skip to main content
10.1145/3626485.3626555acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesissConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper
Open Access

Designing and Evaluating Interactions for Handheld AR

Published:05 November 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

Mobile devices such as phones and tablets have become the most prevalent AR devices and are applied in various domains, including architecture, entertainment, and education. However, due to device-specific characteristics, designing and evaluating handheld AR interactions can be especially challenging as handheld AR displays provide 1) limited input options, 2) a narrow camera field of view, and 3) restricted context awareness. To address these challenges with design recommendations and research implications, the dissertation follows a mixed-methods approach with three research questions (RQs): On the one hand, specific aspects of fundamental 3D object manipulation tasks (RQ1) and awareness and discoverability (RQ2) are explored and evaluated in controlled lab studies. For increased ecological validity, the developed interaction concepts are also investigated in public interactive exhibitions. These studies then inform the creation of a framework for designing and evaluating handheld AR experiences using VR simulations of the interaction context (RQ3).

References

  1. Ronald T. Azuma. 1997. A Survey of Augmented Reality. Presence: Teleoper. Virtual Environ. 6, 4 (Aug. 1997), 355–385. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.1997.6.4.355Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Mark Billinghurst, Adrian Clark, and Gun Lee. 2015. A Survey of Augmented Reality. Foundations and Trends® in Human–Computer Interaction 8, 2-3 (2015), 73–272. https://doi.org/10.1561/1100000049Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Stefano Burigat and Luca Chittaro. 2007. Navigation in 3D virtual environments: Effects of user experience and location-pointing navigation aids. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 65, 11 (2007), 945–958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2007.07.003Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Wolfgang Büschel, Anke Lehmann, and Raimund Dachselt. 2021. MIRIA: A Mixed Reality Toolkit for the In-Situ Visualization and Analysis of Spatio-Temporal Interaction Data. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama, Japan) (CHI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 470, 15 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445651Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Luca Chittaro and Stefano Burigat. 2004. 3D Location-Pointing as a Navigation Aid in Virtual Environments. In Proceedings of the Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces (Gallipoli, Italy) (AVI ’04). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 267–274. https://doi.org/10.1145/989863.989910Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. J. G. Grandi, H. G. Debarba, I. Bemdt, L. Nedel, and A. Maciel. 2018. Design and Assessment of a Collaborative 3D Interaction Technique for Handheld Augmented Reality. In 2018 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR). 49–56. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2018.8446295Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. J. G. Grandi, H. G. Debarba, and A. Maciel. 2019. Characterizing Asymmetric Collaborative Interactions in Virtual and Augmented Realities. In 2019 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR). 127–135. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2019.8798080Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Uwe Gruenefeld, Abdallah El Ali, Wilko Heuten, and Susanne Boll. 2017. Visualizing Out-of-View Objects in Head-Mounted Augmented Reality. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (Vienna, Austria) (MobileHCI ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 81, 7 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3098279.3122124Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Uwe Gruenefeld, Jonas Auda, Florian Mathis, Stefan Schneegass, Mohamed Khamis, Jan Gugenheimer, and Sven Mayer. 2022. VRception: Rapid Prototyping of Cross-Reality Systems in Virtual Reality. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New Orleans, LA, USA) (CHI ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 611, 15 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3501821Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Sebastian Hubenschmid, Jonathan Wieland, Daniel Immanuel Fink, Andrea Batch, Johannes Zagermann, Niklas Elmqvist, and Harald Reiterer. 2022. ReLive: Bridging In-Situ and Ex-Situ Visual Analytics for Analyzing Mixed Reality User Studies. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New Orleans, LA, USA) (CHI ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 24, 20 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3517550Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Sebastian Hubenschmid, Johannes Zagermann, Daniel Fink, Jonathan Wieland, Tiare Feuchtner, and Harald Reiterer. 2021. Towards Asynchronous Hybrid User Interfaces for Cross-Reality Interaction. In ISS’21 Workshop Proceedings: "Transitional Interfaces in Mixed and Cross-Reality: A new frontier?". https://doi.org/10.18148/kops/352-2-84mm0sggczq02Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Joseph J. LaViola. 2017. 3D user interfaces: theory and practice (second ed.). Addison-Wesley, Boston.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Jens Müller, Johannes Zagermann, Jonathan Wieland, Ulrike Pfeil, and Harald Reiterer. 2019. A Qualitative Comparison Between Augmented and Virtual Reality Collaboration with Handheld Devices. In Proceedings of Mensch Und Computer 2019 (Hamburg, Germany) (MuC’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 399–410. https://doi.org/10.1145/3340764.3340773Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Patrick Perea 2017. Halo3D: A Technique for Visualizing Off-Screen Points of Interest in Mobile Augmented Reality. Adjunct Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, ISMAR-Adjunct 2017 3267 (2017), 170–175. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR-Adjunct.2017.58Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Patrick Perea, Denis Morand, and Laurence Nigay. 2019. Spotlight on Off-Screen Points of Interest in Handheld Augmented Reality: Halo-Based Techniques. In Proceedings of the 2019 ACM International Conference on Interactive Surfaces and Spaces (Daejeon, Republic of Korea) (ISS ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 43–54. https://doi.org/10.1145/3343055.3359719Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Márcio S. Pinho, Doug A. Bowman, and Carla M.D.S. Freitas. 2002. Cooperative Object Manipulation in Immersive Virtual Environments: Framework and Techniques. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology (Hong Kong, China) (VRST ’02). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 171–178. https://doi.org/10.1145/585740.585769Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Marcio S. Pinho, Doug A. Bowman, and Carla M. Dal Sasso Freitas. 2008. Cooperative object manipulation in collaborative virtual environments. Journal of the Brazilian Computer Society 14, 2 (01 06 2008), 53–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03192559Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Patrick Renner and Thies Pfeiffer. 2017. Attention guiding techniques using peripheral vision and eye tracking for feedback in augmented-reality-based assistance systems. In 2017 IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces (3DUI). 186–194. https://doi.org/10.1109/3DUI.2017.7893338Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Kai Riege, T. Holtkamper, G. Wesche, and B. Frohlich. 2006. The Bent Pick Ray: An Extended Pointing Technique for Multi-User Interaction. In 3D User Interfaces (3DUI’06). 62–65. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2006.127Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Roy A. Ruddle, Justin C. D. Savage, and Dylan M. Jones. 2002. Symmetric and Asymmetric Action Integration during Cooperative Object Manipulation in Virtual Environments. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 9, 4 (Dec. 2002), 285–308. https://doi.org/10.1145/586081.586084Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Roy A. Ruddle, Justin C. D. Savage, and Dylan M. Jones. 2003. Levels of Control During a Collaborative Carrying Task. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 12, 2 (2003), 140–155. https://doi.org/10.1162/105474603321640914Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Dieter Schmalstieg and Tobias Höllerer. 2016. Augmented Reality: Principles and Practice. Addison–Wesley Professional.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Iris Seidinger and Jens Grubert. 2016. 3D Character Customization for Non-Professional Users in Handheld Augmented Reality. In 2016 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR-Adjunct). 129–134. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR-Adjunct.2016.0059Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Teresa Siu and Valeria Herskovic. 2013. SidebARs: Improving Awareness of off-Screen Elements in Mobile Augmented Reality. In Proceedings of the 2013 Chilean Conference on Human - Computer Interaction (Temuco, Chile) (ChileCHI ’13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 36–41. https://doi.org/10.1145/2535597.2535608Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Moritz Skowronski, Jonathan Wieland, Marcel Borowski, Daniel Fink, Carla Gröschel, Daniel Klinkhammer, and Harald Reiterer. 2018. Blended Museum: The Interactive Exhibition "Rebuild Palmyra?". In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia (Cairo, Egypt) (MUM 2018). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 529–535. https://doi.org/10.1145/3282894.3289746Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Rishi Vanukuru, Amarnath Murugan, and Jayesh Pillai. 2020. Dual Phone AR: Exploring the Use of Phones as Controllers for Mobile Augmented Reality. In Proceedings of the 26th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology(VRST ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 52. https://doi.org/10.1145/3385956.3422113Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Philipp Wacker, Oliver Nowak, Simon Voelker, and Jan Borchers. 2019. ARPen: Mid-Air Object Manipulation Techniques for a Bimanual AR System with Pen & Smartphone. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Glasgow, Scotland Uk) (CHI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300849Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Jonathan Wieland, Rudolf C. Hegemann Garcia, Harald Reiterer, and Tiare Feuchtner. 2022. Arrow, Bézier Curve, or Halos? – Comparing 3D Out-of-View Object Visualization Techniques for Handheld Augmented Reality. In 2022 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR). 797–806. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR55827.2022.00098Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Jonathan Wieland, Johannes Zagermann, Jens Müller, and Harald Reiterer. 2021. Separation, Composition, or Hybrid? – Comparing Collaborative 3D Object Manipulation Techniques for Handheld Augmented Reality. In 2021 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR). 403–412. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR52148.2021.00057Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Difeng Yu, Hai-Ning Liang, Kaixuan Fan, Heng Zhang, Charles Fleming, and Konstantinos Papangelis. 2020. Design and Evaluation of Visualization Techniques of Off-Screen and Occluded Targets in Virtual Reality Environments. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 26, 9 (2020), 2762–2774. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2019.2905580Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Designing and Evaluating Interactions for Handheld AR

                Recommendations

                Comments

                Login options

                Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

                Sign in
                • Article Metrics

                  • Downloads (Last 12 months)127
                  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)26

                  Other Metrics

                PDF Format

                View or Download as a PDF file.

                PDF

                eReader

                View online with eReader.

                eReader

                HTML Format

                View this article in HTML Format .

                View HTML Format