skip to main content
10.1145/2757226.2757227acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesc-n-cConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Emotion and Creativity: Hacking into Cognitive Appraisal Processes to Augment Creative Ideation

Published:22 June 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

Creativity thrives when people experience positive emotions. How to design an interactive system that can effectively make use of this potential is, however, still an unanswered question. In this paper, we propose one approach to this problem that relies on hacking into the cognitive appraisal processes that form part of positive emotions. To demonstrate our approach we have conceived, made, and evaluated a novel interactive system that influences an individual's appraisals of their own idea generation processes by providing real-time and believable feedback about the originality of their ideas. The system can be used to manipulate this feedback to make the user's ideas appear more or less original. This has enabled us to test experimentally the hypothesis that providing more positive feedback, rather than neutral, or more negative feedback than the user is expecting, causes more positive emotion, which in turn causes more creativity during idea generation. The findings demonstrate that an interactive system can be designed to use the function of cognitive appraisal processes in positive emotion to help people to get more out of their own creative capabilities.

References

  1. Akhbari Chermahini, S. and Hommel, B. More creative through positive mood? Not everyone!. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 6, (2012), article 319.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Ashby, F.G., Isen, A.M., and Turken, A.U. A neuropsychological theory of positive affect and its influence on cognition. Psychological Review 106, 3 (1999), 529--550.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Baas, M., De Dreu, C.K.W., and Nijstad, B.A. A metaanalysis of 25 years of mood-creativity research: Hedonic tone, activation, or regulatory focus?. Psychological Bulletin 134, 6 (2008), 779--806.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Banerjee, S. and Pedersen, T. An adapted Lesk algorithm for word sense disambiguation using WordNet. In Proc. CICLing '02, (2002), 136--145. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Brans, K. and Verduyn, P. Intensity and Duration of Negative Emotions: Comparing the Role of Appraisals and Regulation Strategies. PLoS ONE 9, 3 (2014), e92410.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Calvo, R.A. and Peters, D. Positive computing: Technology for wellbeing and human potential. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Chiew, K.S. and Braver, T.S. Dissociable influences of reward motivation and positive emotion on cognitive control. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience 14, 2 (2014), 509--529.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Cropley, A. In praise of convergent thinking. Creativity Research Journal 18, 3(2006), 391--404.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. de Rooij, A. and Jones, S. (E)Motion and creativity: Hacking the function of motor expressions in emotion regulation to augment creativity. In Proc. TEI '15, (2015). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. de Rooij, A. and Jones, S. Mood and creativity: An appraisal tendency perspective. In Proc. C&C '13, (2013), 362--365. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. de Rooij, A. and Jones, S. Motor expressions as creativity support: Exploring the potential for physical interaction. In Proc. BCS HCI '13, (2013), article 47. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Enders, C. K. and Tofighi, D. Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: A new look at an old issue. Psychological Methods 12, (2007), 121--138.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Fellbaum, C. (Ed.) WordNet: An electronic lexical database. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Field, A. Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics - 4th edition. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Fogg, B.J. Persuasive technology: Using computers to change what we think and do. Ubiquity, (2002), 5. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Forster, E.A. and Dunbar, K.N. Creativity evaluation through latent semantic analysis. In Proc. CogSci '09, (2009), 602--607.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Giannoulis, S. and Verbeek, F. The happiness cube paradigm; eliciting happiness through sound, video, light and odor. In 4th Int. Workshop on Emotion and Computing, KI '09, (2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Griffin, G. and Jacob, R. Priming creativity through improvisation on an adaptive musical instrument. In Proc. C&C '13, (2013), 146--155. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Halácsy, P., Kornai, A., and Oravecz, C. Hunpos - an open source trigram tagger. In Comp. Proc. ACL '07, (2007), 209--212. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Harbison, J.I. and Haarmann, H. Automated scoring of originality using semantic representations. In Proc. CogSci '14, (2014), 2327--2332.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Koster, R. Theory of fun for game design. O'Reilly Media, Inc., 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Kreibig, S.D., Gendolla, G.H., and Scherer, K.R. Goal relevance and goal conduciveness appraisals lead to differential autonomic reactivity in emotional responding to performance feedback. Biological Psychology 91, 3 (2012), 365--375.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Lewis, M.D. Bridging emotion theory and neurobiology through dynamic systems modeling. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28, 2 (2005), 194--245.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Lewis, S., Dontcheva, M., and Gerber, E. (2011). Affective Computational Priming and Creativity. In Proc. CHI '11, (2011), 735--744. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Lyer, L.R., Doboli, S., Minai, A.A., Brown, V.R., Levine, D.S., and Paulus, P.B. Neural dynamics of idea generation and the effects of priming. Neural Networks 22, (2009), 674--686. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Moors, A. On the causal role of appraisal in emotion. Emotion Review 5, 2(2013), 132--140.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Morris, R.R., Dontcheva, M., Finkelstein, A., and Gerber, E. Affect and creative performance on crowdsourcing platforms. In Proc. ACII '13, (2013), 67--72. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Mumford, M.D., Medeiros, K.E., and Partlow, P.J. Creative thinking: processes, strategies, and knowledge. The Journal of Creative Behavior 46, 1 (2012), 30--47.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Nakazato, N., Yoshida, S., Sakurai, S., Narumi, T., Tanikawa, T., and Hirose, M. Smart Face: enhancing creativity during video conferences using real-time facial deformation. In Proc. CSCW '14, (2014), 75--83. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Nyer, P.U. A study of the relationships between cognitive appraisals and consumption emotions. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 25, 4 (1997), 296304.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Plucker, J.A., Qian, M., and Wang, S. Is originality in the eye of the beholder? Comparison of scoring techniques in the assessment of divergent thinking. The Journal of Creative Behavior 45, 1 (2011), 1--22.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Roseman, I.J. Emotional behaviors, emotivational goals, emotion strategies: Multiple levels of organization integrate variable and consistent responses. Emotion Review 3, 4 (2011), 434--443.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Runco, M.A. (ed.) Divergent thinking. Ablex Publishing Corporation, Norwood, NJ, USA, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Salamone, J.D. and Correa, M. The mysterious motivational functions of mesolimbic dopamine. Neuron 76, 3 (2012), 470--485.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Scherer, K.R. The dynamic architecture of emotion: Evidence for the component process model. Cognition & Emotion 23, 7 (2009), 1307--1351.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Scherer, K.R., Bänziger, T., and Roesch, E. (eds.) A blueprint for affective computing: A sourcebook and manual. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Shahid, S., Krahmer, E., Neerincx, M., and Swerts, M. Positive affective interactions: The role of repeated exposure and copresence. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing 4, 2 (2013), 226--237. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Siemer, M. Mood congruent cognitions constitute mood experience. Emotion 5, (2005), 296--308.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Silvia, P.J., Winterstein, B.P., Willse, J.T., Barona, C.M., Cram, J.T., Hess, K.I., Martinez, J.L., and Richard, C.A. Assessing creativity with divergent thinking tasks: Exploring the reliability and validity of new subjective scoring methods. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 2, 2 (2008), 68--85.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Slepian, M.L. and Ambady, N. Fluid movement and creativity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 141, 4 (2012), 625--629.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Sonnemans, J. and Frijda, N. The structure of subjective emotional intensity. Cognition & Emotion 8, (1994), 329--350.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Tingley, D., Yamamoto, T., Hirose, K., Keele, L., and Imai, K. Mediation: R Package for Causal Mediation Analysis. Journal of Statistical Software 59, 5 (2014), 138.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. van der Zwaag, M.D., Janssen, J.H., and Westerink, J.H.D.M. Directing physiology and mood through music: Validation of an affective music player. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing 4, 1 (2012), 57--68. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Emotion and Creativity: Hacking into Cognitive Appraisal Processes to Augment Creative Ideation

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        C&C '15: Proceedings of the 2015 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity and Cognition
        June 2015
        420 pages
        ISBN:9781450335980
        DOI:10.1145/2757226

        Copyright © 2015 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 22 June 2015

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        C&C '15 Paper Acceptance Rate23of88submissions,26%Overall Acceptance Rate108of371submissions,29%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader