ABSTRACT
This article discusses the difficult task of Participatory Design (PD) to design for/with the political dimension of work, such as the work environments' care for inclusion of different groups. It first describes PD's role through time in giving form to this political dimension after the crisis of Fordism and detects some challenges PD is confronted with in addressing this task today. It then explores how Hannah Arendt's reflections on the political dimension of work can contribute to addressing these challenges, researching how her definitions of 'work', 'labour', 'action', 'agorà', 'heroes' and 'interests' can be used as steering concepts that support the (re)activation of this political dimension. We describe how we used Arendt's concepts to steer a PD case in urban design with a group of architects, companies and citizens on how to reintegrate work into the city space of Antwerp. This paper ends with a discussion on the implications of using Arendt's concepts in PD for work.
- Liesbeth Huybrechts, Henric Benesch & Jon Geib. 2017. Institutioning: Participatory Design, Co-Design and the public realm. In CoDesign, 13, 3, 148--159.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jane Jacobs. 1961. The Death and Life of Great American Cities. Random House, New York.Google Scholar
- Hannah Arendt. 2013. The Human Condition. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
- Antonio Gramsci. 1934. Americanism and Fordism. Gramsci Quaderni dal Carcere, 1, Einaudi, 1975.Google Scholar
- Ash Amin. 1995. Postfordism: A Reader, edited by Ash Amin, 409--427. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
- Mouffe, Chantal. 1993. The Return of the Political. Verso, London and New York.Google Scholar
- Jacques Rancière. 2004. Aesthetics and Its Discontents. Polity Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
- Mahmoud Keshavarz and Ramia Maze. 2013. Design and Dissensus: Framing and Staging Participation in Design Research. Design Philosophy Papers, 11, 1, 7--29.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Thomas Binder, Eva Brandt, Pelle Ehn, and Joachim Halse. 2015. "Democratic Design Experiments: Between Parliament and Laboratory." CoDesign 11 (3-4): 152--65.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Richard Sennett. 2009. The Craftsman. Penguin, London.Google Scholar
- Peter Mair. 2013. Ruling the Void: The Hollowing of Western Democracy. Verso, London and New York.Google Scholar
- Ahrensbach, T. and Beunderman, J., Eds. 2012. Compendium for the Civic Economy. Trancity Valiz, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
- Borgonuovo, V. and Frnsceschini, S., Eds. 2015. Global Tools 1973-1975. SALT/Garanti Kültür: Istanbul. AŞ.. Retrieved from http://saltonline.org/media/files/globaltools_scrd-1.pdf.Google Scholar
- Susanne Bødker, Pelle Ehn, Morten Kyng, John Kammersgaard, J., and Yngve Sundblad, 1987. A UTOPIAN Experience: On design of powerful computer-based tools for skilled graphic workers. In Computers and democracy: A Scandinavian challenge. Gower.Google Scholar
- Papanek, Victor. 1985. Design for the Real World: Human Ecology and Social Change. Pantheon Books, New York.Google Scholar
- National Research Council. 1999. The Changing Nature of Work: Implications for Occupational Analysis. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- Clay Spinuzzi. 2012. Working Alone Together. Coworking as Emergent Collaborative Activity. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 26, 4, 399--441Google ScholarCross Ref
- Andy C. Pratt. 2002. Hot jobs in cool places. The material cultures of new media product spaces: The case of South of the Market, San Francisco. Information, Communication and Society, 5, 1, 27--50.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rachel Botsman and Roo Rogers, Eds.. 2011. What's mine is yours: How collaborative consumption is changing the way we live. Collins, New York.Google Scholar
- Eleanor Colleoni and Adam Arvidsson. 2014. Knowledge sharing and social capital building. The role of co-working spaces in the knowledge economy in Milan. Unpublished Report. Office for Youth, Municipality of Milan.Google Scholar
- Carl DiSalvo, Andrew Clement, and Volkmar Pipek. Communities: Participatory Design for, with and by communities. In J. Simonsen & Toni Robertson (eds.). Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design. Routledge International Handbooks, New York, 2012, 182--209.Google Scholar
- Steven Graham and Simon Marvin. 1994. More than Ducts and Wires: Post-Fordism, Cities and Utility Networks. In Managing Cities: The New Urban Context, edited by Patsy Healey, Stuart Cameron, Simin Davoudi, Stephen Graham and Ali Madani-Pour, 169--190. Wiley, London.Google Scholar
- Jane Fulton Suri. 2003. The experience of evolution: developments in design practice. The Design Journal, 6, 2, 39--48Google ScholarCross Ref
- Pelle Ehn. 2008. Participation in design things. In Proceedings of the tenth anniversary conference on participatory design 2008. Indiana University. 92--101. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ezio Manzini, Francesca Rizzo. 2011. Small projects/large changes: Participatory design as an open participated process. CoDesign, 7, 3-4, 199--215Google ScholarCross Ref
- Maurizo Teli, Silvia Bordin, María Menéndez Blanco, Giusi Orabona, and Antonella De Angeli. 2015. Public Design of Digital Commons in Urban Places: A Case Study. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 81, 17--30, doi> Google ScholarDigital Library
- Pelle Ehn, Elisabet M. Nilsson, and Richard Topgaard (eds.). 2014. Making Futures: Marginal Notes on Innovation, Design, and Democracy. MIT Press, Massachusetts. Google ScholarDigital Library
- General Intellect. Commonfare or the Welfare of the CommonWealth. Inte Gloerich, Geert Lovink, Patricia De Vries. Moneylab. Overcoming the hype.Google Scholar
- Anna Seravalli, Mette Agger Eriksen & Per-Anders Hillgren. 2017. Co-Design in co-production processes: jointly articulating and appropriating infrastructuring and commoning with civil servants. CoDesign, 13, 3, 187--201.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Virginia Tassinari, Francesca Piredda & Elisa Bertolotti. 2017. Storytelling in design for social innovation and politics: a reading through the lenses of Hannah Arendt. The Design Journal, 20, supl 1.Google Scholar
- Elisa Bertolotti and Virginia Tassinari. 2017. Experimenting "theatres" for social innovation. A reading through the lenses of Hannah Arendt. NORDES Proceedings.Google Scholar
- Hannah Arendt. 1973. The Origins of Totalitarianisms. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York.Google Scholar
- Jacques Rancière. 2006. The Politics of Aesthetics. A&C Black, London.Google Scholar
- Ezio Manzini. 2015. Design, When Everybody Designs. An Introduction to Design for Innovation. MIT Press, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
- Per-Anders Hillgren, Anna Seravalli, Mette Agger Eriksen. 2016. Counter-hegemonic practices; dynamic interplay between agonism, commoning and strategic design. Strategic Design Research Journal, 9, 2, 89--93.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bernardo Secchi and Paola Vigano'. 2009. Antwerp: Territory Of A New Modernity. Sun Publishers, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
- Wendy Gunn, Ton Otto, Rachel Charlotte Smith, Eds. 2013. Design Anthropology. Theory and Practice. Bloomsbury Academic, London.Google Scholar
- Jamer Hunt. 2011. Prototyping the Social: Temporality and Speculative Futures at the Intersection of Design and Culture. 33--44. In: Alison Clark. Design Anthropology. Springer, Vienna.Google Scholar
- Marijn van de Weijer, Koenraad Van Cleempoel, and Hilde Heynen. 2014. Positioning Research and Design in Academia and Practice. A Contribution to a Continuing Debate. Design Issues, 30, 2, 17--29Google ScholarCross Ref
- Henry Sanoff. 1991. Visual research methods in design. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.Google Scholar
- Hannah Arendt. 2017. The Origins of Totalitarianisms. Penguin UK.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Work, labour and action: the role of participatory design in (re)activating the political dimension of work
Recommendations
Office for bureaucritic imagination: state of exception
PDC '18: Proceedings of the 15th Participatory Design Conference: Short Papers, Situated Actions, Workshops and Tutorial - Volume 2The "Office for Bureaucritic Imagination - State of Exception" is a participatory speculative performance1 to design new laws and rethink alternative forms of political engagement. Together with designers, city municipality, politicians, local ...
Inside the belly of the beast: the challenges and successes of a reformist participatory agenda
PDC '06: Proceedings of the ninth conference on Participatory design: Expanding boundaries in design - Volume 1Shapiro [38] recently argued that participatory design practitioners should consider pursuing a reformist agenda through engagement with the procurement and development of systems in the public sector. This paper considers the challenges, contradictions ...
D for democracy: on political ideals in participatory design
This article joins the debate on political aspects in participatory design (PD) in Scandinavia. The article argues that the political aspect is not missing but rather inherent in current Scandinavian PD research. Democracy is brought forward as a core ...
Comments