skip to main content
10.1145/2700171.2791057acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshtConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Media Bias in German Online Newspapers

Published:24 August 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

Online newspapers have been established as a crucial information source, at least partially replacing traditional media like television or print media. As all other media, online newspapers are potentially affected by media bias.This describes non-neutral reporting of journalists and other news producers, e.g. with respect to specific opinions or political parties. Analysis of media bias has a long tradition in political science. However, traditional techniques rely heavily on manual annotation and are thus often limited to the analysis of small sets of articles. In this paper, we investigate a dataset that covers all political and economical news from four leading German online newspapers over a timespan of four years. In order to analyze this large document set and compare the political orientation of different newspapers, we propose a variety of automatically computable measures that can indicate media bias. As a result, statistically significant differences in the reporting about specific parties can be detected between the analyzed online newspapers.

References

  1. D. D'Alessio and M. Allen. Media bias in presidential elections: a meta-analysis. Journal of communication, 50(4):133--156, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. M. Gentzkow and J. M. Shapiro. What drives media slant? Evidence from US daily newspapers. Econometrica, 78(1):35--71, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. J. Grimmer and B. M. Stewart. Text as data: The promise and pitfalls of automatic content analysis methods for political texts. Political Analysis, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. T. Groseclose and J. Milyo. A measure of media bias. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, pages 1191--1237, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. D. Hillard, S. Purpura, and J. Wilkerson. Computer-assisted topic classification for mixed-methods social science research. Journal of Information Tech. & Politics, 4(4):31--46, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. G. Hirst, Y. Riabinin, J. Graham, and M. Boizot-Roche. Text to ideology or text to party status? From Text to Political Positions: Text analysis across disciplines, 55:93, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. D. E. Ho, K. M. Quinn, et al. Measuring explicit political positions of media. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 3(4):353--377, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. M. Laver and K. Beniot. Estimating Irish party position using computer wordscoring: the 2002 elections. Irish Political Studies, 17(2):97--107, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. W. Lowe, K. Benoitt, S. Mikhaylov, and M. Laver. Scaling policy preferences from coded political texts. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 36(1):123--155, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. F. U. Pappi, N. M. Seher, and A.-S. Kurella. Das Politikangebot deutscher Parteien bei den Bundestags-wahlen seit 1976 im dimensionsweisen Vergleich, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. K. M. Quinn, B. L. Monroe, M. Colaresi, M. H. Crespin, and D. R. Radev. How to analyze political attention with minimal assumptions and costs. American Journal of Political Science, 54(1):209--228, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. J. B. Slapin and S.-O. Proksch. A scaling model for estimating time-series party positions from texts. American Journal of Political Science, 52(3):705--722, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. G. H. Stempel. The prestige press in two presidential elections. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 42(1):15--21, 1965.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. G. H. Stempel and J. W. Windhauser. Coverage by the prestige press of the 1988 presidential campaign. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 66(4):894--919, 1989.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. M. Thelwall, K. Buckley, G. Paltoglou, D. Cai, and A. Kappas. Sentiment strength detection in short informal text. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(12):2544--2558, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. W. Van Atteveldt, J. Kleinnijenhuis, N. Ruigrok, and S. Schlobach. Good news or bad news? conducting sentiment analysis on dutch text to distinguish between positive and negative relations. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 5(1):73--94, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. B. Yu, S. Kaufmann, and D. Diermeier. Classifying party affiliation from political speech. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 5(1):33--48, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Media Bias in German Online Newspapers

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      HT '15: Proceedings of the 26th ACM Conference on Hypertext & Social Media
      August 2015
      360 pages
      ISBN:9781450333955
      DOI:10.1145/2700171

      Copyright © 2015 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 24 August 2015

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • short-paper

      Acceptance Rates

      HT '15 Paper Acceptance Rate24of60submissions,40%Overall Acceptance Rate378of1,158submissions,33%

      Upcoming Conference

      HT '24
      35th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media
      September 10 - 13, 2024
      Poznan , Poland

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader