skip to main content
research-article
Public Access

Dynamic Parameterized Problems and Algorithms

Published:06 July 2020Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Fixed-parameter algorithms and kernelization are two powerful methods to solve NP-hard problems. Yet so far those algorithms have been largely restricted to static inputs. In this article, we provide fixed-parameter algorithms and kernelizations for fundamental NP-hard problems with dynamic inputs. We consider a variety of parameterized graph and hitting set problems that are known to have f(k)n1+o(1) time algorithms on inputs of size n, and we consider the question of whether there is a data structure that supports small updates (such as edge/vertex/set/element insertions and deletions) with an update time of g(k)no(1); such an update time would be essentially optimal. Update and query times independent of n are particularly desirable. Among many other results, we show that FEEDBACK VERTEX SET and k-PATH admit dynamic algorithms with f(k)log O(1) update and query times for some function f depending on the solution size k only. We complement our positive results by several conditional and unconditional lower bounds. For example, we show that unlike their undirected counterparts, DIRECTED FEEDBACK VERTEX SET and DIRECTED k-PATH do not admit dynamic algorithms with no(1) update and query times even for constant solution sizes k3, assuming popular hardness hypotheses. We also show that unconditionally, in the cell probe model, DIRECTED FEEDBACK VERTEX SET cannot be solved with update time that is purely a function of k.

References

  1. Amir Abboud and Virginia Vassilevska Williams. 2014. Popular conjectures imply strong lower bounds for dynamic problems. In Proceedings of the IEEE Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS’14). 434--443.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Faisal N. Abu-Khzam, Judith Egan, Michael R. Fellows, Frances A. Rosamond, and Peter Shaw. 2014. On the parameterized complexity of dynamic problems with connectivity constraints. In Proceedings of the Conference on Combinatorial Optimization and Applications (COCOA’14), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 8881. 625--636.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Faisal N. Abu-Khzam, Judith Egan, Michael R. Fellows, Frances A. Rosamond, and Peter Shaw. 2015. On the parameterized complexity of dynamic problems. Theor. Comput. Sci. 607, Part 3 (2015), 426--434.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Josh Alman, Matthias Mnich, and Virginia Vassilevska Williams. 2017. Dynamic parameterized problems and algorithms. In Proceedings of the International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP’17), Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics, Vol. 80. 41:1–41:16.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Noga Alon, Raphael Yuster, and Uri Zwick. 1997. Finding and counting given length cycles. Algorithmica 17, 3 (1997), 209--223.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Noga Alon, Raphael Yuster, and Uri Zwick. 1995. Color-coding. J. ACM 42, 4 (1995).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Ilya Baran, Erik D. Demaine, and Mihai Pǎtraşcu. 2008. Subquadratic algorithms for 3SUM. Algorithmica 50, 4 (2008), 584--596.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Surender Baswana, Manoj Gupta, and Sandeep Sen. 2015. Fully dynamic maximal matching in O(log n) update time. SIAM J. Comput. 44, 1 (2015), 88--113.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Ann Becker, Reuven Bar-Yehuda, and Dan Geiger. 2000. Randomized algorithms for the loop cutset problem. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 12 (2000), 219--234.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Aaron Bernstein and Liam Roditty. 2011. Improved dynamic algorithms for maintaining approximate shortest paths under deletions. In Proceedings of the ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA’11). 1355--1365.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Sayan Bhattacharya, Monika Henzinger, and Giuseppe F. Italiano. 2015. Deterministic fully dynamic data structures for vertex cover and matching. In Proceedings of the ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA’15). 785--804.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Hans L. Bodlaender. 1993. Dynamic algorithms for graphs with treewidth 2. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Graph-Theoretic Concepts in Computer Science (WG’93) (Lecture Notes Comput. Sci.), Vol. 790. 112--124.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Hans L. Bodlaender, Rodney G. Downey, Michael R. Fellows, and Danny Hermelin. 2009. On problems without polynomial kernels. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 75, 8 (2009), 423--434.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Hans L. Bodlaender, Pål Grønås Drange, Markus S. Dregi, Fedor V. Fomin, Daniel Lokshtanov, and Michał Pilipczuk. 2016. A ck n 5-approximation algorithm for treewidth. SIAM J. Comput. 45, 2 (2016), 317--378.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Jonathan F. Buss and Judy Goldsmith. 1993. Nondeterminism within . SIAM J. Comput. 22, 3 (1993), 560--572.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Leizhen Cai, Siu Man Chan, and Siu On Chan. 2006. Random separation: A new method for solving fixed-cardinality optimization problems. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Parameterized and Exact Computation (IPEC’06), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 4169. 239--250.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Liming Cai, Jianer Chen, Rodney G. Downey, and Michael R. Fellows. 1997. Advice classes of parameterized tractability. Ann. Pure Appl. Logic 84, 1 (1997), 119--138.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Jianer Chen, Iyad A. Kanj, and Ge Xia. 2010. Improved upper bounds for vertex cover. Theoret. Comput. Sci. 411, 40 (2010), 3736--3756.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Jianer Chen, Yang Liu, Songjian Lu, Barry O’Sullivan, and Igor Razgon. 2008. A fixed-parameter algorithm for the directed feedback vertex set problem. J. ACM 55, 5 (2008).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Rajesh Hemant Chitnis, Graham Cormode, Mohammad Taghi Hajiaghayi, and Morteza Monemizadeh. 2015. Parameterized streaming: Maximal matching and vertex cover. In Proceedings of the ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA’15). 1234--1251.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Bruno Courcelle. 1990. The monadic second-order logic of graphs. I. Recognizable sets of finite graphs. Inf. Comput. 85, 1 (1990), 12--75.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Marek Cygan. 2012. Deterministic parameterized connected vertex cover. In Proceedings of the Scandinavian Symposium and Workshops on Algorithm Theory (SWAT’12), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 7357. 95--106.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Marek Cygan, Fedor Fomin, Bart M. P. Jansen, Łukasz Kowalik, Daniel Lokshtanov, Dániel Marx, Marcin Pilipczuk, Michał Pilipczuk, and Saket Saurabh. 2014. Open problems for FPT School 2014. http://fptschool.mimuw.edu.pl/opl.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Marek Cygan, Fedor V. Fomin, Łukasz Kowalik, Daniel Lokshtanov, Dániel Marx, Marcin Pilipczuk, Michał Pilipczuk, and Saket Saurabh. 2015. Parameterized Algorithms. Springer, Cham.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Marek Cygan, Stefan Kratsch, Marcin Pilipczuk, Michał Pilipczuk, and Magnus Wahlström. 2014. Clique cover and graph separation: New incompressibility results. ACM Trans. Comput. Theory 6, 2 (2014), 6:1–6:19.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Marek Cygan, Marcin Pilipczuk, and Michał Pilipczuk. 2016. Known algorithms for edge clique cover are probably optimal. SIAM J. Comput. 45, 1 (2016), 67--83.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Jean Daligault, Gregory Gutin, Eun Jung Kim, and Anders Yeo. 2010. FPT algorithms and kernels for the Directed -Leaf problem. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 76, 2 (2010), 144--152.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Holger Dell and Dieter van Melkebeek. 2014. Satisfiability allows no nontrivial sparsification unless the polynomial-time hierarchy collapses. J. ACM 61, 4 (2014), 23:1–23:27.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Camil Demetrescu and Giuseppe F. Italiano. 2004. A new approach to dynamic all pairs shortest paths. J. ACM 51, 6 (2004), 968--992.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Michael Dom, Daniel Lokshtanov, and Saket Saurabh. 2009. Incompressibility through colors and IDs. In Proceedings of the International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP’09), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 5555. 378--389.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Frederic Dorn. 2010. Planar subgraph isomorphism revisited. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS’10), Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics, Vol. 5. 263--274.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Zdeněk Dvořák, Martin Kupec, and Vojtěch Tůma. 2014. A dynamic data structure for MSO properties in graphs with bounded tree-depth. In Proceedings of the European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA’14), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 8737. 334--345.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Zdeněk Dvořák and Vojtěch Tůma. 2013. A dynamic data structure for counting subgraphs in sparse graphs. In Proceedings of the Algorithms and Data Structures Symposium (WADS’13), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 8037. 304--315.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Ranel E. Erickson, Clyde L. Monma, and Jr. Arthur F. Veinott. 1987. Send-and-split method for minimum-concave-cost network flows. Math. Oper. Res. 12, 4 (1987), 634--664.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Vladimir Estivill-Castro, Michael R. Fellows, Michael A. Langston, and Frances A. Rosamond. 2005. FPT is P-time extremal structure I. In Proceedings of the Algorithms and Complexity Workshop in Durham (ACiD’05). 1--41.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Michael Etscheid and Matthias Mnich. 2016. Linear kernels and linear time algorithms for finding large cuts. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Algorithms and Computation (ISAAC’16), Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics, Vol. 64. 31:1–31:13.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Stefan Fafianie and Stefan Kratsch. 2015. A shortcut to (sun)flowers: Kernels in logarithmic space or linear time. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science (MFCS’15), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 9235. 299--310.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Henning Fernau. 2006. Edge dominating set: Efficient enumeration-based exact algorithms. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Parameterized and Exact Computation (IPEC’06), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 4169. 142--153.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Bernhard Fuchs, Walter Kern, Daniel Mölle, Stefan Richter, Peter Rossmanith, and Xinhui Wang. 2007. Dynamic programming for minimum Steiner trees. Theory Comput. Syst. 41, 3 (2007), 493--500.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Anka Gajentaan and Mark H. Overmars. 2012. On a class of problems in computational geometry. Comput. Geom. 45, 4 (2012), 140--152.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. François Le Gall. 2014. Powers of tensors and fast matrix multiplication. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Symbolic and Algebraic Computation (ISSAC'14). 296--303.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. David Gibb, Bruce Kapron, Valerie King, and Nolan Thorn. 2015. Dynamic Graph Connectivity with Improved Worst Case Update Time and Sublinear Space. Technical Report. https://arxiv.org/abs/1509.06464https://arxiv.org/abs/1509.06464 -->.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Jens Gramm, Jiong Guo, Falk Hüffner, and Rolf Niedermeier. 2009. Data reduction and exact algorithms for clique cover. J. Exp. Algor. 13, Article 2 (2009), 2:2.2–2:2.15 pages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Manoj Gupta and Richard Peng. 2013. Fully dynamic -approximate matchings. In Proceedings of the IEEE Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS’13). 548--557.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Andras Gyárfás. 1990. A simple lower bound on edge coverings by cliques. Discr. Math. 85, 1 (1990), 103--104.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Godfrey H. Hardy and S. Ramanujan. 1918. Asymptotic formulæ in combinatory analysis. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. s2-17, 1 (1918), 75--115.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. Monika Henzinger, Sebastian Krinninger, and Danupon Nanongkai. 2015. Improved algorithms for decremental single-source reachability on directed graphs. In Proceedings of the International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP’15), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 9134. 725--736.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Monika Henzinger, Sebastian Krinninger, and Danupon Nanongkai. 2016. Dynamic approximate all-pairs shortest paths: Breaking the O(mn) barrier and derandomization. SIAM J. Comput. 45, 3 (2016), 947--1006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Monika Henzinger, Sebastian Krinninger, Danupon Nanongkai, and Thatchaphol Saranurak. 2015. Unifying and strengthening hardness for dynamic problems via the online matrix-vector multiplication conjecture. In Proceedings of the IEEE Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS’15). 21--30.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Monika Rauch Henzinger and Valerie King. 1999. Randomized fully dynamic graph algorithms with polylogarithmic time per operation. J. ACM 46, 4 (1999), 502--516.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Monika Rauch Henzinger and Valerie King. 2001. Maintaining minimum spanning forests in dynamic graphs. SIAM J. Comput. 31, 2 (2001), 364--374.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Monika Rauch Henzinger and Mikkel Thorup. 1997. Sampling to provide or to bound: With applications to fully dynamic graph algorithms. Rand. Struct. Algor. 11, 4 (1997), 369--379.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Jacob Holm, Kristian de Lichtenberg, and Mikkel Thorup. 2001. Poly-logarithmic deterministic fully-dynamic algorithms for connectivity, minimum spanning tree, 2-edge, and biconnectivity. J. ACM 48, 4 (2001), 723--760.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Shang-En Huang, Dawei Huang, Tsvi Kopelowitz, and Seth Pettie. 2016. Fully Dynamic Connectivity in O(log n(log log n)2) Amortized Expected Time. Technical Report. http://arxiv.org/abs/1609.05867http://arxiv.org/abs/1609.05867.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Alon Itai and Michael Rodeh. 1978. Finding a minimum circuit in a graph. SIAM J. Comput. 7, 4 (1978), 413--423.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. Ken Iwaide and Hiroshi Nagamochi. 2016. An improved algorithm for parameterized edge dominating set problem. J. Graph Algor. Appl. 20, 1 (2016), 23--58.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  57. Yoichi Iwata. 2017. A linear time kernelization for feedback vertex set. In Proceedings of the International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP’17), Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics, Vol. 80. 68:1–68:14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. Yoichi Iwata and Keigo Oka. 2014. Fast dynamic graph algorithms for parameterized problems. In Proceedings of the Scandinavian Symposium and Workshops on Algorithm Theory (SWAT’14), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 8503. 241--252.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  59. Yoichi Iwata, Keigo Oka, and Yuichi Yoshida. 2014. Linear-time FPT algorithms via network flow. In Proceedings of the ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA’14). 1749--1761.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  60. Bruce M. Kapron, Valerie King, and Ben Mountjoy. 2013. Dynamic graph connectivity in polylogarithmic worst case time. In Proceedings of the ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA’13). 1131--1142.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  61. Tsvi Kopelowitz, Seth Pettie, and Ely Porat. 2016. Higher lower bounds from the 3SUM conjecture. In Proceedings of the ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA’16). 1272--1287.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  62. Stefan Kratsch, Geevarghese Philip, and Saurabh Ray. 2016. Point line cover: The easy kernel is essentially tight. ACM Trans. Algor. 12, 3 (2016), 40:1–40:16.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. Stefan Kratsch and Magnus Wahlström. 2012. Representative sets and irrelevant vertices: New tools for kernelization. In Proceedings of the IEEE Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS’12). 450--459.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  64. Jakub Łacki, Jakub Oćwieja, Marcin Pilipczuk, Piotr Sankowski, and Anna Zych. 2015. The power of dynamic distance oracles: Efficient dynamic algorithms for the Steiner tree. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC’15). 11--20.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. Stefan Langerman and Pat Morin. 2005. Covering things with things. Discr. Comput. Geom. 33, 4 (2005), 717--729.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  66. Daniel Lokshtanov, N. S. Narayanaswamy, Venkatesh Raman, M. S. Ramanujan, and Saket Saurabh. 2014. Faster parameterized algorithms using linear programming. ACM Trans. Algor. 11, 2 (2014), 15:1–15:31.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. Daniel Lokshtanov, M. S. Ramanujan, and Saket Saurabh. 2015. Linear time parameterized algorithms for subset feedback vertex set. In Proceedings of the International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP’15), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 9134. 935--946.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  68. Daniel Lokshtanov, M. S. Ramanujan, and Saket Saurabh. 2018. When recursion is better than iteration: A linear-time algorithm for acyclicity with few error vertices. In Proceedings of the ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA'18). 1916–1933.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  69. Aleksander Madry. 2013. Navigating central path with electrical flows: From flows to matchings, and back. In Proceedings of the IEEE Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS’13). 253--262.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  70. M. Naor, L. J. Schulman, and A. Srinivasan. 1995. Splitters and near-optimal derandomization. In Proceedings of the IEEE Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS’95). 182--191.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  71. Krzysztof Onak and Ronitt Rubinfeld. 2010. Maintaining a large matching and a small vertex cover. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC’10). 457--464.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  72. Mihai Pǎtraşcu. 2010. Towards polynomial lower bounds for dynamic problems. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC’10). 603--610.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  73. Mihai Pǎtraşcu. 2011. Unifying the landscape of cell-probe lower bounds. SIAM J. Comput. 40, 3 (2011), 827--847.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  74. Mihai Pǎtraşcu and Erik D. Demaine. 2006. Logarithmic lower bounds in the cell-probe model. SIAM J. Comput. 35, 4 (2006), 932--963.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  75. Mihai Pǎtraşcu and Mikkel Thorup. 2011. Don’t rush into a union: Take time to find your roots. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC’11). 559--568.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  76. Daniel D. Sleator and Robert Endre Tarjan. 1983. A data structure for dynamic trees. J. Comput. System Sci. 26, 3 (1983), 362--391.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  77. Shay Solomon. 2016. Fully dynamic maximal matching in constant update time. In Proceedings of the IEEE Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS’16). 325--334.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  78. Mikkel Thorup. 2000. Near-optimal fully-dynamic graph connectivity. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC’00). 343--350.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  79. René van Bevern. 2014. Towards optimal and expressive kernelization for -hitting set. Algorithmica 70, 1 (2014), 129--147.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  80. Virginia Vassilevska Williams. 2012. Multiplying matrices faster than Coppersmith-Winograd. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC’12). 887--898.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  81. Jens Vygen. 2011. Faster algorithm for optimum Steiner trees. Inf. Proc. Lett. 111, 21–22 (2011), 1075--1079.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  82. Magnus Wahlström. 2014. Half-integrality, LP-branching and FPT algorithms. In Proceedings of the ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA’14). 1762--1781.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  83. Christian Wulff-Nilsen. 2013. Faster deterministic fully-dynamic graph connectivity. In Proceedings of the ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA’13). 1757--1769.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Dynamic Parameterized Problems and Algorithms

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image ACM Transactions on Algorithms
        ACM Transactions on Algorithms  Volume 16, Issue 4
        October 2020
        404 pages
        ISSN:1549-6325
        EISSN:1549-6333
        DOI:10.1145/3407674
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Copyright © 2020 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 6 July 2020
        • Online AM: 7 May 2020
        • Accepted: 1 April 2020
        • Revised: 1 January 2020
        • Received: 1 March 2019
        Published in talg Volume 16, Issue 4

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format