Rafael M. L. Silva
Andrés Monroy-Hernández
ABSTRACT
The rise of consumer augmented reality (AR) technology has opened up new possibilities for interventions intended to disrupt and subvert cultural conventions. From defacing corporate logos to erecting geofenced digital monuments, more and more people are creating AR experiences for social causes. We sought to understand this new form of activism, including why people use AR for these purposes, opportunities and challenges in using it, and how well it can support activist goals. We conducted semi-structured interviews with twenty people involved in projects that used AR for a social cause across six different countries. We found that AR can overcome physical world limitations of activism to convey immersive, multilayered narratives that aim to reveal invisible histories and perspectives. At the same time, people experienced challenges in creating, maintaining, and distributing their AR experiences to audiences. We discuss open questions and opportunities for creating AR tools and experiences for social change.
Supplemental Material
- Jérémy Albouys-Perrois, Jérémy Laviole, Carine Briant, and Anke M Brock. 2018. Towards a multisensory augmented reality map for blind and low vision people: A participatory design approach. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1–14.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Amanda Almond, Rob McMahon, D Janes, Greg Whistance-Smith, Diana Steinhauer, and Stewart Steinhauer. 2018. We are all related: Using augmented reality as a learning resource for Indigenous-settler relations. Northern Public Affairs 6, 2 (2018).Google Scholar
- Hiroo Aoyama and Leila Aflatoony. 2020. HomeModAR: A Home Intervention Augmented Reality Tool for Occupational Therapists. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–7.Google Scholar
- John Perry Barlow. 2018. A declaration of the independence of cyberspace. https://www.eff.org/cyberspace-independenceGoogle Scholar
- W Lance Bennett and Alexandra Segerberg. 2012. The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Information, communication & society 15, 5 (2012), 739–768.Google Scholar
- Tom Boellstorff. 2015. Coming of age in Second Life. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Andrew Boyd and David Oswald Mitchell. 2013. Beautiful Trouble: A Toolbox For Revolution (Pocket Edition). Or Books.Google Scholar
- Sasha Costanza-Chock. 2020. Design justice: Community-led practices to build the worlds we need. The MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Tomás Sánchez Criado. 2020. Anthropology as a careful design practice?Zeitschrift fuer Ethnologie 145, 1 (2020), 47–70.Google Scholar
- CRL. [n.d.]. ”Creative Reaction Lab”. https://www.creativereactionlab.com. Accessed: 2020-08-30.Google Scholar
- Munmun De Choudhury, Shagun Jhaver, Benjamin Sugar, and Ingmar Weber. 2016. Social media participation in an activist movement for racial equality. In Tenth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media.Google Scholar
- Marco De Sá and Elizabeth F Churchill. 2013. Mobile augmented reality: A design perspective. In Human factors in augmented reality environments. Springer, 139–164.Google Scholar
- Jill P Dimond, Michaelanne Dye, Daphne LaRose, and Amy S Bruckman. 2013. Hollaback! The role of storytelling online in a social movement organization. In Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work. 477–490.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Carl DiSalvo, Jonathan Lukens, Thomas Lodato, Tom Jenkins, and Tanyoung Kim. 2014. Making public things: how HCI design can express matters of concern. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2397–2406.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Paul Farber, Kara Crombie, Michelle Angela Ortiz, Jamel Shabazz, and Marisa Williamson. 2019. ” Monument Lab: Prototypes/Proposals” Installation Image. (2019).Google Scholar
- Joshua A Fisher. 2021. Augmented and Mixed Reality for Communities. CRC Press.Google Scholar
- Sarah Fox, Catherine Lim, Tad Hirsch, and Daniela K Rosner. 2020. Accounting for Design Activism: On the Positionality and Politics of Designerly Intervention. Design Issues 36, 1 (2020), 5–18.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sarah E Fox, Rafael ML Silva, and Daniela K Rosner. 2018. Beyond the prototype: Maintenance, collective responsibility, and public IoT. In Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference. 21–32.Google ScholarDigital Library
- John Craig Freeman. 2012. ManifestAR: an augmented reality manifesto. In The Engineering Reality of Virtual Reality 2012, Vol. 8289. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 82890D.Google Scholar
- Alastair Fuad-Luke. 2013. Design activism: beautiful strangeness for a sustainable world. Routledge.Google Scholar
- Jordana J George and Dorothy E Leidner. 2019. From clicktivism to hacktivism: Understanding digital activism. Information and Organization 29, 3 (2019), 100249.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Benjamin Gleason. 2013. # Occupy Wall Street: Exploring informal learning about a social movement on Twitter. American Behavioral Scientist 57, 7 (2013), 966–982.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kavita Gonsalves, Marcus Foth, Glenda Caldwell, and Waldemar Jenek. 2021. Radical placemaking: An immersive, experiential and activist approach for marginalised communities. Connections: Exploring heritage, architecture, cities, art, media. Vol. 20.1. (2021), 237–252.Google Scholar
- Anhong Guo, Ilter Canberk, Hannah Murphy, Andrés Monroy-Hernández, and Rajan Vaish. 2019. Blocks: Collaborative and persistent augmented reality experiences. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 3, 3 (2019), 1–24.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Aurora Harley. 2020. UX guidelines for augmented-reality shopping tools. https://www.nngroup.com/articles/augmented-reality-ecommerce-guidelines/Google Scholar
- Michael T Heaney and Fabio Rojas. 2014. Hybrid activism: Social movement mobilization in a multimovement environment. Amer. J. Sociology 119, 4 (2014), 1047–1103.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Fernanda Herrera, Jeremy Bailenson, Erika Weisz, Elise Ogle, and Jamil Zaki. 2018. Building long-term empathy: A large-scale comparison of traditional and virtual reality perspective-taking. PloS one 13, 10 (2018), e0204494.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jaylin Herskovitz, Jason Wu, Samuel White, Amy Pavel, Gabriel Reyes, Anhong Guo, and Jeffrey P Bigham. 2020. Making mobile augmented reality applications accessible. In The 22nd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. 1–14.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tad Hirsch and John Henry. 2005. TXTmob: text messaging for protest swarms. In CHI’05 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems. 1455–1458.Google Scholar
- Nathan Jurgenson. 2011. Digital Dualism versus Augmented Reality. https://thesocietypages.org/cyborgology/2011/02/24/digital-dualism-versus-augmented-reality/Google Scholar
- Antti Jylhä, Petteri Nurmi, Miika Sirén, Samuli Hemminki, and Giulio Jacucci. 2013. Matkahupi: a persuasive mobile application for sustainable mobility. In Proceedings of the 2013 ACM conference on Pervasive and ubiquitous computing adjunct publication. 227–230.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Martijn JL Kors, Gabriele Ferri, Erik D Van Der Spek, Cas Ketel, and Ben AM Schouten. 2016. A breathtaking journey. On the design of an empathy-arousing mixed-reality game. In Proceedings of the 2016 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play. 91–104.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Stacey Kuznetsov, George Noel Davis, Eric Paulos, Mark D Gross, and Jian Chiu Cheung. 2011. Red balloon, green balloon, sensors in the sky. In Proceedings of the 13th international conference on Ubiquitous computing. 237–246.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Stacey Kuznetsov, Eric Paulos, and Mark D Gross. 2010. WallBots: interactive wall-crawling robots in the hands of public artists and political activists. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. 208–217.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Christopher A Le Dantec. 2016. Designing publics. MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Yu-Hao Lee and Gary Hsieh. 2013. Does slacktivism hurt activism? The effects of moral balancing and consistency in online activism. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 811–820.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hanlin Li, Disha Bora, Sagar Salvi, and Erin Brady. 2018. Slacktivists or Activists? Identity Work in the Virtual Disability March. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–13.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Fannie Liu, Denae Ford, Chris Parnin, and Laura Dabbish. 2017. Selfies as social movements: Influences on participation and perceived impact on stereotypes. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 1, CSCW(2017), 1–21.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Blair Maclntyre and Trevor F Smith. 2018. Thoughts on the Future of WebXR and the Immersive Web. In 2018 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality Adjunct (ISMAR-Adjunct). IEEE, 338–342.Google Scholar
- Thomas Markussen. 2013. The disruptive aesthetics of design activism: enacting design between art and politics. Design Issues 29, 1 (2013), 38–50.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rob McMahon, Amanda Almond, Greg Whistance-Smith, Diana Steinhauer, Stewart Steinhauer, and Diane P Janes. 2019. Sweetgrass AR: Exploring augmented reality as a resource for Indigenous–settler relations. International Journal of Communication 13 (2019), 23.Google Scholar
- Jasna S Milošević-Đorđević and Iris L Žeželj. 2017. Civic activism online: Making young people dormant or more active in real life?Computers in Human Behavior 70 (2017), 113–118.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Andrés Monroy-Hernández, Danah Boyd, Emre Kiciman, Munmun De Choudhury, and Scott Counts. 2013. The new war correspondents: The rise of civic media curation in urban warfare. In Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work. 1443–1452.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Evgeny Morozov. 2009. The brave new world of slacktivism. Foreign Policy. Retrieved July 28, 2016 from http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=104302141.Google Scholar
- Fariba Mostajeran, Frank Steinicke, Oscar Javier Ariza Nunez, Dimitrios Gatsios, and Dimitrios Fotiadis. 2020. Augmented reality for older adults: Exploring acceptability of virtual coaches for home-based balance training in an aging population. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–12.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lisa Nakamura. 2019. Virtual reality and the feeling of virtue: Women of color narrators, enforced hospitality, and the leveraging of empathy. In Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference. 3–3.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Janne Paavilainen, Hannu Korhonen, Kati Alha, Jaakko Stenros, Elina Koskinen, and Frans Mayra. 2017. The Pokémon GO experience: A location-based augmented reality mobile game goes mainstream. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 2493–2498.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Eric Paulos, RJ Honicky, and Ben Hooker. 2009. Citizen science: Enabling participatory urbanism. In Handbook of research on urban informatics: The practice and promise of the real-time city. IGI Global, 414–436.Google Scholar
- Thammathip Piumsomboon, Gun A Lee, Andrew Irlitti, Barrett Ens, Bruce H Thomas, and Mark Billinghurst. 2019. On the shoulder of the giant: A multi-scale mixed reality collaboration with 360 video sharing and tangible interaction. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1–17.Google ScholarDigital Library
- The Whole Story Project. 2017. WholeStoryProject. Retrieved January 1, 2022 from https://www.commarts.com/project/11275/the-whole-story-project-ar-appGoogle Scholar
- Refratik. 2015. HackDaPatriaProject. Retrieved January 1, 2022 from https://refrakt.org/states-of-mindGoogle Scholar
- Flora Salim and Usman Haque. 2015. Urban computing in the wild: A survey on large scale participation and citizen engagement with ubiquitous computing, cyber physical systems, and Internet of Things. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 81 (2015), 31–48.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Janice Tisha Samuels, Anijo P. Mathew, Chantala Kommanivanh, Daniel Kwon, Liz Gomez, B’Rael Ali Thunder, Daria Velazquez, Millie Martinez, and Leah LaQueens. 2018. Art, Human Computer Interaction, and Shared Experiences: A Gun Violence Prevention Intervention. In Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI EA ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1145/3170427.3186526Google ScholarDigital Library
- Samaneh Sanaeipoor and Khashayar Hojjati Emami. 2020. Smart City: Exploring the Role of Augmented Reality in Placemaking. In 2020 4th International Conference on Smart City, Internet of Things and Applications (SCIOT). IEEE, 91–98.Google Scholar
- Dieter Schmalstieg, Tobias Langlotz, and Mark Billinghurst. 2008. Augmented Reality 2.0. In Virtual Realities.Google Scholar
- Kristen Shinohara, Cynthia L Bennett, Wanda Pratt, and Jacob O Wobbrock. 2018. Tenets for social accessibility: Towards humanizing disabled people in design. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing (TACCESS) 11, 1 (2018), 1–31.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mark Skwarek. 2018. Augmented reality activism. In Augmented reality art. Springer, 3–40.Google Scholar
- Ivan E Sutherland. 1968. A head-mounted three dimensional display. In Proceedings of the December 9-11, 1968, fall joint computer conference, part I. 757–764.Google ScholarDigital Library
- David R Thomas. 2006. A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American journal of evaluation 27, 2 (2006), 237–246.Google Scholar
- Ann Thorpe. 2012. Architecture and design versus consumerism: how design activism confronts growth. Routledge.Google Scholar
- Jasper Tran O’Leary, Sara Zewde, Jennifer Mankoff, and Daniela K Rosner. 2019. Who gets to future? Race, representation, and design methods in Africatown. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–13.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Zeynep Tufekci and Christopher Wilson. 2012. Social media and the decision to participate in political protest: Observations from Tahrir Square. Journal of communication 62, 2 (2012), 363–379.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Otto Von Busch. 2022. Making Trouble: Design and Material Activism. Bloomsbury Publishing.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hsin-Kai Wu, Silvia Wen-Yu Lee, Hsin-Yi Chang, and Jyh-Chong Liang. 2013. Current status, opportunities and challenges of augmented reality in education. Computers & education 62 (2013), 41–49.Google Scholar
- Alison Wylie. 2020. The promise and perils of an ethic of stewardship. In Embedding ethics. Routledge, 47–68.Google Scholar
- Yuhang Zhao, Cynthia L Bennett, Hrvoje Benko, Edward Cutrell, Christian Holz, Meredith Ringel Morris, and Mike Sinclair. 2018. Enabling people with visual impairments to navigate virtual reality with a haptic and auditory cane simulation. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1–14.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ethan Zuckerman. 2007. The connection between cute cats and web censorship. http://ethanz.wpengine.com/2007/07/16/the-connection-between-cute-cats-and-web-censorship/Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Understanding AR Activism: An Interview Study with Creators of Augmented Reality Experiences for Social Change
Recommendations
Multimodal augmented reality: the norm rather than the exception
MVAR '16: Proceedings of the 2016 workshop on Multimodal Virtual and Augmented RealityAugmented reality (AR) is commonly seen as a technology that overlays virtual imagery onto a participant's view of the world. In line with this, most AR research is focused on what we see. In this paper, we challenge this focus on vision and make a case ...
Haptics in Augmented Reality
ICMCS '99: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Multimedia Computing and Systems - Volume 2An augmented reality system merges synthetic sensory information into a user's perception of a three-dimensional environment. An important performance goal for an augmented reality system is that the user perceives a single seamless environment. In most ...
Experiencing Social Augmented Reality in Public Spaces
UbiComp/ISWC '21 Adjunct: Adjunct Proceedings of the 2021 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Proceedings of the 2021 ACM International Symposium on Wearable ComputersWe present various views on the future use of augmented reality in public spaces. The views address enhanced walking, social activity, appropriation of public spaces, and futuristic social aspects of future outdoor augmented reality. Although we often ...
Comments