Areti Galani
Jenny Kidd
Abstract
Digital heritage interpretation is often untethered from traditional museological techniques and environments. As museums and heritage sites explore the potential of locative technologies and ever more sophisticated content-triggering mechanisms for use outdoors, the kinds of questions that digital heritage researchers are able to explore have become increasingly more complex. Researchers now find themselves in the realm of the immersive, the experiential, and the performative. Working closely with their research participants, they navigate ambiguous terrain, including the often unpredictable affective resonances that are the direct consequences of interaction.
This article creates a dialogue between two case studies which, taken together, help to unpack some key methodological and ethical questions emerging from these developments. First, we introduce With New Eyes I See, an itinerant and immersive digital heritage encounter which collapsed boundaries between physical/digital, fact/fiction and past/present. Second, we detail Rock Art on Mobile Phones, a set of dialogic web apps that aimed to explore the potential of mobile devices in delivering heritage interpretation in the rural outdoors.
Looking outward from these case studies, we reflect on how traditional evaluation frameworks are being stretched and strained given the kinds of questions that digital heritage researchers are now exploring. Drawing on vignettes from experience-oriented qualitative studies with participants, we articulate specific common evaluative challenges related to the embodied, multimodal, and transmedial nature of the digital heritage experiences under investigation. In doing so, we make the case for reflexivity as a central and more collaborative feature of research design within this field going forward — paying attention to and advocating the reciprocal relationship between researchers and the heritage experiences that we study.
- Peter Wright, John McCarthy, and Lisa Meekison. 2004. Making sense of experience. In Funology, Mark A. Blythe, Kees Overbeeke, Andrew F. Monk, and Peter C. Wright (Eds.). Kluwer Academic Publishers, New York, 43--54. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Catherine Styles. 2011. Dialogic learning in museum space. Ethos 19, 3 (2011), 12--20.Google Scholar
- Shelley Ruth Butler. 2015. Reflexive museology: lost and found. In The International Handbooks of Museum Studies, Andrea Witcomb, and Kylie Message (Eds.). John Wiley & Sons, New York, 159--182.Google Scholar
- Daniela Petrelli, Luigina Ciolfi, Dick van Dijk, Eva Hornecker, Elena Not, and Albrecht Schmidt. 2013. Integrating material and digital: a new way for cultural heritage. Interactions 20, 4 (2013), 58--63. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Areti Damala, Tobias Schuchert, Isabel Rodriguez, Jorge Moragues, Kiel Gilleade, and Nenad Stojanovic. 2013. Exploring the affective museum visiting experience: adaptive augmented reality (A2R) and cultural heritage. International Journal of Heritage in the Digital Era 2, 1 (2013), 117--141.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Areti Damala, Merel van derVaart, Loraine Clarke, Eva Hornecker, Gabriela Avram, Hub Kockelkorn, and Ian Ruthven. 2016. Evaluating Tangible and Multisensory Museum Visiting Experiences: Lessons Learned from the meSch Project. Museums and the Web 2016 (MW’16). Los Angeles, CA. Retrieved May 22, 2018 from http://mw2016.museumsandtheweb.com/paper/evaluating-tangible-and-multisensory-museumvisiting-experiences-lessons-learned-from-the-mesch-project/.Google Scholar
- Areti Galani, Aron Mazel, Deborah Maxwell, and Kate Sharpe. 2013. Situating cultural technologies outdoors: Empathy in the design of mobile interpretation of rock art in rural Britain. In Visual Heritage in the Digital Age, Eugene Ch’ng, Vincent Gaffney, and Henry Chapman (Eds.). Springer, London, 183--204.Google Scholar
- Luigina Ciolfi. 2015. Embodiment and place experience in heritage technology design. In The International Handbooks of Museum Studies, Michelle Henning (Ed.). John Wiley, New York, 419--445.Google Scholar
- Sarah Kenderdine. 2016. Embodiment, entanglement, and immersion in digital cultural heritage. In A New Companion to Digital Humanities, Susan Schreibman, Ray Siemens, and John Unsworth (Eds.). Wiley, Chichester, 22--41.Google Scholar
- Luigina Ciolfi and Marc McLoughlin. 2017. Supporting place-specific interaction through a physical/digital assembly. Human-Computer Interaction 00, online (2017), 1--45.Google Scholar
- Steve Poole. 2017. Ghosts in the Garden: Locative gameplay and historical interpretation from below. International Journal of Heritage Studies 24, 3 (2017), 300--314.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jenny Kidd. 2014. Museums in the New Mediascape: Transmedia, Participation. Ethics, Routledge, London and New York.Google Scholar
- Jenny Kidd. 2017. With new eyes I see: Embodiment, empathy and silence in digital heritage interpretation. International Journal of Heritage Studies. Online.Google Scholar
- Robert Stein. 2015. CODE|WORDS: The back story. In CODE|WORDS: Technology and Theory in the Museum, Ed Rodley, Robert Stein, and Suse Cairns (Eds.). Museums Etc., Edinburgh, and Boston.Google Scholar
- Mats Alvesson and Kaj Skoldberg. 2017. Reflexive Methodology: New Vistas for Qualitative Research. SAGE Publications, London, California, New Delhi, and Singapore.Google Scholar
- Maria Economou and Laia Pujol Tost. 2011. Evaluating the use of virtual reality and multimedia applications for presenting the past. In Handbook of Research on Technologies and Cultural Heritage, Georgio Styliaras, Dimitrios Koukopoulos, and Fotis Lazarinis (Eds.). IGI Global, 223--239.Google Scholar
- Aron Mazel, Areti Galani, Deborah Maxwell, and Kate Sharpe. 2012. “I want to be provoked”: Public involvement in the development of the Northumberland Rock Art on Mobile Phones project. World Archaeology 44, 4 (2012), 592--611.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Christopher Tilley. 1994. A Phenomenology of Landscape. Berg, Oxford.Google Scholar
- John Was and Aaron Watson. 2017. Neolithic monuments: Sensory technology. Time and Mind 10, 1 (2017), 3--22.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bradley S. Jorgensen and Richard C. Stedman. 2001. Sense of place as an attitude: Lakeshore owners attitudes toward their properties. Journal of Environmental Psychology 21 (2001), 233--248.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Steve Mann. 2016. The Research Interview: Reflective Practice and Reflexivity in Research Processes. Palgrave Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
- Marianna Adams, John H. Falk, and Lynn D. Dierking. 2003. Things change. In Researching Visual Arts Education in Museums and Galleries. Vol. 2: Landscapes: The Arts, Aesthetics, and Education, Maria Xanthoudaki, Les Tickle, and Veronica Sekules (Eds.). Springer, London, 15--32.Google Scholar
- Lesley Fosh, Steve Benford, Stuart Reeves, Boriana Koleva, and Patrick Brundell. 2013. See me, feel me, touch me, hear me: trajectories and interpretation in a sculpture garden. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’13). ACM Press, New York, NY, 149--158. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Liam Betsworth, Huw Bowen, Simon Robinson, and Matt Jones. 2014. Performative technologies for heritage site regeneration. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 18, 7 (2014), 1631--1650. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Elisa Giaccardi and Leysia Palen. 2008. The social production of heritage through cross-media interaction: Making place for place-making. International Journal of Heritage Studies 14, 3 (2008), 281--297.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jeff Ritchie. 2014. The affordances and constraints of mobile locative narrative. In The Mobile Story — Narrative Practices with Locative Technologies, Jason Farman (Ed.). Routledge, New York, London, 53-67.Google Scholar
- Sarah Pink. 2015. Doing Sensory Ethnography (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications, London.Google Scholar
- Panagiotis Galatis, Damianos Gavalas, Vlasios Kasapakis, Grammati Pantziou, and Christos Zaroliagis. 2016. Mobile augmented reality guides in cultural heritage. In Proceedings of the 8th EAI International Conference on Mobile Computing, Applications and Services (MobiCASE’16), Fahim Kawsar, Pei Zhang, and Mirco Musolesi (Eds.). ICST, Brussels, 11--19. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Theano Moussouri and George Roussos. 2014. Mobile sensing, BYOD and Big data analytics: New technologies for audience research in museums. Participations 11, 1 (2014), 270--285.Google Scholar
- Anthony Jackson and Jenny Kidd. 2008. Performance, Learning and Heritage. Project report. Centre for Applied Theatre Research, University of Manchester, Manchester.Google Scholar
- Rose Biggin. 2017. Immersive Theatre and Audience Experience: Space, Game and Story in the Work of Punchdrunk. Palgrave Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
- Alke Gröppel-Wegener. 2011. Creating heritage experiences through architecture. In Performing Heritage: Research, Practice and Innovation in Museum Theatre and Live Interpretation, Anthony Jackson and Jenny Kidd (Eds.). Manchester University Press, Manchester, and New York, 39--52.Google Scholar
- Aron Mazel. 2017. Valuing rock art: A view from Northumberland in North East England. International Journal of Heritage Studies 23, 5 (2017), 421--433.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Eva Hornecker and Emma Nicol. 2011. Towards the Wild: Evaluating museum installations in semi-realistic situations. In Proceedings of the International Conference “Re-thinking Technology in Museums 2011: Emerging Experiences, Luigina Ciolfi, Katherine Scott, and Sara Barbieri (Eds.). University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.Google Scholar
- Maria Economou and Laia Pujol. 2008. Educational tool or expensive toy? Evaluating VR evaluation and its relevance for virtual heritage. In New Heritage: New Media and Cultural Heritage, Yehuda Kalay, Thomas Kvan, and Janice Affleck (Eds.). Routledge, London, 242--260.Google Scholar
- Carey Jewitt, Jeff Bezemer, and Kay O'Halloran. 2016. Introducing Multimodality. Routledge, Oxon and New York.Google Scholar
- Carey Jewitt (Ed.). 2013. The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis (2nd ed.). Routledge, Abingdon and Oxon.Google Scholar
- Lian Loke and George P. Khut. 2014. Intimate aesthetics and facilitated interaction. In Interactive Experience in the Digital Age: Evaluating New Art Practice, Linda Candy and Sam Ferguson (Eds.). Springer, Switzerland, 91--108.Google Scholar
- Jenny Kidd. 2019. Digital media ethics and museum communication. In The Routledge Handbook of Museum Media and Communication, Kirsten Drotner, Vince Dziekan, Ross Parry, and Kim Schrøder (Eds.). Routledge, London and New York.Google Scholar
- Celine Latulipe. 2013. The value of research in creativity and the arts. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM Conference on Creativity and Cognition. ACM Press, New York, 1--10. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Geoffrey Crossick and Patrycja Kaszynska. 2016. Understanding the Value of Arts and Culture: The AHRC Cultural Value Project. Report. Arts and Humanities Research Council, Swindon.Google Scholar
- John H. Falk and Lynn D. Dierking. 1992. The Museum Experience. Whalesback Books, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Evaluating Digital Cultural Heritage ‘In the Wild’: The Case For Reflexivity
Recommendations
Research on Three-dimensional Digital Technology Displaying Material Cultural Heritage——: A Case Study of Haechi in Xiaoling Mausoleum of Ming Dynasty
WSSE '21: Proceedings of the 3rd World Symposium on Software EngineeringMing Xiaoling Mausoleum, as the head of the Ming and Qing imperial tombs in China, represents the highest achievement of stone carving art in the early Ming Dynasty. In order to satisfy the desire of contemporary young tourists to visit material ...
North-American aboriginal curators' understandings of aboriginal cultural heritage: a discourse-analytic approach
iConference '11: Proceedings of the 2011 iConferenceThis poster presents the main aspects of my dissertation proposal, which focuses on discourses around aboriginal cultural heritage produced by aboriginal museum and gallery professionals in North America. This is a particularly important and timely ...
Comments