skip to main content
10.1145/3460231.3474232acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesrecsysConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

“Serving Each User”: Supporting Different Eating Goals Through a Multi-List Recommender Interface

Authors Info & Claims
Published:13 September 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

Food recommender systems optimize towards a user’s current preferences. However, appetites may vary, in the sense that users might seek healthy recipes today and look for unhealthy meals tomorrow. In this paper, we propose a novel approach in the food domain to diversify recommendations across different lists to ‘serve’ different users goals, compiled in a multi-list food recommender interface. We evaluated our interface in a 2 (single list vs multiple lists) x 2 (without or with explanations) between-subject user study (N = 366), linking choice behavior and evaluation aspects through the user experience framework. Our multi-list interface was evaluated more favorably than a single-list interface, in terms of diversity and choice satisfaction. Moreover, it triggered changes in food choices, even though these choices were less healthy than those made in the single-list interface.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

Starke2021.mp4

mp4

20.4 MB

References

  1. Yuki M Asano and Gesa Biermann. 2019. Rising adoption and retention of meat-free diets in online recipe data. Nature Sustainability 2, 7 (2019), 621–627.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. James R. Bettman, Mary Frances Luce, and John W. Payne. 1998. Constructive Consumer Choice Processes. Journal of Consumer Research 25, 3 (Dec 1998), 187–217.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Dirk Bollen, Bart P Knijnenburg, Martijn C Willemsen, and Mark Graus. 2010. Understanding choice overload in recommender systems. In Proceedings of the fourth ACM conference on Recommender systems. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 63–70.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Li Chen and Pearl Pu. 2010. Eye-tracking study of user behavior in recommender interfaces. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) 6075 LNCS, June 2010(2010), 375–380.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Li Chen and Pearl Pu. 2012. Critiquing-based recommenders: survey and emerging trends. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 22, 1 (2012), 125–150.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Alexander Chernev, Ulf Böckenholt, and Joseph Goodman. 2015. Choice overload: A conceptual review and meta-analysis. Journal of Consumer Psychology 25, 2 (2015), 333–358.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. David Elsweiler, Christoph Trattner, and Morgan Harvey. 2017. Exploiting food choice biases for healthier recipe recommendation. In Proceedings of the 40th international acm sigir conference on research and development in information retrieval. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 575–584.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Jill Freyne and Shlomo Berkovsky. 2010. Intelligent food planning: personalized recipe recommendation. In Proceedings of the 15th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 321–324.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Mouzhi Ge, Carla Delgado-Battenfeld, and Dietmar Jannach. 2010. Beyond accuracy: evaluating recommender systems by coverage and serendipity. In Proceedings of the fourth ACM conference on Recommender systems. ACM, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 257–260.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Carlos A Gomez-Uribe and Neil Hunt. 2015. The netflix recommender system: Algorithms, business value, and innovation. ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems (TMIS) 6, 4(2015), 1–19.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Rong Hu and Pearl Pu. 2011. Enhancing recommendation diversity with organization interfaces. In Proceedings of the 16th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 347–350.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. J.Z. Ilich, J.A. Vollono, and R.A. Brownbill. 1999. Impact of Nutritional Knowledge on Food Choices and Dietary Intake of College Students. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 99, 9, Supplement(1999), A89.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Sheena S Iyengar and Mark R Lepper. 2000. When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing?Journal of personality and social psychology 79, 6(2000), 995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Dietmar Jannach, Mathias Jesse, Michael Jugovac, and Christoph Trattner. 2021. Exploring Multi-List User Interfaces for Similar-Item Recommendations. In Proceedings of the 29th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 224–228.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Rex B Kline. 2015. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford publications, New York, NY, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Bart P. Knijnenburg and Martijn C. Willemsen. 2015. Evaluating recommender systems with user experiments. Springer, New York, NY, USA, 309–352.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Bart P. Knijnenburg, Martijn C. Willemsen, Zeno Gantner, Hakan Soncu, and Chris Newell. 2012. Explaining the user experience of recommender systems. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 22, 4–5 (2012), 441–504.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Ricardo Gomes Lage, Frederico Durao, Peter Dolog, and Avaré Stewart. 2011. Applicability of recommender systems to medical surveillance systems. In Proceedings of the second international workshop on Web science and information exchange in the medical web. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1–6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Cataldo Musto, Christoph Trattner, Alain Starke, and Giovanni Semeraro. 2020. Towards a knowledge-aware food recommender system exploiting holistic user models. In Proceedings of the 28th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 333–337.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Theodora Nanou, George Lekakos, and Konstantinos Fouskas. 2010. The effects of recommendations’ presentation on persuasion and satisfaction in a movie recommender system. Multimedia Systems 16, 4-5 (2010), 219–230.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Department of Health UK and Food Standards Agency. 2016. Guide to creating a front of pack (FoP) nutrition label for pre-packed products sold through retail outlets. (2016). https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/566251/FoP_Nutrition_labelling_UK_guidance.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Florian Pecune, Lucile Callebert, and Stacy Marsella. 2020. A Recommender System for Healthy and Personalized Recipes Recommendations.. In HealthRecSys@ RecSys. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 15–20.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Bartosz Porebski, Karol Przystalski, and Leszek Nowak. 2011. Building PHP Applications with Symfony, CakePHP, and Zend Framework. John Wiley and Sons, Indianapolis, IN, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Pearl Pu and Li Chen. 2007. Trust-inspiring explanation interfaces for recommender systems. Knowledge-Based Systems 20, 6 (2007), 542–556.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Pearl Pu, Li Chen, and Rong Hu. 2011. A user-centric evaluation framework for recommender systems. In Proceedings of the fifth ACM conference on Recommender systems. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 157–164.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Hanna Schäfer, Santiago Hors-Fraile, Raghav Pavan Karumur, André Calero Valdez, Alan Said, Helma Torkamaan, Tom Ulmer, and Christoph Trattner. 2017. Towards health (aware) recommender systems. In Proceedings of the 2017 international conference on digital health. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 157–161.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Benjamin Scheibehenne, Rainer Greifeneder, and Peter M Todd. 2010. Can there ever be too many options? A meta-analytic review of choice overload. Journal of consumer research 37, 3 (2010), 409–425.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Alain Starke. 2019. RecSys Challenges in achieving sustainable eating habits.. In HealthRecSys@RecSys. CEUR-WS, Aachen, DE, 29–30.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Alain Starke, Martijn Willemsen, and Chris Snijders. 2017. Effective User Interface Designs to Increase Energy-efficient Behavior in a Rasch-based Energy Recommender System. In Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM Conference on Recommender Systems(RecSys ’17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 65–73. https://doi.org/10.1145/3109859.3109902Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Alain D Starke, Elias Kløverød Kløverød Brynestad, Sveinung Hauge, and Louise Sandal Løkeland. 2021. Nudging Healthy Choices in Food Search Through List Re-Ranking. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 29th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 293–298.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Alain D. Starke and Christoph Trattner. 2021. Promoting Healthy Food Choices Online: A Case for Multi-List Recommender Systems. In HEALTHI’21: Joint Proceedings of ACM IUI 2021 Workshops. CEUR-WS, Aachen, DE, 3 pages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Alain D Starke, Martijn C Willemsen, and Chris Snijders. 2020. With a little help from my peers: Depicting social norms in a recommender interface to promote energy conservation. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 568–578.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Alain D Starke, Martijn C Willemsen, and Christoph Trattner. 2021. Nudging Healthy Choices in Food Search Through Visual Attractiveness. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence 4 (2021), 20.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Nava Tintarev and Judith Masthoff. 2012. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Explanations for Recommender Systems. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 22, 4–5 (Oct 2012), 399–439.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Christoph Trattner and David Elsweiler. 2017. Investigating the healthiness of internet-sourced recipes: implications for meal planning and recommender systems. In Proceedings of the 26th international conference on world wide web. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 489–498.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Christoph Trattner and David Elsweiler. 2019. Food Recommendations. In Collaborative recommendations: Algorithms, practical challenges and applications. World Scientific, 653–685.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Christoph Trattner, David Elsweiler, and Simon Howard. 2017. Estimating the healthiness of internet recipes: a cross-sectional study. Frontiers in public health 5 (2017), 16.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Christoph Trattner and Dietmar Jannach. 2020. Learning to recommend similar items from human judgments. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 30, 1 (March 2020), 1–49.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Christoph Trattner, Dominik Moesslang, and David Elsweiler. 2018. On the predictability of the popularity of online recipes. EPJ Data Science 7, 1 (2018), 1–39.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    RecSys '21: Proceedings of the 15th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems
    September 2021
    883 pages
    ISBN:9781450384582
    DOI:10.1145/3460231

    Copyright © 2021 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 13 September 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate254of1,295submissions,20%

    Upcoming Conference

    RecSys '24
    18th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems
    October 14 - 18, 2024
    Bari , Italy

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format