skip to main content
10.1145/1982185.1982263acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

System-level co-simulation of integrated avionics using polychrony

Published:21 March 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

The design of embedded systems from multiple views and heterogeneous models is ubiquitous in avionics as, in particular, different high-level modeling standards are adopted for specifying the structure, hardware and software components of a system. The system-level simulation of such composite models is necessary but difficult task, allowing to validate global design choices as early as possible in the system design flow. This paper presents an approach to the issue of composing, integrating and simulating heterogeneous models in a system co-design flow. First, the functional behavior of an application is modeled with synchronous data-flow and statechart diagrams using Simulink/Gene-Auto. The system architecture is modeled in the AADL standard. These highlevel, synchronous and asynchronous, models are then translated into a common model, based on a polychronous model of computation, allowing for a Globally Asynchronous Locally Synchronous (GALS) interpretation of the composed models. This translation is implemented as an automatic model transformation within Polychrony, a toolkit for embedded systems design. Simulation, including profiling and value change dump demonstration, has been carried out based on the common model within Polychrony. An avionic case study, consisting of a simplified doors and slides control system, is presented to illustrate our approach.

References

  1. ATL. http://www.eclipse.org/atl/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. GTKWave. http://gtkwave.sourceforge.net/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Kermeta. http://www.kermeta.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. RT-Builder. http://www.geensoft.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Syndex. http://www-rocq.inria.fr/syndex/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. The MathWorks: Simulink. http://www.mathworks.com/products/simulink/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. IEEE Standard for Verilog Hardware Description Language (VHDL), 2006. IEEE Std 1364-2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Airlines Electronic Engineering Committee. Avionics Application Software Standard Interface (ARINC 653), 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. R. Alur, T. Dang, J. Esposito, Y. Hur, F. Ivancic, V. Kumar, I. Lee, P. Mishra, and G. P. snd O. Sokolsky. Hierarchical modeling and analysis of embedded systems. Proc. IEEE, 91(1): 11--28, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. L. Besnard, T. Gautier, P. Le Guernic, and J.-P. Talpin. Compilation of polychronous data flow equations. In S. Shukla and J.-P. Talpin, editors, Correct-by-Construction Embedded Software Synthesis: Formal Frameworks, Methodologies, and Tools, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. M. Y. Chkouri, A. Robert, M. Bozga, and J. Sifakis. Translating AADL into BIP - Application to the Verification of Real-Time Systems. In International Workshop on Model Based Architecting and Construction of Embedded Systems (ACES'08), Toulouse, France, September 2008. Springer-Verlag.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. J. Eker, J. Janneck, E. Lee, J. Liu, J. Ludwig, S. Neuendorffer, S. Sachs, and Y. Xiong. Taming heterogeneity: The Ptolemy approach. Proc. IEEE, 91(1): 127--144, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. A. Gamatié, T. Gautier, and L. Besnard. Modeling of Avionics Applications and Performance Evaluation Techniques using the Synchronous Language SIGNAL. In SLAP'03. Elsevier Science B. V., 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. INRIA ESPRESSO team. Polychrony. http://www.irisa.fr/espresso/Polychrony.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. A. Kountouris and P. Le Guernic. Profiling of Signal Programs and its application in the timing evaluation of design implementations. In Proceedings of the IEE Colloq. on HW-SW Cosynthesis for Reconfigurable Systems, HP Labs, Bristol, UK, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. P. Le Guernic, J.-P. Talpin, and J.-C. Le Lann. Polychrony for System Design. Journal for Circuits, Systems and Computers, 12(3): 261--304, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. D. A. Mathaikutty, H. D. Patel, S. K. Shukla, and A. Jantsch. SML-Sys: a functional framework with multiple models of computation for modeling heterogeneous system. Design Automation for Embedded Systems, 12: 1--30, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. D. Monteverde, A. Olivero, S. Yovine, and V. Braberman. VTS-based Specification and Verification of Behavioral Properties of AADL Models. In International Workshop on Model Based Architecting and Construction of Embedded Systems (ACES'08). Springer-Verlag, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. I. Sander and A. Jantsch. System modeling and transformational design refinement in ForSyDe. IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Design Integr. Circuits Syst., 23(1): 17--32, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. F. Singhoff and A. Plantec. AADL modeling and analysis of hierarchical schedulers. In ACM international conference on Ada (SIGAda'07), 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE). Architecture Analysis & Design Language (AADL, SAE standard ASS5506). http://www.sae.org.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. The CESAR project. Cost-efficient methods and processes for safety relevant embedded systems. http://www.cesarproject.eu, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. A. Toom, T. Naks, M. Pantel, M. Gandriau, and I. Wati. Gene-Auto: An Automatic Code Generator for a Safe Subset of SimuLink/StateFlow and Scicos. In European Conference on Embedded Real-Time Software (ERTS'08), 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. System-level co-simulation of integrated avionics using polychrony

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SAC '11: Proceedings of the 2011 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing
        March 2011
        1868 pages
        ISBN:9781450301138
        DOI:10.1145/1982185

        Copyright © 2011 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 21 March 2011

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate1,650of6,669submissions,25%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader