skip to main content
10.1145/1979742.1979887acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

The online privacy paradox: a social representations perspective

Authors Info & Claims
Published:07 May 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper we present early results from a study, which aims at understanding the privacy paradox from a social representations perspective. After identifying adequate stimulus words with the help of a preliminary study, we conducted the main study using an online questionnaire. Participants were instructed to associate freely to the given stimulus words. The results of the polarity and sequence analysis of the associations provide a first valuable insight into the social representations of online privacy.

References

  1. Abric, J.C. (1996). Specific processes of social representations. Papers on Social Representations, 5(1), 77--80.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Acquisti, A., John, L. and Loewenstein, G. (2009). What is Privacy Worth?. Technical Report, Heinz College, Carnegie Mellon University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Brandimarte, L., Acquisti, A. and Loewenstein, G. (2009). Privacy Concerns and Information Disclosure: An Illusion of Control Hypothesis. Poster, iConference 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. ConsumersUnions.org (2008). Consumer Reports Poll: Americans Extremely Concerned About Internet Privacy. Retrieved January 11, 2011 from http://www.consumersunion.org/pub/core_telecom_and_utilities/006189.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. de Rosa, A.S. (1995). Le "réseau d'associations" comme méthode d'étude dans la recherche sur les representations sociales: structure, contenus et polarité du champ semantique. Cahiers Internationaux de Psychologie Sociales, 28, 96--122.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Dinev, T. and Hart, P. (2006). An Extended Privacy Calculus Model for E-Commerce Transactions. Information Systems Research (17:1), 61--80. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Jung, Y., Pawlowski, S., & Wiley-Patton, S. (2009). Conducting Social Cognition Research in IS: A Methodology for Eliciting and Analyzing Social Representations. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 24(1), 15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Moscovici, S. (1984). The phenomenon of social representations. In: Farr, R.M., Moscovici, S. (Eds.), Social Representations. University Press, Cambridge, pp. 3--69.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Norberg, P.A., Horne, D.R., et al. (2007). The Privacy Paradox: Personal Information Disclosure Intentions versus Behaviors. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 41(1), 100--126.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Spiekermann, S., Grossklags, J. and Berendt, B. (2001). E-privacy In 2nd Generation E-Commerce: Privacy Preferences Versus Actual Behavior. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, 38--47. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Vaast, E. (2007). Danger is in the eye of the beholders: social representations of information systems security in healthcare. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 16, 130--152. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Xu, H., Teo, H. H., Tan, B. C. Y., & Agarwal, R. (2010). The role of push-pull technology in privacy calculus: the case of location-based services. Journal of Management Information Systems, 26(3), 137--176. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. The online privacy paradox: a social representations perspective

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader