skip to main content
10.1145/335603.335888acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

A weighted coding in a genetic algorithm for the degree-constrained minimum spanning tree problem

Authors Info & Claims
Published:19 March 2000Publication History
First page image

References

  1. 1.F. N. Abuali, D. A. Schoene~eld, and R. L. Wainwright. Designing telecommunications networks using genetic algorithms and probabilistic minimum spanning trees. In E. Deaton, D. Oppenheim, J. Urban, and H. Berghel, editors, Proceedings of the 199J A CM Symposium on Applied Computing, pagcs 242-246, New York, 1994. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. 2.F. N. Abuali, R. L. Wainwright, and D. A. Schoenefeld. Determinant factorization: A new encoding scheme for spanning trees applied to the probabilistic minimum spanning tree problem. In L. J. Eshelman, editor: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Genetic Algorithms, pages 470--477, San Marco, CA, 1995. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. 3.F. N. Abuali, R. L. Wainwright, and D. A. Schoenefeld. Solving the three-star tree isomorphism problem using genetic algorithms. In K. M. George, J. H. Carroll, E. Deaton, D. Oppenheim, and J. Hightower, editors, Proceedings of the 1995 A CM Symposium on Applied Computing, pages 337-343, New York, 1995. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. 4.B. Boldon, N. Dec, and N. Kumar. Minimum-weight degree-constrained spanning tree problem: Heuristics and implementation on an SIMD parallel machine. Technical Report CS-T1~-95-02, Department of Computer Science, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.J. Branke and M. Middend(~rf. Searching for shortest common supersequences by means of a heuristic-based genetic algorithm. In J. T. Alander, editor, Proceedings of the Second Nordic Workshop on Genetic Algorithms and their Applications, pages 105-113, University of Vaasa, Vaasa, Finland, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.S. Brave and A. S. Wu, editors. Late Breaking Papers at the t999 Genetic and EvolutionaT~j Computation Conferencc, Orlando, FL, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.A. C~ylcy. A theorem on trees. Quarterly Journal of Mathematics, 23:376-378, t889.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.B. Dengiz, F. Altiparmak, and A. E. Smith. Local search genetic algorithm for optimization of highly reliable communications networks. In T. Back, editor, Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Genetic Algorithms, pages 650-657, San Francisco, CA, 1997. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.A. E. Eiben and J. K. van der Hauw. Solving 3-SAT by GAs adapting constraint weights. In Proceedings of 1997 IEEE rnternational Conference on Evotutior~. ary Computation, pages 81-86, Indianapolis, IN, 1997. IEEE Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.51. Even. Algorithmic Combinatorics. The Macmillan Company, New York, 1973.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.$. Fekete, S. Khuller, M. Klemmstein, B. Raghavachaxi, and N. Young. A network-flow technique for finding low-weight bounded-degree spanning trees. Journal of Algorithms, 24:310-324, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. 12.M. R. Garey and D. S. Johnson. Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-UompleteheSS. W. H. Freeman, New York, 1979. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. 13.M. L. Gaxgano, W. Edelson, and O. Koval. A genetic algorithm with feasible search space for minimal spanning trees with time-dependent edge costs. In Koza et al. {19}, page 495.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.M. Gen, G. Zhou, and M. Takayama. A comparative study of tree encodings on spanning tree problems. In Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation Proceedings, pages 33- 38, Anchorage, AL, 1998. IEEE Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. 15.B. A. julstrom. Representing rectilinear Steiner trees in genetic algorithms. In K. M. George, J. H. Carroll, D. Oppenheim, and J. Hightower, editors, Proceedings of the 1996 A C'M Symposium on Applied Computing, pages 245-250, New York, 1996. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. 16.B. A. Julstrom. Insertion decoding algorithms and initial tours in a weight-coded GA for TSP. In Koza et al. {19}, pages 528-534.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.J. R. Kim and M. Glen. Genetic algorithm for solving bicriteri~ network topology design problem. In Porto {25}, pages 2272-2279.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.J. Knowles and D. Corne. A new evolutionary approach to the degree constrained minimum spanning tree problem. {EEE Transactions on Evolutionar~d Computation, to appear. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. 19.J. R. Koza, W. Banzhaf. K. Cheltapilla, K. Deb, M. Dorigo, D- B. Fogel, H. Iba, and P~. L. Riolo, editors. Genetic Programming 1998: PTvccedin~s of the Third Annual Conference, Madison, Wisconsin, 1998. Morgan Kaufmann. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. 20.J. B. Kruskal. On the shortest spanning subtree of a graph and the traveling salesman problem. Proceedings of the American Mathematics Society, 7(1):48-50, 1956.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. 21.C. Monma and S. Suri. Transitions in geometric minimum spanning trees. Discrete and Computational Geometry, 8(3):265- 293, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. 22.S. C. Narula and C. A. Ho. Degree-constrained minimum spanning trees. Computers and Operations Research, 7:239-249, 1980.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. 23.C. C. Palmer and A. Kershenbaum. Representing trees in genetic algorithms. In Proceedings of the First IEEE Conference on Evolutionary Computation, pages 379- 384, Orlando, FL, 1994. IEEE Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. 24.C. H. Papadimitriou and U. V. Vaziraifi. On two geometric problems related to the traveling salesman problem. Journal of Algorithms, 5:231-246, 1984.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. 25.V. W. Porto, editor. Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE Con#russ on Evolutionary Computation, Piscataway: N J, 1999. IEEE Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.R. Prim. Shortest connection networks and some generalizations. Bell System Technical Journal, 36:1389- 1401, 1957.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. 27.G. R. Raidl. A weight-coded genetic algorithm for the multiple container packing problem. In J. Carroll, H. Hiddad, D. Oppenheim, B. Bryant, and G. B. Lamont, editors, Proceedings of the 1999 A CM Symposium on Applied Computing, pages 291-296, New York, 1999. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. 28.G. R. Raidl. Weight-codings in a genetic algorithm for the m~alticoas%~aint knapsack problem. In Porto {25}, pages 596-603.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.G. It. Raidl and J. Gottlieb. On the importance of pheaotypic duplicate elimination in decoder-based evolutionaxy algorithms. In Brave and Wu {6}, pages 204- 211.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.F. Rothlauf and D. Goldberg. Tree network design with genetic algorithms - an investigation in the locality of the Pruefernumber encoding, lu Brave and Wu {6}, pages 238-243.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.M. Saveisbergh and T. Volgcnant. Edge exchanges in the degree-constrained minimum spanning tree problem. Computers and Operations Research, 12(4):341- 348, 1985.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. 32.G. Zhou and M. Gun. Approach to degree-constrained minimum spanning tree problem using genetic algorithm. Engineering Desing ~ Automation, 3(2):157- 165, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. A weighted coding in a genetic algorithm for the degree-constrained minimum spanning tree problem

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SAC '00: Proceedings of the 2000 ACM symposium on Applied computing - Volume 1
        March 2000
        536 pages
        ISBN:1581132409
        DOI:10.1145/335603

        Copyright © 2000 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 19 March 2000

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate1,650of6,669submissions,25%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader