skip to main content
10.1145/2660460.2660477acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescosnConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Beyond CPM and CPC: determining the value of users on OSNs

Published:01 October 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

Not all of the over one billion users of online social networks (OSNs) are equally valuable to the OSNs. The current business model of monetizing advertisements targeted to users does not appear to be based on any visible grouping of the users. The primary metrics remain CPM (cost per mille---i.e., thousand impressions) and CPC (cost per click) of ads that are shown to users. However, there is significant diversity in the actions of users---some users upload interesting content triggering additional views and comments leading to further cascades of action. Beyond direct impressions, a user's action can generate indirect impressions by actions induced on friends and other users. Identifying the valuable user segments requires examination of profile data, friendships, and most importantly, their activity. Here we explore an alternate approach for measuring the value of users in OSNs by proposing a framework from the viewpoint of a popular OSN. Using a real dataset on the social network and activities of users, we show that a small subset of actions are likely to be key indicators of a user's value. Additionally, by examining the current targeting demographics available in Facebook, we are able to explore the relative (monetary) value that different users represent to the OSN.

References

  1. P. Adams. Grouped: How Small Groups of Friends Are the Key to Influence on the Social Web. Voices That Matter. Pearson Education, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. V. Aksakallı. Optimizing direct response in internet display advertising. Electron. Commer. Rec. Appl., 11(3):229--240, May 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. B. Augustin, B. Krishnamurthy and W. Willinger. Ixps: Mapped? In IMC, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. E. Bakshy, J. M. Hofman, W. A. Mason and D. J. Watts. Everyone's an influencer: quantifying influence on twitter. In WSDM, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. E. Bakshy, B. Karrer and L. Adamic. Social influence and the diffusion of user-created content. In EC, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. P. Barford, I. Canadi, D. Krushevskaja, Q. Ma and S. Muthukrishnan. Adscape: Harvesting and analyzing online display ads. In WWW, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. F. Benevenuto, T. Rodrigues, V. Almeida, J. Almeida and M. Gonçalves. Detecting spammers and content promoters in online video social networks. In SIGIR, July 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. F. Benevenuto, T. Rodrigues, M. Cha and V. Almeida. Characterizing user behavior in online social networks. In IMC, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. M. Cha, F. Benevenuto, Y.-Y. Ahn and K. P. Gummadi. Delayed information cascades in Flickr: Measurement, analysis, and modeling. Computer Networks, 56(3):1066--1076, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. M. Cha, H. Haddadi, F. Benevenuto and K. P. Gummadi. Measuring User Influence in Twitter: The Million Follower Fallacy. In ICWSM, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. P. Domingos and M. Richardson. Mining the network value of customers. In KDD, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. J. Edwards. Facebook shares surge on first ever$1 billion mobile ad revenue quarter, 2013. http://www.businessinsider.com/facebook-q4-2013-earnings-2014-1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. A. Goel and K. Munagala. Hybrid keyword search auctions. In WWW, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. S. Goel, S. Lahaie and S. Vassilvitskii. Contract auctions for sponsored search. In WINE, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Google. 2013 financial tables, 2013. http://investor.google.com/financial/2013/tables.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. S. Guha, B. Cheng and P. Francis. Challenges in measuring online advertising systems. In IMC, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. B. J. Jansen, T. Flaherty, R. A. Baeza-Yates, L. Hunter, B. Kitts and J. Murphy. The components and impact of sponsored search. IEEE Computer, 42(5), 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. A. C. König, M. Gamon and Q. Wu. Click-through prediction for news queries. In SIGIR '09, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. K. J. Lang, B. Moseley and S. Vassilvitskii. Handling forecast errors while bidding for display advertising. In WWW, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Y. Liu, C. Kliman-Silver, B. Krishnamurthy, R. Bell and A. Mislove. Measurement and analysis of osn ad auctions. In COSN, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Y. Moon and C. Kwon. Online advertisement service pricing and an option contract. Electron. Commer. Rec. Appl., 10(1):38--48, Jan. 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. H. Nazerzadeh, A. Saberi and R. Vohra. Dynamic cost-per-action mechanisms and applications to online advertising. In WWW, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. C. Perlich, B. Dalessandro, R. Hook, O. Stitelman, T. Raeder and F. Provost. Bid optimizing and inventory scoring in targeted online advertising. In KDD, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. A. Radovanovic and W. D. Heavlin. Risk-aware revenue maximization in display advertising. In WWW, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. T. Rodrigues, F. Benevenuto, M. Cha, K. Gummadi and V. Almeida. On word-of-mouth based discovery of the Web. In IMC, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. D. Saez-Trumper, G. Comarela, V. Almeida, R. Baeza-Yates and F. Benevenuto. Finding trendsetters in information networks. In KDD, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. D. Saez-Trumper, D. Nettleton and R. Baeza-Yates. High correlation between incoming and outgoing activity: a distinctive property of OSNs? In ICWSM, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. F. Schneider, A. Feldmann, B. Krishnamurthy and W. Willinger. Understanding online social network usage from a network perspective. In IMC, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. B. Viswanath, A. Mislove, M. Cha and K. P. Gummadi. On the Evolution of User Interaction in Facebook. In WOSN, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Y. Wang, D. Burgener, A. Kuzmanovic and G. Maciá-Fernández. Understanding the network and user-targeting properties of web advertising networks. In ICDCS, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. J. Weng, E.-P. Lim, J. Jiang and Q. He. Twitterrank: finding topic-sensitive influential twitterers. In WSDM, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. W. Willinger, B. Ager, N. Chatzis, A. Feldmann, N. Sarrar and S. Uhlig. Anatomy of a large european ixp. In SIGCOMM, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. C. Wilson, A. Sala, K. P. Puttaswamy and B. Y. Zhao. Beyond social graphs: User interactions in online social networks and their implications. ACM Transactions on the Web, 6(4), 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Beyond CPM and CPC: determining the value of users on OSNs

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        COSN '14: Proceedings of the second ACM conference on Online social networks
        October 2014
        288 pages
        ISBN:9781450331982
        DOI:10.1145/2660460

        Copyright © 2014 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 1 October 2014

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        COSN '14 Paper Acceptance Rate25of87submissions,29%Overall Acceptance Rate69of307submissions,22%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader