Lixia Zhang
Abstract
Performance control in packet switching networks is one of the remaining areas that are yet to be explored. In this paper we look into the performance problems with two existing network architectures, datagram and virtual circuit. The major problem with the datagram network is lack of effective traffic control; and with the virtual circuit network, the improperly defined network control semantics and mechanisms. We consider that a new network architecture should be investigated in order to provide performance support for diverse applications.
- [1] James Atkins. Path Control - The Network Layer of System Network Architecture. Computer Network Architecture and Protocols. Plenum Press, 1982, pages 297-326, Chapter 11.Google Scholar
- [2] Dimitri Bertsekas and Robert Gallager. Flow Control. Data Networks. Prentice-Hall, 1986, pages 423-461, Chapter 6.Google Scholar
- [3] Robert Braden. Towards A Transport Service for Transaction Processing Applications. Network Information Center RFC-955, SRI International. September, 1985. Google ScholarDigital Library
- [4] Vinton G. Cerf. Packet Communication Technology. Protocols and Techniques for Data Communication Networks. Prentics-Hall, Inc., 1981, pages 1-34, Chapter 1.Google Scholar
- [5] David Clark. Some Thought on the DARPA Internet Architecture. Paper in preparation. 1986.Google Scholar
- [6] David Clark, Mark Lambert, and Lixia Zhang. NETBLT: A Bulk Data Transfer Protocol. Network Information Center RFC-998, SRI International. March, 1987. Google ScholarDigital Library
- [7] A. Danet et al. The French Publick Packet Switching Service: The Transpac Network. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Computer Communications. August, 1976.Google Scholar
- [8] D. Davies. The Control of Congestion in Packet Switching Networks. IEEE Transactions on Communications COM-20(6):546-550, June, 1972.Google Scholar
- [9] J. Fraser, D. Bullock, and N. Long. Overall Characteristics of a TASI System. Bell System Technical Journal :1439-1454, July, 1962.Google Scholar
- [10] Mario Gerla and Leonard Kleinrock. Flow Control: A Comparative Survey. IEEE Transactions on Communications COM-28(4), April, 1980.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [11] L. Kleinrock. A Decade of Network Development. Journal of Telecommunication Networks, Spring, 1982.Google Scholar
- [12] John Nagle. Congestion Control in TCP/IP Internetworks. ACM Computer Communications Review 14(4), October, 1984. Google ScholarDigital Library
- [13] J . Postel, Carl Sunshine, and Danny Cohen. The Arpa Internet Protocol. Computer Networks 5(1981):261-271, 1981.Google Scholar
- [14] J. Postel. Internet Control Message Protocol. Network Information Center RFC-792, SRI International. September, 1981. Google ScholarDigital Library
- [15] L. Pouzin, editor. The Cyclades Computer Network. North-Holland Publishing Company, 1982.Google Scholar
- [16] J. Rinde. TYMNET: An Alternative to Packet Technology. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Computer Communications, pages 268-273. August, 1976.Google Scholar
- [17] Marshall T. Rose. Comments on "Comments on 'Congestion Control in TCP/IP Internetworks'" or The Holy Wars Begin Again. ACM Computer Communications Review 15(4), October, 1985. Google ScholarDigital Library
- [18] Jerome Saltzer, David Reed, David Clark. End-to-End Arguments in System Design. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems. IEEE, 1981.Google Scholar
- [19] David R. Smith. Operational Evaluation of a Voice Concentrator Over AUTOVON Interswitch Trunks. IEEE Transactions on Communications COM-30(4):792-802, April, 1982.Google Scholar
- [20] D. Sproule and F. Mellor. Routing, Flow, and Congestion Control in the Datapac Network. IEEE Transactions on Communications COM-29(4), April, 1981.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [21] Stuart Wecker. DNA - The Digital Network Architecture. Computer Network Architecture and Protocols. Plenum Press, 1982, pages 249-296, Chapter 10.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Some thoughts on the packet network architecture
Recommendations
New Security Architecture for IoT Network
AbstractWe explain the notion of security architecture for Internet of Things (IoT) based on software-defined networking (SDN). In this context, the SDN-based architecture works with or without infrastructure, that we call SDN-Domain. This work describes ...
A novel M2M backbone network architecture
Network architecture analysis is a curial issue for a large scale Machine-To-Machine (M2M) network. Considering an M2M backbone network which consists of distributed satellite clusters in geosynchronous orbit (GEO), a new distributed satellite cluster ...
Comments