skip to main content
10.1145/1940941.1940966acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesinfoseccdConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A comparison of information security risk analysis in the context of e-government to criminological threat assessment techniques

Published:01 October 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper examines prior research on the topic of information security analysis in the context of e-Government. Specifically, risk management concept models and analysis techniques are reviewed and their application in e-Government is covered. In addition, this paper will review criminological threat assessment techniques and relate them to risk management methodologies, discussing similarities and differences. This paper offers the conclusion that the fields of information security risk management and criminological threat assessment techniques have a number of similarities and differences and the methodologies should be examined together more closely in future research for the benefit of both fields.

References

  1. International Telecommunication Union (2010). Information Communication Technology Indicators Database. Retrieved June 20, 2010 from ITU Statistics page: http://www.itu.int/ITU-D/ict/statistics/index.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Zang, Z. (2002). E-Government in Digital Era: Concept, Practice, and Development. International Journal of The Computer, The Internet, and Management, 10 (2). 1--22.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Ebrahim, Z., Irani, Z. (2005). E-government adoption: Architecture and barriers. Business Process Management Journal, 15 (5). 589--611. DOI: 10.1108/14637150510619902Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Wang, J. F. E-Government security management: Key factors and countermeasures. in Fifth International Conference on Information Assurance and Security. (Xi'an, China, 2009). IEEE Computer Society, 483--486. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Joshi, J., Ghafoor, A., Aref, W. G., Spafford, E. H. Digital government security infrastructure design challenges, IEEE Computer, 34 (2). 66--72. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Hwang, M. S., Li, C. T., Shen, J. J., Chen, Y. P. Challenges in e-government and security of information. Information & Security: An International Journal, 15 (1). 9--20.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Conklin, A., White, G. B. E-government and cyber security: The role of cyber security exercises. Proceedings of the 39th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. (Kauai, HI, 2006). IEEE Computer Society, 1--8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Luna-Reyes, L. F., Gil-Garcia, J. R. E-government & internet security: Some technical and policy considerations. Proceedings of the 2003 Annual National Conference on Digital Government Research. (Boston, MA, 2003). ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, Vol. 130. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Whitman, M., and Mattord, H. J. Management of Information Security. Thomson Course Technology, Boston, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Stoneburner, G., Goguen, A., Feringa, A. Risk management guide for information technology systems: recommendations of the national institute of standards and technology. NIST Special Publication 800--30. Retrieved June 20, 2010 from http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/nistpubs/800-30/sp800-30.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Evangelidis, A. A risk assessment framework for e-services. Electronic Journal of e-Government, 2 (1). 21--30.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Tchankova, L. Risk Identification - Basic Stage in Risk Management. Environmental Management and Health, 13 (3). 290--297.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Liebermann, Y., Stashevsky, S. Perceived risks as barriers to internet and e-commerce usage. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 5 (4). 291--300.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Zhou, Z., Hu, C. Study on the e-government security risk management. IJCSNS International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, 8 (5). 208--213.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Fein, R. A., Vossekuil, B., & Holden, G. A. (1995). Threat assessment: An approach to prevent targeted violence. National Institute of Justice: Research in Action, 1--7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Ackerman, A., Moran, S. Bioterrorism and threat assessment. Weapons of Mass Destruction Terrorism Research Program. Retrieved June 20, 2010 from http://www.wmdcommission.org/files/No22.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. A comparison of information security risk analysis in the context of e-government to criminological threat assessment techniques

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      InfoSecCD '10: 2010 Information Security Curriculum Development Conference
      October 2010
      187 pages
      ISBN:9781450302029
      DOI:10.1145/1940941

      Copyright © 2010 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 1 October 2010

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate18of23submissions,78%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader