Abstract
There is a growing scientific interest in the use and development of just-in-time adaptive interventions in mobile health. These mobile interventions typically involve treatments, such as reminders, activity suggestions and motivational messages, delivered via notifications on a smartphone or a wearable to help users make healthy decisions in the moment. To be effective in influencing health, the combination of the right treatment and right delivery time is likely critical. A variety of prediction/detection algorithms have been developed with the goal of pinpointing the best delivery times. The best delivery times might be times of greatest risk and/or times at which the user might be most receptive to the treatment notifications. In addition, to avoid over burdening users, there is of ten a constraint on the number of treatments that should be provided per time interval (e.g., day or week). Yet there may be many more times at which the user is predicted or detected to be at risk and/or receptive. The goal then is to spread treatment uniformly across all of these times. In this paper, we introduce a method that spreads the treatment uniformly across the delivery times. This method can also be used to provide data for learning whether the treatments are effective at the delivery times. This work is motivated by our work on two mobile health studies, a smoking cessation study and a physical activity study.
Supplemental Material
Available for Download
Supplemental movie, appendix, image and software files for, Justin-Time but Not Too Much: Determining Treatment Timing in Mobile Health
- Jan G De Gooijer and Rob J Hyndman. 2006. 25 years of time series forecasting. International journal of forecasting 22, 3 (2006), 443--473.Google ScholarCross Ref
- W. Dempsey, P. Liao, and S.A. Murphy. {n. d.}. Sample size calculations for stratified micro-randomised trials in mHealth. ({n. d.}). Submitted.Google Scholar
- W. Dempsey, P. Liao, P. Klasnja I. Nahun-Shani, and S.A. Murphy. 2015. Randomised trials for the Fitbit generation. Significance 12, 6 (2015), 20--23.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M.L. Dennis, C. K. Scott, R. R. Funk, and L. Nicholson. 2015. A pilot study to examine the feasibility and potential effectiveness of using smartphones to provide recovery support for adolescents. Substance abuse 36, 4 (2015), 486--492.Google Scholar
- MR Dimitrijević, J Faganel, M Gregorić, PW Nathan, and JK Trontelj. 1972. Habituation: effects of regular and stochastic stimulation. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry 35, 2 (1972), 234--242.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Patrick L. Dulin, Vivian M. Gonzalez, and Kendra Campbell. 2014. Results of a Pilot Test of a Self-Administered Smartphone-Based Treatment System for Alcohol Use Disorders: Usability and Early Outcomes. Substance Abuse 35, 2 (2014), 168--175.Google ScholarCross Ref
- E. Ertin, N. Stohs, S. Kumar, A. Raij, M. al'Absi, and S. Shah. 2011. AutoSense: Unobtrusively Wearable Sensor Suite for Inferring the Onset, Causality, and Consequences of Stress in the Field. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems. New York, NY, USA, 274--287. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Syed Monowar Hossain, Timothy Hnat, Nazir Saleheen, Nusrat Jahan Nasrin, Joseph Noor, Bo-Jhang Ho, Tyson Condie, Mani Srivastava, and Santosh Kumar. 2017. mCerebrum: An mHealth Software Platform for Development and Validation of Digital Biomarkers and Interventions. In The ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys). ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- P. Klasnja, B. L. Harrison, L. LeGrand, A. LaMarca, J. Froehlich, and S.E. Hudson. 2008. Using Wearable Sensors and Real Time Inference to Understand Human Recall of Routine Activities. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp '08). 154--163. Google ScholarDigital Library
- P. Klasnja, E.B. Hekler, S. Shiffman, A. Boruvka, D. Almirall, A. Tewari, and S.A. Murphy. 2015. Micro-randomized trials: An experimental design for developing just-in-time adaptive interventions. Health Psychology 34, S (2015), 1220.Google Scholar
- P. Klasnja, S. Smith, N.J. Seewald, A. Lee, K. Hall, B. Luers, E.B. Hekler, and S.A. Murphy. 2018. Efficacy of contextually-tailored suggestions for physical activity: A micro-randomized optimization trial of HeartSteps. (2018). To appear in the Annals of Behavioral Medicine.Google Scholar
- G. Muhammad, M. Alsulaiman, S. U. Amin, A. Ghoneim, and M. F. Alhamid. 2017. A Facial-Expression Monitoring System for Improved Healthcare in Smart Cities. IEEE Access 5 (2017), 10871--10881.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Inbal Nahum-Shani, Shawna N Smith, Bonnie J Spring, Linda M Collins, Katie Witkiewitz, Ambuj Tewari, and Susan A Murphy. 2016. Just-in-Time Adaptive Interventions (JITAIs) in mobile health: key components and design principles for ongoing health behavior support. Annals of Behavioral Medicine (2016), 1--17.Google Scholar
- Martin Pielot, Bruno Cardoso, Kleomenis Katevas, Joan Serrà, Aleksandar Matic, and Nuria Oliver. 2017. Beyond Interruptibility: Predicting Opportune Moments to Engage Mobile Phone Users. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 1, 3, Article 91 (Sept. 2017), 25 pages. Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. Rathbun, X. Song, B. Neustfiter, and S. Shiffman. 2012. Survival analysis with time-varying covariates measured at random times by design. JR Stat Soc Ser C Appl. Stat. 62, 3 (2012), 419--434.Google ScholarCross Ref
- N. Saleheen, A.A. Ali, S.M. Hossain, H. Sarker, S. Chatterjee, B. Marlin, E. Ertin, M. al'Absi, and S. Kumar. 2015. puffMarker: A Multi-sensor Approach for Pinpointing the Timing of First Lapse in Smoking Cessation. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 999--1010. Google ScholarDigital Library
- H. Sarker, K. Hovsepian, S. Chatterjee, I. Nahum-Shani, S.A. Murphy, B. Spring, E. Ertin, M. al'Absi, M. Nakajima, and S. Kumar. 2017. From Markers to Interventions: The Case of Just-in-Time Stress Intervention. In Mobile Health Sensors, Analytic Methods, and Applications, J.M. Regh, S.A. Murphy, and S. Kumar (Eds.). Springer International.Google Scholar
- H. Sarker, M. Tyburski, M.M. Rahman, K. Hovsepian, M. Sharmin, D.H. Epstein, K.L. Preston, C.D. Furr-Holden, A. Milam, I. Nahum-Shani, M. al'Absi, and S. Kumar. 2016. Finding Significant Stress Episodes in a Discontinuous Time Series of Rapidly Varying Mobile Sensor Data. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). ACM, Santa Clara, California, USA, 4489--4501. Google ScholarDigital Library
- C.K. Scott, M.L. Dennis, and D.H. Gustafson. 2017. Using smartphones to decrease substance use via self-monitoring and recovery support: study protocol for a randomized control trial. Trials 18, 1 (2017), 374.Google ScholarCross Ref
- C. K. Scott, M. L. Dennis, D. Gustafson, and K. Johnson. 2017. A pilot study of the feasibility and potential effectiveness of using smartphones to provide recovery support. Drug & Alcohol Dependence 171 (2017), e185.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Saul Shiffman, Arthur A Stone, and Michael R Hufford. 2008. Ecological momentary assessment. Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol. 4 (2008), 1--32.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Arthur Stone, Saul Shiffman, Audie Atienza, and Linda Nebeling. 2007. The science of real-time data capture: Self-reports in health research. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- C. Wen, S. Schneider, A. Stone, and D. Spruijt-Metz. 2017. Compliance With Mobile Ecological Momentary Assessment Protocols in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Med Internet Res 19, 4 (2017), e132.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Wikipedia. 2018. KullbackâĂŞLeibler divergence --- Wikipedia The Free Encyclopedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KullbackâĂŞLeibler_divergence. {Online; accessed 26-July-2018}.Google Scholar
- Melvyn W B Zhang, John Ward, John J B Ying, Fang Pan, and Roger C M Ho. 2016. The alcohol tracker application: an initial evaluation of user preferences. BMJ Innovations 2, 1 (2016), 8--13.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Just-in-Time but Not Too Much: Determining Treatment Timing in Mobile Health
Recommendations
Personalized HeartSteps: A Reinforcement Learning Algorithm for Optimizing Physical Activity
With the recent proliferation of mobile health technologies, health scientists are increasingly interested in developing just-in-time adaptive interventions (JITAIs), typically delivered via notifications on mobile devices and designed to help users ...
Use of Mobile Health Applications for Health-Seeking Behavior Among US Adults
This study explores the use of mobile health applications (mHealth apps) on smartphones or tablets for health-seeking behavior among US adults. Data was obtained from cycle 4 of the 4th edition of the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS 4). ...
Experiences in mHealth for chronic disease management in 4 countries
ISABEL '11: Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Applied Sciences in Biomedical and Communication TechnologiesThis paper describes mHealth applications to deal with Non Communicable Diseases in North and Latin America: In Chile, a project focused on Diabetes Mellitus type 2; In the United States, Honduras, and Mexico, projects focused in diabetes, heart failure,...
Comments