Abstract
Wearables are poised to transform health and wellness through automation of cost-effective, objective, and real-time health monitoring. However, machine learning models for these systems are designed based on labeled data collected, and feature representations engineered, in controlled environments. This approach has limited scalability of wearables because (i) collecting and labeling sufficiently large amounts of sensor data is a labor-intensive and expensive process; and (ii) wearables are deployed in highly dynamic environments of the end-users whose context undergoes consistent changes. We introduce TransNet, a deep learning framework that minimizes the costly process of data labeling, feature engineering, and algorithm retraining by constructing a scalable computational approach. TransNet learns general and reusable features in lower layers of the framework and quickly reconfigures the underlying models from a small number of labeled instances in a new domain, such as when the system is adopted by a new user or when a previously unseen event is to be added to event vocabulary of the system. Utilizing TransNet on four activity datasets, TransNet achieves an average accuracy of 88.1% in cross-subject learning scenarios using only one labeled instance for each activity class. This performance improves to an accuracy of 92.7% with five labeled instances.
- David Zakim and Matthias Schwab. 2015. Data collection as a barrier to personalized medicine. Trends in Pharmacological Sciences 36, 2 (2015), 68--71.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Isabelle Budin-Ljøsne and Jennifer R. Harris. 2016. Patient and interest organizations’ views on personalized medicine: A qualitative study. BMC Medical Ethics 17, 1 (2016), 28.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Akram Alyass, Michelle Turcotte, and David Meyre. 2015. From big data analysis to personalized medicine for all: Challenges and opportunities. BMC Medical Genomics 8, 1 (2015), 33.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Seyed Iman Mirzadeh, Jessica C. Ardo, Ramin Fallahzadeh, Bryan Minor, Lorraine S. Evangelista, Diane J. Cook, and Hassan Ghasemzadeh. 2019. LabelMerger: Learning activities in uncontrolled environments. 2019 First International Conference on Transdisciplinary AI (TransAI’19), 64--67.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ramyar Saeedi, Janet Purath, Krishna Venkatasubramanian, and Hassan Ghasemzadeh. 2014. Toward seamless wearable sensing: Automatic on-body sensor localization for physical activity monitoring. In Proceedings of the 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC’14).Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ramin Fallahzadeh and Hassan Ghasemzadeh. 2017. Personalization without user interruption: Boosting activity recognition in new subjects using unlabeled data. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Cyber-Physical Systems (ICCPS’17). ACM, New York, NY, 293--302.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Allan Stisen, Henrik Blunck, Sourav Bhattacharya, Thor Siiger Prentow, Mikkel Baun Kjærgaard, Anind Dey, Tobias Sonne, and Mads Møller Jensen. 2015. Smart devices are different: Assessing and mitigatingmobile sensing heterogeneities for activity recognition. In Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys’15). ACM, New York, NY, 127--140.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jennifer R. Kwapisz, Gary M. Weiss, and Samuel A. Moore. 2011. Activity recognition using cell phone accelerometers. ACM SigKDD Explorations Newsletter 12, 2 (2011), 74--82.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Seyed Ali Rokni and Hassan Ghasemzadeh. 2017. Synchronous dynamic view learning: A framework for autonomous training of activity recognition models using wearable sensors. In Proceedings of the 16th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks. ACM, 79--90.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ramyar Saeedi, Brian Schimert, and Hassan Ghasemzadeh. 2014. Cost-sensitive feature selection for on-body sensor localization. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp’14 Adjunct). 833--842.Google ScholarDigital Library
- P. Alinia, R. Saeedi, R. Fallahzadeh, A. Rokni, and H. Ghasemzadeh. 2016. A reliable and reconfigurable signal processing framework for estimation of metabolic equivalent of task in wearable sensors. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing 10, 5 (Aug. 2016), 842--853. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JSTSP.2016.2569472Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ramyar Saeedi, Navid Amini, and Hassan Ghasemzadeh. 2014. Patient-centric on-body sensor localization in smart health systems. In Proceedings of the Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems, and Computers.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Nimish Kale, Jaeseong Lee, Reza Lotfian, and Roozbeh Jafari. 2012. Impact of sensor misplacement on dynamic time warping based human activity recognition using wearable computers. In Proceedings of the Conference on Wireless Health (WH’12). ACM, New York, NY, Article 7, 8 pages.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yunus Emre Ustev, Ozlem Durmaz Incel, and Cem Ersoy. 2013. User, device and orientation independent human activity recognition on mobile phones: Challenges and a proposal. In Proceedings of the 2013 ACM Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing Adjunct Publication. ACM, 1427--1436.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Piero Zappi, Thomas Stiefmeier, Elisabetta Farella, Daniel Roggen, Luca Benini, and G. Troster. 2007. Activity recognition from on-body sensors by classifier fusion: Sensor scalability and robustness. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Intelligent Sensors, Sensor Networks and Information (ISSNIP 2007). IEEE, 281--286.Google Scholar
- Hesam Sagha, Alberto Calatroni, Jose del R. Millan, Daniel Roggen, Gerhard Troster, and Ricardo Chavarriaga. 2013. Robust activity recognition combining anomaly detection and classifier retraining. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE International Conference on Body Sensor Networks (BSN’13). IEEE, 1--6.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kai Kunze and Paul Lukowicz. 2008. Dealing with sensor displacement in motion-based onbody activity recognition systems. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing. ACM, 20--29.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ryoma Uchida, Hiroto Horino, and Ren Ohmura. 2013. Improving fault tolerance of wearable wearable sensor-based activity recognition techniques. In Proceedings of the 2013 ACM Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing Adjunct Publication (UbiComp’13 Adjunct). ACM, New York, NY, 633--644.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kazuya Murao, Tsutomu Terada, Yoshinari Takegawa, and Shojiro Nishio. 2008. A context-aware system that changes sensor combinations considering energy consumption. In Pervasive Computing. Springer, 197--212.Google Scholar
- N. Ravi, N. Dandekar, P. Mysore, and M. L. Littman. 2005. Activity recognition from accelerometer data. In Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 20.AAAI Press; MIT Press; 1999, 1541.Google Scholar
- Jeff Donahue, Yangqing Jia, Oriol Vinyals, Judy Hoffman, Ning Zhang, Eric Tzeng, and Trevor Darrell. 2014. Decaf: A deep convolutional activation feature for generic visual recognition. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning. 647--655.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Grégoire Mesnil Yann Dauphin, Xavier Glorot, Salah Rifai, Yoshua Bengio, Ian Goodfellow, Erick Lavoie, Xavier Muller, Guillaume Desjardins, David Warde-Farley, Pascal Vincent, et al. 2012. Unsupervised and transfer learning challenge: A deep learning approach. In Proceedings of ICML Workshop on Unsupervised and Transfer Learning. 97--110.Google Scholar
- Pierre Sermanet, David Eigen, Xiang Zhang, Michaël Mathieu, Rob Fergus, and Yann LeCun. 2013. Overfeat: Integrated recognition, localization and detection using convolutional networks. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR’14). CBLS, 16.Google Scholar
- Yoshua Bengio, Arnaud Bergeron, Nicolas Boulanger-Lewandowski, Thomas Breuel, Youssouf Chherawala, Moustapha Cisse, Dumitru Erhan, Jeremy Eustache, Xavier Glorot, Xavier Muller, et al. 2011. Deep learners benefit more from out-of-distribution examples. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics. 164--172.Google Scholar
- Gutemberg Guerra-Filho, Cornelia Fermuller, and Yiannis Aloimonos. 2005. Discovering a language for human activity. In Proceedings of the AAAI 2005 fall Symposium on Anticipatory Cognitive Embodied Systems. 10.Google Scholar
- Tomas Mikolov, Ilya Sutskever, Kai Chen, Greg S. Corrado, and Jeff Dean. 2013. Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 3111--3119.Google Scholar
- Chris Piech, Jonathan Bassen, Jonathan Huang, Surya Ganguli, Mehran Sahami, Leonidas J. Guibas, and Jascha Sohl-Dickstein. 2015. Deep knowledge tracing. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 505--513.Google Scholar
- H. Ghasemzadeh, V. Loseu, and R. Jafari. 2010. Structural action recognition in body sensor networks: Distributed classification based on string matching. IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine 14, 2 (2010), 425--435.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ronan Collobert, Jason Weston, Léon Bottou, Michael Karlen, Koray Kavukcuoglu, and Pavel Kuksa. 2011. Natural language processing (almost) from scratch. Journal of Machine Learning Research 12, (Aug. 2011), 2493--2537.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ronan Collobert and Jason Weston. 2008. A unified architecture for natural language processing: Deep neural networks with multitask learning. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Machine Learning. ACM, 160--167.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jason Yosinski, Jeff Clune, Yoshua Bengio, and Hod Lipson. 2014. How transferable are features in deep neural networks? In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 3320--3328.Google Scholar
- Ian Goodfellow, Yoshua Bengio, and Aaron Courville. 2016. Deep Learning. MIT Press.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Y. T. Zhou and R. Chellappa. 1988. Computation of optical flow using a neural network. In IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, Vol. 1998. 71--78.Google Scholar
- Sheng-Jun Huang, Rong Jin, and Zhi-Hua Zhou. 2014. Active Learning by querying informative and representative examples. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 36, 10 (Oct. 2014).Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sivan Sabato and Tom Hess. 2016. Interactive algorithms: From pool to stream. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual Conference on Learning Theory (COLT), JMLR Workshop and Conference Proceedings. New York.Google Scholar
- Zuobing Xu, Ram Akella, and Yi Zhang. 2007. Incorporating diversity and density in active learning for relevance feedback. In Proceedings of 29th European Conference on IR Research.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kwang-Sung Jun and Robert Nowak. 2016. Graph-based active learning: A new look at expected error minimization. In Proceedings of the IEEE Global Conference on Signal and Information Processing (GlobalSIP’16).Google ScholarCross Ref
- Steven C. H. Hoi, Rong Jin, Jianke Zhu, and Michael R. Lyu. 2006. Batch mode active learning and its application to medical image classification. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Machine Learning.Google Scholar
- Xuehua Shen and ChengXiang Zhai. 2005. Active feedback in ad hoc information retrieval. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ozan Sener and Silvio Savarese. 2018. Active learning for convolutional neural networks: A core-set approach. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR’18).Google Scholar
- Marjan Nourollahi, Seyed Ali Rokni, and Hassan Ghasemzadeh. 2020. Proximity-based active learning on streaming data: A personalized eating moment recognition. CoRR abs/2003.13098. arxiv:2003.13098 https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.13098Google Scholar
- Zhila Esna Ashari and Hassan Ghasemzadeh. 2019. Mindful active learning. In Proceedings of the 28th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI’19), Sarit Kraus (Ed.). ijcai.org, 2265--2271. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2019/314Google ScholarCross Ref
- Maja Stikic and Bernt Schiele. 2009. Activity recognition from sparsely labeled data using multi-instance learning. In Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Location- and Context-Awareness.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tom Diethe, Niall Twomey, and Peter Flach. 2016. Active transfer learning for activity recognition. In Proceedings of the European Symposium on Artificial Neural Networks, Computational Intelligence and Machine Learning.Google Scholar
- Ling Bao and Stephen S. Intille. 2004. Activity recognition from user-annotated acceleration data. In Pervasive Computing. Springer, 1--17.Google Scholar
- Ji Wang, Bokai Cao, Philip Yu, Lichao Sun, Weidong Bao, and Xiaomin Zhu. 2018. Deep learning towards mobile applications. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE 38th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS’18). IEEE, 1385--1393.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Yunbin Deng. 2019. Deep learning on mobile devices: A review. In Mobile Multimedia/Image Processing, Security, and Applications 2019, Vol. 10993. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 109930A.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Pengfei Zhang, Eric Lo, and Baotong Lu. 2020. High performance depthwise and pointwise convolutions on mobile devices. In AAAI. 6795--6802.Google Scholar
- Xiaolong Ma, Fu-Ming Guo, Wei Niu, Xue Lin, Jian Tang, Kaisheng Ma, Bin Ren, and Yanzhi Wang. 2020. PCONV: The missing but desirable sparsity in DNN weight pruning for real-time execution on mobile devices. In AAAI. 5117--5124.Google Scholar
- Xiaofan Zhang, Cong Hao, Yuhong Li, Yao Chen, Jinjun Xiong, Wen-mei Hwu, and Deming Chen. 2019. A bi-directional co-design approach to enable deep learning on IoT devices. Arxiv Preprint Arxiv:1905.08369.Google Scholar
- Bin Yang, Lin Yang, Xiaochun Li, Wenhan Zhang, Hua Zhou, Yequn Zhang, Yongxiong Ren, and Yinbo Shi. 2019. 2-bit model compression of deep convolutional neural network on ASIC engine for image retrieval. Arxiv Preprint Arxiv:1905.03362.Google Scholar
- Adrian Burns, Barry R. Greene, Michael J. McGrath, Terrance J. O’Shea, Benjamin Kuris, Steven M. Ayer, Florin Stroiescu, and Victor Cionca. 2010. SHIMMER™—A wireless sensor platform for noninvasive biomedical research. IEEE Sensors Journal 10, 9 (2010), 1527--1534.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Daniel Roggen, Alberto Calatroni, M. Rossi, Thomas Holleczek, Kilian Förster, Gerhard Tröster, Paul Lukowicz, David Bannach, Gerald Pirkl, Alois Ferscha, Jakob Doppler, Clemens Holzmann, Marc Kurz, Gerald Holl, Ricardo Chavarriaga, Hesam Sagha, Hamidreza Bayati, Marco Creatura, and José del R. Millàn. 2010. Collecting complex activity data sets in highly rich networked sensor environments. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Networked Sensing Systems. http://www.inss-conf.org/2010/.Google Scholar
- Billur Barshan and Murat Cihan Yüksek. 2013. Recognizing daily and sports activities in two open source machine learning environments using body-worn sensor units. Computer Journal 57, 11 (2013), 1649--1667.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kerem Altun, Billur Barshan, and Orkun Tunçel. 2010. Comparative study on classifying human activities with miniature inertial and magnetic sensors. Pattern Recognition 43, 10 (2010), 3605--3620.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mohammad Abu Alsheikh, Ahmed Selim, Dusit Niyato, Linda Doyle, Shaowei Lin, and Hwee-Pink Tan. 2016. Deep activity recognition models with triaxial accelerometers. In AAAI Workshop: Artificial Intelligence Applied to Assistive Technologies and Smart Environments.Google Scholar
- Francisco Javier Ordóñez and Daniel Roggen. 2016. Deep convolutional and LSTM recurrent neural networks for multimodal wearable activity recognition. Sensors 16, 1 (2016), 115.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Xavier Glorot, Antoine Bordes, and Yoshua Bengio. 2011. Deep sparse rectifier neural networks. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics. 315--323.Google Scholar
- Alex Krizhevsky, Ilya Sutskever, and Geoffrey E. Hinton. 2012. Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 1097--1105.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Diederik Kingma and Jimmy Ba. 2014. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. Arxiv Preprint Arxiv:1412.6980.Google Scholar
- Nitish Srivastava, Geoffrey E. Hinton, Alex Krizhevsky, Ilya Sutskever, and Ruslan Salakhutdinov. 2014. Dropout: A simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting. Journal of Machine Learning Research 15, 1 (2014), 1929--1958.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ramin Fallahzadeh and Hassan Ghasemzadeh. 2017. Personalization without user interruption: Boosting activity recognition in new subjects using unlabeled data. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Cyber-Physical Systems. ACM, 293--302.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Thomas G. Dietterich. 1998. Approximate statistical tests for comparing supervised classification learning algorithms. Neural Computation 10, 7 (1998), 1895--1923.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Alberto Calatroni, Daniel Roggen, and Gerhard Tröster. 2011. Automatic transfer of activity recognition capabilities between body-worn motion sensors: Training newcomers to recognize locomotion. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Networked Sensing Systems (INSS’11) Vol. 6.Google Scholar
- Francisco Javier Ordóñez Morales and Daniel Roggen. 2016. Deep convolutional feature transfer across mobile activity recognition domains, sensor modalities and locations. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers. ACM, 92--99.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ramyar Saeedi, Skyler Norgaard, and Assefaw H. Gebremedhin. 2017. A closed-loop deep learning architecture for robust activity recognition using wearable sensors. In Proceedings in the 2017 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data’17). IEEE, 473--479.Google Scholar
- Sinno Jialin Pan and Qiang Yang. 2010. A survey on transfer learning. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 22, 10 (Oct. 2010), 1345--1359.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Alex Graves, Abdel-rahman Mohamed, and Geoffrey Hinton. 2013. Speech recognition with deep recurrent neural networks. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP’13). IEEE, 6645--6649.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ming Zeng, Le T. Nguyen, Bo Yu, Ole J. Mengshoel, Jiang Zhu, Pang Wu, and Joy Zhang. 2014. Convolutional neural networks for human activity recognition using mobile sensors. In Proceedings of the 2014 6th International Conference on Mobile Computing, Applications and Services (MobiCASE’14). IEEE, 197--205.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jianbo Yang, Minh Nhut Nguyen, Phyo Phyo San, Xiaoli Li, and Shonali Krishnaswamy. 2015. Deep convolutional neural networks on multichannel time series for human activity recognition. In IJCAI. 3995--4001.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Charissa Ann Ronao and Sung-Bae Cho. 2016. Human activity recognition with smartphone sensors using deep learning neural networks. Expert Systems with Applications 59 (2016), 235--244.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Baoding Zhou, Jun Yang, and Qingquan Li. 2019. Smartphone-based activity recognition for indoor localization using a convolutional neural network. Sensors 19, 3 (2019), 621.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Isah A. Lawal and Sophia Bano. 2019. Deep human activity recognition using wearable sensors. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments (PETRA’19). ACM, 45--48.Google Scholar
- Andrey Ignatov. 2018. Real-time human activity recognition from accelerometer data using convolutional neural networks. Applied Soft Computing 62 (2018), 915--922.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Nastaran Mohammadian Rad, Andrea Bizzego, Seyed Mostafa Kia, Giuseppe Jurman, Paola Venuti, and Cesare Furlanello. 2015. Convolutional neural network for stereotypical motor movement detection in autism. Arxiv Preprint Arxiv:1511.01865.Google Scholar
- Nils Y. Hammerla, Shane Halloran, and Thomas Ploetz. 2016. Deep, convolutional, and recurrent models for human activity recognition using wearables. Arxiv Preprint Arxiv:1604.08880.Google Scholar
- Sepp Hochreiter and Jürgen Schmidhuber. 1997. Long short-term memory. Neural Computation 9, 8 (1997), 1735--1780.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Parastoo Alinia, Seyed-Iman Mirzadeh, and Hassan Ghasemzadeh. 2020. ActiLabel: A combinatorial transfer learning framework for activity recognition. ArXiv abs/2003.07415.Google Scholar
- Thomas Elsken, Jan Hendrik Metzen, and Frank Hutter. 2018. Neural architecture search: A survey. Arxiv Preprint Arxiv:1808.05377.Google Scholar
- Barret Zoph and Quoc V. Le. 2016. Neural architecture search with reinforcement learning. Arxiv Preprint Arxiv:1611.01578.Google Scholar
- Stanislaw Jastrzebski, Zachary Kenton, Devansh Arpit, Nicolas Ballas, Asja Fischer, Yoshua Bengio, and Amos J. Storkey. 2018. Three factors influencing minima in SGD. ArXiv abs/1711.04623.Google Scholar
- Yunhui Guo, Honghui Shi, Abhishek Kumar, Kristen Grauman, Tajana Rosing, and Rogerio Feris. 2019. SpotTune: Transfer learning through adaptive fine-tuning. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 4805--4814.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Vitor F. Rey and Paul Lukowicz. 2017. Label propagation: An unsupervised similarity based method for integrating new sensors in activity recognition systems. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 1, 3 (Sept. 2017), Article 94, 24 pages.Google ScholarDigital Library
- German I. Parisi, Ronald Kemker, Jose L. Part, Christopher Kanan, and Stefan Wermter. 2019. Continual lifelong learning with neural networks: A review. Neural Networks 113(2019), 54--71.Google ScholarDigital Library
- James Kirkpatrick, Razvan Pascanu, Neil Rabinowitz, Joel Veness, Guillaume Desjardins, Andrei A. Rusu, Kieran Milan, John Quan, Tiago Ramalho, Agnieszka Grabska-Barwinska, et al. 2017. Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 114, 13 (2017), 3521--3526.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Seyed-Iman Mirzadeh, Mehrdad Farajtabar, and Hassan Ghasemzadeh. 2020. Dropout as an implicit gating mechanism for continual learning. ArXiv abs/2004.11545.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- TransNet: Minimally Supervised Deep Transfer Learning for Dynamic Adaptation of Wearable Systems
Recommendations
Multi-task Self-Supervised Learning for Human Activity Detection
Deep learning methods are successfully used in applications pertaining to ubiquitous computing, pervasive intelligence, health, and well-being. Specifically, the area of human activity recognition (HAR) is primarily transformed by the convolutional and ...
NuActiv: recognizing unseen new activities using semantic attribute-based learning
MobiSys '13: Proceeding of the 11th annual international conference on Mobile systems, applications, and servicesWe study the problem of how to recognize a new human activity when we have never seen any training example of that activity before. Recognizing human activities is an essential element for user-centric and context-aware applications. Previous studies ...
Semi-supervised Similarity Learning in Process-Oriented Case-Based Reasoning
Artificial Intelligence XLAbstractSupervised learning is typically challenging with insufficient amounts of labeled training data and high costs for label acquisition, creating a demand for unsupervised learning methods. In the research area of Process-Oriented Case-Based ...
Comments