D L. Lee
F H. Lochovsky
- ALLEN, J. 1976. Synthesis of speech from unrestricted text. Proc. IEEE 64, 4 (Apr.), 433-442.Google Scholar
- ANDERSON, J. B., AND BODIE, J. B. 1975. Tree en* coding of speech. IEEE Trans. In{. Theory IT-21, 4 (July), 379-387.Google Scholar
- ATAL, B. S., AND HANAUER, S. L. 1971. Speech analysis and synthesis by linear prediction of the speech waveform. J. Acoust. Soc Amer. 50, 2-2 (Aug.), 637-655.Google Scholar
- BELL SYSTEMS TECHNICAL J. 1981. Special issue on the DSP 60, 7-2 (Sept.).Google Scholar
- BERNEY, C. L. 1980. The capability and applications of voice recognition and response systems. In Proceedings o{ the National Electronics Con{erence (Chicago, I11., Oct.), vol. 34, pp. 530-533.Google Scholar
- BERNSTEIN, J., AND PISONI, P. B. 1980. Unlimited text-to-speech system: Description and evaluation of a microprocessor based device. In International Con{erence on Acoustics, Speech, and Stgnal Processing, Conference Record (Denver, Colo., Apr.), pp. 576-579.Google Scholar
- BERNSTEIN, J., et al. 1982. An intelligible text-tospeech converter with flexible controls. In COMPCON Spring 82 Digest of Papers (San Francisco, Calif., Feb.), pp. 201-206.Google Scholar
- CALDWELL, J. 1980. Programmable synthesis using a new 'speech microprocessor.' In International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, Conference Record (Denver, Colo. Apr.), pp. 868-871.Google Scholar
- CHANDRA, S., AND LIN, W. C. 1974. Experimental comparison between stationary and nonstationary formulations of linear prediction applied to voiced speech analysis. IEEE Trans. Acoust., Speech, Signal Process. ASSP-22, 6 (Dec.), 403- 415.Google Scholar
- CHOMSKY, N. 1957. Syntactic Structures. Mouton, The Hague, 1957.Google Scholar
- COXEN, D. 1981. A voice message system. In Computer Message Systems, R. P. Uhlig, Ed. Elsevier North-Holland, New York, pp. 17-28.Google Scholar
- COSTELLO, J. 1981. High quality and less memory using time domain speech synthesis. In Wescon 81 Con{erence Record (San Francisco, Calif., Sept.), pp. 2/3.1-2/3.9.Google Scholar
- CUMMiSKEY, P., JAYANT, N. S., AND FLANAGAN, J. L. 1973. Adaptive quantlzation in differential PCM coding of speech. Bell Syst. Tech J. 52, 7 (Sept.), 1105-1118.Google Scholar
- DATE, C. J. 1981. An Introductzon to Database Systems, 3rd ed. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass. Google Scholar
- DAUMER, W. R. 1982. Subjective evaluation of several efficient speech coders. IEEE Trans. Commun. COM-30, 4 (Apr.), 655-662.Google Scholar
- DIXON, R., AND MAXEY, H. 1968. Terminal analog synthesis of continuous speech using the diphone method of segment assembly. IEEE Trans. Audio Electroacoust. AU-16, I (Mar.), 40-50.Google Scholar
- ELOVITZ, H., et al. 1976. Letter-to-sound rules for automatic translation of English text to phonetics. IEEE Trans Acoust., Speech, Signal Process. ASSP-24, 6 (Dec.), 446-459.Google Scholar
- FELDMAN, J. A. 1982. A compact digital channel vocoder using commercial devices, in International Con{erence on Acoustws, Speech, and Signal Processing, Con{erence Record (Boston, Mass., Apr.), pp. 1960-1963.Google Scholar
- FELDMAN, J. A., HOFSTETTER, E. M., AND MALPASS, M. L. 1983. A compact flexible LPC vocoder based on a commercial signal processing microcomputer. IEEE Trans. Acoust., Speech, Signal Process. ASSP-31, 1-II (Feb.), 252-257.Google Scholar
- FLANAOAN, J. L., et al. 1970. Synthetic voices for computers. IEEE Spectrum 7, 10 (Oct.), 22-45.Google Scholar
- FLANAGAN, J. L., et al. 1979. Speech coding. IEEE Trans. Commun. COM-27, 4 (Apr.), 710-737.Google Scholar
- FONG, A. C. 1983. A model for automatic formprocessing procedures. In Proceedings o/the 16th Hawaii Internatwnal Conference on Systems Sczence (Honolulu, Hawaii, Jan.), pp. 558-565.Google Scholar
- GAGNON, R. T. 1978. Votrax real time hardware for phoneme synthesis of speech. In International Con/erence on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, Conference Record (Tulsa, Okla., Apr.), pp. 175-178.Google Scholar
- GREEFKES, J. A. 1970. A digitally companded delta modulation modem for speech transmission. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Communication (San Francisco, Cahf., June), pp. 7.33-7.48.Google Scholar
- GREGORIAN, R., AND AMIR, G. 1983. A single chip speech synthesizer using a switched-capacitor multiplier. IEEE Trans. Acoust., Speech, Signal Process. ASSP-31, 1-II (Feb.), 313-323.Google Scholar
- HILL, D. R. 1980. Spoken language generation and understanding by machine: A problems and applications oriented overview. In Spoken Language Generation and Understanding, J. C. Simon, Ed. Proceedings of the NATO Advanced Study Institute (Bonas, France, June), pp. 3-38.Google Scholar
- HOi~G, J., et al. 1981. Form procedures. In Omega Alpha, D. Tsichritzis, Ed., Tech. Pep. CSRG-127, Computer Systems Research Group, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. (Mar.), pp. 101-133.Google Scholar
- JOEL, A. E., JR. 1983. Public digital switching systerns. IEEE Commun. 21, 3 (May), 6-10.Google Scholar
- JONES, D. 1979. Delta modulation for voice transmission. Application Notes, HARRIS Semiconductor Products Diviswn (Jan.).Google Scholar
- KERNIGHAN, B., AND RITCHIE, D. 1978. The C Programming Language. Prentice-Hall, New York. Google Scholar
- KLATT, D. H. 1976. Structure of a phonological rule component for a synthes~s-by-rule program. IEEE Trans. Acoust., Speech, S~gnal Process. ASSP-24, 5 (Oct.), 391-398.Google Scholar
- KLATT, D. H. 1979. Synthesis by rule of segmental durations in English sentences. In Frontwrs of Speech Communication Research, B. Lindblom and S. Ohman, Eds. Academic Press, New York, pp. 287-300.Google Scholar
- KOEKERAKKER, J. 1981. Computer voice response/ recognition. Can. Datasyst. 13, 5 (May), 26-31.Google Scholar
- KUCERA, H., AND FRANClS, W. N. 1967. Computational Analysis of Present-Day American English Brown Univ. Press, Providence, R. I.Google Scholar
- KURZWEIL, R. C. 1981. Kurzweil reading machine for the blind. In Proceedings of the Johns Hopkzns 1st National Search for Applicatwns of Personal Computing to Aid the Handwapped (Washington, D.C., Oct.), pp. 236-241.Google Scholar
- LEE, D. L. 1982. A voice response system for an office information system. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGOA Conference on Office Information Systems (Philadelphia, Pa., June), ACM, New York, pp. 113-121. Google Scholar
- LERNER, E. 1982. Micros in 'white goods.' IEEE Spectrum 19, 4 (Apr.), 50-54.Google Scholar
- LIN, K. S. 1981. LPC compressed speech at 850 b~tsper-second. In international Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and S~gnal Processing, Conference Record (Atlanta, Ga., Mar.), pp. 5-7.Google Scholar
- LOCHOVSKY, F. H. 1981 Human factors issues in office information systems. In Proceedings of the International Congress on Applied Systems Research and Cybernetics, vol. 5. Pergamon Press, Elmsford, New York, pp. 2497-2501.Google Scholar
- MAKHOUL, J. 1975. Linear prediction: A tutorial review. Proc. IEEE 63, 4 (Apr.), 561-580.Google Scholar
- MAKHOUL, J. 1977. Stable and efficient lattice methods for linear prediction. IEEE Trans. Acoust., Speech, S~gnal Process. ASSP-25, 5 (Oct.), 423- 428.Google Scholar
- MARKEL, J. D. 1972. The SIFT algorithm for fundamental frequency estimation. IEEE Trans. Audio Electroacoust A U-20, 5 (Dec.), 367-377.Google Scholar
- MARKEL, J. D., AND GRAY, A. H. 1976. Linear Prediction of Speech. Springer-Verlag, New York. Google Scholar
- MAXEMCHUK, N. F. 1980. An experimental speech storage and editing facility. Bell Syst Tech. J. 59, 8 (Oct.), 1383-1395.Google Scholar
- MCILgO~, M. D. 1974. Syntheti~ ~ by rule. Computer Science Tech. Pep. 14, Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, N. J. (Mar.).Google Scholar
- MORRIS, L. R. 1979. A fast FORTRAN implementation of the U.S. Naval Research Laboratory algorithm for automatic translation of English text to Votrax parameters. In International Conference of Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, Con/erence Record (Washington, D. C., Apr.), pp. 907-913.Google Scholar
- MYERS, W. 1982. Personal computers aid the handicapped. IEEE Spectrum 2, 1 (FEB), 26-40.Google Scholar
- O'SHAUGHNESSY, D. 1983. Automatic speech synthesis. IEEE Commun. 21, 9 (Dec.), 26-34.Google Scholar
- PICKVANCE, R. 1980. Speech synthesis; the new frontiers. Electron. Eng. 52, 640 (July), 37-52.Google Scholar
- PlsoNI, D. B., AND HUNlqlCUTr, S. 1980. Perceptual evaluation of MITalk: The MIT unrestricted text-to-speech system, in International Conference on Acoustws, Speech, and Signal Processing, Conference Record (Denver, Colo., Apr.), pp. 572- 575.Google Scholar
- RABINER, L. R., AND SCHAFER, R. W. 1978. Digital Processing of Speech Signals. Prentice-Hall, New York.Google Scholar
- RAmNER, L. R., et al. 1971. A hardware realization of a digital formant speech synthesier, iEEE Trans. Commun. Technol, COM-19, 6 (Dec.), 1016-1020.Google Scholar
- RICE, D. L. 1976. Friends, humans, and countryrobots: Lend me your ears. Byte 1, 12 (Aug.), 16- 24.Google Scholar
- RICHER, I., STERNER, M., AND S~NGOKU, M. 1981. Office communication and the digital PBX. Cornput. Networks 5, 6, 411-422.Google Scholar
- ROSENTHAL, L. H., et al. 1974. Automatic voice response: Interfacing man with machine. IEEE Spectrum 11, 7 (July), 61-68,Google Scholar
- SAMPEI, T., ASADA, A., AND NAKATA, K. 1980. High quality PARCOR speech synthesizer. IEEE Trans. Consum. Electron. CE-26, 4 (Aug.), 353- 358.Google Scholar
- SCHAFER, R. W., AND RAmNER, L. R. 1975. Digital representatwns of speech signals. Proc. IEEE 63, 4 (Apr.), 662-677.Google Scholar
- SCHMANDT, C., AND HUL?EEN, E. 1982. The intelligent voice-interactive interface. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computer Systems (Gaitherburg, Maryland, Mar.), pp. 363- 366. Google Scholar
- SCHROEDER, M. R. 1966. Vocoders: Analysis and synthesis of speech. Proc. IEEE 54, 5 (May), 720- 734.Google Scholar
- SCHWARTZ, R., KLOVSTAD, J., MAKHOUL, J., KLATT, D., ANO ZUE, J. 1979. Diphone synthesis for phonetic vocoding. In International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, Conference Record (Washington, D. C., Apr.), pp. 891-894.Google Scholar
- SCHWARTZ, R., KLOVS?AO, J., MAKHOUL, J., AND SORENSEN, J. 1980. A preliminary design of a phonetic vocoder based on a diphone model. In International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, Conference Record (Denver, Colo., Apr.), pp. 32-35.Google Scholar
- SHOVP, J. E. 1980. Phonological aspects of speech recognition. In Trends in Speech Recognition, W. A. Lea, Ed. Prentice-Hall, New York, pp. 125- 138.Google Scholar
- SMITH, W., AND CROOK, S. B. 1981. Phonemes, allophones, and LPC team to synthesize speech. Electronic Design 29, 13 (June), 121-127.Google Scholar
- $ONGCO, D. C., ALLEN, S. I., PLEXiCO, P. S., AND MORFORD, R. A. 1980. How computers talk to the blind. IEEE Spectrum 17, 5 (May), 34-38.Google Scholar
- TSICHRITZIS, D., ANO LOCHOVSKY, F. H. 1980. Office information systems: Challenge for the 80's. Proc IEEE 68, 9 (Sept.), 1054-1059.Google Scholar
- TSlCHRITZIS, D., et al. 1983. A multimedia office filing system. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Large Data Bases (Florence, Italy, Oct.), pp. 2-7. Google Scholar
- VOTRAX 1980. SC-01 Speech Synthesizer Data Sheet. Votrax Division, Federal Screw Works, Michigan.Google Scholar
- WEINRICH, D. W. 1980. Speech-synthesis chip borrows human intonation. Electronics 53, 8 (Apr.), 113-118.Google Scholar
- WINO(~RAD, T. 1972. Understanding Natural Language. Academic Press, New York. Google Scholar
- WITTEN, I. H., AND ABBESS, J. 1979. A microcomputer-based speech synthesis-by-Rule system. Int. J. Man-Mach. Stud. 11, 5 (Sept.), 585-620.Google Scholar
- YOUNG, S. J. 1980. Synthesis by rule of prosodic features in word concatenation synthesis. Int. J. Man-Mach Stud. 12, 3 (Apr.), 241-258.Google Scholar
- YOUNG, S. g., AND FALLSIDE, F. 1979. Speech synthesis from concept: A method for speech output from information systems. J. Acoust. Soc Amer. 66, 3 (Sept.), 685-695.Google Scholar
Recommendations
Emergency response systems: research directions and current challenges
ICC '17: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Internet of things, Data and Cloud ComputingEmergency response is the most critical phase in emergency management. This primarily returns to the importance of direct interference right after the incident occurrence to save lives and protect properties. Therefore, decision making and resource ...
A response selection model for intrusion response systems: Response Strategy Model RSM
Intrusion response systems aim to provide a systematic procedure to respond to incidents. However, with different type of response options, an automatic response system is designed to select appropriate response options automatically in order to act ...
Modeling Emergency Response Systems
HICSS '07: Proceedings of the 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System SciencesThis paper discusses a model for an emergency response system. The model is based on a review of the literature and the incorporation of lessons learned from Hurricane Katrina response. The paper takes a holistic view of a system in that an Emergency ...
Comments