ABSTRACT
The hardware-inspired volume user interface model that is in use across all of today's operating systems is the source of several usability issues. One of them is that restoring the volume of a muted application can require an inappropriately long troubleshooting process: in addition to manipulating the application's volume and mute controls, users may also have to visit the system's volume control panel to find and adjust additional controls there. The "flat" volume control model presented in this paper eliminates this and other problems by hiding the hardware-oriented volume model from the user. Using the flat model, users use one slider per application to indicate how loud they want the respective applications to play; the slider then internally adjusts all hardware volume variables necessary to obtain the requested output. By offering a single point of control for each application, the flat model simplifies controlling application volume and restoring muted applications. In our studies, participants completed all four volume control and mixing tasks faster and with less error when using the flat model than when using the existing hardware-oriented volume control model. Participants also indicated a subjective preference for the flat model over the existing model.
- Aoki, P. et al. The mad hatter's cocktail party: a social mobile audio space supporting multiple simultaneous conversations. In Proc CHI'03, pp. 425--432.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Back, M., Cohen, J., Gold, R., Harrison, S., and Minneman, S. Listen reader: an electronically augmented paper-based book. In Proc CHI'01, pp. 23--29.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Baudisch, P. Don't Click, Paint! Using Toggle Maps to Manipulate Sets of Toggle Switches. In Proc. UIST'98, pp. 65--66.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Brewster, S. Overcoming the Lack of Screen Space on Mobile Computers. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 6(3):188--205, May 2002.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Brewster, S. Using non-speech sounds to provide navigation cues. TOCHI 5(3):224--259, Sept. 1998.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Carr, D.A. Specification of Interface Interaction Objects. In Proc. CHI'94, pp. 372--378.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Freeman, W.T. and Weissman, C.D. Television Control by Hand Gesture. In IEEE Intl. Workshop on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition, 1995.]]Google Scholar
- Greenberg, S. and Boyle, M. Customizable physical interfaces for interacting with conventional applications. In Proc. UIST'02, pp. 31--40.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- http://www.griffintechnology.com/products/powermate]]Google Scholar
- Kohle, M. Special Topics of Gesture Recognition Applied in Intelligent Home Environments. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1371:285--296, 1998.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kramer, G. An Introduction to auditory displays. In Auditory Display: Sonification, Audification, and Auditory Interfaces. Addison-Wesley 1994, pp 1--78.]]Google Scholar
- Lee, C.H., Kim, S., Chae, C.S., Chung, K.H. Sound: an emotional element of interactions a case study of a microwave oven. In Proc. DIS'00, pp. 174--182.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Masui, T., and Siio, I. Real-World Graphical User Interfaces. In Proc. HUC'00, pp. 72--84.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Naef, M., Staadt, O., and Gross, M. Spatialized audio rendering for immersive virtual environments. In Proc. VR Software and Technology, pp. 55--72.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Plaisant, C., Wallace, D. Touchscreen Toggle Switches: Push or slide? Design issues and usability study. University of Maryland, CS-Tech Report 2557, 1990.]]Google Scholar
- Rushby, J. Analyzing cockpit interfaces using formal methods. In H. Bowman (editor), Elsevier Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science 43, Oct. 2000.]]Google Scholar
- Shneiderman, B., Designing the User Interface: Strategies for effective human-computer interaction, Third edition, Reading MA: Addison-Wesley, 1998]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Singer, A., Hindus, D., Stifelman, L. and White, S. Tangible progress: less is more in Somewire audio spaces. In Proc CHI'99, pp 104--111.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wickens, C.D. and Hollands, J.G. Engineering Psychology and Human Performance. Third Edition, Prentice Hall, NJ, 2000.]]Google Scholar
- Jones, D. The cognitive psychology of auditory distraction. The 1997 BPS Broadbent Lecture. British Journal of Psychology, Vol 90(2), May 1999, 167--187.]]Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Flat volume control: improving usability by hiding the volume control hierarchy in the user interface
Recommendations
Sonic gems: exploring the potential of audio recording as a form of sentimental memory capture
BCS-HCI '08: Proceedings of the 22nd British HCI Group Annual Conference on People and Computers: Culture, Creativity, Interaction - Volume 1This paper presents an exploratory study exploring the potential of audio recording as a form of sentimental memory capture. Drawing on data from four family households, we spotlight participants' attitudes towards sounds and audio recording, their ...
Treemaps to visualise and navigate speech audio
OzCHI '13: Proceedings of the 25th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference: Augmentation, Application, Innovation, CollaborationAudio recordings are usually treated as one unbreakable and sequential document. Most interfaces only support basic audio navigation controls such as play, pause, forward, and rewind. However, by extracting meaningful information from audio, such as the ...
AudioGPS: Spatial Audio Navigation with a Minimal Attention Interface
In this paper we describe a prototype spatial audio user interface for a Global Positioning System (GPS). The interface is designed to allow mobile users to carry out location tasks while their eyes, hands or attention are otherwise engaged. Audio user ...
Comments