ABSTRACT
The choice of communicative modality will greatly affect the way cooperative work is coordinated. Computer supported coordination brings about changes to communicative modalities-often the change is from oral to artifact based coordination. In order to inform the designed changes in modality we need to understand the characteristics of individual modes of coordination, and we need to compare modes before changes are implemented. Within this context the paper has two objectives: (1) to characterize oral and artifact based coordination, and (2) to establish an initial set of dimensions which will support a comparison between the two modes of coordination. The basis for both points is empirical: a field study of oral coordination in maritime operations, and a study of artifact based coordination in software engineering.
- 1.Agostini, A., et al. A Prototype of an Integrated Coordination Support System. CSCW Journal, 1994. 2(4).]]Google Scholar
- 2.Andersen, P.B. A theory of computer semiotics. Semiotic approaches to construction and assessment of computer systems. 1997, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 3.Andersen, P.B., M. Nielsen, and P. Carstensen. Verbal and artifact based coordination. In Third International Workshop in Organizational Semiotics. 2000. Stafford: University of Stafford.]]Google Scholar
- 4.Carstensen, P. Computer Supported Coordination. 1996, Roskilde University, Department of Computer Science.]]Google Scholar
- 5.Fitzpatrick, G., W.J. Tolone, and S.M. Kaplan. Work, Locales and Distributed Social Worlds, in ECSCW '95. Proceedings of the Third European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. 1995, Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht. p. 1-16.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 6.Grinter, R.E. Workflow systems: Occasions for success and failure. CSCW Journal, 2000. 9(2): p. 157-187.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 8.Harper, R., et al., Ordering the Skies: The Sociology of Coordination Work. 1994, London: Routledge.]]Google Scholar
- 9.Harper, R.R., J.A. Hughes, and D.Z. Shapiro. The Functionality of Flight Strips in ATC Work. The report for the Civil Aviation Authority. 1989, Lancaster Sociotechnics Group, Lancaster University:]]Google Scholar
- 10.Heath, C. and P. Luff. Collaboration and Control. Crisis Management and Multimedia Technology in London Underground Control Rooms. CSCW Journal, 1992. 1(1-2): p. 69-94.]]Google Scholar
- 11.Hughes, J.A., et al. The Automation of Air Traffic Control. 1988, Lancaster Sociotechnics Group, Department of Sociology, Lancaster University.]]Google Scholar
- 12.Hutchins, E. Cognition in the Wild. 1995, Cambridge, Mass., and London, England: The MIT Press.]]Google Scholar
- 13.Kasbi, C. and M.d. Montmollin, Activity Without Decision and Responsibility: The Case of Nuclear Power Plants. In Distributed Decision Making. Cognitive Models for Cooperative Work, J. Rasmussen, B. Brehmer, and J. Leplat, Editor. 1991, John Wiley & Sons: Chichester. p. 275-283.]]Google Scholar
- 14.Kreifelts, T., et al. Experiences with the DOMINO Office Procedure System, in ECSCW '91. Proceedings of the Second European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work. 1991, Kluwer Academic Publishers: Amsterdam. p. 117- 130.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 15.Malone, T.W. and K. Crowston. The Interdisciplinary Study of Coordination. ACM Computing Surveys, 1994. 26(1).]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 16.Malone, T.W., et al. Semistructured messages are surprisingly useful for computer-supported coordination. TOIS, 1987. 5(2): p. 115-131.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 17.Malone, T.W., H.-Y. Lai, and C. Fry. Experiments with Oval: A Radically Tailorable Tool for Cooperative Work. In CSCW '92. Proceedings of the Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work. 1992, ACM Press: New York. p. 289-297.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 18.Malone, T.W., H.-Y. Lai, and C. Fry. Experiments with Oval: A Radically Tailorable Tool for Cooperative Work. TOIS, 1995. 13(2): p. 177-205.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 19.Schmidt, K. and C. Simone. Coordination mechanisms: Towards a conceptual foundation for CSCW systems design. CSCW Journal, 1996. 5(2-3): p. 155-2000.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 20.Strauss, A. Work and the Division of Labor. The Sociological Quarterly, 1985. 26(1): p. 1-19.]]Google Scholar
- 21.Strauss, A. Continual Permutations of Action. 1994, New York: Aldine de Gruyter.]]Google Scholar
- 22.Suchman, L.A. Plans and situated actions. The problem of human-machine communication. 1987, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 23.Winograd, T. and F. Flores. Understanding Computers and Cognition: A New Foundation for Design. 1986, Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corp.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Characterizing modes of coordination: a comparison between oral and artifact based coordination
Recommendations
Vicious and Virtuous Cycles in Global Virtual Team Role Coordination
HICSS '05: Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'05) - Track 1 - Volume 01Role coordination is an important aspect of task performance in teams. This phenomenon has received little attention in global virtual teams (GVT) with their coordination hurdles. An exploratory study of two GVT was conducted to investigate role ...
Characterizing in-Car Conversational Speech of Different Dialogue Modes
ICICIC '06: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Innovative Computing, Information and Control - Volume 2The dependency of conversational utterances on the mode of dialogue is analyzed. A speech corpus of 800 speakers collected under three different modes, i.e., talking to a human operator, an WOZ system and an ASR system, is used for analysis. Some ...
Effect of the Coordination Modes in Supporting Group Multiple Criteria Decision Making in a Distributed and Asynchronous Environment
CRIWG '02: Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Groupware: Design, Implementation and UseTo solve a multiple criteria decision problem by a collaborative group is necessary to have an adequate coordination process. This paper discusses an on-going research project, which aims to develop an internet-based Multiple Criteria Group Decision ...
Comments