skip to main content
10.1145/3486011.3486439acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesteemConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Math is magic: an adaptive serious game to reinforce math competences

Published:20 December 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

Mathematics is one of the basic competencies that pupils should acquire during primary schools. The European Commission has included math in the Key competencies for Lifelong Learning that every EU citizen must acquire for personal fulfilment and development, employment, and active citizenship. Very often lacks math skills are due to the method used to teach math since childhood. Currently, different educational technologies have been implied to improve the learning process, making it more engaging and motivating. Serious games (SG) have been proved can be an excellent tool for acquiring and reinforcing math competencies by combining mathematical questions with game challenges. The paper presents a serious game, named Math is magic, designed specifically to address these shortcomings in primary school children. A user test was conducted to assess the effectiveness of the application, the cognitive workload, and user engagement. The data confirms that pupils improve their math skills and that the game approach was engaging and immersive.

References

  1. European Communities. (2007). Key competences for lifelong learning: European reference framework.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Katja Maass, Vince Geiger, Marta R. Ariza, and Merrilyn Goos. 2019. The role of mathematics in interdisciplinary STEM education. ZDM, 51(6), 869-884.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Noleine Fitzallen. 2015. STEM Education: What Does Mathematics Have to Offer? Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Léonie Rennie, John Wallace, and Grady Venville. 2012. Exploring curriculum integration: Why integrate? In L. Rennie, G. Venville, & J. Wallace (Eds.), Integrating science, technology, engineering, and mathematics: Issues, reflections, and ways forward (pp. 1-11). New York: Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Michael R. David, and Sandra L. Chen. 2005. Serious Games: Games that Educate, Train and Inform. USA, Thomson Course Technology.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Johan Huizinga. 1938. Homo ludens: proeve fleener bepaling van het spel-element der cultuur. Haarlem: Tjeenk Willink.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Pamela M. Kato, Steve W. Cole, Andrew S. Bradlyn and Brad H. Pollock. 2008. A Video Game Improves Behavioral outcomes in Adolescents and Young Adults With Cancer: A Randomized Trial. Pediatrics 122(2): 305-317.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Mark R. Lepper, Thomas W. Malone. 1987. Intrinsic motivation and instructional effectiveness in computer-based education. Aptitude, Learn. Instr. 3, 255–286.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Amy L. Reschly, and Sandra L. Christenson. 2012. Jingle, Jangle, and Conceptual Haziness: Evolution and Future Directions of the Engagement Construct. Handbook of Research on Student Engagement. pp. 3–19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Diana G. Oblinger. 2004. The Next Generation of Educational Engagement. Journal of Interactive Media in Education. Vol. 8, Special Issue on the Educational Semantic Web. ISSN:1365-893XGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Marc Prensky. 2003. Digital game-based learning Comput. Entertain., vol. 1 (1) pp. 21–21.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Jean Piaget, and Barbel Inhelder. 2008. The psychology of the child, Basic Books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Harel Idit Ed, and Seymour Ed Papert. 1991. Constructionism. Ablex Publishing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Juho Hamari, David J. Shernoff, Elizabeth Rowe, Brianno Coller, Jodi Asbell-Clarke, and Teon Edwards. 2016. Challenging games help students learn: An empirical study on engagement, flow and immersion in game- based learning. Computers in human behavior. Vol. 54, 170-179.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Ali Shirkarami, Khadijeh Ali Abadi, Saeid Pourroostaei Ardakani, and Shadi Azimi Shirkarami. 2020. The effect of mobile games on math learning of third graders of elementary schools. In 2020 International Serious Games Symposium (ISGS) (pp. 126-130). IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Veronica Rossano, Rosa Lanzilotti, Antonio Cazzolla, and Teresa Roselli. 2020. Augmented reality to support geometry learning. IEEE Access. Vol. 8, 107772-107780.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Cristina Rebollo, Inmaculada Remolar, Veronica Rossano, and Rosa Lanzilotti. 2021. Multimedia augmented reality game for learning math. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 1-18, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-021-10821-3.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Szilvia Szilágyi, and Attila Körei. 2021. “LimStorm”–A Didactic Card Game for Collaborative Math Learning for Gen Z Students. In Educating Engineers for Future Industrial Revolutions: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning (ICL2020), Volume 1 23 (pp. 452-463). Springer International Publishing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Sukajaya, I. N., Damurrosysyi Mujahidain, and I. M. Suarsana. 2020. A Learning by Doing of Weight Unit Conversion-Serious Game for Elementary School Students. In 2020 International Conference on Computer Engineering, Network, and Intelligent Multimedia (CENIM) (pp. 168-173). IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Holly Pope, and Charmaine Mangram. 2015. Wuzzit trouble: The influence of a digital math game on student number sense. International Journal of Serious Games, 2(4).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Ombretta Gaggi, Francesco Ciraulo, and Marco Casagrande. 2018. Eating Pizza to learn fractions. In Proceedings of the 4th EAI International Conference on Smart Objects and Technologies for Social Good (pp. 220-225).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Jesper Juul. 2009. Fear of failing? the many meanings of difficulty in video games. The video game theory reader. Vol. 2(237-252).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Jonathan Tremblay, Bruno Bouchard, and Abdenour Bouzouane. 2010. Adaptive Game Mechanics for Learning Purposes-Making Serious Games Playable and Fun. In CSEDU (2) (pp. 465-470).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Sandra G. Hart. 2006. Nasa-Task Load Index (NASA-TLX); 20 YEARS LATER. Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting. Vol. 50. No. 9. CA: Sage publications.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Heather L. O'Brien, Paul Cairns, and Mark Hall. 2018. A practical approach to measuring user engagement with the refined user engagement scale (UES) and new UES short form. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 112, 28-39.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Enrica Pesare, Teresa Roselli, Veronica Rossano, and Piepaolo Di Bitonto. 2015. Digitally enhanced assessment in virtual learning environments. Journal of Visual Languages & Computing, 31, 252-259.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Carmelo Ardito, Maria F. Costabile, Maria De Marsico, 2004. Towards guidelines for usability of e-learning applications. In ERCIM Workshop on User Interfaces for All (pp. 185-202). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Math is magic: an adaptive serious game to reinforce math competences
            Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Other conferences
              TEEM'21: Ninth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (TEEM'21)
              October 2021
              823 pages
              ISBN:9781450390668
              DOI:10.1145/3486011
              • Editors:
              • Marc Alier,
              • David Fonseca

              Copyright © 2021 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 20 December 2021

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • research-article
              • Research
              • Refereed limited

              Acceptance Rates

              Overall Acceptance Rate496of705submissions,70%
            • Article Metrics

              • Downloads (Last 12 months)67
              • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5

              Other Metrics

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader

            HTML Format

            View this article in HTML Format .

            View HTML Format