skip to main content
10.1145/1871437.1871690acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Adaptive outlierness for subspace outlier ranking

Published:26 October 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

Outlier mining is an important data analysis task to distinguish exceptional outliers from regular objects. However, in recent applications traditional outlier mining approaches miss outliers as they are hidden in subspace projections.

In this work, we propose a novel outlier ranking based on the degree of deviation in subspaces. Object deviation is measured only in a selection of relevant subspaces and is based on adaptive neighborhoods in these subspaces. We show that our approach outperforms competing outlier ranking approaches by detecting outliers in arbitrary subspaces.

References

  1. I. Assent, R. Krieger, E. Müller, and T. Seidl. DUSC: Dimensionality unbiased subspace clustering. In ICDM, pages 409--414, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. M. Breunig, H.-P. Kriegel, R. Ng, and J. Sander. LOF: Identifying density-based local outliers. In SIGMOD, pages 93--104, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. H.-P. Kriegel, P. Kröger, E. Schubert, and A. Zimek. Outlier detection in axis-parallel subspaces of high dimensional data. In PAKDD, pages 831--838, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. H.-P. Kriegel, M. Schubert, and A. Zimek. Angle-based outlier detection in high-dimensional data. In KDD, pages 444--452, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. E. Müller, I. Assent, S. Günnemann, R. Krieger, and T. Seidl. Relevant Subspace Clustering: mining the most interesting non-redundant concepts in high dimensional data. In ICDM, pages 377--386, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. E. Müller, I. Assent, U. Steinhausen, and T. Seidl. Outrank: Ranking outliers in high dimensional data. In DBRank Workshop, pages 600--603, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. E. Müller, S. Günnemann, I. Assent, and T. Seidl. Evaluating clustering in subspace projections of high dimensional data. PVLDB, 2(1):1270--1281, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. E. Müller, M. Schiffer, P. Gerwert, M. Hannen, T. Jansen, and T. Seidl. SOREX: Subspace outlier ranking exploration toolkit. In ECML PKDD, pages 607--610, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. B. Silverman. Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis. Chapman and Hall, London, 1986.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Adaptive outlierness for subspace outlier ranking

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CIKM '10: Proceedings of the 19th ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management
      October 2010
      2036 pages
      ISBN:9781450300995
      DOI:10.1145/1871437

      Copyright © 2010 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 26 October 2010

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • poster

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate1,861of8,427submissions,22%

      Upcoming Conference

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader