skip to main content
10.1145/641007.641109acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Achieving effective floor control with a low-bandwidth gesture-sensitive videoconferencing system

Published:01 December 2002Publication History

ABSTRACT

Multiparty videoconferencing with even a small number of people is often infeasible due to the high network bandwidth required. Bandwidth can be significantly reduced if most of the advantages of using full-motion video can be achieved with low-frame-rate video; unfortunately, the impact of low-frame-rate video on communication is relatively unexplored. We implemented a multiparty videoconferencing system that supports full-motion video, low-frame-rate video where the video is updated only once every few seconds, and a hybrid scheme where full-motion video is transmitted when the system detects that a user is making a gesture and low-frame-rate video is transmitted at all other times. We studied people using our system for small-group discussions and found that low-frame-rate video limited people's ability to request to speak or judge when to stop speaking. The hybrid scheme, conversely, was as effective as full-motion video for floor control, resulting in a similar number of speaker changes, while using only ten percent of the bandwidth.

References

  1. A. Anderson, A. Newlands, J. Mulin, A. Fleming, G. Doherty-Sneddon, and J. Velden. Impact of Video-Mediated Communication on Simulated Service Encounters. Interacting with Computers, pages 193--206, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. M. Argyle and M. Cook. Gaze and Mutual Gaze. Cambridge University Press, 1976.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. V. Bruce. The Role of the Face in Communication: Implications for Videophone Design. Interacting with Computers, pages 166--176, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. C. Chen, M. Rouan, J. Edwards, and C. Moore. An Exploratory Study on the Impact of Broadcast Courses at Stanford University. Prepared for the Stanford Dean of Engineering, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. M. Chen. Design of a Virtual Auditorium. Proceedings of ACM Multimedia, pages 19--28, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. M. Claypool and J. Tanner. The Effects of Jitter on the Perceptual Quality of Video. Proceedings of ACM Multimedia, pages 115--118, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. P. Dourish and S. Bly. Portholes: Supporting Awareness in a Distributed Work Group. Proceedings of CHI, pages 541--547, 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. P. Eisert and B. Girod. Analyzing Facial Expressions for Virtual Conferencing. IEEE Computer Graphics & Applications: Special Issue on Computer Animation for Virtual Humans, pages 70--78, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. D. Gavrila. The Visual Analysis of Human Movement: A Survey. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, pages 82--98, January 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. G. Ghinea and J. Thomas. QoS Impact of User Perception and Understanding of Multimedia Video Clips. Proceedings of ACM Multimedia, pages 49--54, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. E. Isaacs, T. Morris, T. Rodriguez, and J. Tang. A Comparison of Face-to-face and Distributed Presentations. Proceedings of CHI, pages 354--361, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. J. Iverson and S. Goldin-Meadow. Why people gesture when they speak. Nature, volume 396, pages 228, November 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. M. Jackson, A. Anderson, R. McEwan, and J. Mullin. Impact of Video Frame Rate on Communicative Behavior in Two and Four Party Groups. Proceedings of CSCW, pages 11--20, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. G. Jancke, J. Grudin, and A. Gupta. Presenting to Local and Remote Audiences: Design and Use of the TELEP System. Proceedings of CHI, pages 384--391, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. B. Johnson and J. Caird. The Effect of Frame Rate and Video Information Redundancy on the Perceptual Learning of American Sign Language Gestures. Proceedings of CHI, pages 121--122, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. J. Li, G. Chen, J. Xu, Y. Wang, H. Zhou, K. Yu, K. Ng, and H. Shum. Bi-level Video: Video Communication at Very Low Bit Rates. Proceedings of ACM Multimedia, pages 392--400, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. R. Malpani and L. Rowe Floor Control for Large-Scale Mbone Seminars. Proceedings of ACM Multimedia, pages 155--163, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. M. Masoodian, M. Apperley, and L. Frederickson. Video Support for Shared Work-space Interaction: an empirical study. Interacting with computers, pages 237--273, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. V. Pavlovic, R. Sharma, and T. Huang. Visual Interpretation of Hand Gestures for Human-Computer Interaction: A Review IEEE Transaction on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, pages 677--695, July 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. A. Pentland. Looking at People: Sensing for Ubiquitous and Wearable Computing. IEEE Transaction on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, pages 107--118, January 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. L. Rowe. ACM Multimedia Tutorial on Distance Learning, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. J. Short, E. Williams, and B. Christie. The Social Psychology of Telecommunications. London, U.K. Wiley, 1976.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. B. Stapley. Visual Enhancement of Telephone Conversations. Ph.D. Thesis, University of London, 1972.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. J. Tang and E. Isaacs. Why Do Users Like Video? Studies of Multimedia-Supported Collaboration. Computer-Supported Cooperative Work: An International Journal, pages 163--196, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. A. Watson and A. Sasse. Evaluating Audio and Video Quality in Low-cost Multimedia Conferencing Systems. Interacting with Computers, pages 255--275, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Intel Image Processing Library http://developer.intel.com/software/products/perflib/iplGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. MPEG-4 Overview. ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11 N4030, March 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Stanford Center for Professional Development. http://scpd.stanford.edu/scpd/about/history.htmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Stanford Video Auditorium http://graphics.stanford.edu/~miltchen/VideoAuditoriumGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    MULTIMEDIA '02: Proceedings of the tenth ACM international conference on Multimedia
    December 2002
    683 pages
    ISBN:158113620X
    DOI:10.1145/641007

    Copyright © 2002 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 1 December 2002

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Acceptance Rates

    MULTIMEDIA '02 Paper Acceptance Rate46of330submissions,14%Overall Acceptance Rate995of4,171submissions,24%

    Upcoming Conference

    MM '24
    MM '24: The 32nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia
    October 28 - November 1, 2024
    Melbourne , VIC , Australia

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader