Abstract
The richness that characterizes relationships is often absent when they are modeled using computational methods in network science. Typically, relationships are represented simply as links, perhaps with weights. The lack of finer granularity is due in part to the fact that, aside from linkage and strength, no fundamental or immediately obvious dimensions exist along which to categorize relationships. Here we propose a set of dimensions that capture major components of many relationships -- derived both from relevant academic literature and people's everyday descriptions of their relationships. We first review prominent findings in sociology and social psychology, highlighting dimensions that have been widely used to categorize social relationships. Next, we examine the validity of these dimensions empirically in two crowd-sourced experiments. Ultimately, we arrive at a set of ten major dimensions that can be used to categorize relationships: similarity, trust, romance, social support, identity, respect, knowledge exchange, power, fun, and conflict. These ten dimensions, while not dispositive, offer higher resolution than existing models. Indeed, we show that one can more accurately predict missing links in a social graph by using these dimensions than by using a state-of-the-art link embeddedness method. We also describe tinghy.org, an online platform we built to collect data about how social media users perceive their online relationships, allowing us to examine these dimensions at scale. Overall, by proposing a new way of modeling social graphs, our work aims to contribute both to theory in network science and practice in the design of social-networking applications.
- Luca Maria Aiello. 2015. Group Types in Social Media. In User Community Discovery. Springer, 97--134.Google Scholar
- Luca Maria Aiello. 2017. The Nature of Social Structures .Springer.Google Scholar
- Luca Maria Aiello, Alain Barrat, Ciro Cattuto, Rossano Schifanella, and Giancarlo Ruffo. 2012a. Link Creation and Information Spreading over Social and Communication Ties in an Interest-based Online Social Network. EPJ Data Science, Vol. 1, 1 (2012), 12.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Luca Maria Aiello, Alain Barrat, Rossano Schifanella, Ciro Cattuto, Benjamin Markines, and Filippo Menczer. 2012b. Friendship Prediction and Homophily in Social Media. Transactions on the Web, Vol. 6, 2, Article 9 (2012), bibinfonumpages33 pages. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Luca Maria Aiello, Georgios Petkos, Carlos Martin, David Corney, Symeon Papadopoulos, Ryan Skraba, Ayse Göker, Ioannis Kompatsiaris, and Alejandro Jaimes. 2013. Sensing Trending Topics in Twitter. Transactions on Multimedia, Vol. 15, 6 (2013), 1268--1282. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Luca Maria Aiello, Rossano Schifanella, and Bogdan State. 2014. Reading the Source Code of Social Ties. In Conference on Web Science (WebSci). ACM, 139--148. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Alexa. 2017. The top 500 sites on the web. (2017). http://www.alexa.com/topsitesGoogle Scholar
- Lars Backstrom, Jon Kleinberg, Lillian Lee, and Cristian Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil. 2013. Characterizing and Curating Conversation Threads: Expansion, Focus, Volume, Re-entry. In International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM). ACM, 13--22. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Eytan Bakshy, Solomon Messing, and Lada A Adamic. 2015. Exposure to Ideologically Diverse News and Opinion on Facebook. Science, Vol. 348, 6239 (2015), 1130--1132.Google Scholar
- Alain Barrat, Marc Barthelemy, and Alessandro Vespignani. 2007. The Architecture of Complex Weighted Networks: Measurements and Models. In Large Scale Structure And Dynamics Of Complex Networks: From Information Technology to Finance and Natural Science. World Scientific, 67--92.Google Scholar
- Roy F Baumeister and Mark R Leary. 1995. The Need to Belong: Desire for Interpersonal Attachments as a Fundamental Human Motivation. Psychological bulletin (1995).Google Scholar
- Peter Bearman and Paolo Parigi. 2004. Cloning Headless Frogs and Other Important Matters: Conversation Topics and Network Structure. Social Forces, Vol. 83, 2 (2004), 535--557.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hila Becker, Mor Naaman, and Luis Gravano. 2011. Beyond Trending Topics: Real-World Event Identification on Twitter. In International Conference on Web and Social Media (ICWSM). AAAI, 438--441.Google Scholar
- Cristina Bicchieri. 2006. The Grammar of Society: The Nature and Dynamics of Social Norms. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Peter Michael Blau. 1964. Exchange and power in social life .Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
- Martin Boeker, Werner Vach, and Edith Motschall. 2013. Google Scholar as Replacement for Systematic Literature Searches: Good Relative Recall and Precision are not Enough. BMC medical research methodology, Vol. 13, 1 (2013), 131.Google Scholar
- danah boyd, Scott Golder, and Gilad Lotan. 2010. Tweet, Tweet, Retweet: Conversational Aspects of Retweeting on Twitter. In Hawaii International conference on System Sciences (HICSS). IEEE, 1--10. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wichor M Bramer, Dean Giustini, Bianca MR Kramer, and PF Anderson. 2013. The Comparative Recall of Google Scholar versus PubMed in Identical Searches for Biomedical Systematic Reviews: a Review of Searches Used in Systematic Reviews. Systematic reviews, Vol. 2, 1 (2013), 115.Google Scholar
- Philip Bramsen, Martha Escobar-Molano, Ami Patel, and Rafael Alonso. 2011. Extracting Social Power Relationships from Natural Language. In Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (HLT). Association for Computational Linguistics, 773--782. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Moira Burke and Robert E Kraut. 2016. The Relationship Between Facebook Use and Well-Being Depends on Communication Type and Tie Strength. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, Vol. 21, 4 (2016), 265--281. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ronald S Burt. 2009. Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- David M Buss. 2003. The Evolution of Desire: Strategies of Human Mating. Basic books.Google Scholar
- David M Buss and David P Schmitt. 1993. Sexual Strategies Theory: an Evolutionary Perspective on Human Mating. Psychological review (1993).Google Scholar
- Nancy Cantor and Walter Mischel. 1979. Prototypes in Person Perception. In Advances in experimental social psychology. Vol. 12. Elsevier, 3--52.Google Scholar
- Fabio Celli and Luca Rossi. 2012. The Role of Emotional Stability in Twitter Conversations. In Workshop on semantic analysis in social media. Association for Computational Linguistics, 10--17. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Teresa Correa, Amber Willard Hinsley, and Homero Gil De Zuniga. 2010. Who Interacts on the Web? The Intersection of Users' Personality and Social Media Use. Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 26, 2 (2010), 247--253. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cristian Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, Lillian Lee, Bo Pang, and Jon Kleinberg. 2012. Echoes of Power: Language Effects and Power Differences in Social Interaction. In International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW). ACM, 699--708. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Munmun De Choudhury, Hari Sundaram, Ajita John, and Dorée Duncan Seligmann. 2009. What Makes Conversations Interesting?: Themes, Participants and Consequences of Conversations in Online Social Media. In International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW). ACM, 331--340. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Simon DeDeo. 2013. Collective Phenomena and Non-Finite State Computation in a Human Social System. PLoS ONE, Vol. 8, 10 (10 2013).Google ScholarCross Ref
- Martin Dittus, Luca Maria Aiello, and Daniele Quercia. 2017. Community Engagement Triage: Lightweight Prompts for Systematic Reviews. Proceedings of Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 1, CSCW, Article 39 (2017), bibinfonumpages22 pages. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Robin IM Dunbar. 1998. The Social Brain Hypothesis. brain, Vol. 9, 10 (1998), 178--190.Google Scholar
- Robin IM Dunbar and Matt Spoors. 1995. Social Networks, Support Cliques, and Kinship. Human Nature, Vol. 6, 3 (1995), 273--290.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Richard M Emerson. 1976. Social Exchange Theory. Annual review of sociology, Vol. 2, 1 (1976), 335--362.Google Scholar
- Stephen T Emlen and Lewis W Oring. 1977. Ecology, Sexual Selection, and the Evolution of Mating Systems. Science, Vol. 197, 4300 (1977), 215--223.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Motahhare Eslami, Amirhossein Aleyasen, Karrie Karahalios, Kevin Hamilton, and Christian Sandvig. 2015. FeedVis: A Path for Exploring News Feed Curation Algorithms. In Conference Companion on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW Companion). ACM, 65--68. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Alan P Fiske. 1992. The four elementary forms of sociality: framework for a unified theory of social relations. Psychological review, Vol. 99, 4 (1992), 689.Google Scholar
- Susan T Fiske, Amy JC Cuddy, and Peter Glick. 2007. Universal Dimensions of Social Cognition: Warmth and Competence. Trends in cognitive sciences, Vol. 11, 2 (2007), 77--83.Google Scholar
- JR French, Bertram Raven, and D Cartwright. 1959. The Bases of Social Power. Classics of organization theory, Vol. 7 (1959), 311--320.Google Scholar
- John RP French Jr. 1956. A Formal Theory of Social Power. Psychological review, Vol. 63, 3 (1956), 181.Google Scholar
- Aurelien Gautreau, Alain Barrat, and Marc Barthélemy. 2009. Microdynamics in Stationary Complex Networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 106, 22 (2009), 8847--8852.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jean-Francc ois Gehanno, Laetitia Rollin, and Stefan Darmoni. 2013. Is the coverage of Google Scholar Enough to be Used Alone for Systematic Reviews. BMC medical informatics and decision making, Vol. 13, 1 (2013), 7.Google Scholar
- Deborah E Gibbons. 2004. Friendship and Advice Networks in the Context of Changing Professional Values. Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 49, 2 (2004), 238--262.Google Scholar
- Eric Gilbert. 2012. Predicting Tie Strength in a New Medium. In Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW). ACM, 1047--1056. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Eric Gilbert and Karrie Karahalios. 2009. Predicting Tie Strength with Social Media. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI). ACM, 211--220. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jesús Gómez-Gardenes, Irene Reinares, Alex Arenas, and Luis Mario Flor'ia. 2012. Evolution of Cooperation in Multiplex Networks. Scientific reports, Vol. 2 (2012), 620.Google Scholar
- Pollyanna Gonccalves, Matheus Araújo, Fabr'icio Benevenuto, and Meeyoung Cha. 2013. Comparing and Combining Sentiment Analysis Methods. In Conference on Online Social Networks (COSN). ACM, 27--38. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Przemyslaw A Grabowicz, José J Ramasco, Esteban Moro, Josep M Pujol, and Victor M Eguiluz. 2012. Social Features of Online Networks: The Strength of Intermediary Ties in Online Social Media. PloS one, Vol. 7, 1 (2012), e29358.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M S Granovetter. 1973. The Strength of Weak Ties. Amer. J. Sociology (1973).Google Scholar
- Shannon Greenwood, Andrew Perrin, and Maeve Duggan. 2016. Social Media Update. (November 2016). http://www.pewinternet.org/2016/11/11/social-media-update-2016/Google Scholar
- F. Maxwell Harper, Dan Frankowski, Sara Drenner, Yuqing Ren, Sara Kiesler, Loren Terveen, Robert Kraut, and John Riedl. 2007. Talk Amongst Yourselves: Inviting Users to Participate in Online Conversations. In International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI). ACM, 62--71. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Albert H Hastorf and Hadley Cantril. 1954. They Saw a Game; a Case Study. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, Vol. 49, 1 (1954), 129.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Russell A Hill and Robin IM Dunbar. 2003. Social Network Size in Humans. Human nature, Vol. 14, 1 (2003), 53--72.Google Scholar
- Petter Holme and Jari Saram"aki. 2012. Temporal Networks. Physics reports, Vol. 519, 3 (2012), 97--125.Google Scholar
- C. Honeycutt and S.C. Herring. 2009. Beyond Microblogging: Conversation and Collaboration via Twitter. In Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS). IEEE.Google Scholar
- Giacomo Inches and Fabio Crestani. 2011. Online Conversation Mining for Author Characterization and Topic Identification. In Workshop for Ph.D. Students in Information & Knowledge Management (PIKM). ACM, 19--26. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Matthew O Jackson. 2010. Social and Economic Networks. Princeton university press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Akshay Java, Xiaodan Song, Tim Finin, and Belle Tseng. 2007. Why We Twitter: Understanding Microblogging Usage and Communities. In Workshop on Web Mining and Social Network Analysis (WebKDD/SNA-KDD). ACM, 56--65. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Suin Kim, JinYeong Bak, and Alice Oh. 2012. Do You Feel what I Feel? Social Aspects of Emotions in Twitter Conversations. In International Conference on Web and Social Media (ICWSM). AAAI.Google Scholar
- Mikko Kivel"a, Alex Arenas, Marc Barthelemy, James P Gleeson, Yamir Moreno, and Mason A Porter. 2014. Multilayer Networks. Journal of complex networks, Vol. 2, 3 (2014), 203--271.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Farshad Kooti, Luca Maria Aiello, Mihajlo Grbovic, Kristina Lerman, and Amin Mantrach. 2015. Evolution of Conversations in the Age of Email Overload. In International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW). ACM, 603--613. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ravi Kumar, Mohammad Mahdian, and Mary McGlohon. 2010. Dynamics of Conversations. In International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD). ACM, 553--562. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jérôme Kunegis, Andreas Lommatzsch, and Christian Bauckhage. 2009. The Slashdot Zoo: Mining a Social Network with Negative Edges. In International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW). ACM, 741--750. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jérôme Kunegis, Julia Preusse, and Felix Schwagereit. 2013. What is the Added Value of Negative Links in Online Social Networks?. In International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW). ACM, 727--736. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jure Leskovec, Daniel Huttenlocher, and Jon Kleinberg. 2010. Predicting Positive and Negative Links in Online Social Networks. In International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW). ACM, 641--650. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Daniel Z Levin and Rob Cross. 2004. The Strength of Weak Ties you can Trust: The Mediating Role of Trust in Effective Knowledge Transfer. Management science, Vol. 50, 11 (2004), 1477,1490. Google ScholarDigital Library
- David Liben-Nowell and Jon Kleinberg. 2007. The Link-prediction Problem for Social Networks. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 58, 7 (2007), 1019--1031. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Linyuan Lü and Tao Zhou. 2011. Link Prediction in Complex Networks: A Survey. Physica A: statistical mechanics and its applications, Vol. 390, 6 (2011), 1150--1170.Google Scholar
- Niklas Luhmann. 1982. Trust and Power.Google Scholar
- Francc ois Mairesse, Marilyn A Walker, Matthias R Mehl, and Roger K Moore. 2007. Using Linguistic Cues for the Automatic Recognition of Personality in Conversation and Text. Journal of artificial intelligence research, Vol. 30 (2007), 457--500. Google ScholarDigital Library
- David Martin-Borregon, Luca Maria Aiello, Przemyslaw Grabowicz, Alejandro Jaimes, and Ricardo Baeza-Yates. 2014. Characterization of Online Groups along Space, Time, and Social Dimensions. EPJ Data Science, Vol. 3, 1 (2014), 8.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Miller McPherson, Lynn Smith-Lovin, and James M Cook. 2001. Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks. Annual review of sociology, Vol. 27, 1 (2001).Google Scholar
- Mark EJ Newman. 2003. The Structure and Function of Complex Networks. SIAM review 2 (2003), 167,256.Google Scholar
- Penelope J Oakes, S Alexander Haslam, and John C Turner. 1994. Stereotyping and Social Reality. Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
- Katrina Panovich, Rob Miller, and David Karger. 2012. Tie Strength in Question & Answer on Social Network Sites. In Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW). ACM, 1057--1066. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Malcolm R Parks, Charlotte M Stan, and Leona L Eggert. 1983. Romantic Involvement and Social Network Involvement. Social Psychology Quarterly (1983), 116--131.Google Scholar
- R. Plutchik. 1980. Emotion: A Psychoevolutionary Synthesis.Google Scholar
- Joel M Podolny and James N Baron. 1997. Resources and Relationships: Social Networks and Mobility in the Workplace. American sociological review (1997), 673--693.Google Scholar
- Hemant Purohit, Yiye Ruan, David Fuhry, Srinivasan Parthasarathy, and Amit Sheth. 2014. On Understanding Divergence of Online Social Group Discussion. In International Conference on Web and Social Media (ICWSM). AAAI.Google Scholar
- Anabel Quan-Haase and Alyson L Young. 2010. Uses and gratifications of social media: A comparison of Facebook and instant messaging. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, Vol. 30, 5 (2010), 350--361.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Daniele Quercia, Michal Kosinski, David Stillwell, and Jon Crowcroft. 2011. Our Twitter Profiles, our Selves: Predicting Personality with Twitter. In International Conference on Social Computing (SocialCom). IEEE, 180--185.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Emilee Rader and Rebecca Gray. 2015. Understanding User Beliefs About Algorithmic Curation in the Facebook News Feed. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI). ACM, 173--182. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lee Rainie and Barry Wellman. 2012. Networked: The new social operating system .Mit Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Liz Spencer and Ray Pahl. 2006. Rethinking Friendship: Hidden Solidarities Today. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- James B. Stewart. {n. d.}. Facebook Has 50 Minutes of Your Time Each Day. It Wants More. The New York Time ( {n. d.}). https://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/06/business/facebook-bends-the-rules-of-audience-engagement-to-its-advantage.htmlGoogle Scholar
- Michael Szell, Renaud Lambiotte, and Stefan Thurner. 2010. Multirelational Organization of Large-scale Social Networks in an Online World. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 107, 31 (2010), 13636--13641.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Henri Tajfel. 2010. Social Identity and Intergroup Relations. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Simo Tchokni, Diarmuid Ó Séaghdha, and Daniele Quercia. 2014. Emoticons and Phrases: Status Symbols in Social Media. In International Conference on Web and Social Media (ICWSM). AAAI.Google Scholar
- Mart GM Van der Poel. 1993. Delineating Personal Support Networks. Social networks, Vol. 15, 1 (1993), 49--70.Google Scholar
- Alan Vaux. 1988. Social Support: Theory, Research, and Intervention. Praeger publishers.Google Scholar
- Bimal Viswanath, Alan Mislove, Meeyoung Cha, and Krishna P. Gummadi. 2009. On the Evolution of User Interaction in Facebook. In Workshop on Online Social Networks (WOSN). ACM, 37--42. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kenneth N Walker, Arlene MacBride, and Mary LS Vachon. 1977. Social support networks and the crisis of bereavement. Social Science & Medicine, Vol. 11, 1 (1977), 35--41.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. Wasserman and K. Faust. 1994. Social Network Analysis. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Barry Wellman and Scot Wortley. 1990. Different Strokes from Different Folks: Community Ties and Social Support. AJS, Vol. 96, 3 (1990), 558--588.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Harrison C White. 2008. Identity and Control: How Social Formations Emerge. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Christo Wilson, Bryce Boe, Alessandra Sala, Krishna P.N. Puttaswamy, and Ben Y. Zhao. 2009. User Interactions in Social Networks and Their Implications. In European Conference on Computer Systems (EuroSys). ACM, 205--218. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kath Wright, Su Golder, and Rocio Rodriguez-Lopez. 2014. Citation Searching: a Systematic Review Case Study of Multiple Risk Behaviour Interventions. BMC medical research methodology, Vol. 14, 1 (2014), 73.Google Scholar
- Akbar Zaheer, Bill McEvily, and Vincenzo Perrone. 1998. Does Trust Matter? Exploring the Effects of Interorganizational and Interpersonal Trust on Performance. Organization science, Vol. 9, 2 (1998), 141,159. Google ScholarDigital Library
- W-X Zhou, Didier Sornette, Russell A Hill, and Robin IM Dunbar. 2005. Discrete Hierarchical Organization of Social Group Sizes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, Vol. 272, 1561 (2005), 439--444.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Coloring in the Links: Capturing Social Ties as They are Perceived
Recommendations
Who is Your Best Friend?: Ranking Social Network Friends According to Trust Relationship
UMAP '18: Proceedings of the 26th Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and PersonalizationIn online social networks (OSNs), e.g. Facebook, the relationship between users is binary, i.e., either friend (trust) or stranger (distrust). However, in real-world life, people always have different trust relationships with others (e.g., best friend, ...
Social Commerce: The Mediating Effects of Trust and Value Co-creation on Social Sharing and Shopping Intentions
HCI in Business, Government and OrganizationsAbstractAs social media developed rapidly all over the world, online customers tend to seek advices before making purchase decisions. Yet little known is about how social media community members would influence each other and in what ways that lead to ...
Shopping on social networks: is this the storefront of the future?
Consumers are moving towards social networking technologies as an alternative channel for shopping. This research extended the technology acceptance model (TAM) to investigate the factors that predict Facebook users' behavioural intentions towards the ...
Comments