skip to main content
10.1145/3424978.3424995acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescsaeConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A Pulse Repetition Frequency Sorting Algorithm Based on Dual-PRI Transform

Published:20 October 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Most ready-made signal sorting algorithms does not perform well when the pulse repetition frequency (PRF) jitter and the PRF stagger signals impinging on the radar simultaneously. In view of this, an effective and fast signal sorting method based on dual-PRI Transform is proposed. In this correspondence, we fully exploit the differences between the jittered and the staggered signals to segment the mixed signals. The proposed algorithm consecutively implements two pulse repetition interval (PRI) transforms, followed by the first order sequential difference (SDIF) histogram, to analyze the signals. The experimental results verify the proposed method is simple and easy to implement, and the accuracy is high.

References

  1. D J Milojević and B M Popović (1992). Improved algorithm for the deinterleaving of radar pulses. IEE PROCEEDINGS-F, 139(1), 98--104.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. M G S Ahmed and Bin Tang (2017). Sorting radar signal from symmetry clustering perspective. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 28(4), 690--696.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. X Wei, Y C Pan J Han and H He (2017). Radar Signal Sorting Based on Resemblance Coefficient of Welch Power Spectrum. ICSAI 2017, Hangzhou, China, 1120--1125.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. L Cheng, A Yang and Z Liu (2019). A Radar Main Lobe Pulse Correlation Sorting Method. ICSIP 2019, Wuxi, China, 41--45.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Q Guo, X Z Zhang and Z Li (2006). A Novel Method for Resolving Problem of Tolerance in Radar Signal Sorting. CEEM 2006, Dalian, China, 775--781.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. J Liu, Jim P Y Lee, et al. (2005). Online Clustering Algorithms for Radar Emitter Classification. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 27(8), 1185--1196.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. H K Mardia (1989). New Techniques for the deinterleaving of repetitive sequences. IEE Proceedings, 136(4), 149--154.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. D Nelson (1993). Special Purpose Correlation Functions for Improved Signal Detection and Parameter Estimation. ICASSP 1993, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA, 73--76.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. K Nishiguchi and M Kobayashi (2000). Improved Algorithm for Estimating Pulse Repetition Intervals, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 36(2), 407--421.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Y Mao, J Han, et al. (2009). An Improved Algorithm of PRI Transform. 2009 WRI Global Congress on Intelligent Systems, Xiamen, China, 145--149.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. A Pulse Repetition Frequency Sorting Algorithm Based on Dual-PRI Transform

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        CSAE '20: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Computer Science and Application Engineering
        October 2020
        1038 pages
        ISBN:9781450377720
        DOI:10.1145/3424978

        Copyright © 2020 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 20 October 2020

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        CSAE '20 Paper Acceptance Rate179of387submissions,46%Overall Acceptance Rate368of770submissions,48%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader