Leandro Amancio
ABSTRACT
In Community Question Answering, recency ranking refers to put the freshness answers with high quality in top positions of a ranking. Freshness is not related to how recent is the answer creation date, but to how up-to-date is the answer content. This is extremely important because the users need to get best answers quickly to solve their questions and, usually, they expect up-to-date solutions. In this paper, we propose a new approach to provide recency ranking in these environments and present a set of experiments that show the effectiveness of our proposal.
- ZHANG, J., KONG, X., LUO, R.J., CHANG, Y., and YU, P.S., 2014. NCR: A Scalable Network-Based Approach to Co-Ranking in Question-and-Answer Sites. In Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 23rd ACM International Conference on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (Shanghai, China2014), ACM, 2661978, 709--718. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2661829.2661978. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- WEI, X., HUANG, H., LIN, C.-Y., XIN, X., MAO, X., and WANG, S., 2015. Re-ranking voting-based answers by discarding user behavior biases. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence AAAI Press, 2380--2386.Google Scholar
- MA, Z., SUN, A., YUAN, Q., and CONG, G., 2015. A Tri-Role Topic Model for Domain-Specific Question Answering. In AAAI, 224--230.Google Scholar
- YANG, L., QIU, M., GOTTIPATI, S., ZHU, F., JIANG, J., SUN, H., and CHEN, Z., 2013. CQArank: jointly model topics and expertise in community question answering. In Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 22nd ACM international conference on Information & Knowledge Management (San Francisco, California, USA2013), ACM, 2505720, 99--108. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2505515.2505720. Google ScholarDigital Library
- DALIP, D.H., ANDRÉ, M., GONÇALVES, CRISTO, M., and CALADO, P., 2013. Exploiting user feedback to learn to rank answers in q&a forums: a case study with stack overflow. In Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 36th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval (Dublin, Ireland2013), ACM, 2484072, 543--552. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2484028.2484072. Google ScholarDigital Library
- DALIP, D.H., GONÇALVES, M.A., CRISTO, M., and CALADO, P., 2016. A general multiview framework for assessing the quality of collaboratively created content on web 2.0. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, n/a-n/a. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.23650.Google Scholar
- FU, H., WU, S., and OH, S., 2015. Evaluating answer quality across knowledge domains: using textual and non-textual features in social Q&A. In Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 78th ASIS&T Annual Meeting: Information Science with Impact: Research in and for the Community (St. Louis, Missouri2015), American Society for Information Science, 2857158, 1--5. Google ScholarCross Ref
- DONG, A., CHANG, Y., ZHENG, Z., MISHNE, G., BAI, J., ZHANG, R., BUCHNER, K., LIAO, C., and DIAZ, F., 2010. Towards recency ranking in web search. In Proceedings of the Proceedings of the third ACM international conference on Web search and data mining (New York, New York, USA2010), ACM, 1718490, 11--20. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1718487.1718490. Google ScholarDigital Library
- CHANG, Y., DONG, A., KOLARI, P., ZHANG, R., INAGAKI, Y., DIAZ, F., ZHA, H., and LIU, Y., 2013. Improving recency ranking using twitter data. ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol. 4, 1, 1--24. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2414425.2414429. Google ScholarDigital Library
- EFRON, M. and GOLOVCHINSKY, G., 2011. Estimation methods for ranking recent information. In Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 34th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in Information Retrieval (Beijing, China2011), ACM, 2009984, 495--504. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2009916.2009984. Google ScholarDigital Library
- AGICHTEIN, E., CASTILLO, C., DONATO, D., GIONIS, A., and MISHNE, G., 2008. Finding high-quality content in social media. In Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 2008 International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (Palo Alto, California, USA2008), ACM, 1341557, 183--194. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1341531.1341557. Google ScholarDigital Library
- XU, J. and LI, H., 2007. AdaRank: a boosting algorithm for information retrieval. In Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 30th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval (Amsterdam, The Netherlands2007), ACM, 1277809, 391--398. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1277741.1277809. Google ScholarDigital Library
- METZLER, D. and BRUCE CROFT, W., 2007. Linear feature-based models for information retrieval. Information Retrieval 10, 3, 257--274. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10791-006--9019-z.Google ScholarDigital Library
- WU, Q., BURGES, C.J.C., SVORE, K.M., and GAO, J., 2010. Adapting boosting for information retrieval measures. Information Retrieval 13, 3, 254--270. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10791-009--9112--1.Google ScholarDigital Library
- BREIMAN, L., 2001. Random Forests. Machine Learning 45, 1, 5--32. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/a:1010933404324. Google ScholarDigital Library
- JOACHIMS, T., 2002. Optimizing search engines using clickthrough data. In Proceedings of the Proceedings of the eighth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining (Edmonton, Alberta, Canada2002), ACM, 775067, 133--142. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/775047.775067. Google ScholarDigital Library
- BAEZA-YATES, R. and RIBEIRO-NETO, B., 1999. Modern information retrieval. ACM press New York.Google Scholar
- WILCOXON, F., 1945. Individual Comparisons by Ranking Methods. Biometrics Bulletin 1, 6, 80--83. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3001968. Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Towards Recency Ranking in Community Question Answering: A Case Study of Stack Overflow
Recommendations
Recency and quality-based ranking question in CQAs: A Stack Overflow case study
AbstractRecency ranking, in Community-based Question Answering (CQA), would refer to put recent answers in a list’s top positions. To be recent is not related to how new is the date of creation or editing of a given answer, but how current is ...
Highlights- An automatic proposal for quality and recency-based answer ranking.
- Proposal of ...
Improving recency ranking using twitter data
Special section on twitter and microblogging services, social recommender systems, and CAMRa2010: Movie recommendation in contextIn Web search and vertical search, recency ranking refers to retrieving and ranking documents by both relevance and freshness. As impoverished in-links and click information is the the biggest challenge for recency ranking, we advocate the use of ...
Recency ranking by diversification of result set
CIKM '11: Proceedings of the 20th ACM international conference on Information and knowledge managementIn this paper, we propose a web search retrieval approach which automatically detects recency sensitive queries and increases the freshness of the ordinary document ranking by a degree proportional to the probability of the need in recent content. We ...
Comments