Diana Kirk
Andrew Luxton-Reilly
ABSTRACT
Tertiary educators in software related topics experience issues during project-based group assessments. Our long term goal is to help educators manage the challenges that inevitably occur by providing a risk planning mechanism for students that suits the needs of the course. In this paper, we describe the first iteration of an action research study to trial a risk framework for academic group projects. Our aims were to understand how educators appropriate the framework to suit their course, gain insight into students’ understanding of risk concepts and refine the framework. A questionnaire based on the framework was distributed to students in three 12-week computer science (CS) courses. We found that most students reported few issues. Participating courses used the framework in different ways. Students lacked a holistic understanding of risk management concepts, implying the need to formally introduce these. Our study progresses the understanding of the issues experienced in academic group projects and contributes a revised framework to help manage these. In future iterations, we will investigate links between issues and project characteristics and establish a repository of mitigation strategies that is project-specific.
- Tero Ahtee and Timo Poranen. 2009. Risks in Students’ Software Projects. In Proceedings of the 22nd Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training (CSEET’09). ACM, NY, USA, 154–157. https://doi.org/10.1109/CSEET.2009.31Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Craig Anslow and Frank Maurer. 2015. An Experience Report at Teaching a Group Based Agile Software Development Project Course. In Proceedings of the 46th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Kansas City, MO, USA) (SIGCSE ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 500–505. https://doi.org/10.1145/2676723.2677284Google ScholarDigital Library
- David E. Avison, Francis Lau, Michael D. Myers, and Peter Axel Nielsen. 1999. Action Research. Commun. ACM 42, 1 (jan 1999), 94–97. https://doi.org/10.1145/291469.291479Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sarah Beecham, Tony Clear, Ramesh Lal, and John Noll. 2021. Do scaling agile frameworks address global software development risks? An empirical study. Journal of Systems and Software 171 (2021), 110823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2020.110823Google ScholarCross Ref
- Difference Between). 2021. Difference Between PMI and Prince2. Retrieved June 28, 2021 from http://www.differencebetween.net/business/difference-between-pmi-and-prince2/Google Scholar
- Barry Boehm and Daniel Port. 2001. Educating Software Engineering Students to Manage Risk. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE ’01). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 591–600. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE.2001.919133Google ScholarCross Ref
- Barry W. Boehm. 1991. Software Risk Management: Principles and Practices. IEEE Software 8, 1 (1991), 32–41.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3, 2 (2006), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa arXiv:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1191/1478088706qp063oaGoogle ScholarCross Ref
- Business Research Methodology. n.d.. Action research. Retrieved July 25, 2022 from https://research-methodology.net/research-methods/action-research/Google Scholar
- Jennifer Campbell and Anya Tafliovich. 2015. An Experience Report: Using Mobile Development To Teach Software Design. In Proceedings of the 46th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Kansas City, USA) (SIGCSE ’15). ACM, NY, USA, 506–511. https://doi.org/10.1145/2676723.2677307Google ScholarDigital Library
- Daniela Damian and Arber Borici. 2012. Teamwork, Coordination and Customer Relationship Management Skills: As Important as Technical Skills in Preparing our SE Graduates. In 2012 First International Workshop on Software Engineering Education Based on Real-World Experiences (EduRex). 37–40. https://doi.org/10.1109/EduRex.2012.6225704Google ScholarCross Ref
- Emeral Publishing. 2022. How to carry out action research. Retrieved July 25th, 2022 from https://www.emeraldgrouppublishing.com/how-to/research-methods/carry-out-action-researchGoogle Scholar
- Chase Felker, Radka Slamova, and Janet Davis. 2012. Integrating UX with Scrum in an Undergraduate Software Development Project. In Proceedings of the 43rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Raleigh, North Carolina, USA) (SIGCSE ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 301–306. https://doi.org/10.1145/2157136.2157226Google ScholarDigital Library
- Maria Lydia Fioravanti, Bruno Sena, Leo Natan Paschoal, Laísa de Silva, Ana P. Allian, Elisa Y. Nakagawa, Simone R.S. Souza, Seiji Isotani, and Ellen F. Barbosa. 2018. Integrating Project Based Learning and Project Management for Software Engineering Teaching: An Experience Report. In Proc. 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Baltimore, MD, USA) (SIGCSE ’18). ACM, 806–811. https://doi.org/10.1145/3159450.3159599Google ScholarDigital Library
- David P. Gluch. 1994. A Construct for Describing Software Development Risks. Technical Report CMU/SEI-94-TR-14. Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University.Google Scholar
- International Standards Organisation. 2008. ISO/IEC 12207: Information Technology - Software Lifecycle Processes). ISO/IEC.Google Scholar
- International Standards Organisation. 2021. ISO/IEC/IEEE 16085:2021: Systems and Software Engineering - Lifecycle Processes - Risk Management). https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEESTD.2021.9325968Google ScholarCross Ref
- An Ju, Adnan Hemani, Yannis Dimitriadis, and Armando Fox. 2020. What Agile Processes Should We Use in Software Engineering Course Projects?. In Proceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education(SIGCSE ’20). ACM, NY, USA, 643–649. https://doi.org/10.1145/3328778.3366864Google ScholarDigital Library
- Diana Kirk, Andrew Luxton-Reilly, and Ewan Tempero. 2022. Risks in Student Projects. In Australasian Computing Education Conference(Virtual Event, Australia) (ACE ’22). New York, NY, USA, 143–152. https://doi.org/10.1145/3511861.3511877Google ScholarDigital Library
- Barbara Kitchenham, Tore Dybå, and Magne Jorgensen. 2004. Evidence-Based Software Engineering. In Proceedings of the 26th International conference on Software engineering (ICSE’04) (Washington, DC, USA). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 273–281.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Supannika Koolmanojwong and Barry Boehm. 2013. A Look at Software Engineering Risks in a Team Project Course. In Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training (CSEET’13). IEEE, 21–30. https://doi.org/10.1109/CSEET.2013.6595233Google ScholarCross Ref
- Timo O.A. Lehtinen, Mika V. Mäntillaä, Jari Vanhanen, Juha Itkonen, and Casper Lassenius. 2014. Perceived causes of software project failures - An analysis of their relationships. Information and Software Technology 56, 6 (2014), 623–643.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sherlock A. Licorish, Matthias Galster, Georgia M. Kapitsaki, and Amjed Tahir. 2022. Understanding Students’ Software Development Projects: Effort, Performance, Satisfaction, Skills and Their Relation to the Adequacy of Outcomes Developed. J. Syst. Softw. 186, C (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2021.111156Google ScholarDigital Library
- Axelos Limited. 2021. Prince2 - Project Management. Retrieved June 28, 2021 from https://www.axelos.com/best-practice-solutions/prince2Google Scholar
- Samuel Mann and Lesley Smith. 2007. Software Engineering Class Eating Its Own Tail. In Proceedings of the Ninth Australasian Conference on Computing Education - Volume 66(ACE ’07). Australian Computer Society, Inc., 115–123.Google Scholar
- Ana M. Moreno, María-Isabel Sánchez-Segura, Fuensanta Medina-Domínguez, Lawrence Peters, and Jonathan Araujo. 2016. Enriching Traditional Software Engineering Curricula with Software Project Management Knowledge. In ICSE ’16: Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Software Engineering Companion. ACM, NY, USA, 404–411. https://doi.org/10.1145/2889160.2889193Google ScholarDigital Library
- Claudia Ott and Veronica Liesaputra. 2020. Industry-focused Projects in an Intense One-Year ICT Programme. In Proceedings of 22nd Australasian Computing Education Conference (ACE2020 (Melbourne, Victoria, AU). Australian Computer Society, Inc., AUS, 132–141. https://doi.org/10.1145/3373165.3373180Google ScholarDigital Library
- Janne Ropponen and Kalle Lyytinen. 2000. Components of Software Development Risk: How to Address Them? A Project Manager Survey. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 26, 2 (2000), 98–112.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Roy Schmidt, Kalle Lyytinen, Mark Keil, and Paul Cule. 2001. Identifying Software Project Risks: An International Delphi Study. Journal of Management Information Systems 17, 4 (2001), 5–36. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40398503Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jean-Guy Schneider, Peter W. Eklund, Kevin Lee, Feifei Chen, Andrew Cain, and Mohamed Abdelrazek. 2020. Adopting Industry Agile Practices in Large-scale Capstone Education. In Proc. of the ACM/IEEE 42nd International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering Education and Training(ICSE-SEET ’20). ACM, NY, USA, 119–129. https://doi.org/10.1145/3377814.3381715Google ScholarDigital Library
- J.M. Verner, O.P. Brereton, B.A. Kitchenham, M. Turner, and M. Niazi. 2014. Risks and risk mitigation in global software development: A tertiary study. Information and Software Technology 56, 1 (2014), 54–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2013.06.005Google ScholarDigital Library
- Brian R. von Kronsky and Jim Ivins. 2008. Assessing the Capability and Maturity of Capstone Software Engineering Projects. In Proceedings of the Tenth Conference on Australasian Computing Education - Volume 78(Wollongong, NSW, Australia) (ACE ’08). Australian Computer Society, Inc., AUS, 171–180.Google Scholar
- Linda Wallace and Mark Keil. 2004. Software Project Risks and their Effects on Outcomes. Commun. ACM 47, 4 (2004), 68–73. https://doi.org/10.1145/975817.975819Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Refining a Risk Framework for Student Group Projects
Recommendations
Risks in Student Projects
ACE '22: Proceedings of the 24th Australasian Computing Education ConferenceAnecdotally, tertiary educators in software related topics experience challenges during project-based group assessments. To address the range of issues experienced, some educators have introduced aspects of project management (PM) into their course. ...
Educator Experiences of Low Overhead Student Project Risk Management
ACE '24: Proceedings of the 26th Australasian Computing Education ConferenceMany software-related courses at tertiary level incorporate group projects in their assessment strategy. Project goals vary according to course learning outcomes, for example, consolidating course content and preparing students for industry by providing ...
Student initiated capstone projects
SIGITE '14: Proceedings of the 15th Annual Conference on Information technology educationCapstone projects/courses, in which students undertake a significant project under supervision, have been offered in many computing programs In this paper, we present our experience for the senior project course as offered by the BCIS program at Mount ...
Comments