skip to main content
10.1145/2541016.2541040acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesozchiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Dispelling ageing myths in technology design

Published:25 November 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

We present a review of literature from the fields of gerontology, gerontechnology, HCI and government policy that deals with social and technical solutions for the ageing population. We highlight common assumptions about ageing people, which we argue are still embedded in much of the research related to the domain of ageing. This paper challenges six common assumptions across four broad themes that we identified in the literature. It aims to provide a reminder and resource for designers to eschew assumptions during designing technology for 'older' users.

References

  1. Aberdeen, L., & Bye, L.-A. (2013). Challenges for Australian sociology: Critical ageing research -- ageing well? Journal of Sociology, 49(1), 3--21.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Andrews, K. (2002). National Strategy for an Ageing Australia: An Older Australia, Challenges and Opportunities for all. Commonwealth of Australia, 1--71.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Asquith, N. (2009). Positive ageing, neoliberalism and Australian sociology. Journal of Sociology, 45(3), 255--269.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). (2009). Future Population Growth and Ageing. 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Australian Local Government Association (ALGA). (2006). Age-friendly built environments. 1--20.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Bannon, L. (1992). From Human Factors to Human Actors: The Role of Psychology and Human-Computer Interaction Studies in System Design. In J. M. Greenbaum & M. Kyng (Eds.), Design at Work: Cooperative Design of Computer Systems (pp. 25--44): Routledge. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Binder, T., de Michelis, G., Ehn, P., Jacucci, G., Linde, P., & Wagner, I. (2011). Design Things (Design Thinking, Design Theory) (Kindle ed.).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Blythe, M. A., Monk, A. F., & Doughty, K. (2005). Socially dependable design: The challenge of ageing populations for HCI. Interacting with Computers, 17(6), 672--689. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Buys, L., Lovie-Kitchin, J., Barnette, J., David, N., Anderson, D., Boulton-Lewis, G., et al. (2005). Active and Productive Ageing: What is the Real Experience of Australians?, Research Bulletin (Vol. 1): National Seniors Productive Research Centre (NSPAC).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Buys, L., & Miller, E. (2006). The meaning of "active ageing" to older Australians: Exploring the relative importance of health, participation and security. In 39th Australian Association of Gerontology Conference.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Coleman, R. (2001). Drivers of change, Living longer -- the new context for design. London, UK: The Design Council.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Coleman, R., Lebbon, C., Clarkson, J., & Keates, S. (2003). From margins to mainstream. In J. Clarkson, R. Coleman, S. Keates & C. Lebbon (Eds.), Inclusive Design: Design for the Whole Population. London: Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Coleman, R., & Myerson, J. (2001). Improving Life Quality by Countering Design Exclusion. Gerontechnology, 1(2), 88--102.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Connell, J., Grealy, C., Olver, K., & Power, J. (2008). Comprehensive scoping study on the use of assistive technology by frail older people living in the community. Urbis.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Cornejo, R., Tentori, M., & Favela, J. (2013). Ambient Awareness to Strengthen the Family Social Network of Older Adults. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 1--36. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Cross, N. (1982). Designerly ways of knowing. Design Studies, 3(4), 221--227.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Crowley, J. (2006). Editorial. International Social Science Journal, 58(190), 539--543.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Department of Communities Child Safety and Disability Services (DOCCSDS). (2012; original in 2002). Ageing - Myth and Reality. Queensland Government, 1--43.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Department of Health and Ageing (DOHA). (2005). A literature review and description of the regulatory framework. Commonwealth of Australia.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Department of Health and Ageing (DOHA). (2008). Ageing and Aged Care in Australia. Commonwealth of Australia, 1--45.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Fozard, J. L. (2002). Gerontechnology--Beyond Ergonomics and Universal Design. Gerontechnology, 1(3), 137--139.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Gerling, K. M., Schild, J., & Masuch, M. (2010). Exergame design for elderly users: the case study of SilverBalance. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology, 66--69. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Granat, C., Pino, M., Legouverneur, G., Vidal, J. S., Bidaud, P., & Rigaud, A. S. (2013). Robot services for elderly with cognitive impairment: Testing usability of graphical user interfaces. Technology and Health Care.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Grosinger, J., Vetere, F., & Fitzpatrick, G. (2012). Agile Life: Addressing Knowledge and Social Motivations for Active Aging, OZCHI'12 (pp. 162--165). Melbourne, Victoria, Australia: ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Hallewell Haslwanter, J. D., & Fitzpatrick, G. (2013). The Development of a sensor-based System for older People: A Case Study, HCI 2013 (pp. 1--10). Brunel University, UK.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Harvey, P. W., & Thurnwald, I. (2009). Ageing well, ageing productively: The essential contribution of Australia's ageing population to the social and economic prosperity of the nation. Health Sociology Review, 18(4), 379--386.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Hernández-Encuentra, E., Pousada, M., & Gómez-Zúñiga, B. (2009). ICT and Older People: Beyond Usability. Educational Gerontology, 35(3), 226--245.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Ijsselsteijn, W., Nap, H. H., de Kort, Y., & Poels, K. (2007). Digital game design for elderly users. In Proceedings of the 2007 conference on Future Play, 17--22. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Jaeger, B. (2005). The Inclusion of Senior Citizens in the Information Society - What have we learned? In B. Jaeger (Ed.), Young Technologies in Old Hands: An International View on Senior Citizens' Utilization of ICT (pp. 77--112). Copenhagen: DJOF Publishing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Kendig, H., & Browning, C. (2011). Directions for Ageing Well in a Healthy Australia. Academy of the Social Sciences, 31(2), 23--30.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Keyani, P., Hsieh, G., Mutlu, B., Easterday, M., & Forlizzi, J. (2005). DanceAlong: supporting positive social exchange and exercise for the elderly through dance, CHI '05 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 1541--1544). Portland, OR, USA: ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Laslett, P. (1991). A fresh map of life: The emergence of the third age. Harvard University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Lindley, S. E., Harper, R., & Sellen, A. (2008). Designing for elders: exploring the complexity of relationships in later life. In Proceedings of the 22nd British HCI Group Annual Conference on People and Computers: Culture, Creativity, Interaction-Volume 1, 77--86. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Melenhorst, A., Rogers, W. A., & Bouwhuis, D. G. (2006). Older adults' motivated choice for technological innovation: Evidence for benefit-driven selectivity. Psychology and Aging, 21(1), 190--195.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Mubin, O., Shahid, S., & Al Mahmud, A. (2008). Walk 2 Win: towards designing a mobile game for elderly's social engagement. In Proceedings of the 22nd British HCI Group Annual Conference on People and Computers: Culture, Creativity, Interaction-Volume 2, 11--14. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. National Seniors Productive Ageing Centre (NSPAC). (2013). Staying Connected: Social Engagement and Wellbeing Among Mature Age Australians. Commonwealth of Australia, 1--25.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Östlund, B. (2005). Design Paradigms and Misunderstood Technology: The Case of Older Users. In B. Östlund (Ed.), Young Technologies in Old Hands: An International View on Senior Citizens' Utilization of ICT (pp. 25--39). Copenhagen: DJOF Publishing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Östlund, B. (2008). The Revival of Research Circles: Meeting the Needs of Modern Aging and the Third Age. Educational Gerontology, 34(4), 255--266.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Oulasvirta, A., Rattenbury, T., Ma, L., & Raita, E. (2012). Habits make smartphone use more pervasive. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 16(1), 105--114. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Pedell, S., Vetere, F., Kulik, L., Ozanne, E., & Gruner, A. (2010). Social isolation of older people: the role of domestic technologies, Proceedings of the 22nd Conference of the Computer-Human Interaction Special Interest Group of Australia on Computer-Human Interaction (pp. 164--167). Brisbane, Australia: ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Phelan, E. A., Anderson, L. A., LaCroix, A. Z., & Larson, E. B. (2004). Older Adults' Views of "Successful Aging"---How Do They Compare with Researchers' Definitions? Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 52(2), 211--216.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Robertson, T., Durick, J., Brereton, M., Vaisutis, K., Vetere, F., Nansen, B., et al. (2013). Emerging Technologies and the Contextual and Contingent Experiences of Ageing Well. In P. Kotzé, G. Marsden, G. Lindgaard, J. Wesson & M. Winckler (Eds.), Human-Computer Interaction -- INTERACT 2013 (Vol. 8119, pp. 582--589). Berlin: Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Robertson, T., Durick, J., Brereton, M., Vetere, F., Howard, S., & Nansen, B. (2012). Knowing Our Users: Scoping Interviews in Design Research with Ageing Participants, OZCHI'12 (pp. 517--520). Melbourne, Victoria, Australia: ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Robertson, T., & Loke, L. (2009). Designing Situations, OZCHI 2009 (pp. 1--8). Melbourne, Australia: ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Rogers, Y., & Marsden, G. (2013). Does he take sugar?: moving beyond the rhetoric of compassion. interactions, 20(4), 48--57. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Romero, N., Sturm, J., Bekker, T., de Valk, L., & Kruitwagen, S. (2010). Playful persuasion to support older adults' social and physical activities. Interacting with Computers, 22(6), 485--495. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Rook, K. S. (1987). Reciprocity of social exchange and social satisfaction among older women. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(1), 145--154.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Russell, C., Campbell, A., & Hughes, I. (2008). Ageing, social capital and the Internet: Findings from an exploratory study of Australian 'silver surfers'. Australasian Journal on Ageing, 27(2), 78--82.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Sengers, P., & Gaver, B. (2006). Staying open to interpretation: engaging multiple meanings in design and evaluation. In Proceedings of the 6th conference on Designing Interactive systems, 99--108. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Sharp, H., Preece, J. & Rogers, Y. (Eds.). (2011). Interaction Design: beyond human-computer interaction: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Tang, J. C., Xiao, R., Hoff, A., Venolia, G., Therien, P., & Roseway, A. (2013). HomeProxy: Exploring a Physical Proxy for Video Communication in the Home. In CHI 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Waycott, J., Vetere, F., Pedell, S., Kulik, L., Ozanne, E., Gruner, A., & Downs, J. (2013). Older adults as digital content producers, Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 39--48). Paris, France: ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. World Health Organization (WHO). (2002). Active Ageing: A Policy Framework. 1--59.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Dispelling ageing myths in technology design

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      OzCHI '13: Proceedings of the 25th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference: Augmentation, Application, Innovation, Collaboration
      November 2013
      549 pages
      ISBN:9781450325257
      DOI:10.1145/2541016

      Copyright © 2013 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 25 November 2013

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      OzCHI '13 Paper Acceptance Rate34of70submissions,49%Overall Acceptance Rate362of729submissions,50%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader