skip to main content
10.1145/2556288.2557244acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Diversity for design: a framework for involving neurodiverse children in the technology design process

Published:26 April 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

The neurodiversity movement seeks to positively reframe certain neurological conditions, such as autism spectrum disorders (ASD) and dyslexia, by concentrating on their strengths. In recent years, neurodiverse children have increasingly been involved in the technology design process, but the design approaches adopted have focused mostly on overcoming difficulties of working with these children, leaving their strengths untapped. We present a new participatory design (PD) framework, Diversity for Design (D4D), which provides guidance for technology designers working with neurodiverse children in establishing PD methods that capitalize on children's strengths and also support potential difficulties. We present two case studies of use of the D4D framework, involving children with ASD and dyslexia, showing how it informed the development and refinement of PD methods tailored to these populations. In addition, we show how to apply the D4D framework to other neurodiverse populations.

References

  1. Al-Wabil, A., Meldah, E., Al-Suwaidan, A., and AlZahrani, A. Designing Educational Games for Children with Specific Learning Difficulties: Insights from Involving Children and Practioners. ICCGI '10, IEEE (2010), 195--198. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Alper, M., Hourcade, J. P., and Gilutz, S. Adding reinforced corners: designing interactive technologies for children with disabilities. Interactions 19, 6 (2012), 72--75. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Armagno, G. The Role of HCI in the Construction of Disability. Proc. of HCI Ethics '12, BIS Ltd. (2012).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Armstrong, T. Neurodiversity. Da Capo, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Baron-Cohen, S. Autism: The Empathizing-Systemizing (E-S) Theory. Ann NY Acad Sci 1156, 1 (2009), 68--80.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Benton, L., Ashwin, E., Johnson, H., Grawemeyer, B., and Brosnan, M. IDEAS: An interface design experience for the autistic spectrum. Proc. CHI '11, ACM (2011), 1759--1764. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Benton, L., Johnson, H., Ashwin, E., Brosnan, M., and Grawemeyer, B. Developing IDEAS: Supporting children with autism within a participatory design team. Proc. CHI '12, ACM Press (2012), 2599--2608. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Dalton, N. S. Neurodiversity & HCI. Proc. CHI'13, ACM (2013), 2295--2304. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Dalton, N. S. Neurodiversity HCI. Interactions 20, 2 (2013), 72--75. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Fohlin, R. Designing for Special Education Schools Involving Children with Intellectual Disabilities in the Design Process. SIDeR '13, (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Foss, E., Guha, M. L., Papadatos, P., Clegg, T., Yip, J., and Walsh, G. Cooperative Inquiry Extended: Creating Technology with Middle School Students with Learning Differences. Journal of Special Education Technology 28, 3 (2013), 33--46.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Frauenberger, C., Good, J., and Keay-Bright, W. Designing technology for children with special needs: bridging perspectives through participatory design. CoDesign 7, 1 (2011), 1--28.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Gibson, L., Gregor, P., and Milne, S. Case study: Designing with difficult children. Proc. IDC '02, (2002), 42--52.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Guha, M. L., Druin, A., and Fails, J. Designing with and for children with special needs: An inclusionary model. Proc. IDC '08, ACM (2008), 61--64. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Guha, M. L., Druin, A., and Fails, J. A. Cooperative Inquiry revisited: Reflections of the past and guidelines for the future of intergenerational co-design. Journal of Child-Computer Interaction 1, 1 (2013), 14--23.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Happe, F. and Vital, P. What aspects of autism predispose to talent' Phil Trans R Soc B: Biological Sciences 364, 1522 (2009), 1369--1375.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Harder, M. K., Burford, G., and Hoover, E. What is Participation' Design Leads the Way to a CrossDisciplinary Framework. Design Issues 29, 4 (2013), 41--57.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Kapp, S. K., Gillespie-Lynch, K., Sherman, L. E., and Hutman, T. Deficit, Difference, or Both' Autism and neurodiversity 49, 1 (2013), 59--71.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Kärnä, Eija, Nuutinen, Jussi, Pihlainen-Bednarik, Kaisa, Virpi, V. Designing Technologies with Children with Special Needs: Children in the Centre (CiC) Framework. Proc. IDC '10, ACM (2010), 218--221. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Large, A., Nesset, V., Beheshti, J., and Bowler, L. 'Bonded design': A novel approach to intergenerational information technology design. Library & Information Science Research 28, 1 (2006), 64--82.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Mazurek, M. O., Shattuck, P. T., Wagner, M., and Cooper, B. P. Prevalence and Correlates of Screen-Based Media Use Among Youths with Autism Spectrum Disorders. J Autism Dev Dis 42, 8 (2011), 1757--1767.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Mesibov, G. B., Shea, V., and Schopler, E. The TEACCH approach to autism spectrum disorders. Springer, New York, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Millen, L., Cobb, S., and Patel, H. A Method for Involving Children with Autism in Design. Proc. IDC '11, ACM (2011), 185--188. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Montgomery, D. Gifted and Talented Children with Special Educational Needs: Double Exceptionality. Routledge, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Van Rijn, H. Meaningful encounters: Explorative studies about designers learning from children with autism. Dcotoral Thesis (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Rose, J. Identifying and Teaching Children and Young People with Dyslexia and Literacy Difficulties. 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Sanders, E. B.-N. and Stappers, P. J. Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign 4, 1 (2008), 5--18.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. TEACCH. TEACCH Approach. 2013. http://teacch.com/about-us/what-is-teacch.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Warr, A. and O'Neill, E. Understanding design as a social creative process. Proc. Creativity & Cognition '05, ACM (2005), 118--127. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Diversity for design: a framework for involving neurodiverse children in the technology design process

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '14: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2014
      4206 pages
      ISBN:9781450324731
      DOI:10.1145/2556288

      Copyright © 2014 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 26 April 2014

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '14 Paper Acceptance Rate465of2,043submissions,23%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI PLAY '24
      The Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play
      October 14 - 17, 2024
      Tampere , Finland

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader