skip to main content
research-article

Towards Synaptic Behavior of Nanoscale ReRAM Devices for Neuromorphic Computing Applications

Authors Info & Claims
Published:29 April 2020Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Resistive Random Access Memory (ReRAM), a form of non-volatile memory, has been proposed as a Flash memory replacement. In addition, novel circuit architectures have been proposed that rely on newly discovered or predicted behavior of ReRAM. One such architecture is the memristive Dynamic Adaptive Neural Network Array, developed to emulate the functionality of a biological neuron system. We demonstrated ReRAM devices that show a synaptic tendency by changing their resistance in an analog fashion. The CMOS compatible nanoscale ReRAM devices shown are based on an HfO2 switching layer that sits on a tungsten electrode and is covered by a titanium oxygen scavenger layer and a titanium nitride top electrode. In this work, we showed devices exceeding endurance values of 10B cycles with a discrete Roff/Ron ratio of 15. Multi-level states were achieved by using consecutive ultra-short 5/1.5 ns pulses during the reset operation. A neural network simulation was performed in which the synaptic weights were perturbed with the ReRAM variability, which was extracted from two different characterization methods: (1) via direct write, and (2) via a write/read verification approach during the reset operation. A substantial improvement of the neural network fitness was demonstrated when using the write/read verification approach.

References

  1. D. B. Strukov, G. S. Snider, D. R. Stewart, and R. S. Williams. 2008. The missing memristor found. Nature 453 (2008), 80--83.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. D. S. Jeong, H. Schroeder, and R. Waser. 2007. Coexistence of bipolar and unipolar resistive switching behaviors in a Pt TiO2 Pt stack. Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. 10, 8 (2007).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. M. N. Kozicki, M. Yun, S. J. Yang, J. P. Aberouette, and J. P. Bird. 2000. Nanoscale effects in devices based on chalcogenide solid solutions. Superlatt. Microstruct. 27, 5 (2000), 485--488.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. T. Fujii, M. Kawasaki, A. Sawa, H. Akoh, Y. Kawazoe, and Y. Tokura. 2005. Hysteretic current—Voltage characteristics and resistance switching at an epitaxial oxide Schottky junction SrRuO[sub 3]∕SrTi[sub 0.99]Nb[sub 0.01]O[sub 3]. Appl. Phys. Lett. 86, 1 (2005), 012107.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. A. Beck, J. G. Bednorz, C. Gerber, C. Rossel, and D. Widmer, 2000. Reproducible switching effect in thin oxide films for memory applications. Appl. Phys. Lett. 77, 1 (2000), 139Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. L. Chua. 1971. Memristor—The missing circuit element. IEEE Trans. Circ. Theory 18, 5 (1971). 507--519.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. D.-J. Seong et al. 2013. Highly reliable ReRAM technology with encapsulation process for 20nm and beyond. In Proceedings of the 5th IEEE International Memory Workshop. 42--43.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Y. Hayakawa et al. 2015. Highly reliable TaOx ReRAM with centralized filament for 28-nm embedded application. In Proceedings of the Symposium on VLSI Technology. T14--T15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. R. Waser, R. Dittmann, G. Staikov, and K. Szot. 2009. Redox-based resistive switching memories—Nanoionic mechanisms, prospects, and challenges. Adv. Mater. 21, 25--26 (July 2009), 2632--2663.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. S. Menzel, M. Waters, A. Marchewka, U. Böttger, R. Dittmann, and R. Waser. 2011. Origin of the Ultra-nonlinear switching kinetics in oxide-based resistive switches. Adv. Funct. Mater. 21, 23 (Dec. 2011), 4487--4492.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. D. Kuzum, R. G. D. Jeyasingh, B. Lee, and H.-S. P. Wong. 2012. Nanoelectronic programmable synapses based on phase change materials for brain-inspired computing. Nano Lett, 125 (May 2012), 2179--86.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. G. W. Burr et al. 2015. Experimental demonstration and tolerancing of a large-scale neural network (165,000 synapses) using phase-change memory as the synaptic weight element. IEEE Trans. Electron. Dev. 62 11 (2015), 3498--3507.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. K. Beckmann, H. Manem, and N. C. Cady. 2017. Performance enhancement of a time-delay PUF design by utilizing integrated nanoscale ReRAM devices. IEEE Trans. Emerg. Top. Comput. 5, 3 (July 2017), 304--316.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. J. Rajendran, H. Manem, R. Karri, and G. S. Rose. 2012. An energy-efficient memristive threshold logic circuit. IEEE Trans. Comput. 61, 4 (Apr. 2012), 474--487.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Z. Alamgir, K. Beckmann, N. Cady, A. Velasquez, and S. K. Jha. 2016. Flow-based computing on nanoscale crossbars: Design and implementation of full adders. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS’16). 1870--1873.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. M. Hu, H. Li, Y. Chen, Q. Wu, G. S. Rose, and R. W. Linderman. 2014. Memristor crossbar-based neuromorphic computing system: A case study. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst. 25, 10 (Oct. 2014), 1864--1878.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. G. S. Rose, N. McDonald, L.-K. Yan, and B. Wysocki. 2013. A write-time based memristive PUF for hardware security applications. In Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM International Conference on Computer-Aided Design (ICCAD’13). 830--833.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. H. Manem, K. Beckmann, M. Xu, R. Carroll, R. Geer, and N. C. Cady. 2015. An extendable multi-purpose 3D neuromorphic fabric using nanoscale memristors. In Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence for Security and Defense Applications (CISDA’15). 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. T. E. Potok et al. 2016. A study of complex deep learning networks on high performance, neuromorphic, and quantum computers. In Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Machine Learning in HPC Environments (MLHPC’16). 47--55.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. J. Schemmel, D. Briiderle, A. Griibl, M. Hock, K. Meier, and S. Millner. 2010. A wafer-scale neuromorphic hardware system for large-scale neural modeling. In Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems. 1947--1950.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. A. Kalampokis, C. Kotsavasiloglou, P. Argyrakis, and S. Baloyannis. 2003. Robustness in biological neural networks. Phys. A Stat. Mech. Appl. 317, 3--4 (Jan. 2003), 581--590.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. X. Liu et al. 2016. Harmonica: A framework of heterogeneous computing systems with memristor-based neuromorphic computing accelerators. IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst. I Regul. Pap. 63, 5 (May 2016), 617--628.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. G. Indiveri, B. Linares-Barranco, R. Legenstein, G. Deligeorgis, and T. Prodromakis. 2013. Integration of nanoscale memristor synapses in neuromorphic computing architectures. Nanotechnology. 24 38 (Sept. 2013), 384010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. R. J. Vogelstein, U. Mallik, J. T. Vogelstein, and G. Cauwenberghs. 2007. Dynamically reconfigurable silicon array of spiking neurons with conductance-based synapses. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 18, 1 (Jan. 2007), 253--265.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. S. Kim et al. 2015. NVM neuromorphic core with 64k-cell (256-by-256) phase change memory synaptic array with on-chip neuron circuits for continuous in-situ learning. In Proceedings of the International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM’15).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. M. Suri et al. 2012. Interface engineering of PCM for improved synaptic performance in neuromorphic systems. In Proceedings of the 4th IEEE International Memory Workshop (IMW’12). 1--4.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. G. W. Burr et al. 2015. Large-scale neural networks implemented with non-volatile memory as the synaptic weight element: Comparative performance analysis (accuracy, speed, and power). In Proceedings of the IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM’15). 4.4.1--4.4.4.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. R. B. Jacobs-Gedrim et al. 2017. Impact of linearity and write noise of analog resistive memory devices in a neural algorithm accelerator. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Rebooting Computing (ICRC’17). 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. S. H. Jo, T. Chang, I. Ebong, B. B. Bhadviya, P. Mazumder, and W. Lu. Nanoscale memristor device as synapse in neuromorphic systems. Nano Lett. 10, 4 (Apr. 2010), 1297--301.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. J.-W. Jang, S. Park, Y.-H. Jeong, and H. Hwang. 2014. ReRAM-based synaptic device for neuromorphic computing. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS’14). 1054--1057.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. J. Woo, A. Padovani, K. Moon, M. Kwak, L. Larcher, and H. Hwang. 2017. Linking conductive filament properties and evolution to synaptic behavior of RRAM devices for neuromorphic applications. IEEE Electron. Dev. Lett. 38, 9 (Sept. 2017), 1220--1223.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. S. Yu, B. Gao, Z. Fang, H. Yu, J. Kang, and H.-S. P. Wong. 2012. A neuromorphic visual system using RRAM synaptic devices with Sub-pJ energy and tolerance to variability: Experimental characterization and large-scale modeling. In Proceedings of the International Electron Devices Meeting. 10.4.1--10.4.4.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Z. Alamgir, K. Beckmann, J. Holt, and N. C. Cady. 2017. Pulse width and height modulation for multi-level resistance in bi-layer TaOx based RRAM. Appl. Phys. Lett. 111, 6 (Aug. 2017).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. M. J. Marinella et al. 2018. Multiscale co-design analysis of energy, latency, area, and accuracy of a ReRAM analog neural training accelerator. IEEE J. Emerg. Sel. Top. Circ. Syst. 8, 1 (Mar. 2018), 86--101.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Q. Xia and J. J. Yang. 2019. Memristive crossbar arrays for brain-inspired computing. Nature Mat. 18, 4 (Apr 2019), 309--323.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. M. Liehr et al. 2019. Fabrication and performance of hybrid RERAM-CMOS circuit elements for dynamic neural networks. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. N. C. Cady, K. Beckmann, H. Manem, M. E. Dean, G. Rose, and J. E. Van Nostrand. 2016. Towards memristive dynamic adaptive neural network arrays. In Proceedings of the Government Microcircuit Applications and Critical Technology Conference (GOMACTech’16). 1--4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. A. Disney, J. Reynolds, C. D. Schuman, A. Klibisz, A. Young, and J. S. Plank. 2016. DANNA: A neuromorphic software ecosystem. Biol. Inspired Cogn. Archit. 17 (2016), 49--56.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. C. D. Schuman, A. Disney, and J. Reynolds. 2015. Dynamic adaptive neural network arrays: A Neuromorphic Architecture. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Machine Learning in High-Performance Computing Environments (MLHPC’15). 1--4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Q. Liu et al. 2012. Resistive switching: Real-time observation on dynamic growth/dissolution of conductive filaments in oxide-electrolyte-based ReRAM. Adv. Mater. 24 (2012), 1844--1849.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. A. Marchewka et al. 2016. Nanoionic resistive switching memories: On the physical nature of the dynamic reset process. Adv. Electron. Mater. 2, 1 (Jan. 2016), 1--13.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. F. Cüppers et al. 2019. Exploiting the switching dynamics of HfO 2-based ReRAM devices for reliable analog memristive behavior. APL Mater. 7, 9 (2019), 091105.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. C. D. Schuman, J. D. Birdwell, and M. Dean. 2014. Neuroscience-inspired dynamic architectures. In Proceedings of the Biomedical Science & Engineering Conference (BSEC’14). 1--4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. C. D. Schuman and J. D. Birdwell. 2013. Variable structure dynamic artificial neural networks. Biol. Inspired Cogn. Archit. 6 (Oct. 2013), 126--130.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. T. Dalgaty et al. 2019. Hybrid CMOS-RRAM neurons with intrinsic plasticity. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Towards Synaptic Behavior of Nanoscale ReRAM Devices for Neuromorphic Computing Applications

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image ACM Journal on Emerging Technologies in Computing Systems
        ACM Journal on Emerging Technologies in Computing Systems  Volume 16, Issue 2
        April 2020
        261 pages
        ISSN:1550-4832
        EISSN:1550-4840
        DOI:10.1145/3375712
        • Editor:
        • Zhaojun Bai
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Copyright © 2020 ACM

        © 2020 Association for Computing Machinery. ACM acknowledges that this contribution was authored or co-authored by an employee, contractor or affiliate of the United States government. As such, the United States Government retains a nonexclusive, royalty-free right to publish or reproduce this article, or to allow others to do so, for Government purposes only.

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 29 April 2020
        • Accepted: 1 February 2020
        • Revised: 1 November 2019
        • Received: 1 May 2019
        Published in jetc Volume 16, Issue 2

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format