ABSTRACT
Knowing tourists' individual preferences provides the possibility to offer personalized tours. The challenge is to capture these preferences using a mobile device. During a field study in Görlitz three methods for elicitation were evaluated by computing the correlation between the tourists' and the algorithms' rankings. The results served to clarify fundamental questions en route to develop a personal tour guide. 1) Is it possible to seed a general interest profile in the mobile context with all its distractions that allows the accurate prediction of actual rankings of sights? 2) Are the interest profiles sufficiently diverse to base personalized tours on individual interest profiles instead of interest prototypes? 3) How do personalized tours affect the spatial behavior of tourists, do they really visit a broader set of attractions than before? Analyzing the interest profiles gives an insight into their actual diversity, discusses their necessity and helps simulating an improved distribution of tourists at a destination.
- Abowd, Gregory D.; Atkeson Christopher G.; Hong, Jason; Long, Sue; Kooper, Rob; Pinkerton, Mike (1997): Cyberguide -- a mobile context-aware tour guide, Baltzer/ACM Wireless Networks. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cheverst, Keith; Davies, Nigel; Mitchell, Keith; Friday, Adrian; Efstratiou, Christos (2000): Developing a Context-aware Electronic Tourist Guide: Some Issues and Experiences, Distributed Multimedia Research Group, Lancaster University, UK.Google Scholar
- Djikstra, Jan; Jessurun, Joran; Timmermans, Harry (2001): "A Multi-Agent Cellular Automata Model of Pedestrian Movement, Pedestrian and Evacuation Dynamics", Schreckenberg and Sharma (eds.), Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
- Freytag, Tim (2003): ,,Städtetourismus in Heidleberg - Ergebnisbericht zur Gästebefragung 2003", Geographisches Institut der Universität Heidelberg.Google Scholar
- Gretzel, Ulrike; Fesenmeier, Daniel (2005): "Persuasiveness of Preference Elicitation Processes in Destination Recommendation Systems", Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2005, Andrew Frew et al. (eds.), Springer Computer Science. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kaufman L.; P. J. Rousseeuw (1987): "Finding Groups in Data: an Introduction to Cluster Analysis", John Wiley & Sons, 1990.Google Scholar
- Kempermann, Astrid; Chang-Hyeon, Joh; Timmermans, Harry (2004): "Comparing First-time and Repeat Visitors' Activity Patterns in a Tourism Environment", Consumer Psychology of Tourism, Hospitality and Leisure Vol.3, CAB International.Google Scholar
- Lowry, Richard (1999-2005): "Concepts and Applications of Inferential Statistics", Subchapter 3b: Rank-Order Correlation. http://faculty.vassar.edu/lowry/webtext.htmlGoogle Scholar
- Ricci, Francesco; Woeber, Karl; Zins, Andreas (2005): "Recommendations by Collaborative Browsing", Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2005 (eds.), Andrew Frew, Springer Computer Science (ENTER 2005).Google Scholar
- Schmidt-Belz, Barbara; Posland, Stefan (2003a): "User Validation of a mobile Tourism Service", Workshop "HCI mobile Guides", Udine (Italy).Google Scholar
- Shoval, Noam; Isaacson, Michal (2005): "The Application of Tracking Technologies to the Study of Pedestrian Spatial Behaviour", The Professional Geographer.Google Scholar
- Ten Hagen, Klaus; Kramer, Ronny; Müller, Patrick; Schumann, Bjoern; Hermkes, Marcel (2005): Semantic Matching and Heuristic Search for a Dynamic Tour Guide, Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2005, Andrew Frew et al. (eds.), Springer Computer Science.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Field study on methods for elicitation of preferences using a mobile digital assistant for a dynamic tour guide
Recommendations
A comparative user study on rating vs. personality quiz based preference elicitation methods
IUI '09: Proceedings of the 14th international conference on Intelligent user interfacesWe conducted a user study evaluating two preference elicitation approaches based on ratings and personality quizzes respectively. Three criteria were used in this comparative study: perceived accuracy, user effort and user loyalty. Results from our ...
Semi-supervised discriminative preference elicitation for cold-start recommendation
CIKM '13: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM international conference on Information & Knowledge ManagementRecommendation for cold users is fairly challenging because no prior rating can be used in preference prediction. To tackle this cold-start scenario, rating elicitation is usually employed through an initial interview in which users are queried by some ...
Preference elicitation for narrowing the recommended list for groups
RecSys '14: Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Recommender systemsA group may appreciate recommendations on items that fit their joint preferences. When the members' actual preferences are unknown, a recommendation can be made with the aid of collaborative filtering methods. We offer to narrow down the recommended ...
Comments