skip to main content
10.1145/3419249.3420123acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesnordichiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Readiness, Seamlessness and Connectedness Understanding Business Travellers’ Door to Door Journeys

Authors Info & Claims
Published:26 October 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Understanding how digital technologies influence peoples' mobility is becoming a substantial research topic within the HCI community. Here, we present a study of the roles that digital technologies play within the context of door-to-door business travel. We approached business travel as an integrated whole instead of a collection of multiple travel segments, and our research approach was influenced by social practice by focusing on the meaning, materials and competences brought forward by a group of frequent business travelers that we interviewed. Our data analysis followed an iterative, inductive approach and our primary contribution is the identification of three aspects of relevance for the business travel practice: readiness, seamlessness and connectedness. Readiness relates to business travelers preparing for a journey, seamlessness relates to how they realize and react when a trip is going (or not) according to plan, and connectedness centers on how travelers balance between work and non-work activities. We conclude by discussing these three aspects and by identifying socially shared desirable expectations and design potentials for an integrated door-to-door travel solution.

References

  1. Ahmed Abdelghany and Khaled F. Abdelghany. 2007. Modelling air-carrier's portfolio of business travel. Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, 6, 1, 51-63. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.rpm.5160064Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Pavel Andreev, Ilan Salomon, and Nava Pliskin. 2010. Review: State of teleactivities. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 18, 1, 3-20. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2009.04.017Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Ian Arawjo. 2020. To Write Code: The Cultural Fabrication of Programming Notation and Practice. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’20), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376731Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Jonathan V. Beaverstock, Ben Derudder, James R. Faulconbridge, and Frank Witlox. 2009. International business travel: some explorations. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 91, 3, 193-202. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0467.2009.00314.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Hugh Beyer, and Karen Holzblatt. 1998. Contextual Design: Defining Customer Centred Systems. Morgan Kaufmann.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Stanley Blue, Elizabeth Shove, Chris Carmona, and Michael P. Kelly. 2015. Theories of practice and public health: understanding (un)healthy practices. Critical Public Health, 26, 1, 36-50. https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2014.980396Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Vanja Bogicevic, Milos Bujisic, Anil Bilgihan, Wan Yang, and Cihan Cobanoglu. 2017. The impact of traveler-focused airport technology on traveler satisfaction. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 123, 351-361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.03.038Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Margot Brereton, Paul Roe, Marcus Foth, Jonathan M. Bunker, and Laurie Buys. 2009. Designing participation in agile ridesharing with mobile social software. In Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference of the Australian Computer-Human Interaction Special Interest Group (OZCHI '09), 257-260. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1738826.1738868Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Richard A. Bretschneider. 2016. Evaluation approaches for HCI related aspects of occupational safety regulations exemplified by mobile hotel booking applications. In  International Conference on HCI in Business, Government, and Organizations (HCIBGO 2016), 395-402. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39399-5_37Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Lucy Budd and Tim Vorley. 2013. Airlines, apps, and business travel: a critical examination. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 9, 41-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2013.08.004Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Tawanna R. Dillahunt, Vaishnav Kameswaran, Linfeng Li, and Tanya Rosenblat. 2017. Uncovering the Values and Constraints of Real-time Ridesharing for Low-resource Populations. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17), 2757-2769. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025470Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Anneli Douglas, Berendien Lubbe, and Adrene van der Merwe. 2017. Managing Business Travellers’ Use of Mobile Travel Applications. In Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2017, Roland Schegg and Brigitte Stangl (eds). Springer, Cham, 271-283. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51168-9_20Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Judith Doyle and Max Nathan. 2001. Wherever next?: Work in a mobile world. The Industrial Society.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. C.M. Espino, S.M. Sundstrom, H. L. Frick, M. Jacobs, and M. Peters. 2002. International Business Travel: Impact on Families and Travellers. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 59, 5, 309–322. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/oem.59.5.309Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Lotta Frändberg and Bertil Vilhelmson. 2003. Personal Mobility: A Corporeal Dimension of Transnationalisation. The Case of Long-Distance Travel from Sweden. Environment and Planning: Economy and Space, 35, 10. https://doi-org.zorac.aub.aau.dk/10.1068/a35315Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Janet Fulk and Low Collins-Jarvis. 2001. Wired meetings: technological mediation of organizational gatherings. In The New Handbook of Organizational Communication, Fredric. M. Jablin, and Lindia L. Putnam (eds.). Sage, 624-703. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781412986243.n16Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Eva Ganglbauer, Geraldine Fitzpatrick, and Florian Güldenpfennig. 2015. Why and what did we throw out? Probing on Reflection through the Food Waste Diary. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15), 1105-1114. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702284Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Mareike Glöss, Moira McGregor, and Barry Brown. 2016. Designing for Labour: Uber and the On-Demand Mobile Workforce. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16), 1632-1643. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858476Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Dion H. Goh, Chei Sian Lee, Rebecca P. Ang, and Chu Keong Lee. 2010. Determining Services for the Mobile Tourist.  Journal of Computer Information Systems, 51, 1, 31–40. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2010.11645447Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Per Gustafson. 2012. Managing Business Travel: Developments and Dilemmas in Corporate Travel Management.  Tourism Management, 33, 2, 276-284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2011.03.006Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Harvard Business Review. 2009. Managing across Distance in Today's Economic Climate: The Value of Face-to-face Communication. Harvard Business School.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Hanna Hasselqvist, Mia Hesselgren, and Cristian Bogdan. 2016. Challenging the Car Norm: Opportunities for ICT to Support Sustainable Transportation Practices. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16), 1300-1311. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858468Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Charles Heckscher. 1994. Defining the post-bureaucratic type. In The Post-Bureaucratic Organization: New Perspectives on Organizational Change, Charles Heckscher and Anne Donnellon (eds.). Sage, 14-62.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Rikke Hagensby Jensen, Yolande Strengers, Dimitrios Raptis, Larissa Nicholls, Jesper Kjeldskov, and Mikael B. Skov. 2018. Exploring Hygge as a Desirable Design Vision for the Sustainable Smart Home. In Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS '18), 355-360. https://doi.org/10.1145/3196709.3196804Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Jason T. Jacques. 2020. CHI 2020: Right Here, Right Now? A bottom-up approach to estimating the carbon emissions from more than twenty years of CHI conference travel. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA ’20). https://doi.org/10.1145/3334480.3381806Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Andrew Jones. 2007. More than 'managing across borders?' The complex role of face-to-face interaction in globalizing law firms. Journal of Economic Geography, 7,3, 223-246. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26161034Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Andrew Jones. 2013. Conceptualising business mobilities: towards an analytical framework. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 9, 58-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2013.08.003Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Tom Erik Julsrud, Randi Hjorthol, and Jon Martin Denstadli. 2012. Business meetings: do new videoconferencing technologies change communication patterns? Journal of Transport Geography, 24, 396-403. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.04.009Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Tapio Ikkala and Airi Lampinen. 2014. Defining the price of hospitality: networked hospitality exchange via Airbnb. In Proceedings of the companion publication of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing (CSCW Companion '14), 173-176. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556420.2556506Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Matthew Kay, Tara Kola, Jessica R. Hullman, and Sean A. Munson. 2016. When (ish) is My Bus?: User-centered Visualizations of Uncertainty in Everyday, Mobile Predictive Systems. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16), 5092-5103. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858558Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Margit Keller, Bente Halkier. 2014. Positioning consumption: A practice theoretical approach to contested consumption and media discourse. Marketing Theory, 14, 1, 35-51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593113506246Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Sara Kiesler, and Jonathon N. Cummings. 2002. What do we know about proximity and distance in work groups? A legacy of research. In Distributed Work, P. Hinds and Sara Kiesler (eds.). MIT Press, 57-80.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Lenneke Kuijer, Annelise de Jong, and Daan van Eijk. 2013. Practices as a unit of design: An exploration of theoretical guidelines in a study on bathing. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 20, 4, Article 21. https://doi.org/10.1145/2493382Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Nada Kulendran and Kenneth Wilson. 2000. Modelling business travel. Tourism Economics, 6, 1, 47-59. https://doi.org/10.5367/000000000101297460Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Kari Kuutti and Liam J. Bannon. 2014. The turn to practice in HCI: Towards a research agenda. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’14), 3543–3552. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557111Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Machiel Lamers, René van der Duim, and Gert Spaargaren. 2017. The relevance of practice theories for tourism research. Annals of Tourism Research, 62, 54-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2016.12.002Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Adele Ladkin, Cheryl Willis, Juliet Jain, William Clayton, and Marina Marouda. 2016. Business travellers' connections to home: ICTs supporting work‐life balance. New Technology, Work and Employment, 31, 3, 255-270. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12071Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Jonathan Lazar, Jinjuan Heidi Feng, and Harry Hochheiser. 2010. Research Methods in Human-Computer Interaction. Wiley Publishing.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Jon Inge Lian and Jon Martin Denstadli. 2004. Norwegian business air travel: Segments and trends. Journal of Air Transport Management, 10, 2, 109-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2003.08.001Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Glenn Lyons, Juliet Jain, and David Holley. 2007. The use of travel time by rail passengers in Great Britain. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 41, 1, 107-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2006.05.012Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Jin-Long Lu and Srinivas Peeta. 2009. Analysis of the factors that influence the relationship between business air travel and videoconferencing. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 43, 8, 709-721. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.tra.2009.07.001Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Luis Martin-Domingo and Juan Carlos Martin. 2015. Airport Surface Access and Mobile Apps. Journal of Airline and Airport Management,5, 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.3926/jairm.38Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Mary McDowell. 2008. Business mobility: A changing ecosystem. Information Knowledge Systems Management, 7, 1-2, 25-37. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1402701.1402709Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Johanna Meurer, Martin Stein, David Randall, Markus Rohde, and Volker Wulf. 2014. Social dependency and mobile autonomy: supporting older adults' mobility with ridesharing ICT. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14), 1923-1932. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557300Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Kenton O'Hara, Mark Perry, Abigail Sellen and Barry A. T. Brown. 2002. Exploring the relationship between mobile phone and document activity during business travel. In Wireless World, Barry Brown, Nicola Green and Richard Harper (eds.). Springer, 180-194. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0665-4_12Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. James Pierce, Yolande Strengers, Phoebe Sengers, and Susanne Bødker. 2013. Introduction to the Special Issue on Practice-oriented Approaches to Sustainable HCI. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 20, 4, Article 20. https://doi.org/10.1145/2494260Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Sarah Pink, Kerstin Leder Mackley, Val Mitchell, Marcus Hanratty, Carolina Escobar-Tello, Tracy Bhamra, and Roxana Morosanu. 2013. Applying the Lens of Sensory Ethnography to Sustainable HCI. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 20, 4, Article 25. https://doi.org/10.1145/2494261Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Marianne G. Petersen, Aviaja B. Lynggaard, Peter G. Krogh, and Ida W. Winther. 2010. Tactics for homing in mobile life: a fieldwalk study of extremely mobile people. In Proceedings of the 12th international conference on Human computer interaction with mobile devices and services (MobileHCI '10), 265-274. https://doi.org/10.1145/1851600.1851646Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Gary Pritchard, John Vines, Pam Briggs, Lisa Thomas, and Patrick Olivier. 2014. Digitally driven: how location based services impact the work practices of London bus drivers. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14), 3617-3626. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557156Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Gary Pritchard, John Vines, and Patrick Olivier. 2015. Your Money's No Good Here: The Elimination of Cash Payment on London Buses. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15), 907-916. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702137Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Lisa Rayle, Danielle Dai, Nelson Chan, Robert Cervero, and Susan Shaheen. 2016. Just a better taxi? A survey-based comparison of taxis, transit, and ridesourcing services in San Francisco. Transport Policy, 45, 168-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.10.004Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. Andreas Reckwitz. 2002. Toward a Theory of Social Practices. European Journal of Social Theory, 5, 2, 243–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684310222225432Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. Kati Saarenpää. 2017. Stretching the borders: how international business travel affects the work–family balance. Community, Work & Family, 21, 1, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2016.1170666Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. Kirsten Sadler, Toni Robertson, Melanie Kan, and Penny Hagen. 2006. Balancing work, life and other concerns: a study of mobile technology use by Australian freelancers. In Proceedings of the 4th Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction: changing roles (NordiCHI '06), 413-416. https://doi.org/10.1145/1182475.1182525Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. Pedro Sanches, Vasiliki Tsaknaki, Asreen Rostami, and Barry Brown. 2020. Under Surveillance: Technology Practices of those Monitored by the State. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’20), 1–13. https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3313831.3376889Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. Joachim Scheiner. 2006. Does the car make elderly people happy and mobile? Settlement structures, car availability and leisure mobility of the elderly. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 6, 2, 151-172. https://doi.org/10.18757/ejtir.2006.6.2.3431Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Jan Aart Scholte. 2005. Globalization: A critical introduction. Red Globe Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. C. Schuitmaker and Peta Thomas. 2016. Managing the corporate traveller. African Journal of Hospitality, Tourism and Leisure, 5, 4, Article 18. https://www.ajhtl.com/2016.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. Elizabeth Shove. 2003. Comfort, Cleanliness and Convenience: The Social Organisation of Normality. Berg Publishers.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Elizabeth Shove, Mika Pantzar, and Matt Watson. 2012. The Dynamics of Social Practice: Everyday Life and How it Changes. SAGE Publications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. Nancy A. Skopp, Don E. Workman, Jamie L. Adler, and Gregory A. Gahm. 2015. Analysis of Distance Collaboration Modalities: Alternatives to Meeting Face-to-Face. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 31, 12, 901-910. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2015.1072786Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. Linda Steg. 2005. Car use: lust and must. Instrumental, symbolic and affective motives for car use. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 39, 2-3, 147-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2004.07.001Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  63. Yolande Strengers. 2013. Smart Energy Technologies in Everyday Life: Smart Utopia?Palgrave-MacMillan.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. Yolande Strengers. 2015. Meeting in the Global Workplace: Air Travel, Telepresence and the Body. Mobilities, 10, 4, 592-608. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2014.902655Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  65. Michael K. Svangren, Mikael B. Skov, and Jesper Kjeldskov. 2018. Passenger Trip Planning using Ride-Sharing Services. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '18), Paper 480, 12 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174054Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  66. UN World Tourism Organization. 2019. International Tourism Highlights, 2019 Edition. https://www.e-unwto.org/doi/book/10.18111/9789284421152Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. Ron Wakkary, Audrey Desjardins, Sabrina Hauser, and Leah Maestri. 2013. A sustainable design fiction: Green practices.  ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 20, 4, Article 23. https://doi.org/10.1145/2494265Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  68. Mark Weiser. 1994. Creating the invisible interface (invited talk). In Proceedings of the 7th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology (UIST '94) https://doi.org/10.1145/192426.192428Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  69. Mark Weiser. 1995. Ubiquitous computing (invited talk). In Proceedings of USENIX ‘95.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  70. Volker Wulf, Markus Rohde, Volkmar Pipek, and Gunnar Stevens. 2011. Engaging with practices: design case studies as a research framework in CSCW. In Proceedings of the ACM 2011 conference on Computer supported cooperative work (CSCW '11), 505-512. https://doi.org/10.1145/1958824.1958902Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Readiness, Seamlessness and Connectedness Understanding Business Travellers’ Door to Door Journeys
    Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      NordiCHI '20: Proceedings of the 11th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Shaping Experiences, Shaping Society
      October 2020
      1177 pages
      ISBN:9781450375795
      DOI:10.1145/3419249

      Copyright © 2020 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 26 October 2020

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      NordiCHI '20 Paper Acceptance Rate89of399submissions,22%Overall Acceptance Rate379of1,572submissions,24%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)21
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format