Erin L. Brady
Yu Zhong
Meredith Ringel Morris
ABSTRACT
Recent work has shown the potential of having remote humans answer visual questions that blind users have. On the surface social networking sites (SNSs) offer an attractive free source of human-powered answers that can be personalized to the user. In this paper, we explore the potential of blind users asking visual questions to their social networks. We present the first formal study of how blind people use social networking sites via a survey of 191 blind adults. We also explore whether blind users find SNSs an appropriate venue for Q&A through a log analysis of questions asked using VizWiz Social, an iPhone app with over 5,000 users, which lets blind users ask questions to either the crowd or friends. We then report findings of a field experiment with 23 blind VizWiz Social users, which explored question asking on VizWiz Social in the presence of monetary costs for non-social sources. We find that blind people have a large presence on social networking sites, but do not see them as an appropriate venue for asking questions due to high perceived social costs.
- Abascal, J. and Civit, A. Mobile communication for people with disabilities and older people: New opportunities for autonomous life. Proceedings of the 6th ERCIM Workshop 2000, 255--268.Google Scholar
- American Foundation for the Blind. Survey Results on Social Networking. AccessWorld 10(3), May 2009. http://www.afb.org/afbpress/pub.asp?DocID=aw100306Google Scholar
- André, P., Bernstein, M., and Luther, K. Who gives a tweet? Evaluating microblog content value. Proceedings of CSCW 2012, 471--474. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Arthur, C. Average Twitter User has 126 Followers, and Only 20% of Users go via Website. The Guardian Technology Blog, June 29, 2009.Google Scholar
- Bernstein, M. S., Tan, D., Smith, G., Czerwinski, M., and Horvitz, E. Personalization vs. Friendsourcing. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 17(2), May 2010. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bigham, J. P., Jayant, C., Ji, H., Little, G., Miller, A., Miller, R. C., Miller, R., Tatarowicz, A., White, B., White, S., and Yeh, T. VizWiz: Nearly Real-Time Answers to Visual Questions. Proceedings of UIST 2010, 333--342. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Burke, M., Kraut, R., and Marlow, C. Social Capital on Facebook: Differentiating Uses and Users. Proceedings of CHI 2011, 571--580. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Burke, M., Kraut, R., and Williams, D. Social Use of Computer-Mediated Communication by Adults on the Autism Spectrum. Proceedings of CSCW 2010, 425--434. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Burke, M., Marlow, C., and Lento, T. Social Network Activity and Social Well-Being. Proceedings of CHI 2010, 1909--1912. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Brenner, J. Social Networking. Pew Internet & American Life Project, March 29, 2012.Google Scholar
- Cavender, A. C., Otero, D. S., Bigham, J. P., and Ladner, R. E. ASL-STEMForum: Enabling Sign Language to Grow Through Online Collaboration. Proceedings of CHI 2010, 2075--2078. Google ScholarDigital Library
- DePaulo, B. M. and Fisher, J. D. "The Costs of Asking for Help," Basic and Applied Social Psychology (1980), 37--41.Google Scholar
- Efron, M. and Winget, M. Questions are Content: A Taxonomy of Questions in a Microblogging Environment. Proceedings of ASIS&T 2010, Article 27. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Facebook Official Statistics Page. Retrieved Sept. 12, 2009. http://facebook.com/press/info.php?statistics.Google Scholar
- Glaser, B. G. and Strauss, A. L. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine Transaction. 1977.Google Scholar
- Hampton, K., Goulet, L. S., Marlow, C., and Rainie, L. Why Most Facebook Users Get More Than They Give. Pew Internet & American Life Project, February 3, 2012.Google Scholar
- Hong, H., Kim, J. G., Abowd, G. D., and Arriaga, R. I. Designing a Social Network to Support the Independence of Young Adults with Autism. Proceedings of CSCW 2012, 627--636. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jayant, C., Ji, H., White, S., and Bigham, J. Supporting Blind Photography. Proceedings of ASSETS 2011, 203--210. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kane, S., Jayant, C., Wobbrock, J., and Ladner, R. Freedom to Roam: A Study of Mobile Device Adoption and Accessibility for People with Visual and Motor Disabilities. Proceedings of ASSETS 2009, 115--122. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lampe, C., Vitak, J., Gray, R., and Ellison, N. Perceptions of Facebook's value as an information source. Proceedings of CHI 2012, 3195--3204. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Morris, M. R. Collaborative Search Revisited. Proceedings of CSCW 2013. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Morris, M. R., Teevan, J., and Panovich, K. What Do People Ask Their Social Networks, and Why? A Survey Study of Status Message Q&A Behavior. Proceedings of CHI 2010, 1739--1748. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Morris, M. R., Teevan, J., and Panovich, K. A Comparison of Information Seeking Using Search Engines and Social Networks. Proceedings of ICWSM 2010.Google Scholar
- Nichols, J. and Kang, J.-H. Asking questions of targeted strangers on social networks. Proceedings of CSCW 2012, 999--1002. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Panovich, K., Miller, R., and Karger, D. Tie strength in question & answer on social network sites. Proceedings of CSCW 2012, 1057--1066. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Paul, S. A., Hong, L., and Chi, E. H. Is Twitter a Good Place for Asking Questions? A Characterization Study. Proceedings of ICWSM 2011.Google Scholar
- Shinohara, K. and Wobbrock, J. O. In the Shadow of Misperception: Assistive Technology Use and Social Interactions. Proceedings of CHI 2011, 705--714. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Smith, A. Why Americans Use Social Media. Pew Internet & American Life Project, November 15, 2011.Google Scholar
- Smith, A. and Brenner, J. Twitter Use 2012. Pew Internet & American Life Project, May 31, 2012.Google Scholar
- Teevan, J., Morris, M. R., and Panovich, K. Factors Affecting Response Quantity, Quality, and Speed for Questions Asked via Social Network Status Messages. Proceedings of ICWSM 2011.Google Scholar
- Thom, J., Helsley, S. Y., Matthews, T. L., Daly, E. M., Millen, D. R. What Are You Working On? Status Message Q&A within an Enterprise SNS. Proceedings of ECSCW 2011.Google Scholar
- Uehara, E. Reciprocity Reconsidered: Gouldner's "Moral Norm of Reciprocity" and Social Support. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 12(4), 1995, 483--502.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Walther, J. B. Selective self-presentation in computer-mediated communication: Hyperpersonal dimensions of technology, language, and cognition. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(5), September 2007, 2538--2557. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Web Accessibility in Mind. WebAIM Screen Reader User Survey #4. May 2012. http://webaim.org/projects/screenreadersurvey4/Google Scholar
- Wentz, B. and Lazar, J. Are separate interfaces inherently unequal? An evaluation with blind users of the usability of two interfaces for a social networking platform. Proceedings of iConference 2011, 91--97. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wills, T. A. Perceptual Consequences of Helping Another Person. 84th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, 1976.Google Scholar
- World Health Organization. Fact Sheet #282: Visual Impairment and Blindness. October 2011.Google Scholar
- Yang, J., Morris, M. R., Teevan, J., Adamic, L., and Ackerman, M. Culture Matters: A Survey Study of Social Q&A Behavior. Proceedings of ICWSM 2011.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Investigating the appropriateness of social network question asking as a resource for blind users
Recommendations
How Blind People Interact with Visual Content on Social Networking Services
CSCW '16: Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social ComputingIn this paper, we explore blind people's motivations, challenges, interactions, and experiences with visual content on Social Networking Services (SNSs). We present findings from an interview study of 11 individuals and a survey study of 60 individuals, ...
Visually impaired users on an online social network
CHI '14: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsIn this paper we present the first large-scale empirical study of how visually impaired people use online social networks, specifically Facebook. We identify a sample of 50K visually impaired users, and study the activities they perform, the content ...
Visual challenges in the everyday lives of blind people
CHI '13: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsThe challenges faced by blind people in their everyday lives are not well understood. In this paper, we report on the findings of a large-scale study of the visual questions that blind people would like to have answered. As part of this year-long study, ...
Comments