skip to main content
10.1145/2506182.2506197acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessemanticsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Ontology-based situation recognition for context-aware systems

Published:04 September 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

Today's personal devices provide a stream of information which, if processed adequately, can provide a better insight into their owner's current activities, environment, location, etc. In treating these devices as part of a personal sensor network, we exploit raw and interpreted context information in order to enable the automatic recognition of personal recurring situations. An ontology-based graph matching technique continuously compares a person's 'live context', with all previously-stored situations, both of which are represented as an instance of the DCON Context Ontology. Whereas each situation corresponds to an adaptive DCON instance, initially marked by a person and gradually characterised over time, the live context representation is constantly updated with mashed-up context information streaming in from various personal sensors. In this paper we present the matching technique employed to enable automatic situation recognition, and an experiment to evaluate its performance based on real users and their perceived context data.

References

  1. D. Baggenstos. Implementation and evaluation of graph isomorphism algorithms for RDF-Graphs. 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. J. J. Carroll, C. Bizer, P. Hayes, and P. Stickler. Named graphs, provenance and trust. In Proceedings of the 14th international conference on World Wide Web, page 613, New York, New York, USA, 2005. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. J. Debattista, S. Scerri, I. Rivera, and S. Handschuh. Ontology-based rules for recommender systems. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Semantic Technologies meet Recommender Systems & Big Data, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. A. K. Dey. Understanding and using context. Technical report, Future Computing Environments Group, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. F. Esposito, D. Malerba, and G. Semeraro. Flexible matching for noisy structural descriptions. In In proceeding of 12th IJCAI, pages 658--664, 1991. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. J. Hong, E. Suh, and S. Kim. Context-aware systems: A literature review and classification. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(4):8509--8522, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. A. Krause, A. Smailagic, and D. P. Siewiorek. Context-aware mobile computing: Learning context-dependent personal preferences from a wearable sensor array. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 5:113--127, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. A. Moon, Y. Park, and S. Kim. Short paper: Situation-awareness model for higher order network knowledge management platform. Proc. Semantic Sensor Networks, page 110, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. R. Oldakowski and C. Bizer. SemMF: A Framework for Calculating Semantic Similarity of Objects Represented as RDF Graphs. Poster at the 4th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2005), 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. E. Rahm and P. A. Bernstein. A survey of approaches to automatic schema matching. VLDB JOURNAL, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. S. Scerri, J. Attard, I. Rivera, M. Valla, and S. Handschuh. Dcon: Interoperable context representation for pervasive environments. In In Proceedings of the Activity Context Representation Workshop at AAAI 2012, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. S. Scerri, A. Schuller, I. Rivera, J. Attard, J. Debattista, M. Valla, F. Hermann, and S. Handschuh. Interacting with a context-aware personal information sharing system. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (HCI2013) {to appear}, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. S. Scerri, A. Schuller, I. Rivera, J. Attard, J. Debattista, M. Valla, F. Hermann, and S. Handschuh. Interacting with a context-aware personal information sharing system. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (HCI2013) {to appear}, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. D. W. Schloerb. A quantitative measure of telepresence. Presence, 4(1):64--80, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. S. Schwarz. A context model for personal knowledge management applications. In Modeling and Retrieval of Context, Second International Workshop, MRC 2005, Edinburgh, UK, July 31 - August 1, 2005, Revised Selected Papers, volume 3946 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 18--33. Springer, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. D. Siewiorek, A. Smailagic, J. Furukawa, A. Krause, N. Moraveji, K. Reiger, J. Shaffer, and F. L. Wong. Sensay: A context-aware mobile phone. In Proceedings of the 7th IEEE International Symposium on Wearable Computers, ISWC '03, Washington, DC, USA, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    I-SEMANTICS '13: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Semantic Systems
    September 2013
    158 pages
    ISBN:9781450319720
    DOI:10.1145/2506182

    Copyright © 2013 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 4 September 2013

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate40of182submissions,22%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader