skip to main content
10.1145/500286.500301acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgroupConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Characterizing modes of coordination: a comparison between oral and artifact based coordination

Published:30 September 2001Publication History

ABSTRACT

The choice of communicative modality will greatly affect the way cooperative work is coordinated. Computer supported coordination brings about changes to communicative modalities-often the change is from oral to artifact based coordination. In order to inform the designed changes in modality we need to understand the characteristics of individual modes of coordination, and we need to compare modes before changes are implemented. Within this context the paper has two objectives: (1) to characterize oral and artifact based coordination, and (2) to establish an initial set of dimensions which will support a comparison between the two modes of coordination. The basis for both points is empirical: a field study of oral coordination in maritime operations, and a study of artifact based coordination in software engineering.

References

  1. 1.Agostini, A., et al. A Prototype of an Integrated Coordination Support System. CSCW Journal, 1994. 2(4).]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.Andersen, P.B. A theory of computer semiotics. Semiotic approaches to construction and assessment of computer systems. 1997, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. 3.Andersen, P.B., M. Nielsen, and P. Carstensen. Verbal and artifact based coordination. In Third International Workshop in Organizational Semiotics. 2000. Stafford: University of Stafford.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.Carstensen, P. Computer Supported Coordination. 1996, Roskilde University, Department of Computer Science.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.Fitzpatrick, G., W.J. Tolone, and S.M. Kaplan. Work, Locales and Distributed Social Worlds, in ECSCW '95. Proceedings of the Third European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. 1995, Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht. p. 1-16.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. 6.Grinter, R.E. Workflow systems: Occasions for success and failure. CSCW Journal, 2000. 9(2): p. 157-187.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. 8.Harper, R., et al., Ordering the Skies: The Sociology of Coordination Work. 1994, London: Routledge.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. 9.Harper, R.R., J.A. Hughes, and D.Z. Shapiro. The Functionality of Flight Strips in ATC Work. The report for the Civil Aviation Authority. 1989, Lancaster Sociotechnics Group, Lancaster University:]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. 10.Heath, C. and P. Luff. Collaboration and Control. Crisis Management and Multimedia Technology in London Underground Control Rooms. CSCW Journal, 1992. 1(1-2): p. 69-94.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. 11.Hughes, J.A., et al. The Automation of Air Traffic Control. 1988, Lancaster Sociotechnics Group, Department of Sociology, Lancaster University.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. 12.Hutchins, E. Cognition in the Wild. 1995, Cambridge, Mass., and London, England: The MIT Press.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. 13.Kasbi, C. and M.d. Montmollin, Activity Without Decision and Responsibility: The Case of Nuclear Power Plants. In Distributed Decision Making. Cognitive Models for Cooperative Work, J. Rasmussen, B. Brehmer, and J. Leplat, Editor. 1991, John Wiley & Sons: Chichester. p. 275-283.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. 14.Kreifelts, T., et al. Experiences with the DOMINO Office Procedure System, in ECSCW '91. Proceedings of the Second European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work. 1991, Kluwer Academic Publishers: Amsterdam. p. 117- 130.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. 15.Malone, T.W. and K. Crowston. The Interdisciplinary Study of Coordination. ACM Computing Surveys, 1994. 26(1).]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. 16.Malone, T.W., et al. Semistructured messages are surprisingly useful for computer-supported coordination. TOIS, 1987. 5(2): p. 115-131.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. 17.Malone, T.W., H.-Y. Lai, and C. Fry. Experiments with Oval: A Radically Tailorable Tool for Cooperative Work. In CSCW '92. Proceedings of the Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work. 1992, ACM Press: New York. p. 289-297.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. 18.Malone, T.W., H.-Y. Lai, and C. Fry. Experiments with Oval: A Radically Tailorable Tool for Cooperative Work. TOIS, 1995. 13(2): p. 177-205.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. 19.Schmidt, K. and C. Simone. Coordination mechanisms: Towards a conceptual foundation for CSCW systems design. CSCW Journal, 1996. 5(2-3): p. 155-2000.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. 20.Strauss, A. Work and the Division of Labor. The Sociological Quarterly, 1985. 26(1): p. 1-19.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. 21.Strauss, A. Continual Permutations of Action. 1994, New York: Aldine de Gruyter.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. 22.Suchman, L.A. Plans and situated actions. The problem of human-machine communication. 1987, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. 23.Winograd, T. and F. Flores. Understanding Computers and Cognition: A New Foundation for Design. 1986, Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corp.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Characterizing modes of coordination: a comparison between oral and artifact based coordination

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        GROUP '01: Proceedings of the 2001 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work
        September 2001
        310 pages
        ISBN:1581132948
        DOI:10.1145/500286

        Copyright © 2001 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 30 September 2001

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate125of405submissions,31%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader