ABSTRACT
The accelerated adoption of digital technologies by people and communities results in a close relation between, on one hand, the state of individual and societal well-being and, on the other hand, the state of the digital technologies that underpin our life experiences. The ethical concerns and questions about the impact of such technologies on human well-being become more crucial when data analytics and intelligent competences are integrated. To investigate how learning technologies could impact human well-being considering the promising and concerning roles of learning analytics, we apply the initial phase of the recently produced IEEE P7010 Well-being Impact Assessment, a methodology and a set of metrics, to allow the digital well-being of a set of educational technologies to be more comprehensively tackled and evaluated. We posit that the use of IEEE P7010 well-being metrics could help identify where educational technologies supported by learning analytics would increase or decrease well-being, providing new routes to future technological innovation in Learning Analytics research.
- Christopher Burr, Mariarosaria Taddeo and Luciano Floridi. 2020. The Ethics of Digital Well-Being: A Thematic Review. Sci Eng Ethics 26, 2313–2343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-020-00175-8Google ScholarCross Ref
- IEEE Global Initiative on Ethics of Autonomous and Intelligent Systems. 2019. Ethically Aligned Design: A Vision for Prioritizing Human Well-being with Autonomous and Intelligent Systems, First Edition. IEEE. https://standards.ieee.org/content/ieee-standards/en/industryGoogle Scholar
- Agnes Kukulska-Hulme, Elaine Beirne, Gráinne Conole, Eamon Costello, Tim Coughlan, Rebecca Ferguson, Elizabeth FitzGerald, Mark Gaved, Christothea Herodotou, Wayne Holmes, Conchúr Mac Lochlainn, Mairéad Nic Giolla Mhichíl, Bart Rienties, Julia Sargent, Eileen Scanlon, Mike Sharples, and Denise Whitelock. 2020. Innovating Pedagogy. Open University Innovation Report 8. Milton Keynes: The Open University. https://iet.open.ac.uk/file/innovating-pedagogy-2020.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Rebecca Ferguson, Tore Hoel, Maren Scheffel, and Hendrik Drachsler. 2016. Guest Editorial: Ethics and Privacy in Learning Analytics. Journal of Learning Analytics 3, 1. 5–15. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2016.31.2Google ScholarCross Ref
- Yi-Shan Tsai, Alexander Whitelock-Wainwright, and Dragan Gašević. 2020. The privacy paradox and its implications for learning analytics. 2020. In Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge (LAK ’20), pp. 230-239. ACM, New York, NY, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3375462.3375536Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tore Hoel, Dai Griffiths, and Weiqin Chen. 2017. The influence of data protection and privacy frameworks on the design of learning analytics systems. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Learning Analytics & Knowledge Conference (LAK '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA. 243-252. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3027385.3027414Google ScholarDigital Library
- Simon Buckingham Shum. 2017. Black box learning analytics? Beyond algorithmic transparency. Keynote presented at the Learning Analytics Summer Institute, Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
- Bodong Chen and Haiyi Zhu. 2019. Towards Value-Sensitive Learning Analytics Design. 2019. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge (LAK19), pp. 343–352. ACM, New York, NY, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3303772.3303798Google ScholarDigital Library
- Josh Gardner, Christopher Brooks and Ryan Baker. 2019. Evaluating the Fairness of Predictive Student Models Through Slicing Analysis. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge (LAK19), pp. 225-234. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2019). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3303772.3303791Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hendrik Drachsler and Wolfgang Greller. 2016. Privacy and analytics: It's a DELICATE issue a checklist for trusted learning analytics. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 89–98. https://doi.org/10.1145/2883851.2883893Google ScholarDigital Library
- Anders Albrechtslund. 2007. Ethics and technology design. Ethics and Information Technology. 9. 63-72. 10.1007/s10676-006-9129-8.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sharon Slade, Paul Prinsloo and Mohammad Khalil. 2019. Learning analytics at the intersections of student trust, disclosure and benefit. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge (LAK19), pp. 235-244. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2019). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3303772.3303796Google ScholarDigital Library
- Phill Long and George Siemens. 2011. Penetrating the Fog: Analytics in Learning and Education. Educause Review 46, 5 (2011), 30–32.Google Scholar
- Sharon Slade and Paul Prinsloo. 2013. Learning analytics: Ethical issues and dilemmas. The American behavioral scientist 57, 10 (Oct. 2013), 1510–1529. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764213479366Google Scholar
- Paul Prinsloo and Sharon Slade. 2017. An elephant in the learning analytics room: the obligation to act. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Learning Analytics & Knowledge Conference (LAK '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 46-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3027385.3027406Google ScholarDigital Library
- Batya Friedman, Peter H. Kahn and Alan Borning. 2002. Value Sensitive Design: Theory and Methods. University of Washington, 2002Google Scholar
- Luciano Floridi. 2014. The onlife manifesto. In The onlife manifesto (pp. 264–13). Cham: Springer. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04093-6_2Google Scholar
- Margus Pedaste and Äli Leijen. 2018. How can advanced technologies support the contemporary learning approach?. In Presented at the 2018 IEEE 18th international conference on advanced learning technologies (ICALT) (pp. 21–23).Google Scholar
- Ali Karime, Basim Hafdh, Abdulmajeed Khaldi, Jihad Mohamad Aljaam and Abdulmotaleb El Saddik. 2012. MeMaPads: Enhancing children's well-being through a physically interactive memory and math games. In Presented at the 2012 IEEE international instrumentation and measurement technology conference (pp. 2563–2566).Google Scholar
- Karolina Baras, Luisa Soares, Norberto Paulo and Regina Barros. 2016. ‘Smartphine‘: Supporting students’ well-being according to their calendar and mood. In Presented at the 2016 international multidisciplinary conference on computer and energy science (SpliTech) (pp. 1–7).Google Scholar
- Aliaksei Andrushevich, Martin Biallas, R. Kistler, Lorenzo Eusebi, Judit Ronai and Judit Valla. 2017. Towards smart working spaces with enhanced well-being and safety of elderly staf. In Presented at the 2017 global internet of things summit (GIoTS) (pp. 1–6).Google Scholar
- André Freitas, Lina Brito, Karolina Baras and José Silva. 2017. Overview of context-sensitive technologies for well-being. In Presented at the 2017 international conference on internet of things for the global community (IoTGC) (pp. 1–8)Google Scholar
- Enrique Garcia-Ceja, Venet Osmani and Oscar Mayora. 2016. Automatic stress detection in working environments from smartphones’ accelerometer data: A frst step. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, 20(4), 1053–1060Google ScholarCross Ref
- Barbara Skinner, Gerard Leavey and Despina Rothi. 2018. Managerialism and teacher professional identity: Impact on well-being among teachers in the UK. Educational Review, 00(00), 1–16.Google Scholar
- Rafael A Calvo and DorianPeters. 2013. Promoting psychological wellbeing: Loftier goals for new technologies [opinion]. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 32(4), 19–21.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Pieter Desmet and Anna Pohlmeyer. 2013. Positive design: An introduction to design for subjective wellbeing. International Journal of Design, 7(3), 5–19Google Scholar
- IEEE Recommended Practice for Assessing the Impact of Autonomous and Intelligent Systems on Human Well-Being. 2020. in IEEE Std 7010-2020 , vol., no., pp.1-96, 1 May 2020, doi:10.1109/IEEESTD.2020.9084219Google Scholar
- Janet Davis and Lisa P Nathan. 2013. Value Sensitive Design: Applications, Adaptations, and Critiques. In Handbook of Ethics, Values, and Technological Design: Sources, Theory, Values and Application Domains, Jeroen van den Hoven, Pieter E Vermaas, and Ibo van de Poel (Eds.). Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6994-6_3-1Google Scholar
- Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD). 2017 OECD-stat better life index- edition 2017, https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=BLIGoogle Scholar
- U.K. Office for National Statistics. 2015. Measuring national well-being: personal well-being in the U.K., 2014 to 2015, http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/wellbeing/measuring-national-well-being/personal-well-being-in-the-uk–2014-15/stb-personal-well-being-in-the-uk–2014-15.html#tab-3–Measuring-personal-well-being-in-the-UKGoogle Scholar
- World Values Survey. 2010–2012. World values survey wave 6 (official aggregate v.20150418), http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSDocumentationWV6.jspGoogle Scholar
- European Social Survey. 2015. Europeans' Personal and Social well-being https://www.europeansocialsurvey.org/docs/findings/ESS6_toplines_issue_5_personal_and_social_wellbeing.pdfGoogle Scholar
- United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. (n.d.) SDG indicators, https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/indicators/indicators-list/Google Scholar
- Tom W. Smith, Peter V. Marsden and Michael Hout. 2013. General social surveys, 1972–2012 [cumulative file]. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research. http://people.wku.edu/douglas.smith/GSS%201972_2012%20Codebook.pdfGoogle Scholar
- United Nations Development Program. 2019. The Human Development Index. http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/human-development-index-hdiGoogle Scholar
- Center for Bhutan Studies and GNH Research. 2015. Third Gross National Happiness http://Questionnairewww.grossnationalhappiness.com/Questionnaire/2015%20GNH%20questionnaire.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Freedom House. 2016. Methodology: Freedom in the World 2016, https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world-2016/methodologyGoogle Scholar
- World Health Organization. 2002. WHOQOL-HIV instrument. Geneva, Switzerland: Author. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/77774/1/WHO_MSD_MER_Rev.2012.01_eng.pdf?ua=1Google Scholar
- European Union. 1998. Minimum set of Euròpean mental health indicators, https://ec.europa.eu/health/ph_projects/1998/monitoring/fp_monitoring_1998_annexe2_09_en.pdfGoogle Scholar
- World Health Organization. 2015. World health organization global reference list of 100 core indicators, http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/77774/1/WHOMSDMER_Rev.2012.01eng.pdf?ua=1Google Scholar
- The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health [NIOSH]. https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/data/default.htmlGoogle Scholar
- European Social Survey Round Five Work Family Well-being Module https://www.europeansocialsurvey.org/docs/round5/questionnaire/ESS5_final_work_family_wellbeing_module_template.pdfGoogle Scholar
- The Global Reporting Initiative. 2002. https://www.aeca.es/old/comisiones/rsc/documentos_fundamentales_rsc/gri/guidelines/gri_guidelines_2002.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Ed Diener. 1984. Subjective Well-Being. Psychological Bulletin 95, no. 3 (May 1984): 542– https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.95.3.542Google ScholarCross Ref
- Felicia A Huppert. 2009. Psychological Well-Being: Evidence Regarding Its Causes and Consequences. Wiley Online Library. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd (10.1111), March 9, 2009. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1758-0854.2009.01008.xGoogle Scholar
- Lexico Dictionary and Oxford University Press. community. https://www.lexico.com/en/Google Scholar
- UNESCO. "Cultural Diversity." http://www.unesco.org/new/en/social-and-human-sciences/themes/international-migration/glossary/cultural-diversityGoogle Scholar
- UNESCO. TVETipedia Glossary. formal learning. https://unevoc.unesco.org/go.php?q=TVETipedia+Glossary+A-Z&filt=all&id=305Google Scholar
- Eorostat Life long learning. https://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/natlinfo/indicators/methodology_sheets/education/life_long_learning.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Collins Dictionary. https://www.collinsdictionary.com/us/Google Scholar
- World Bank. "What is Governance?" The World Bank Group. https://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/#:∼:text=What%20is%20Governance%3F,in%20a%20country%20is%20exercisedGoogle Scholar
- World Health Organization. 2006. Constitution of the World Health Organization. In Basic Documents Forty-Fifth Edition, Supplement, October 2006. https://www.who.int/governance/eb/who_constitution_en.pdfGoogle Scholar
Recommendations
Ethical values and social care robots for older people: an international qualitative study
Values such as respect for autonomy, safety, enablement, independence, privacy and social connectedness should be reflected in the design of social robots. The same values should affect the process by which robots are introduced into the homes of older ...
The Ethics of Machine-Based Learning: Advancing without Losing Humanity
Technological advances in the previous two decades have created an environment of innovation; however, there seems to be sometimes conflicting, emerging educational practices within communities of learners and educators. The central role of the ...
Understanding the Well-Being Impact of a Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Tool: The Case of PyramidApp
Technology-Enhanced Learning for a Free, Safe, and Sustainable WorldAbstractThe global efforts toward evaluating the impact of the use of data-driven technologies on humans’ well-being continue to establish societal guidelines for such systems to remain human-centric, serving humanity’s values and safeguarding well-being. ...
Comments