skip to main content
10.1145/985692.985693acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Acquiring in situ training data for context-aware ubiquitous computing applications

Published:25 April 2004Publication History

ABSTRACT

Ubiquitous, context-aware computer systems may ultimately enable computer applications that naturally and usefully respond to a user's everyday activity. Although new algorithms that can automatically detect context from wearable and environmental sensor systems show promise, many of the most flexible and robust systems use probabilistic detection algorithms that require extensive libraries of training data with labeled examples. In this paper, we describe the need for such training data and some challenges we have identified when trying to collect it while testing three context-detection systems for ubiquitous computing and mobile applications.

References

  1. G.D. Abowd and E.D. Mynatt. Charting past, present, and future research in ubiquitous computing. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 7(1):29--58, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. K. Aminian, P. Robert, E. Jequier, and Y. Schutz. Estimation of speed and incline of walking using neural network. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 44(3):743--746, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. L. Bao. Physical Activity Recognition from Acceleration Data under Semi-Naturalistic Conditions. M.Eng. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. L. Bao and S.S. Intille. Activity recognition from user-annotated acceleration data. In Proceedings of Pervasive 2004: the Second International Conference on Pervasive Computing. Springer, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. J. Beaudin. From Personal Experience to Design: Externalizing the Homeowner's Needs Assessment Process. S.M. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. J.B. Bussmann, W.L. Martens, J.H. Tulen, F.C. Schasfoort, H.J. van den Berg-Emons, and H.J. Stam. Measuring daily behavior using ambulatory accelerometry: the Activity Monitor. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 33(3):349--56, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. G.S. Chambers, S. Venkatesh, G.A.W. West, and H.H. Bui. Hierarchical recognition of intentional human gestures for sports video annotation. In International Conference on Pattern Recognition, pages 1082--5, Quebec City, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. F. Foerster, M. Smeja, and J. Fahrenberg. Detection of posture and motion by accelerometry: a validation in ambulatory monitoring. Computers in Human Behavior, 15:571--583, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. S.S. Intille, E. Munguia Tapia, J. Rondoni, J. Beaudin, C. Kukla, S. Agarwal, L. Bao, and K. Larson. Tools for studying behavior and technology in natural settings. In A.K. Dey, A. Schmidt, and J.F. McCarthy, editors, Proceedings of UbiComp 2003: Ubiquitous Computing, volume LNCS 2864, pages 157--174. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. S.S. Intille, J. Rondoni, C. Kukla, I. Anacona, and L. Bao. A context-aware experience sampling tool. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: Extended Abstracts, pages 972--973. ACM Press, NY, NY, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. S.-W. Lee and K. Mase. Recognition of walking behaviors for pedestrian navigation. In Proceedings of 2001 IEEE Conference on Control Applications (CCA01), pages 1152--5. IEEE Press, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. P. Lukowicz, H. Junker, M. Stager, T.V. Buren, and G. Troster. WearNET: a distributed multi-sensor system for context aware wearables. In G. Borriello and L.E. Holmquist, editors, Proceedings of UbiComp 2002: Ubiquitous Computing, volume LNCS 2498, pages 361--70. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. M. Makikawa and H. Iizumi. Development of an ambulatory physical activity monitoring device and its application for categorization of actions in daily life. In Proceedings of the 8th World Congress on Medical Informatics: MEDINFO 95, pages 747--750. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. M. Makikawa, S. Kurata, Y. Higa, Y. Araki, and R. Tokue. Ambulatory monitoring of behavior in daily life by accelerometers set at both-near-sides of the joint. In V. Patel, R. Rogers, and R. Haux, editors, Proceedings of MedInfo 2001, volume 10(Pt) 1, pages 840--3. IOS Press, Amsterdam, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. J. Mantyjarvi, J. Himberg, and T. Seppanen. Recognizing human motion with multiple acceleration sensors. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, pages 747--52. IEEE Press, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. E. Munguia Tapia, S.S. Intille, and K. Larson. Activity recognition in the home setting using simple and ubiquitous sensors. In Proceedings of Pervasive 2004: the Second International Conference on Pervasive Computing. Springer, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. S.M. Patterson, D.S. Krantz, L.C. Montgomery, P.A. Deuster, S.M. Hedges, and L.E. Nebel. Automated physical activity monitoring: validation and comparison with physiological and self-report measures. Psychophysiology, 30(3):296--305, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. M.R. Puyau, A.L. Adolph, F.A. Vohra, and N.F. Butte. Validation and calibration of physical activity monitors in children. Obesity Research, 10(3):150--7, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. J.R. Quinlan. C4.5 : Programs for Machine Learning. The Morgan Kaufmann series in machine learning. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Mateo, CA, 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. L.R. Rabiner and B.-H. Juang. Fundamentals Of Speech Recognition. PTR Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. C. Randell and H. Muller. Context awareness by analysing accelerometer data. In B. MacIntyre and B. Iannucci, editors, The Fourth International Symposium on Wearable Computers, pages 175--176. IEEE Press, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. J. Rondoni. A Context-Aware Application for Experience Sampling and Machine Learning. M.Eng. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. M. Uiterwaal, E.B. Glerum, H.J. Busser, and R.C. van Lummel. Ambulatory monitoring of physical activity in working situations, a validation study. Journal of Medical Engineering & Technology., 22(4):168--72, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. K. Van Laerhoven and O. Cakmakci. What shall we teach our pants? In The Fourth International Symposium on Wearable Computers, pages 77--83. IEEE Press, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Acquiring in situ training data for context-aware ubiquitous computing applications

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '04: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2004
      742 pages
      ISBN:1581137028
      DOI:10.1145/985692

      Copyright © 2004 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 25 April 2004

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader