ABSTRACT
Enabling healthier online deliberation around issues of public concerns is an increasingly vital challenge in nowadays society. Two fundamental components of a healthier deliberation are: i. the capability of people to make sense of what they read, so that their contribution can be relevant; and ii. the improvement of the overall quality of the debate, so that noise can be reduced and useful signals can inform collective decision making. Platform designers often resort to computational aids to improve these two processes. In this paper, we examine automated reporting as promising mean of improving sensemaking in discussion platforms. We compared three approaches to automated reporting: an abstractive summariser, a template report and an argumentation highlighting system. We then evaluated improvements in sensemaking of participants and the perception on overall quality of the debate. The study suggests that argument mining technologies are particularly promising computational aids to improve sense making and perceived quality of online discussion, thanks to their capability to combine computational models for automated reasoning with users’ cognitive needs and expectation of automated reporting.
- Tanja Aitamurto, Mike Ananny, Chris W Anderson, Larry Birnbaum, Nicholas Diakopoulos, Matilda Hanson, Jessica Hullman, and Nick Ritchie. 2019. HCI for accurate, impartial and transparent journalism: Challenges and solutions. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–8.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kholod Alsufiani, Simon Attfield, and Leishi Zhang. 2017. Towards an instrument for measuring sensemaking and an assessment of its theoretical features. In Proceedings of the 31st British Computer Society Human Computer Interaction Conference. BCS Learning and Development Ltd., 86.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jordan Beck, Bikalpa Neupane, and John M Carroll. 2018. Managing Conflict in Online Debate Communities: Foregrounding Moderators’ Beliefs and Values on Kialo. (2018).Google Scholar
- Elena Cabrio and Serena Villata. 2018. Five Years of Argument Mining: a Data-driven Analysis.. In IJCAI, Vol. 18. 5427–5433.Google Scholar
- Eshwar Chandrasekharan, Chaitrali Gandhi, Matthew Wortley Mustelier, and Eric Gilbert. 2019. Crossmod: A cross-community learning-based system to assist reddit moderators. Proceedings of the ACM on human-computer interaction 3, CSCW(2019), 1–30.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Quanze Chen, Jonathan Bragg, Lydia B Chilton, and Dan S Weld. 2019. Cicero: Multi-turn, contextual argumentation for accurate crowdsourcing. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–14.Google ScholarDigital Library
- John W Creswell and J David Creswell. 2017. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.Google Scholar
- Anna De Liddo and Simon Buckingham Shum. 2013. Improving online deliberation with argument network visualization. (2013).Google Scholar
- Anna De Liddo, Nieves Pedreira Souto, and Brian Plüss. 2020. Let’s replay the political debate: Hypervideo technology for visual sensemaking of televised election debates. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 145 (2020), 102537.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Leon Derczynski and Kalina Bontcheva. 2014. Pheme: Veracity in Digital Social Networks.. In UMAP workshops.Google Scholar
- Alexis Dinno. 2015. Nonparametric pairwise multiple comparisons in independent groups using Dunn’s test. The Stata Journal 15, 1 (2015), 292–300.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Pinar Dönmez, Carolyn Rosé, Karsten Stegmann, Armin Weinberger, and Frank Fischer. 2005. Supporting CSCL with automatic corpus analysis technology. In International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative. 125–134.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Zi-Yi Dou, Pengfei Liu, Hiroaki Hayashi, Zhengbao Jiang, and Graham Neubig. 2020. GSum: A General Framework for Guided Neural Abstractive Summarization. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.08014(2020).Google Scholar
- John Dowell, Michael Tscholl, Thomas Gladisch, and Marzieh Asgari-Targhi. 2009. Argumentation scheme and shared online diagramming in case-based collaborative learning. (2009).Google Scholar
- Cédric Gossart. 2014. Can digital technologies threaten democracy by creating information cocoons?In Transforming politics and policy in the digital age. IGI Global, 145–154.Google Scholar
- Todd Graham and Tamara Witschge. 2003. In search of online deliberation: Towards a new method for examining the quality of online discussions. COMMUNICATIONS-SANKT AUGUSTIN THEN BERLIN- 28, 2 (2003), 173–204.Google Scholar
- Sharath Chandra Guntuku, David B Yaden, Margaret L Kern, Lyle H Ungar, and Johannes C Eichstaedt. 2017. Detecting depression and mental illness on social media: an integrative review. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences 18 (2017), 43–49.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ivan Habernal and Iryna Gurevych. 2017. Argumentation mining in user-generated web discourse. Computational Linguistics 43, 1 (2017), 125–179.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mijail Kabadjov, Josef Steinberger, Emma Barker, Udo Kruschwitz, and Massimo Poesio. 2015. Onforums: The shared task on online forum summarisation at multiling’15. In Proceedings of the 7th forum for information retrieval evaluation. 21–26.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rune Karlsen, Kari Steen-Johnsen, Dag Wollebæk, and Bernard Enjolras. 2017. Echo chamber and trench warfare dynamics in online debates. European Journal of Communication 32, 3 (2017), 257–273.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Robin H Kay. 2006. Developing a comprehensive metric for assessing discussion board effectiveness. British Journal of Educational Technology 37, 5 (2006), 761–783.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sunyoung Kim and Eric Paulos. 2012. A subscription-based authoring tool for mobile citizen science campaigns. In CHI’12 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2135–2140.Google Scholar
- Sung-Chul Lee, Jaeyoon Song, Eun-Young Ko, Seongho Park, Jihee Kim, and Juho Kim. 2020. SolutionChat: Real-time Moderator Support for Chat-based Structured Discussion. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–12.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tianyi Li, Kurt Luther, and Chris North. 2018. Crowdia: Solving mysteries with crowdsourced sensemaking. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 2, CSCW(2018), 1–29.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Raymond Liaw, Ari Zilnik, Mark Baldwin, and Stephanie Butler. 2013. Maater: Crowdsourcing to improve online journalism. In CHI’13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2549–2554.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Marco Lippi and Paolo Torroni. 2016. MARGOT: A web server for argumentation mining. Expert Systems with Applications 65 (2016), 292–303.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cindy-Pamela Lopez, Marco Segura, and Marco Santórum. 2019. Data Analytics and BI Framework based on Collective Intelligence and the Industry 4.0. In Proceedings of the 2019 2nd International Conference on Information Science and Systems. 93–98.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Elijah Mayfield and Alan W Black. 2019. Analyzing Wikipedia Deletion Debates with a Group Decision-Making Forecast Model. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, CSCW(2019), 1–26.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Constantin Orasan, Ruslan Mitkov, and Laura Hasler. 2003. CAST: a computer-aided summarisation tool. In 10th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kasey Panetta. 2017 (accessed January 3, 2021). Deep learning and natural-language generation will become standards in analytics. https://www.gartner.com/smarterwithgartner/nueral-networks-and-modern-bi-platforms-will-evolve-data-and-analytics/.Google Scholar
- Peter Pirolli and Stuart Card. 2005. The sensemaking process and leverage points for analyst technology as identified through cognitive task analysis. In Proceedings of international conference on intelligence analysis, Vol. 5. McLean, VA, USA, 2–4.Google Scholar
- Abigail See, Peter J Liu, and Christopher D Manning. 2017. Get to the point: Summarization with pointer-generator networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1704.04368(2017).Google Scholar
- Simon Buckingham Shum and Nick Hammond. 1994. Argumentation-based design rationale: what use at what cost?International journal of human-computer studies 40, 4 (1994), 603–652.Google ScholarDigital Library
- H Steigler and M De Jong. 2015. Facilitating personal deliberation online: Effects of two consider. it variations. Computers in Human Behaviour 51 (2015), 461–469.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cass R Sunstein. 2018. # Republic: Divided democracy in the age of social media. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Sunny Tian. 2020. Integrating Discussion and Summarization in Collaborative Writing. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–6.Google Scholar
- Ramine Tinati, Max Van Kleek, Elena Simperl, Markus Luczak-Rösch, Robert Simpson, and Nigel Shadbolt. 2015. Designing for citizen data analysis: A cross-sectional case study of a multi-domain citizen science platform. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 4069–4078.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Daniela Tsaneva and Jianhua Shao. 2018. Assisting investors with collective intelligence. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Data Science, E-learning and Information Systems. 1–6.Google ScholarDigital Library
- András Vargha and Harold D Delaney. 1998. The Kruskal-Wallis test and stochastic homogeneity. Journal of Educational and behavioral Statistics 23, 2(1998), 170–192.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Yu Yan, Weizhen Qi, Yeyun Gong, Dayiheng Liu, Nan Duan, Jiusheng Chen, Ruofei Zhang, and Ming Zhou. 2020. Prophetnet: Predicting future n-gram for sequence-to-sequence pre-training. arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.04063(2020).Google Scholar
- Amy X Zhang and Justin Cranshaw. 2018. Making sense of group chat through collaborative tagging and summarization. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 2, CSCW(2018), 1–27.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Amy X Zhang, Lea Verou, and David Karger. 2017. Wikum: Bridging discussion forums and wikis using recursive summarization. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. 2082–2096.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jingqing Zhang, Yao Zhao, Mohammad Saleh, and Peter Liu. 2020. Pegasus: Pre-training with extracted gap-sentences for abstractive summarization. In International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 11328–11339.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Making Sense of Online Discussions: Can Automated Reports help?
Recommendations
Can You Give Me a Reason?: Argument-inducing Online Forum by Argument Mining
WWW '19: The World Wide Web ConferenceThis demonstration paper presents an argument-inducing online forum that stimulates participants with lack of premises for their claim in online discussions. The proposed forum provides its participants the following two subsystems: (1) Argument ...
Comments