ABSTRACT
Ubiquitous, context-aware computer systems may ultimately enable computer applications that naturally and usefully respond to a user's everyday activity. Although new algorithms that can automatically detect context from wearable and environmental sensor systems show promise, many of the most flexible and robust systems use probabilistic detection algorithms that require extensive libraries of training data with labeled examples. In this paper, we describe the need for such training data and some challenges we have identified when trying to collect it while testing three context-detection systems for ubiquitous computing and mobile applications.
- G.D. Abowd and E.D. Mynatt. Charting past, present, and future research in ubiquitous computing. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 7(1):29--58, 2000. Google ScholarDigital Library
- K. Aminian, P. Robert, E. Jequier, and Y. Schutz. Estimation of speed and incline of walking using neural network. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 44(3):743--746, 1995.Google ScholarCross Ref
- L. Bao. Physical Activity Recognition from Acceleration Data under Semi-Naturalistic Conditions. M.Eng. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2003.Google Scholar
- L. Bao and S.S. Intille. Activity recognition from user-annotated acceleration data. In Proceedings of Pervasive 2004: the Second International Conference on Pervasive Computing. Springer, 2004.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. Beaudin. From Personal Experience to Design: Externalizing the Homeowner's Needs Assessment Process. S.M. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2003.Google Scholar
- J.B. Bussmann, W.L. Martens, J.H. Tulen, F.C. Schasfoort, H.J. van den Berg-Emons, and H.J. Stam. Measuring daily behavior using ambulatory accelerometry: the Activity Monitor. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 33(3):349--56, 2001.Google Scholar
- G.S. Chambers, S. Venkatesh, G.A.W. West, and H.H. Bui. Hierarchical recognition of intentional human gestures for sports video annotation. In International Conference on Pattern Recognition, pages 1082--5, Quebec City, 2002. Google ScholarDigital Library
- F. Foerster, M. Smeja, and J. Fahrenberg. Detection of posture and motion by accelerometry: a validation in ambulatory monitoring. Computers in Human Behavior, 15:571--583, 1999.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S.S. Intille, E. Munguia Tapia, J. Rondoni, J. Beaudin, C. Kukla, S. Agarwal, L. Bao, and K. Larson. Tools for studying behavior and technology in natural settings. In A.K. Dey, A. Schmidt, and J.F. McCarthy, editors, Proceedings of UbiComp 2003: Ubiquitous Computing, volume LNCS 2864, pages 157--174. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 2003.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S.S. Intille, J. Rondoni, C. Kukla, I. Anacona, and L. Bao. A context-aware experience sampling tool. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: Extended Abstracts, pages 972--973. ACM Press, NY, NY, 2003. Google ScholarDigital Library
- S.-W. Lee and K. Mase. Recognition of walking behaviors for pedestrian navigation. In Proceedings of 2001 IEEE Conference on Control Applications (CCA01), pages 1152--5. IEEE Press, 2001.Google Scholar
- P. Lukowicz, H. Junker, M. Stager, T.V. Buren, and G. Troster. WearNET: a distributed multi-sensor system for context aware wearables. In G. Borriello and L.E. Holmquist, editors, Proceedings of UbiComp 2002: Ubiquitous Computing, volume LNCS 2498, pages 361--70. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 2002. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Makikawa and H. Iizumi. Development of an ambulatory physical activity monitoring device and its application for categorization of actions in daily life. In Proceedings of the 8th World Congress on Medical Informatics: MEDINFO 95, pages 747--750. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1995.Google Scholar
- M. Makikawa, S. Kurata, Y. Higa, Y. Araki, and R. Tokue. Ambulatory monitoring of behavior in daily life by accelerometers set at both-near-sides of the joint. In V. Patel, R. Rogers, and R. Haux, editors, Proceedings of MedInfo 2001, volume 10(Pt) 1, pages 840--3. IOS Press, Amsterdam, 2001.Google Scholar
- J. Mantyjarvi, J. Himberg, and T. Seppanen. Recognizing human motion with multiple acceleration sensors. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, pages 747--52. IEEE Press, 2001.Google ScholarCross Ref
- E. Munguia Tapia, S.S. Intille, and K. Larson. Activity recognition in the home setting using simple and ubiquitous sensors. In Proceedings of Pervasive 2004: the Second International Conference on Pervasive Computing. Springer, 2004.Google Scholar
- S.M. Patterson, D.S. Krantz, L.C. Montgomery, P.A. Deuster, S.M. Hedges, and L.E. Nebel. Automated physical activity monitoring: validation and comparison with physiological and self-report measures. Psychophysiology, 30(3):296--305, 1993.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M.R. Puyau, A.L. Adolph, F.A. Vohra, and N.F. Butte. Validation and calibration of physical activity monitors in children. Obesity Research, 10(3):150--7, 2002.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J.R. Quinlan. C4.5 : Programs for Machine Learning. The Morgan Kaufmann series in machine learning. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Mateo, CA, 1993. Google ScholarDigital Library
- L.R. Rabiner and B.-H. Juang. Fundamentals Of Speech Recognition. PTR Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1993. Google ScholarDigital Library
- C. Randell and H. Muller. Context awareness by analysing accelerometer data. In B. MacIntyre and B. Iannucci, editors, The Fourth International Symposium on Wearable Computers, pages 175--176. IEEE Press, 2000. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Rondoni. A Context-Aware Application for Experience Sampling and Machine Learning. M.Eng. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2003.Google Scholar
- M. Uiterwaal, E.B. Glerum, H.J. Busser, and R.C. van Lummel. Ambulatory monitoring of physical activity in working situations, a validation study. Journal of Medical Engineering & Technology., 22(4):168--72, 1998.Google ScholarCross Ref
- K. Van Laerhoven and O. Cakmakci. What shall we teach our pants? In The Fourth International Symposium on Wearable Computers, pages 77--83. IEEE Press, 2000. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Acquiring in situ training data for context-aware ubiquitous computing applications
Recommendations
Ubiquitous mobile instrumentation
UbiComp '13 Adjunct: Proceedings of the 2013 ACM conference on Pervasive and ubiquitous computing adjunct publicationMobile phones allow us to reach people anywhere, at anytime. In addition to the benefits for end users, researchers and developers can also benefit from the powerful devices that participants carry on a daily basis. Collectively, mobile phones form a ...
A context based storage for ubiquitous computing applications
EUSAI '04: Proceedings of the 2nd European Union symposium on Ambient intelligenceContext-aware systems are computing systems that provide relevant services and information to users based on their situational conditions [1]. Here, first we present a context based storage system that uses context to aid in the capture and access of ...
A context-aware recognition survey for data collection using ubiquitous sensors in the home
CHI EA '05: CHI '05 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing SystemsIdentifying what people do in the home can both inform ubiquitous computing application design decisions and provide training data to the machine learning algorithms used in their implementation. This paper describes an unsupervised technique in which ...
Comments