skip to main content
research-article
Open Access

TransNet: Minimally Supervised Deep Transfer Learning for Dynamic Adaptation of Wearable Systems

Authors Info & Claims
Published:10 September 2020Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Wearables are poised to transform health and wellness through automation of cost-effective, objective, and real-time health monitoring. However, machine learning models for these systems are designed based on labeled data collected, and feature representations engineered, in controlled environments. This approach has limited scalability of wearables because (i) collecting and labeling sufficiently large amounts of sensor data is a labor-intensive and expensive process; and (ii) wearables are deployed in highly dynamic environments of the end-users whose context undergoes consistent changes. We introduce TransNet, a deep learning framework that minimizes the costly process of data labeling, feature engineering, and algorithm retraining by constructing a scalable computational approach. TransNet learns general and reusable features in lower layers of the framework and quickly reconfigures the underlying models from a small number of labeled instances in a new domain, such as when the system is adopted by a new user or when a previously unseen event is to be added to event vocabulary of the system. Utilizing TransNet on four activity datasets, TransNet achieves an average accuracy of 88.1% in cross-subject learning scenarios using only one labeled instance for each activity class. This performance improves to an accuracy of 92.7% with five labeled instances.

References

  1. David Zakim and Matthias Schwab. 2015. Data collection as a barrier to personalized medicine. Trends in Pharmacological Sciences 36, 2 (2015), 68--71.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Isabelle Budin-Ljøsne and Jennifer R. Harris. 2016. Patient and interest organizations’ views on personalized medicine: A qualitative study. BMC Medical Ethics 17, 1 (2016), 28.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Akram Alyass, Michelle Turcotte, and David Meyre. 2015. From big data analysis to personalized medicine for all: Challenges and opportunities. BMC Medical Genomics 8, 1 (2015), 33.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Seyed Iman Mirzadeh, Jessica C. Ardo, Ramin Fallahzadeh, Bryan Minor, Lorraine S. Evangelista, Diane J. Cook, and Hassan Ghasemzadeh. 2019. LabelMerger: Learning activities in uncontrolled environments. 2019 First International Conference on Transdisciplinary AI (TransAI’19), 64--67.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Ramyar Saeedi, Janet Purath, Krishna Venkatasubramanian, and Hassan Ghasemzadeh. 2014. Toward seamless wearable sensing: Automatic on-body sensor localization for physical activity monitoring. In Proceedings of the 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC’14).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Ramin Fallahzadeh and Hassan Ghasemzadeh. 2017. Personalization without user interruption: Boosting activity recognition in new subjects using unlabeled data. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Cyber-Physical Systems (ICCPS’17). ACM, New York, NY, 293--302.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Allan Stisen, Henrik Blunck, Sourav Bhattacharya, Thor Siiger Prentow, Mikkel Baun Kjærgaard, Anind Dey, Tobias Sonne, and Mads Møller Jensen. 2015. Smart devices are different: Assessing and mitigatingmobile sensing heterogeneities for activity recognition. In Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys’15). ACM, New York, NY, 127--140.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Jennifer R. Kwapisz, Gary M. Weiss, and Samuel A. Moore. 2011. Activity recognition using cell phone accelerometers. ACM SigKDD Explorations Newsletter 12, 2 (2011), 74--82.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Seyed Ali Rokni and Hassan Ghasemzadeh. 2017. Synchronous dynamic view learning: A framework for autonomous training of activity recognition models using wearable sensors. In Proceedings of the 16th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks. ACM, 79--90.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Ramyar Saeedi, Brian Schimert, and Hassan Ghasemzadeh. 2014. Cost-sensitive feature selection for on-body sensor localization. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp’14 Adjunct). 833--842.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. P. Alinia, R. Saeedi, R. Fallahzadeh, A. Rokni, and H. Ghasemzadeh. 2016. A reliable and reconfigurable signal processing framework for estimation of metabolic equivalent of task in wearable sensors. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing 10, 5 (Aug. 2016), 842--853. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JSTSP.2016.2569472Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Ramyar Saeedi, Navid Amini, and Hassan Ghasemzadeh. 2014. Patient-centric on-body sensor localization in smart health systems. In Proceedings of the Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems, and Computers.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Nimish Kale, Jaeseong Lee, Reza Lotfian, and Roozbeh Jafari. 2012. Impact of sensor misplacement on dynamic time warping based human activity recognition using wearable computers. In Proceedings of the Conference on Wireless Health (WH’12). ACM, New York, NY, Article 7, 8 pages.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Yunus Emre Ustev, Ozlem Durmaz Incel, and Cem Ersoy. 2013. User, device and orientation independent human activity recognition on mobile phones: Challenges and a proposal. In Proceedings of the 2013 ACM Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing Adjunct Publication. ACM, 1427--1436.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Piero Zappi, Thomas Stiefmeier, Elisabetta Farella, Daniel Roggen, Luca Benini, and G. Troster. 2007. Activity recognition from on-body sensors by classifier fusion: Sensor scalability and robustness. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Intelligent Sensors, Sensor Networks and Information (ISSNIP 2007). IEEE, 281--286.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Hesam Sagha, Alberto Calatroni, Jose del R. Millan, Daniel Roggen, Gerhard Troster, and Ricardo Chavarriaga. 2013. Robust activity recognition combining anomaly detection and classifier retraining. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE International Conference on Body Sensor Networks (BSN’13). IEEE, 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Kai Kunze and Paul Lukowicz. 2008. Dealing with sensor displacement in motion-based onbody activity recognition systems. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing. ACM, 20--29.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Ryoma Uchida, Hiroto Horino, and Ren Ohmura. 2013. Improving fault tolerance of wearable wearable sensor-based activity recognition techniques. In Proceedings of the 2013 ACM Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing Adjunct Publication (UbiComp’13 Adjunct). ACM, New York, NY, 633--644.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Kazuya Murao, Tsutomu Terada, Yoshinari Takegawa, and Shojiro Nishio. 2008. A context-aware system that changes sensor combinations considering energy consumption. In Pervasive Computing. Springer, 197--212.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. N. Ravi, N. Dandekar, P. Mysore, and M. L. Littman. 2005. Activity recognition from accelerometer data. In Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 20.AAAI Press; MIT Press; 1999, 1541.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Jeff Donahue, Yangqing Jia, Oriol Vinyals, Judy Hoffman, Ning Zhang, Eric Tzeng, and Trevor Darrell. 2014. Decaf: A deep convolutional activation feature for generic visual recognition. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning. 647--655.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Grégoire Mesnil Yann Dauphin, Xavier Glorot, Salah Rifai, Yoshua Bengio, Ian Goodfellow, Erick Lavoie, Xavier Muller, Guillaume Desjardins, David Warde-Farley, Pascal Vincent, et al. 2012. Unsupervised and transfer learning challenge: A deep learning approach. In Proceedings of ICML Workshop on Unsupervised and Transfer Learning. 97--110.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Pierre Sermanet, David Eigen, Xiang Zhang, Michaël Mathieu, Rob Fergus, and Yann LeCun. 2013. Overfeat: Integrated recognition, localization and detection using convolutional networks. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR’14). CBLS, 16.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Yoshua Bengio, Arnaud Bergeron, Nicolas Boulanger-Lewandowski, Thomas Breuel, Youssouf Chherawala, Moustapha Cisse, Dumitru Erhan, Jeremy Eustache, Xavier Glorot, Xavier Muller, et al. 2011. Deep learners benefit more from out-of-distribution examples. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics. 164--172.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Gutemberg Guerra-Filho, Cornelia Fermuller, and Yiannis Aloimonos. 2005. Discovering a language for human activity. In Proceedings of the AAAI 2005 fall Symposium on Anticipatory Cognitive Embodied Systems. 10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Tomas Mikolov, Ilya Sutskever, Kai Chen, Greg S. Corrado, and Jeff Dean. 2013. Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 3111--3119.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Chris Piech, Jonathan Bassen, Jonathan Huang, Surya Ganguli, Mehran Sahami, Leonidas J. Guibas, and Jascha Sohl-Dickstein. 2015. Deep knowledge tracing. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 505--513.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. H. Ghasemzadeh, V. Loseu, and R. Jafari. 2010. Structural action recognition in body sensor networks: Distributed classification based on string matching. IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine 14, 2 (2010), 425--435.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Ronan Collobert, Jason Weston, Léon Bottou, Michael Karlen, Koray Kavukcuoglu, and Pavel Kuksa. 2011. Natural language processing (almost) from scratch. Journal of Machine Learning Research 12, (Aug. 2011), 2493--2537.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Ronan Collobert and Jason Weston. 2008. A unified architecture for natural language processing: Deep neural networks with multitask learning. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Machine Learning. ACM, 160--167.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Jason Yosinski, Jeff Clune, Yoshua Bengio, and Hod Lipson. 2014. How transferable are features in deep neural networks? In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 3320--3328.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Ian Goodfellow, Yoshua Bengio, and Aaron Courville. 2016. Deep Learning. MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Y. T. Zhou and R. Chellappa. 1988. Computation of optical flow using a neural network. In IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, Vol. 1998. 71--78.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Sheng-Jun Huang, Rong Jin, and Zhi-Hua Zhou. 2014. Active Learning by querying informative and representative examples. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 36, 10 (Oct. 2014).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Sivan Sabato and Tom Hess. 2016. Interactive algorithms: From pool to stream. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual Conference on Learning Theory (COLT), JMLR Workshop and Conference Proceedings. New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Zuobing Xu, Ram Akella, and Yi Zhang. 2007. Incorporating diversity and density in active learning for relevance feedback. In Proceedings of 29th European Conference on IR Research.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Kwang-Sung Jun and Robert Nowak. 2016. Graph-based active learning: A new look at expected error minimization. In Proceedings of the IEEE Global Conference on Signal and Information Processing (GlobalSIP’16).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Steven C. H. Hoi, Rong Jin, Jianke Zhu, and Michael R. Lyu. 2006. Batch mode active learning and its application to medical image classification. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Machine Learning.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Xuehua Shen and ChengXiang Zhai. 2005. Active feedback in ad hoc information retrieval. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Ozan Sener and Silvio Savarese. 2018. Active learning for convolutional neural networks: A core-set approach. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR’18).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Marjan Nourollahi, Seyed Ali Rokni, and Hassan Ghasemzadeh. 2020. Proximity-based active learning on streaming data: A personalized eating moment recognition. CoRR abs/2003.13098. arxiv:2003.13098 https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.13098Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Zhila Esna Ashari and Hassan Ghasemzadeh. 2019. Mindful active learning. In Proceedings of the 28th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI’19), Sarit Kraus (Ed.). ijcai.org, 2265--2271. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2019/314Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Maja Stikic and Bernt Schiele. 2009. Activity recognition from sparsely labeled data using multi-instance learning. In Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Location- and Context-Awareness.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Tom Diethe, Niall Twomey, and Peter Flach. 2016. Active transfer learning for activity recognition. In Proceedings of the European Symposium on Artificial Neural Networks, Computational Intelligence and Machine Learning.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Ling Bao and Stephen S. Intille. 2004. Activity recognition from user-annotated acceleration data. In Pervasive Computing. Springer, 1--17.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Ji Wang, Bokai Cao, Philip Yu, Lichao Sun, Weidong Bao, and Xiaomin Zhu. 2018. Deep learning towards mobile applications. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE 38th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS’18). IEEE, 1385--1393.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. Yunbin Deng. 2019. Deep learning on mobile devices: A review. In Mobile Multimedia/Image Processing, Security, and Applications 2019, Vol. 10993. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 109930A.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Pengfei Zhang, Eric Lo, and Baotong Lu. 2020. High performance depthwise and pointwise convolutions on mobile devices. In AAAI. 6795--6802.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Xiaolong Ma, Fu-Ming Guo, Wei Niu, Xue Lin, Jian Tang, Kaisheng Ma, Bin Ren, and Yanzhi Wang. 2020. PCONV: The missing but desirable sparsity in DNN weight pruning for real-time execution on mobile devices. In AAAI. 5117--5124.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Xiaofan Zhang, Cong Hao, Yuhong Li, Yao Chen, Jinjun Xiong, Wen-mei Hwu, and Deming Chen. 2019. A bi-directional co-design approach to enable deep learning on IoT devices. Arxiv Preprint Arxiv:1905.08369.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Bin Yang, Lin Yang, Xiaochun Li, Wenhan Zhang, Hua Zhou, Yequn Zhang, Yongxiong Ren, and Yinbo Shi. 2019. 2-bit model compression of deep convolutional neural network on ASIC engine for image retrieval. Arxiv Preprint Arxiv:1905.03362.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Adrian Burns, Barry R. Greene, Michael J. McGrath, Terrance J. O’Shea, Benjamin Kuris, Steven M. Ayer, Florin Stroiescu, and Victor Cionca. 2010. SHIMMER™—A wireless sensor platform for noninvasive biomedical research. IEEE Sensors Journal 10, 9 (2010), 1527--1534.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. Daniel Roggen, Alberto Calatroni, M. Rossi, Thomas Holleczek, Kilian Förster, Gerhard Tröster, Paul Lukowicz, David Bannach, Gerald Pirkl, Alois Ferscha, Jakob Doppler, Clemens Holzmann, Marc Kurz, Gerald Holl, Ricardo Chavarriaga, Hesam Sagha, Hamidreza Bayati, Marco Creatura, and José del R. Millàn. 2010. Collecting complex activity data sets in highly rich networked sensor environments. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Networked Sensing Systems. http://www.inss-conf.org/2010/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Billur Barshan and Murat Cihan Yüksek. 2013. Recognizing daily and sports activities in two open source machine learning environments using body-worn sensor units. Computer Journal 57, 11 (2013), 1649--1667.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  55. Kerem Altun, Billur Barshan, and Orkun Tunçel. 2010. Comparative study on classifying human activities with miniature inertial and magnetic sensors. Pattern Recognition 43, 10 (2010), 3605--3620.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. Mohammad Abu Alsheikh, Ahmed Selim, Dusit Niyato, Linda Doyle, Shaowei Lin, and Hwee-Pink Tan. 2016. Deep activity recognition models with triaxial accelerometers. In AAAI Workshop: Artificial Intelligence Applied to Assistive Technologies and Smart Environments.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Francisco Javier Ordóñez and Daniel Roggen. 2016. Deep convolutional and LSTM recurrent neural networks for multimodal wearable activity recognition. Sensors 16, 1 (2016), 115.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. Xavier Glorot, Antoine Bordes, and Yoshua Bengio. 2011. Deep sparse rectifier neural networks. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics. 315--323.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. Alex Krizhevsky, Ilya Sutskever, and Geoffrey E. Hinton. 2012. Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 1097--1105.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. Diederik Kingma and Jimmy Ba. 2014. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. Arxiv Preprint Arxiv:1412.6980.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. Nitish Srivastava, Geoffrey E. Hinton, Alex Krizhevsky, Ilya Sutskever, and Ruslan Salakhutdinov. 2014. Dropout: A simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting. Journal of Machine Learning Research 15, 1 (2014), 1929--1958.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  62. Ramin Fallahzadeh and Hassan Ghasemzadeh. 2017. Personalization without user interruption: Boosting activity recognition in new subjects using unlabeled data. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Cyber-Physical Systems. ACM, 293--302.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. Thomas G. Dietterich. 1998. Approximate statistical tests for comparing supervised classification learning algorithms. Neural Computation 10, 7 (1998), 1895--1923.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  64. Alberto Calatroni, Daniel Roggen, and Gerhard Tröster. 2011. Automatic transfer of activity recognition capabilities between body-worn motion sensors: Training newcomers to recognize locomotion. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Networked Sensing Systems (INSS’11) Vol. 6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. Francisco Javier Ordóñez Morales and Daniel Roggen. 2016. Deep convolutional feature transfer across mobile activity recognition domains, sensor modalities and locations. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers. ACM, 92--99.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  66. Ramyar Saeedi, Skyler Norgaard, and Assefaw H. Gebremedhin. 2017. A closed-loop deep learning architecture for robust activity recognition using wearable sensors. In Proceedings in the 2017 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data’17). IEEE, 473--479.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. Sinno Jialin Pan and Qiang Yang. 2010. A survey on transfer learning. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 22, 10 (Oct. 2010), 1345--1359.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  68. Alex Graves, Abdel-rahman Mohamed, and Geoffrey Hinton. 2013. Speech recognition with deep recurrent neural networks. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP’13). IEEE, 6645--6649.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  69. Ming Zeng, Le T. Nguyen, Bo Yu, Ole J. Mengshoel, Jiang Zhu, Pang Wu, and Joy Zhang. 2014. Convolutional neural networks for human activity recognition using mobile sensors. In Proceedings of the 2014 6th International Conference on Mobile Computing, Applications and Services (MobiCASE’14). IEEE, 197--205.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  70. Jianbo Yang, Minh Nhut Nguyen, Phyo Phyo San, Xiaoli Li, and Shonali Krishnaswamy. 2015. Deep convolutional neural networks on multichannel time series for human activity recognition. In IJCAI. 3995--4001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  71. Charissa Ann Ronao and Sung-Bae Cho. 2016. Human activity recognition with smartphone sensors using deep learning neural networks. Expert Systems with Applications 59 (2016), 235--244.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  72. Baoding Zhou, Jun Yang, and Qingquan Li. 2019. Smartphone-based activity recognition for indoor localization using a convolutional neural network. Sensors 19, 3 (2019), 621.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  73. Isah A. Lawal and Sophia Bano. 2019. Deep human activity recognition using wearable sensors. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments (PETRA’19). ACM, 45--48.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  74. Andrey Ignatov. 2018. Real-time human activity recognition from accelerometer data using convolutional neural networks. Applied Soft Computing 62 (2018), 915--922.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  75. Nastaran Mohammadian Rad, Andrea Bizzego, Seyed Mostafa Kia, Giuseppe Jurman, Paola Venuti, and Cesare Furlanello. 2015. Convolutional neural network for stereotypical motor movement detection in autism. Arxiv Preprint Arxiv:1511.01865.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  76. Nils Y. Hammerla, Shane Halloran, and Thomas Ploetz. 2016. Deep, convolutional, and recurrent models for human activity recognition using wearables. Arxiv Preprint Arxiv:1604.08880.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  77. Sepp Hochreiter and Jürgen Schmidhuber. 1997. Long short-term memory. Neural Computation 9, 8 (1997), 1735--1780.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  78. Parastoo Alinia, Seyed-Iman Mirzadeh, and Hassan Ghasemzadeh. 2020. ActiLabel: A combinatorial transfer learning framework for activity recognition. ArXiv abs/2003.07415.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  79. Thomas Elsken, Jan Hendrik Metzen, and Frank Hutter. 2018. Neural architecture search: A survey. Arxiv Preprint Arxiv:1808.05377.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  80. Barret Zoph and Quoc V. Le. 2016. Neural architecture search with reinforcement learning. Arxiv Preprint Arxiv:1611.01578.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  81. Stanislaw Jastrzebski, Zachary Kenton, Devansh Arpit, Nicolas Ballas, Asja Fischer, Yoshua Bengio, and Amos J. Storkey. 2018. Three factors influencing minima in SGD. ArXiv abs/1711.04623.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  82. Yunhui Guo, Honghui Shi, Abhishek Kumar, Kristen Grauman, Tajana Rosing, and Rogerio Feris. 2019. SpotTune: Transfer learning through adaptive fine-tuning. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 4805--4814.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  83. Vitor F. Rey and Paul Lukowicz. 2017. Label propagation: An unsupervised similarity based method for integrating new sensors in activity recognition systems. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 1, 3 (Sept. 2017), Article 94, 24 pages.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  84. German I. Parisi, Ronald Kemker, Jose L. Part, Christopher Kanan, and Stefan Wermter. 2019. Continual lifelong learning with neural networks: A review. Neural Networks 113(2019), 54--71.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  85. James Kirkpatrick, Razvan Pascanu, Neil Rabinowitz, Joel Veness, Guillaume Desjardins, Andrei A. Rusu, Kieran Milan, John Quan, Tiago Ramalho, Agnieszka Grabska-Barwinska, et al. 2017. Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 114, 13 (2017), 3521--3526.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  86. Seyed-Iman Mirzadeh, Mehrdad Farajtabar, and Hassan Ghasemzadeh. 2020. Dropout as an implicit gating mechanism for continual learning. ArXiv abs/2004.11545.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. TransNet: Minimally Supervised Deep Transfer Learning for Dynamic Adaptation of Wearable Systems

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        • Published in

          cover image ACM Transactions on Design Automation of Electronic Systems
          ACM Transactions on Design Automation of Electronic Systems  Volume 26, Issue 1
          January 2021
          234 pages
          ISSN:1084-4309
          EISSN:1557-7309
          DOI:10.1145/3422280
          Issue’s Table of Contents

          Copyright © 2020 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 10 September 2020
          • Received: 1 July 2020
          • Revised: 1 January 2020
          • Accepted: 1 January 2020
          Published in todaes Volume 26, Issue 1

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format .

        View HTML Format