skip to main content
10.1145/3372923.3404792acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshtConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper
Open Access

Anonymity Effects: A Large-Scale Dataset from an Anonymous Social Media Platform

Published:13 July 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Today online social media sites function as the medium of expression for billions of users. As a result, aside from conventional social media sites like Facebook and Twitter, platform designers introduced many alternative social media platforms (e.g., 4chan, Whisper, Snapchat, Mastodon) to serve specific userbases. Among these platforms, anonymous social media sites like Whisper and 4chan hold a special place for researchers. Unlike conventional social media sites, posts on anonymous social media sites are not associated with persistent user identities or profiles. Thus, these anonymous social media sites can provide an extremely interesting data-driven lens into the effects of anonymity on online user behavior. However, to the best of our knowledge, currently there are no publicly available datasets to facilitate research efforts on these anonymity effects.

To that end, in this paper, we aim to publicly release the first ever large-scale dataset from Whisper, a large anonymous online social media platform. Specifically, our dataset contains 89.8 Million Whisper posts (called "whispers'') published between a 2-year period from June 6, 2014 to June 6, 2016 (when Whisper was quite popular). Each of these whispers contained both post text and associated metadata. The metadata contains information like coarse-grained location of upload and categories of whispers. We also present preliminary descriptive statistics to demonstrate a significant language and categorical diversity in our dataset. We leverage previous work as well as novel analysis to demonstrate that the whispers contain personal emotions and opinions (likely facilitated by a disinhibition complex due to anonymity). Consequently, we envision that our dataset will facilitate novel research ranging from understanding online aggression to detect depression within online populace.

References

  1. Michael S Bernstein, Andrés Monroy-Hernández, Drew Harry, Paul André, Katrina Panovich, and Gregory G Vargas. 2011. 4chan and/b: An Analysis of Anonymity and Ephemerality in a Large Online Community. In ICWSM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Piotr Bojanowski, Edouard Grave, Armand Joulin, and Tomas Mikolov. 2016. Enriching Word Vectors with Subword Information. arXiv preprint arXiv:1607.04606 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Meeyoung Cha, Hamed Haddadi, Fabricio Benevenuto, and Krishna P. Gummadi. 2010. Measuring User Influence in Twitter: The Million Follower Fallacy. In ICWSM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Meeyoung Cha, Alan Mislove, and Krishna P. Gummadi. 2009. A Measurement-Driven Analysis of Information Propagation in the Flickr Social Network. In WWW.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Denzil Correa, Leandro Silva, Mainack Mondal, Fabricio Benevenuto, and Krishna P. Gummadi. 2015. The Many Shades of Anonymity: Characterizing Anonymous Social Media Content. In ICWSM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Antigoni-Maria Founta, Constantinos Djouvas, Despoina Chatzakou, Ilias Leontiadis, Jeremy Blackburn, Gianluca Stringhini, Athena Vakali, Michael Sirivianos, and Nicolas Kourtellis. 2018. Large Scale Crowdsourcing and Characterization of Twitter Abusive Behavior. In ICWSM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Liz Gannes. 2013. On Making Our Digital Lives More Real. http://allthingsd.com/20130802/im-so-over-oversharing-on-making-our-digital-lives-more-real/. (Accessed on April 2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Erin Griffith. 2013. With 2 million users, “secrets app” Whisper launches on Android. http://pando.com/2013/05/16/with-2-million-users-secrets-app-whisper-launches-on-android/. (Accessed on April 2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Kristine Johnson. 2017. Strangers Share Extreme Confessions On Whisper App. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-tYMNZUwuY4. (Accessed on April 2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Matthew Lynley. 2015. After Passing 10 Million Monthly Active Users, Whisper Hires Its First President. https://techcrunch.com/2015/04/29/whisper-hires-its-first-president/#.hzgvrt:CTAX. (Accessed on April 2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Binny Mathew, Ritam Dutt, Suman Kalyan Maity, Pawan Goyal, and Animesh Mukherjee. 2019. Deep Dive into Anonymity: Large Scale Analysis of Quora Questions. In International Conference on Social Informatics. Springer, 35--49.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Harry Mccracken. 2016. Whisper's Master Of Content Moderation Is A Machine. https://www.fastcompany.com/3058148/whispers-master-of-content-moderation-is-a-machine. (Accessed on April 2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Alan Mislove, Bimal Viswanath, Krishna P. Gummadi, and Peter Druschel. 2010. You Are Who You Know: Inferring User Profiles in Online Social Networks. In WSDM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Alain Pinsonneault and Nelson Heppel. 1997. Anonymity in group support systems research: A new conceptualization, measure, and contingency framework. Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 14, 3 (1997), 89--108.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. K. Sassenberg. 2002. Common bond and common identity groups on the internet: Attachment and normative behavior in on-topic and off-topic chats. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, Vol. 6, 1 (May 2002), 27--37.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Leandro Araú jo Silva, Mainack Mondal, Denzil Correa, Fabrício Benevenuto, and Ingmar Weber. 2016. Analyzing the Targets of Hate in Online Social Media. In ICWSM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Manya Sleeper, Rebecca Balebako, Sauvik Das, Amber Lynn McConahy, Jason Wiese, and Lorrie Faith Cranor. 2013. The Post that Wasn't: Exploring Self-Censorship on Facebook. In CSCW .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. John Suler. 2004. The online disinhibition effect. Cyberpsychology & behavior, Vol. 7, 3 (2004), 321--326.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. John C. Turner. 1985. Social categorization and the self-concept: A social cognitive theory of group behavior. Advances in Group Process, Vol. 2 (1985), 77--122.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Neal Ungerleider. 2017. How Whisper Survives As Other Anonymous Social Apps Like Yik Yak Fail. https://www.fastcompany.com/40424834/how-whisper-survives-as-other-anonymous-social-apps-like-yik-yak-fail. (Accessed on April 2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Bimal Viswanath, Alan Mislove, Meeyoung Cha, and Krishna P. Gummadi. 2009. On the Evolution of User Interaction in Facebook. In WOSN.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Gang Wang, Bolun Wang, Tianyi Wang, Ana Nika, Haitao Zheng, and Ben Y. Zhao. 2014. Whispers in the Dark: Analyzing an Anonymous Social Network. In IMC.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Philip G Zimbardo. 1969. The human choice: Individuation, reason, and order versus deindividuation, impulse, and chaos. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, Vol. 17 (1969), 237--307.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Anonymity Effects: A Large-Scale Dataset from an Anonymous Social Media Platform

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      HT '20: Proceedings of the 31st ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media
      July 2020
      327 pages
      ISBN:9781450370981
      DOI:10.1145/3372923

      Copyright © 2020 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 13 July 2020

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • short-paper

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate378of1,158submissions,33%

      Upcoming Conference

      HT '24
      35th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media
      September 10 - 13, 2024
      Poznan , Poland

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader