skip to main content
research-article

Towards content-level coherence with aspect-guided summarization

Authors Info & Claims
Published:22 March 2013Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

The TAC 2010 summarization track initiated a new task—aspect-guided summarization—that centers on textual aspects embodied as particular kinds of information of a text. We observe that aspect-guided summaries not only address highly specific user need, but also facilitate content-level coherence by using aspect information. In this article, we present a full-fledged approach to aspect-guided summarization with a focus on summary coherence. Our summarization approach depends on two prerequisite subtasks: recognizing aspect-bearing sentences in order to do sentence extraction, and modeling aspect-based coherence with an HMM model in order to predict a coherent sentence ordering. Using the manually annotated TAC 2010 and 2010 datasets, we validated the effectiveness of our proposed methods for those subtasks. Drawing on the empirical results, we proceed to develop an aspect-guided summarizer based on a simple but robust base summarizer. With sentence selection guided by aspect information, our system is one of the best on TAC 2011. With sentence ordering predicted by the aspect-based HMM model, the summaries achieve good coherence.

References

  1. Barzilay, R. and Lapata, M. 2008. Modeling local coherence: An entity-based approach. Comput. Linguist. 34, 1--34. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Barzilay, R., and Lee, L. 2004. Catching the drift: Probabilistic content models, with applications to generation and summarization. In Proceedings of the Human Language Technology Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (HLT-NAACL). 113--120.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Blei, D. M., Ng, A. Y., and Jordan, M. I. 2003. Latent dirichlet allocation. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 3, 4--5, 993--1022. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Boutell, M. R., Luo, J., Shen, X., and Brown, C. M. 2004. Learning multi-label scene classification. Pattern Recogn. 37, 9, 1757--71.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Daumé III, H. and Marcu, D. 2006. Bayesian query-focused summarization. In Proceedings of the Meeting of the Association of Computational Linguistics (ACL). 305--312. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Elsner, M., Austerweil, J. and Charniak, E. 2007. A unified local and global model for discourse coherence. In Proceedings of the Human Language Technology Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (HLT-NAACL). 436--443.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Fuentes, M., Alfonseca, E., and Rodríguez, H. 2007. Support vector machines for query-focused summarization trained and evaluated on pyramid data. In Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Companion Volume Proceedings of the Demo and Poster Sessions). 57--60. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Genest, P. and Lapalme, G. 2010. Text generation for abstractive summarization. In Proceedings of the 3rd Text Analysis Conference. National Institute of Standards and Technology.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Ji, H., Favre, B., Lin, W., Gillick, D., Hakkani-Tur, D., and Grishman, R. 2011. Open-Domain multi-document summarization via information extraction: Challenges and prospects. In Multi-Source, Multilingual Information Extraction and Summarisation Volume of Theory and Applications of Natural Language Processing. Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Joachims, T. 1999. Transductive inference for text classification using support vector machines. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML'99). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Klein, D., and Manning, C. D. 2003. Accurate unlexicalized parsing. In Proceedings of the 41st Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 423--430. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Lapata, M. 2003. Probabilistic text structuring: Experiments with sentence ordering. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association of Computational Linguistics (ACL). 545--552. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Lapata, M. 2006. Automatic evaluation of information ordering: Kendall's tau. Comput. Linguist. 32, 4, 1--14. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Li, P., Wang, Y., Gao, W., and Jiang, J. 2011. Generating aspect-oriented multi-document summarization with event-aspect model. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 1137--1146. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Li, W., Li, W., and Lu, Q. 2006. Mining implicit entities in queries. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC'06). 24--26.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Lin, C.-Y. and Hovy, E. 2003. Automatic evaluation of summaries using n-gram co-occurrence statistics. In Proceedings of the Human Technology Conference (HLT-NAACL'03). 71--78. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Mani, I. and Bloedorn E. 1999. Summarizing similarities and differences among related documents. Inf. Retr. 1, 35--67. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Mcknight, L. and Srinivasan, P. 2003. Categorization of sentence types in medical abstracts. In Proceedings of the American Medical Informatics Association Annual Symposium. 440--444.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Owczarzak, K. and Dang, H. T. 2011. Who wrote what where: Analyzing the content of human and automatic summaries. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Automatic Summarization for Different Genres, Media, and Languages. 25--32. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Patwardhan, S. 2010. Widening the field of view of information extraction through sentential event recognition. Ph.D. dissertation, The University of Utah. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Rand, W. M. 1971. Objective criteria for the evaluation of clustering methods. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 66, 336, 846--850.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Riloff, E. 1996. Automatically generating extraction patterns from untagged text. In Proceedings of the 13th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 1044--1049. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Schilder, F. and Kondadadi, R. 2008. FastSum: Fast and accurate query-based multi-document summarization. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (ACL'08: HLT). 205--208. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Stevenson, M. and Greenwood, M. A. 2005. A semantic approach to ie pattern recognition. In Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting of the Association of Computational Linguistics (ACL). 379--386. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Teufel, S. and Moens, M. 1999. Argumentative classification of extracted sentences as a first step towards flexible abstracting. In Advances in Automatic Text Summarization, I. Mani and M. T. Maybury, Eds., MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 155--171.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Teufel, S. and Moens, M. 2002. Summarizing scientific articles: Experiments with relevance and rhetorical status. Comput. Linguist. 28, 4, 409--445. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Tsoumakas, G. and Katakis, I. 2007. Multi label classification: An overview. Int. J. Data Warehous. Min. 3, 3, 1--13.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Vanderwende, L., Suzuki, H., Brockett, C., and Nenkova, A. 2007. Beyond sumbasic: Task-Focused summarization with sentence simplification and lexical expansion. Inf. Process. Manag. 43, 6, 1606--1618. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Vapnik, V. 1998. Statistical Learning Theory. John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Wan, X., Yang, J., and Xiao, J. 2007. Towards a unified approach based on affinity graph to various multi-document summarizations. In Proceedings of the 11th European Conference. 297--308. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Wang, L., Shen, X., and Pan, W. 2007. On transductive support vector machines. In Prediction and Discovery, J. Verducci, X. Shen, and J. Lafferty, Eds., American Mathematical Society.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Yangarber, R. 2003. Counter-Training in the discovery of semantic patterns. In Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL'03). 343--350. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Zhang, R., Ouyang, Y., and Li, W. 2011. Guided summarization with aspect recognition. In Proceedings of Textual Analysis Conference (TAC'11).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Zhou, L., Ticrea, M., and Hovy, E. 2004. Multidocument biography summarization. In Proceedings of Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP'04). 434--441.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Towards content-level coherence with aspect-guided summarization

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image ACM Transactions on Speech and Language Processing
      ACM Transactions on Speech and Language Processing   Volume 10, Issue 1
      March 2013
      50 pages
      ISSN:1550-4875
      EISSN:1550-4883
      DOI:10.1145/2442076
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2013 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 22 March 2013
      • Revised: 1 January 2013
      • Accepted: 1 January 2013
      • Received: 1 February 2012
      Published in tslp Volume 10, Issue 1

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader