skip to main content
10.1145/3442381.3449790acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswwwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Target-adaptive Graph for Cross-target Stance Detection

Authors Info & Claims
Published:03 June 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

Target plays an essential role in stance detection of an opinionated review/claim, since the stance expressed in the text often depends on the target. In practice, we need to deal with targets unseen in the annotated training data. As such, detecting stance for an unknown or unseen target is an important research problem. This paper presents a novel approach that automatically identifies and adapts the target-dependent and target-independent roles that a word plays with respect to a specific target in stance expressions, so as to achieve cross-target stance detection. More concretely, we explore a novel solution of constructing heterogeneous target-adaptive pragmatics dependency graphs (TPDG) for each sentence towards a given target. An in-target graph is constructed to produce inherent pragmatics dependencies of words for a distinct target. In addition, another cross-target graph is constructed to develop the versatility of words across all targets for boosting the learning of dominant word-level stance expressions available to an unknown target. A novel graph-aware model with interactive Graphical Convolutional Network (GCN) blocks is developed to derive the target-adaptive graph representation of the context for stance detection. The experimental results on a number of benchmark datasets show that our proposed model outperforms state-of-the-art methods in cross-target stance detection.

References

  1. Isabelle Augenstein, Tim Rocktäschel, Andreas Vlachos, and Kalina Bontcheva. 2016. Stance Detection with Bidirectional Conditional Encoding. In Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 876–885.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Costanza Conforti, Jakob Berndt, Mohammad Taher Pilehvar, Chryssi Giannitsarou, Flavio Toxvaerd, and Nigel Collier. 2020. Will-They-Won’t-They: A Very Large Dataset for Stance Detection on Twitter. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 1715–1724.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Jacob Devlin, Ming-Wei Chang, Kenton Lee, and Kristina Toutanova. 2019. BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers). 4171–4186.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Ruixue Ding, Pengjun Xie, Xiaoyan Zhang, Wei Lu, Linlin Li, and Luo Si. 2019. A Neural Multi-digraph Model for Chinese NER with Gazetteers. In Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 1462–1467.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Jiachen Du, Ruifeng Xu, Yulan He, and Lin Gui. 2017. Stance Classification with Target-specific Neural Attention. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI-17. 3988–3994.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Javid Ebrahimi, Dejing Dou, and Daniel Lowd. 2016. Weakly Supervised Tweet Stance Classification by Relational Bootstrapping. In Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 1012–1017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Eduardo Graells-Garrido, Ricardo Baeza-Yates, and Mounia Lalmas. 2020. Representativeness of Abortion Legislation Debate on Twitter: A Case Study in Argentina and Chile. In Companion Proceedings of the Web Conference 2020. 765–774.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Tao Gui, Yicheng Zou, Qi Zhang, Minlong Peng, Jinlan Fu, Zhongyu Wei, and Xuanjing Huang. 2019. A Lexicon-Based Graph Neural Network for Chinese NER. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP). 1040–1050.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Myungha Jang and James Allan. 2018. Explaining Controversy on Social Media via Stance Summarization. In The 41st International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research & Development in Information Retrieval. 1221–1224.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Yoon Kim. 2014. Convolutional Neural Networks for Sentence Classification. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP). 1746–1751.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Thomas N Kipf and Max Welling. 2017. Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Computational Linguistics.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Neema Kotonya and Francesca Toni. 2019. Gradual Argumentation Evaluation for Stance Aggregation in Automated Fake News Detection. In Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on Argument Mining. 156–166.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Cheng Li, Xiaoxiao Guo, and Qiaozhu Mei. 2017. Deep memory networks for attitude identification. In Proceedings of the Tenth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. 671–680.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Xien Liu, Xinxin You, Xiao Zhang, Ji Wu, and Ping Lv. 2020. Tensor graph convolutional networks for text classification. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 34. 8409–8416.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Yi-Ju Lu and Cheng-Te Li. 2020. GCAN: Graph-aware Co-Attention Networks for Explainable Fake News Detection on Social Media. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 505–514.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Yishu Miao, Edward Grefenstette, and Phil Blunsom. 2017. Discovering discrete latent topics with neural variational inference. In Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning-Volume 70. 2410–2419.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Saif Mohammad, Svetlana Kiritchenko, Parinaz Sobhani, Xiaodan Zhu, and Colin Cherry. 2016. SemEval-2016 Task 6: Detecting Stance in Tweets. In Proceedings of the 10th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval-2016). 31–41.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Mitra Mohtarami, Ramy Baly, James Glass, Preslav Nakov, Lluís Màrquez, and Alessandro Moschitti. 2018. Automatic Stance Detection Using End-to-End Memory Networks. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers). 767–776.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Jeffrey Pennington, Richard Socher, and Christopher Manning. 2014. Glove: Global Vectors for Word Representation. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP). 1532–1543.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Benjamin Riedel, Isabelle Augenstein, Georgios P. Spithourakis, and Sebastian Riedel. 2017. A simple but tough-to-beat baseline for the Fake News Challenge stance detection task. CoRR abs/1707.03264(2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. T. Y.S.S. Santosh, Srijan Bansal, and Avirup Saha. 2019. Can Siamese Networks Help in Stance Detection?. In Proceedings of the ACM India Joint International Conference on Data Science and Management of Data. 306–309.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Joseph Sirrianni, Xiaoqing Liu, and Douglas Adams. 2020. Agreement Prediction of Arguments in Cyber Argumentation for Detecting Stance Polarity and Intensity. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 5746–5758.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Swapna Somasundaran and Janyce Wiebe. 2010. Recognizing stances in ideological on-line debates. In Proceedings of the NAACL HLT 2010 workshop on computational approaches to analysis and generation of emotion in text. 116–124.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Akash Srivastava and Charles Sutton. 2017. Autoencoding variational inference for topic models. arXiv preprint arXiv:1703.01488(2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Peter Stefanov, Kareem Darwish, Atanas Atanasov, and Preslav Nakov. 2020. Predicting the Topical Stance and Political Leaning of Media using Tweets. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 527–537.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Qingying Sun, Zhongqing Wang, Qiaoming Zhu, and Guodong Zhou. 2018. Stance Detection with Hierarchical Attention Network. In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Computational Linguistics. 2399–2409.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Yizhou Sun. 2017. User Stance Prediction via Online Behavior Mining. In Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web Companion. 1317.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Hao Tang, Donghong Ji, Chenliang Li, and Qiji Zhou. 2020. Dependency Graph Enhanced Dual-transformer Structure for Aspect-based Sentiment Classification. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 6578–6588.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. James Thorne, Andreas Vlachos, Christos Christodoulopoulos, and Arpit Mittal. 2018. FEVER: a Large-scale Dataset for Fact Extraction and VERification. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers). 809–819.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Kai Wang, Weizhou Shen, Yunyi Yang, Xiaojun Quan, and Rui Wang. 2020. Relational Graph Attention Network for Aspect-based Sentiment Analysis. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 3229–3238.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Yequan Wang, Minlie Huang, xiaoyan zhu, and Li Zhao. 2016. Attention-based LSTM for Aspect-level Sentiment Classification. In Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 606–615.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Penghui Wei and Wenji Mao. 2019. Modeling Transferable Topics for Cross-Target Stance Detection. In Proceedings of the 42nd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 1173–1176.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Zonghan Wu, Shirui Pan, Fengwen Chen, Guodong Long, Chengqi Zhang, and S Yu Philip. 2020. A comprehensive survey on graph neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems (2020), 1–21.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Chang Xu, Cécile Paris, Surya Nepal, and Ross Sparks. 2018. Cross-Target Stance Classification with Self-Attention Networks. In Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers). 778–783.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Liang Yao, Chengsheng Mao, and Yuan Luo. 2019. Graph convolutional networks for text classification. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 33. 7370–7377.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Yongjing Yin, Fandong Meng, Jinsong Su, Chulun Zhou, Zhengyuan Yang, Jie Zhou, and Jiebo Luo. 2020. A Novel Graph-based Multi-modal Fusion Encoder for Neural Machine Translation. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 3025–3035.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Bowen Zhang, Min Yang, Xutao Li, Yunming Ye, Xiaofei Xu, and Kuai Dai. 2020. Enhancing Cross-target Stance Detection with Transferable Semantic-Emotion Knowledge. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 3188–3197.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Chen Zhang, Qiuchi Li, and Dawei Song. 2019. Aspect-based Sentiment Classification with Aspect-specific Graph Convolutional Networks. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP). 4567–4577.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Qiang Zhang, Emine Yilmaz, and Shangsong Liang. 2018. Ranking-Based Method for News Stance Detection. In Companion Proceedings of the The Web Conference 2018. 41–42.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Yuhao Zhang, Peng Qi, and Christopher D. Manning. 2018. Graph Convolution over Pruned Dependency Trees Improves Relation Extraction. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2205–2215.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Yufeng Zhang, Xueli Yu, Zeyu Cui, Shu Wu, Zhongzhen Wen, and Liang Wang. 2020. Every Document Owns Its Structure: Inductive Text Classification via Graph Neural Networks. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 334–339.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Jie Zhou, Ganqu Cui, Zhengyan Zhang, Cheng Yang, Zhiyuan Liu, Lifeng Wang, Changcheng Li, and Maosong Sun. 2018. Graph neural networks: A review of methods and applications. arXiv preprint arXiv:1812.08434(2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    WWW '21: Proceedings of the Web Conference 2021
    April 2021
    4054 pages
    ISBN:9781450383127
    DOI:10.1145/3442381

    Copyright © 2021 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 3 June 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate1,899of8,196submissions,23%

    Upcoming Conference

    WWW '24
    The ACM Web Conference 2024
    May 13 - 17, 2024
    Singapore , Singapore

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format