skip to main content
10.1145/1005686.1005724acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmetricsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

The impact of BGP dynamics on intra-domain traffic

Published:01 June 2004Publication History

ABSTRACT

Recent work in network traffic matrix estimation has focused on generating router-to-router or PoP-to-PoP (Point-of-Presence) traffic matrices within an ISP backbone from network link load data. However, these estimation techniques have not considered the impact of inter-domain routing changes in BGP (Border Gateway Protocol). BGP routing changes have the potential to introduce significant errors in estimated traffic matrices by causing traffic shifts between egress routers or PoPs within a single backbone network. We present a methodology to correlate BGP routing table changes with packet traces in order to analyze how BGP dynamics affect traffic fan-out within a large "tier-1" network. Despite an average of 133 BGP routing updates per minute, we find that BGP routing changes do not cause more than 0.03% of ingress traffic to shift between egress PoPs. This limited impact is mostly due to the relative stability of network prefixes that receive the majority of traffic -- 0.05% of BGP routing table changes affect intra-domain routes for prefixes that carry 80% of the traffic. Thus our work validates an important assumption underlying existing techniques for traffic matrix estimation in large IP networks.

References

  1. D. Oran, "OSI IS-IS intra-domain routing protocol," RFC 1142, IETF, February 1990.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. J. Moy, "OSPF version 2," RFC 1583, IETF, March 1994.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. J. W. Stewart, BGP4: Inter-Domain Routing in the Internet. Addison-Wesley, 1998.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Y. Vardi, "Network tomography: estimating source-destination traffic intensities from link data," Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 91, no. 433, pp. 365--377, 1996.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. C. Tebaldi and M. West, "Bayesian inference on network traffic using link count data," Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 93, no. 442, pp. 557--576, 1998.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. J. Cao, D. Davis, S. Wiel, and B. Yu, "Time-varying network tomography : Router link data," Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 95, pp. 1063--1075, 2000.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Y. Zhang, M. Roughan, N. Duffield, and A. Greeberg, "Fast accurate computation of large-scale IP traffic matrices from link loads," in Proc. ACM SIGMETRICS, June 2003.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. G. Huston, "Analyzing the Internet's BGP Routing Table," Cisco Internet Protocol Journal, March 2001.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. T. Bu, L. Gao, and D. Towsley, "On routing table growth," in Proc. IEEE Global Internet Symposium, 2002.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. J. Rexford, J. Wang, Z. Xiao, and Y. Zhang, "BGP routing stability of popular destinations," in Proc. Internet Measurement Workshop, 2002.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. S. Uhlig and O. Bonaventure, "Implications of interdomain traffic characteristics on traffic engineering," European Transactions on Telecommunications, 2002.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. S. Agarwal, C.-N. Chuah, and R. H. Katz, "OPCA: Robust interdomain policy routing and traffic control," Proc. IEEE International Conference on Open Architectures and Network Programming, 2003.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Cisco Systems Inc., "Cisco IOS IP and IP routing command reference, release 12.1."]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. T. G. Griffin, "What is the sound of one route flapping?," in Network Modeling and Simulation Summer Workshop, Dartmouth, 2002.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Labovitz, Malan, and Jahanian, "Internet routing instability," in Proc. ACM SIGCOMM, 1997.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. L. Subramanian, S. Agarwal, J. Rexford, and R. H. Katz, "Characterizing the Internet hierarchy from multiple vantage points," Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, 2002.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. K.Papagiannaki, N. Taft, S. Bhattacharyya, P. Thiran, K. Salamatian, and C. Diot, "A pragmatic definition of elephants in Internet backbone traffic," Proc. Internet Measurement Workshop, 2002.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. S. Bhattacharyya, C. Diot, J. Jetcheva, and N. Taft, "Pop-level and access-link-level traffic dynamics in a tier-1 PoP," in Proc. Internet Measurement Workshop, 2001.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. The impact of BGP dynamics on intra-domain traffic

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            SIGMETRICS '04/Performance '04: Proceedings of the joint international conference on Measurement and modeling of computer systems
            June 2004
            450 pages
            ISBN:1581138733
            DOI:10.1145/1005686
            • cover image ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review
              ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review  Volume 32, Issue 1
              June 2004
              432 pages
              ISSN:0163-5999
              DOI:10.1145/1012888
              Issue’s Table of Contents

            Copyright © 2004 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 1 June 2004

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • Article

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate459of2,691submissions,17%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader