skip to main content
research-article
Open Access

Challenges in Designing a Fully Autonomous Socially Assistive Robot for People with Parkinson’s Disease

Authors Info & Claims
Published:31 May 2020Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Assistive robots are becoming an increasingly important application platform for research in robotics, AI, and HRI, as there is a pressing need to develop systems that support the elderly and people with disabilities, with a clear path to market. Yet, what remains unclear is whether current autonomous systems are already up to the task or whether additional HRI work is needed to make these systems acceptable and useful.

In this article, we report our efforts of developing and evaluating an architecture for a fully autonomous robot designed to assist older adults with Parkinson’s disease (PD) in sorting their medications. The main goal for the robot is to aid users in a manner that maintains the autonomy of the user by providing cognitive and social support with varying levels of assistance. We first evaluated the robot with subjects drawn from a pool of university students, which is common practice in experimental work in psychology and HRI. As the results were very positive, we followed up with an evaluation using people with Parkinson’s disease, who surprisingly had mostly negative outcomes. We thus report our analysis of the differences in the evaluations and discuss the challenges for HRI posed by the sources of the negative evaluations: (1) designing a robot to adapt to the many routines the participants use at home, (2) unique needs of participants with PD not present in student participants, and (3) the role of familiar technologies in designing and evaluating a new technology. While it is unlikely, given the current state of technology, that fully autonomous assistive robots for older adults will be available in the near term, we believe that our work exposes a critical need in HRI to involve the target population as early as possible in the design process.

References

  1. H. R. Lee, Šabanović, W. L. Chang, S. Nagata, J. Piatt, C. Bennett, and D. Hakken. 2017. Steps toward participatory design of social robots: mutual learning with older adults with depression. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. 244--253Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Ronald C. Arkin, Matthias Scheutz, and Linda Tickle-Degnen. 2014. Preserving dignity in patient caregiver relationships using moral emotions and robots. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Ethics in Science, Technology and Engineering. 1--5.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. American Occupational Therapy Association et al. 2015. Occupational therapy code of ethics (2015). Amer. J. Occup. Ther. 69, 3 (2015). https://ajot.aota.org/article.aspx?articleid=2442685.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Jacquelyn L. Bainbridge and J. Mark Ruscin. 2009. Challenges of treatment adherence in older patients with Parkinson’s disease. Drugs Aging 26, 2 (2009), 145--155.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Elliot Baum. 2006. Pill dispenser. U.S. Patent 7,100,793.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Priscilla Briggs, Matthias Scheutz, and Linda Tickle-degnen. 2015. Are robots ready for administering health status surveys? First results from an HRI study with subjects with Parkinson’s disease. In Proceedings of the 10th Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. ACM, 327--334.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Susan A. Brown and Viswanath Venkatesh. 2005. Model of adoption of technology in households: A baseline model test and extension incorporating household life cycle. MIS Quart. 29, 3 (2005).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Praminda Caleb-Solly, Sanja Dogramadzi, David Ellender, Tina Fear, and Herjan van den Heuvel. 2014. A mixed-method approach to evoke creative and holistic thinking about robots in a home environment. In Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-robot Interaction. ACM, 374--381.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Vicki S. Conn, Adam R. Hafdahl, Pamela S. Cooper, Todd M. Ruppar, David R. Mehr, and Cynthia L. Russell. 2009. Interventions to improve medication adherence among older adults: Meta-analysis of adherence outcomes among randomized controlled trials. Gerontologist 49, 4 (2009), 447--462.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Chandan Datta, H. Yul Yang, Priyesh Tiwari, I. Han Kuo, and Bruce A. MacDonald. 2011. End user programming to enable closed-loop medication management using a healthcare robot. In Proceedings of Australasian Conference on Robotics and Automation.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Lindsey Dayer, Seth Heldenbrand, Paul Anderson, Paul O. Gubbins, and Bradley C. Martin. 2013. Smartphone medication adherence apps: Potential benefits to patients and providers. J. Amer. Pharm. Assoc. 53, 2 (2013), 172--181.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. E. R. Foster. 2014. Instrumental activities of daily living performance among people with Parkinson’s disease without dementia. Amer. J. Occup. Ther. 68, 3 (2014), 353--362.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Donald Grosset, Angelo Antonini, Margherita Canesi, Gianni Pezzoli, Andrew Lees, Karen Shaw, Esther Cubo, Pablo Martinez-Martin, Olivier Rascol, Laurence Negre-Pages, et al. 2009. Adherence to antiparkinson medication in a multicenter european study. Movement Disorders 24, 6 (2009), 826--832.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Jörg W. Haslbeck and Doris Schaeffer. 2009. Routines in medication management: The perspective of people with chronic conditions. Chronic Illness 5, 3 (2009), 184--196.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Leah M. Haverhals, Courtney A. Lee, Katie A. Siek, Carol A. Darr, Sunny A. Linnebur, J. Mark Ruscin, and Stephen E. Ross. 2011. Older adults with multi-morbidity: Medication management processes and design implications for personal health applications. J. Med. Internet Res. 13, 2 (2011), e44.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Tamara L. Hayes, John M. Hunt, Andre Adami, and Jeffrey A. Kaye. 2006. An electronic pillbox for continuous monitoring of medication adherence. In Proceedings of the International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE, 6400--6403.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Timothy J. Hazen and Issam Bazzi. 2001. A comparison and combination of methods for OOV word detection and word confidence scoring. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP’01), Vol. 1. IEEE, 397--400.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Amanda R. Hemmesch. 2011. The Stigmatizing Effects of Facial Masking and Abnormal Bodily Movement on Older Adults’ First Impressions of Individuals with Parkinson’s Disease. Brandeis University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Judith E. Hertz and Cynthia A. Anschutz. 2002. Relationships among perceived enactment of autonomy, self-care, and holistic health in community-dwelling older adults. J. Holistic Nurs. 20, 2 (2002), 166--186.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Hsiu-Fang Hsieh and Sarah E. Shannon. 2005. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitat. Health Res. 15, 9 (2005), 1277--1288.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Almar A. L. Kok, Marja J. Aartsen, Dorly J. H. Deeg, and Martijn Huisman. 2015. Capturing the diversity of successful aging: An operational definition based on 16-year trajectories of functioning. Gerontologist 57, 2 (2015), 240--251.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Amit S. Kulkarni, Rajesh Balkrishnan, Roger T. Anderson, Heather M. Edin, Jeff Kirsch, and Mark A. Stacy. 2008. Medication adherence and associated outcomes in medicare health maintenance organization-enrolled older adults with Parkinson’s disease. Movement Disorders 23, 3 (2008), 359--365.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Paul Lamere, Philip Kwok, Evandro Gouvea, Bhiksha Raj, Rita Singh, William Walker, Manfred Warmuth, and Peter Wolf. 2003. The CMU SPHINX-4 speech recognition system. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP’03), Vol. 1. Citeseer, 2--5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Chaiwoo Lee and Joseph F. Coughlin. 2015. PERSPECTIVE: Older adults’ adoption of technology: An integrated approach to identifying determinants and barriers. J. Product Innovat. Manage. 32, 5 (2015), 747--759.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Hee Rin Lee and Laurel D. Riek. 2018. Reframing assistive robots to promote successful aging. ACM Trans. Hum.-Robot Interact. 7, 1 (2018), 11.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Matthew L. Lee and Anind K. Dey. 2011. Reflecting on pills and phone use: Supporting awareness of functional abilities for older adults. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2095--2104.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Wendy Levinson, Audiey Kao, Alma Kuby, and Ronald A. Thisted. 2005. Not all patients want to participate in decision making: A national study of public preferences. J. Gen. Internal Med. 20, 6 (2005), 531--535.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Jamy Li. 2015. The benefit of being physically present: A survey of experimental works comparing copresent robots, telepresent robots and virtual agents. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Studies 77 (Jan. 2015), 23--27.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Eric J. MacLaughlin, Cynthia L. Raehl, Angela K. Treadway, Teresa L. Sterling, Dennis P. Zoller, and Chester A. Bond. 2005. Assessing medication adherence in the elderly: Which tools to use in clinical practice? Drugs Aging 22, 3 (2005), 231--255.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. C. Marras, J. C. Beck, J. H. Bower, E. Roberts, B. Ritz, G. W. Ross, R. D. Abbott, R. Savica, S. K. Van Den Eeden, A. W. Willis et al. 2018. Prevalence of Parkinson’s disease across North America. NPJ Parkinson’s Dis. 4, 1 (2018), 21.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Bonnie M. Muir and Neville Moray. 1996. Trust in automation. Part II. Experimental studies of trust and human intervention in a process control simulation. Ergonomics 39, 3 (1996), 429--460.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Alan Naditz. 2008. Medication complianceâhelping patients through technology: Modern “smart” pillboxes keep memory-short patients on their medical regimen. Telemed. e-Health 14, 9 (2008), 875--880.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Lennart Nordenfelt. 2004. The varieties of dignity. Health Care Anal. 12, 2 (2004), 69--81.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Lars Osterberg and Terrence Blaschke. 2005. Adherence to medication. New Engl. J. Med. 353, 5 (2005), 487--497.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. T. J. Parker. 2014. Prescribing design. Design Manage. Rev. 25, 3 (2014), 30--33.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Jürgen Pripfl, Tobias Körtner, Daliah Batko-Klein, Denise Hebesberger, Markus Weninger, Christoph Gisinger, Susanne Frennert, Hakan Eftring, Margarita Antona, Ilia Adami, et al. 2016. Results of a real world trial with a mobile social service robot for older adults. In Proceedings of the 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction. IEEE Press, 497--498.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Ireen M. Proot, Harry F. J. M. Crebolder, Huda Huijer Abu-Saad, Ton H. G. M. Macor, and Ruud H. J. Ter Meulen. 2000. Facilitating and constraining factors on autonomy: The views of stroke patients on admission into nursing homes. Clin. Nurs. Res. 9, 4 (2000), 460--478.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Islam Qudah, Peter Leijdekkers, and Valerie Gay. 2010. Using mobile phones to improve medication compliance and awareness for cardiac patients. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments. ACM, 36.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. M. V. Radomski and C. A. Trombly (Eds.). 2013. Occupational Therapy for Physical Dysfunction (7th ed.). Lippincott Williams 8 Wilkins.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. J. C. Rogers and M. B. Holm. 1994. Performance Assessment of Self-Care Skills (PASS-Home) Version 3.1 [Unpublished assessment tool]. University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Richard M. Ryan, Jennifer G. La Guardia, Jessica Solky-Butzel, Valery Chirkov, and Youngmee Kim. 2005. On the interpersonal regulation of emotions: Emotional reliance across gender, relationships, and cultures. Personal Relation. 12, 1 (2005), 145--163.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Anil Sahai, Stephen K. Breede, Roger O. Topliffe, and Douglas A. Topliffe. 1999. Medication dispensing system. U.S. Patent 5,971,594.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Matthias Scheutz. 2006. ADE—Steps towards a distributed development and runtime environment for complex robotic agent architectures. Appl. Artific. Intell. 20, 4--5 (2006).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Matthias Scheutz, Gordon Briggs, Rehj Cantrell, Evan Krause, Tom Williams, and Richard Veale. 2013. Novel mechanisms for natural human-robot interactions in the DIARC architecture. In Proceedings of the AAAI Workshop on Intelligent Robotic Systems.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Ju Young Shin, Barbara Habermann, and Ingrid Pretzer-Aboff. 2015. Challenges and strategies of medication adherence in Parkinson’s disease: A qualitative study. Geriatr. Nurs. 36, 3 (2015), 192--196.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Candace L. Sidner, Christopher Lee, Cory D. Kidd, Neal Lesh, and Charles Rich. 2005. Explorations in engagement for humans and robots. Artific. Intell. 166, 1--2 (Aug. 2005), 140--164.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. Cory-ann Smarr, Akanksha Prakash, Jenay M. Beer, Tracy L. Mitzner, Charles C. Kemp, and Wendy A. Rogers. 2012. Older adults’ preferences for and acceptance of robot assistance for everyday living tasks. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 56th Annual Meeting. 153--157.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Craig A. Smith and Phoebe C. Ellsworth. 1985. Patterns of cognitive appraisal in emotion. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 48, 4 (1985), 813--838.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Michael A. Steinman and Joseph T. Hanlon. 2010. Managing medications in clinically complex elders: “There’s got to be a happy medium.” J. Amer. Med. Assoc. 304, 14 (2010), 1592--1601.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. Carol S. Stilley, Catherine M. Bender, Jacqueline Dunbar-Jacob, Susan Sereika, and Christopher M. Ryan. 2010. The impact of cognitive function on medication management: Three studies. Health Psychol. 29, 1 (2010), 50.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. P. Tiwari, J. Warren, K. Day, and C. Datta. 2011. Comprehensive support for self management of medications by a networked robot for the elderly. In Proceedings of the Health Informatics New Zealand 10th Annual Conference and Exhibition.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Martijn van der Eijk, Frouke A. P. Nijhuis, Marjan J. Faber, and Bastiaan R. Bloem. 2013. Moving from physician-centered care towards patient-centered care for Parkinson’s disease patients. Parkinson. Relat. Disord. 19, 11 (2013), 923--927.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. Kazuyoshi Wada, Takanori Shibata, Tomoko Saito, Kayoko Sakamoto, and Kazuo Tanie. 2005. Psychological and social effects of one year robot assisted activity on elderly people at a health service facility for the aged. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Vol. 2005. 2785--2790.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. R. L. Wade, B. Clancey, and J. Michaeli. 2016. Improvement in antihypertensive and cholesterol-lowering medication persistence using a mobile technology application. Value Health 19, 3 (2 2016), A306.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Kieran Walsh and Aoife Callan. 2011. Perceptions, preferences, and acceptance of information and communication technologies in older-adult community care settings in Ireland: A case-study and ranked-care program analysis. Ageing Int. 36, 1 (2011), 102--122.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. Ilene Warner. 1998. Telemedicine in home health care: The current status of practice. Home Health Care Manage. Pract. 10, 2 (1998), 62--68.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Netta Weinstein, Andrew K. Przybylski, and Richard M. Ryan. 2012. The index of autonomous functioning: Development of a scale of human autonomy. J. Res. Personal. 46, 4 (2012), 397--413.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. Jason R. Wilson, Nah Young Lee, Annie Saechao, Sharon Hershenson, Matthias Scheutz, and Linda Tickle-Degnen. 2017. Hand gestures and verbal acknowledgments improve human-robot rapport. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Social Robotics. Springer, 334--344.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  59. Jason R. Wilson, Nah Young Lee, Annie Saechao, and Matthias Scheutz. 2016. Autonomy and dignity : Principles in designing effective social robots to assist in the care of older adults. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Using Social Robots to Improve the Quality of Life in the Elderly (ICSR’16).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Jason R. Wilson, Nah Young Lee, Annie Saechao, Linda Tickle-Degnen, and Matthias Scheutz. 2016. Designing a social robot to assist in medication sorting. In Social Robotics (ICSR’16), A. Agah, J. J. Cabibihan, A. Howard, M. Salichs, and H. He (Eds.). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 9979. Springer, Cham. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-47437-3_21.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. Jason R. Wilson, Linda Tickle-Degnen, and Matthias Scheutz. 2016. Designing a social robot to assist in medication sorting. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Social Robotics. Springer International Publishing, 211--221.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  62. Jason R. Wilson, Michael Wransky, and Jorge Tierno. 2018. General approach to automatically generating need-based assistance. In Proceedings of the 6th Annual Conference on Advances in Cognitive Systems.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Challenges in Designing a Fully Autonomous Socially Assistive Robot for People with Parkinson’s Disease

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in

          Full Access

          • Published in

            cover image ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction
            ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction  Volume 9, Issue 3
            September 2020
            172 pages
            EISSN:2573-9522
            DOI:10.1145/3403614
            Issue’s Table of Contents

            Copyright © 2020 Owner/Author

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 31 May 2020
            • Online AM: 7 May 2020
            • Accepted: 1 January 2020
            • Revised: 1 August 2019
            • Received: 1 December 2018
            Published in thri Volume 9, Issue 3

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article
            • Research
            • Refereed

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          HTML Format

          View this article in HTML Format .

          View HTML Format