skip to main content
10.1145/2993148.2993177acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesicmi-mlmiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Context and cognitive state triggered interventions for mobile MOOC learning

Published:31 October 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

We present Context and Cognitive State triggered Feed-Forward (C2F2), an intelligent tutoring system and algorithm, to improve both student engagement and learning efficacy in mobile Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs). C2F2 infers and responds to learners' boredom and disengagement events in real time via a combination of camera-based photoplethysmography (PPG) sensing and learning topic importance monitoring. It proactively reminds a learner of upcoming important content (feed-forward interventions) when disengagement is detected. C2F2 runs on unmodified smartphones and is compatible with courses offered by major MOOC providers. In a 48-participant user study, we found that C2F2 on average improved learning gains by 20.2% when compared with a baseline system without the feed-forward intervention. C2F2 was especially effective for the bottom performers and improved their learning gains by 41.6%. This study demonstrates the feasibility and potential of using the PPG signals implicitly recorded by the built-in camera of smartphones to facilitate mobile MOOC learning.

References

  1. Cross. A. et al. VidWiki: Enabling the crowd to improve the legibility of online educational videos. In Proc. CSCW 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Baker, R., et al. Better to Be Frustrated than Bored: The Incidence, Persistence, and Impact of Learners’ Cognitive-Affective States during Interactions with Three Different Computer-Based Learning Environments, In IJHCS 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Breslow,L., et al. Studying learning in the worldwide classroom: Research into edX’s first MOOC. Research & Practice in Assessment 8, (2013), 13–25.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Coetzee, D., et al. Chatrooms in MOOCs: All talk and no action. In Proc. L@S 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Coetzee, D., et al. Should your MOOC forum use a reputation system? In Proc. CSCW 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Craig, S., et al. Affect and learning: an exploratory look into the role of affect in learning with AutoTutor. Journal of educational media, 29.3 (2004): 241-250.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. D'Mello, S., et al. Gaze tutor: A gaze-reactive intelligent tutoring system. In Proc. IJHCS Vol 70.5 (2012). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. D’Mello, S., et al. A time for emoting: When affect-sensitivity is and isn’t effective at promoting deep learning. In Proc. ITS 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Fowler, G., An early report card on massive open online courses. The Wall Street Journal, October 8, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Glassman, E., et al. Mudslide: A spatially anchored census of student confusion for online lecture videos. In Proc. CHI 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Grawemeyer, B., et al. Light-Bulb Moment?: Towards Adaptive Presentation of Feedback based on Students' Affective State. In Proc. IUI 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Guo, P. J., et al. How video production affects student engagement: An empirical study of MOOC videos. In Proc. L@S 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Han, T., et al. Balancing accuracy and fun: designing camera based mobile games for implicit heart rate monitoring. In Proc CHI 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Kim, J., et al. RIMES: embedding interactive multimedia exercises in lecture videos. In Proc. CHI 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Kim, J., et al. Data-driven interaction techniques for improving navigation of educational videos. In Proc. UIST 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Kim, J., et al. Understanding in-video dropouts and interaction peaks in online lecture videos. In Proc. L@S 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Kizilcec, R., et al. Showing face in video instruction: effects on information retention, visual attention, and affect. In Proc CHI 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Kumar, V. Enhancing video lectures with digital footnotes. In Proc IEEE FIE 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Lee, Y., et al. Using time-anchored peer comments to enhance social interaction in online educational videos. In Proc. CHI 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Monserrat, T., et al. L.IVE: an integrated interactive video-based learning environment. In Proc. CHI 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Parr, C., Not Staying the Course, Times Higher Education, May 10, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Pavel, A., et al. Video digests: A browsable, skimmable format for informational lecture videos. In Proc. UIST 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Pham, P., et al. AttentiveLearner: improving mobile MOOC learning via implicit heart rate tracking. In Proc. AIED 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Risko, E., et al. Everyday Attention: Mind Wandering and Computer Use during Lectures. Computers & Education 68, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Shah, D. MOOCs in 2015: Breaking Down the Numbers. Edsurge.com, December 28, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Smallwood, J., et al. The restless mind. Psychological bulletin, 132(6), 946 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Szafir, D., et al. ARTFul: adaptive review technology for flipped learning. In Proc. CHI 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Szafir, D., et al. Pay attention!: designing adaptive agents that monitor and improve user engagement. In Proc. CHI 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Vogel-Walcutt, J., et al. Boredom in learning. Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning. Springer US, 2012. 477-479.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Weir, S., et al. Learnersourcing subgoal labels for how-to videos. In Proc CSCW 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Woolf, B., et al. Affect-aware tutors’ recognising and responding to student affect. Int. J. Learn. Technol. 4, 3⁄4, Oct. 2009, pp129–164. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Wu, T. Y., et al. Mobile e-learning for next generation communication environment. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies 6.4 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Xiao, X., et al. Towards Attentive, Bi-directional MOOC Learning on Mobile Devices. In Proc. ICMI 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Xiao, X., et al. LensGesture: augmenting mobile interactions with back-of-device finger gestures. In Proc. ICMI 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Yang, D., et al. Exploring the effect of confusion in discussion forums of massive open online courses. In Proc. L@S 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Context and cognitive state triggered interventions for mobile MOOC learning

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      ICMI '16: Proceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Multimodal Interaction
      October 2016
      605 pages
      ISBN:9781450345569
      DOI:10.1145/2993148

      Copyright © 2016 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 31 October 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate453of1,080submissions,42%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader