skip to main content
10.1145/2492517.2492606acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageskddConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Co-training over domain-independent and domain-dependent features for sentiment analysis of an online cancer support community

Published:25 August 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

Sentiment analysis has been widely researched in the domain of online review sites with the aim of getting summarized opinions of product users about different aspects of the products. However, there has been little work focusing on identifying the polarity of sentiments expressed by users in online health communities such as cancer support forums, etc. Online health communities act as a medium through which people share their health concerns with fellow members of the community and get social support. Identifying sentiments expressed by members in a health community can be helpful in understanding dynamics of the community such as dominant health issues, emotional impacts of interactions on members, etc. In this work, we perform sentiment classification of user posts in an online cancer support community (Cancer Survivors Network). We use Domain-dependent and Domain-independent sentiment features as the two complementary views of a post and use them for post classification in a semi-supervised setting using the co-training algorithm. Experimental results demonstrate effectiveness of our methods.

References

  1. K. J. Petrie and J. A. Weinman, Perceptions of health and illness: Current research and applications, 1997, vol. 1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. K. P. Davison, J. W. Pennebaker, and S. S. Dickerson, "Who talks," American Psychologist, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 205--217, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. B. Qiu, K. Zhao, P. Mitra, D. Wu, C. Caragea, J. Yen, G. Greer, and K. Portier, "Get online support, feel better -- sentiment analysis and dynamics in an online cancer survivor community," in SocialComm' 11, 2011, pp. 274--281.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. M. Hu and B. Liu, "Mining and summarizing customer reviews," in SIGKDD '04, ser. KDD '04, 2004, pp. 168--177. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. V. Stoyanov, C. Cardie, and J. Wiebe, "Multi-perspective question answering using the opqa corpus," in HLT-EMNLP '05, ser. HLT '05. Stroudsburg, PA, USA: ACL, 2005, pp. 923--930. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. D. Ly, K. Sugiyama, Z. Lin, and M. Kan, "Product review summarization from a deeper perspective," in JCDL, 2011, pp. 311--314. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. F. Neri, C. Aliprandi, F. Capeci, M. Cuadros, and T. By, "Sentiment analysis on social media," in ASONAM' 12, 2012, pp. 919--926. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. L. Jiang, M. Yu, M. Zhou, X. Liu, and T. Zhao, "Target-dependent twitter sentiment classification," in HLT '11, vol. 1, 2011, pp. 151--160. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. B. Pang, L. Lee, and S. Vaithyanathan, "Thumbs up?: sentiment classification using machine learning techniques," in ACL-02, ser. EMNLP '02, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 2002, pp. 79--86. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. B. Pang and L. Lee, "A sentimental education: Sentiment analysis using subjectivity summarization based on minimum cuts," in ACL '04, 2004, p. 271. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. R. McDonald, K. Hannan, T. Neylon, M. Wells, and J. Reynar, "Structured models for fine-to-coarse sentiment analysis," in ACL '07, vol. 45, 2007, p. 432.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. X. Wan, "Co-training for cross-lingual sentiment classification," in ACL '09, 2009, pp. 235--243. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. J. Kumar Pal and A. Saha, "Identifying themes in social media and detecting sentiments," in ASONAM'10, 2010, pp. 452--457. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. A. Stavrianou, J. Velcin, and J.-H. Chauchat, "Definition and measures of an opinion model for mining forums," in ASONAM'09. IEEE, 2009, pp. 188--193. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. P. D. Turney, "Thumbs up or thumbs down?: semantic orientation applied to unsupervised classification of reviews," in ACL '02, ser. ACL '02, 2002, pp. 417--424. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. M. Thelwall, K. Buckley, and G. Paltoglou, "Sentiment strength detection for the social web," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. A. Blum and T. Mitchell, "Combining labeled and unlabeled data with co-training," in COLT '98, ser. COLT' 98. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 1998, pp. 92--100. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. M.-F. Balcan, A. Blum, and Y. Ke, "Co-training and expansion: Towards bridging theory and practice," Computer Science Department, p. 154, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. M. Hall, E. Frank, G. Holmes, B. Pfahringer, P. Reutemann, and I. Witten, "The weka data mining software: an update," ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 10--18, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    ASONAM '13: Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining
    August 2013
    1558 pages
    ISBN:9781450322409
    DOI:10.1145/2492517

    Copyright © 2013 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 25 August 2013

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate116of549submissions,21%

    Upcoming Conference

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader