Google Scholar
- C. van Walraven, R. Seth, and A. Laupacis. Dissemination of discharge summaries. Not reaching follow-up physicians. Can Fam Physician, 48:737--742, 2002.Google Scholar
- C. van Walraven and A. L. Weinberg. Quality assessment of a discharge summary system. CMAJ, 152(9):1437--1442, 1995.Google Scholar
- VDAP (Verband Deutscher Arztpraxis-Softwarehersteller e.V.). VCS - Der neue Standard für die elektronische Arzt-Arzt-Kommunikation (german). http://www.vdap.de/html/vcs/vcsstand.html, Jun 2003.Google Scholar
- R. M. Wilson, B. T. Harrison, R. W. Gibberd, and J. D. Hamilton. An analysis of the causes of adverse events from the quality in australian health care study. Med J Aust, 170(9):411--415, 1999.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. Wilson, W. Ruscoe, M. Chapman, and R. Miller. General practitioner-hospital communications: a review of discharge summaries. J Qual Clin Pract, 21(4):104--108, 2001.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
Towards a flexible, process-oriented IT architecture for an integrated healthcare network
Recommendations
Establishing 'integrated healthcare' in Austria
Integrated healthcare in Austria is one of the approaches policy-makers choose in facing upcoming challenges that are expected to increase health spending. The paper outlines why networking will be a major issue within integrated healthcare structures. ...
Service innovation from the edges: enhanced by telemedicine decision support
Increased prevalence of diabetes creates a need for improved care. Diabetes, as a chronic disease in which the patient is a central asset for effective care, is relevant as an illustrative example for also other chronic diseases that are on the rise ...
Building an Integrated Patient Information System for a Healthcare Network
The recent healthcare reform act provides incentive payments to providers for their 'meaningful use' of electronic health records to achieve significant improvements in care. The HITECH Act 2009 provides incentives payments through Medicare and Medicaid ...
Comments