skip to main content
10.1145/302979.303042acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

Testing pointing device performance and user assessment with the ISO 9241, Part 9 standard

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 May 1999Publication History

ABSTRACT

The IS0 9241, Part 9 Draft International Standard for testing computer pointing devices proposes an evaluation of performance and comfort. In this paper we evaluate the scientific validity and practicality of these dimensions for two pointing devices for laptop computers, a finger-controlled isometric joystick and a touchpad. Using a between-subjects design, evaluation of performance using the measure of throughput was done for one-direction and multi-directional pointing and selecting. Results show a significant difference in throughput for the multi-directional task, with the joystick 27% higher; results for the one-direction task were non-significant. After the experiment, participants rated the device for comfort, including operation, fatigue, and usability. The questionnaire showed no overall difference in the responses, and a significant statistical difference in only the question concerning force required to operate the device - the joystick requiring slightly more force. The paper concludes with a discussion of problems in implementing the IS0 standard and recommendations for improvement.

References

  1. 1.Douglas, S.A. and Mithal, A.K. The ergonomics of computer pointing devices. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. 2.Douglas, S.A. and Mithal, A.K. The effect of reducing homing time on the speed of a finger-controlled isometric pointing device. Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI '94 Conference Proceedings, ACM Press, New York, pp. 411-416. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. 3.ISO. ISO/DIS 9241-9 Ergonomic Requirements for Office Work with Visual Display Terminals, Nonkeyboard Input Device Requirements, Draft International Standard, International Organization for Standardization, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.MacKenzie, I. S. F itts' law as a research and design tool in human-computer interaction. Human-Computer Interaction, 7, (1992), pp. 91-139.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. 5.MacKenzie, I. S. and Oniszczak, A. A comparison of three selection techniques for touchpads. Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI '98 Conference Proceedings, ACM Press, New York, pp. 336-343. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. 6.Smith, W. ISO and ANSI ergonomic standards for computer products: A guide to implementation and products, Prentice Hall, New York, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. 7.Soukoreff, W. and MacKenzie, I.S. Generalized Fitts' law model builder. In Companion Proceedings of the CHI '95 Conference on Human Factors in ,Computing Systems, A CM Press, New York, pp. 113-114. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Testing pointing device performance and user assessment with the ISO 9241, Part 9 standard

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '99: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 1999
      632 pages
      ISBN:0201485591
      DOI:10.1145/302979

      Copyright © 1999 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 1 May 1999

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '99 Paper Acceptance Rate78of312submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader