Meredith Ringel Morris
ABSTRACT
Despite recent innovations in technologies supporting collaborative web search [11, 13, 25, 34, 35, 37], the features of the primary tools for digital information seeking (web browsers and search engines) continue to reflect a presumption that search is a single-user activity. In this paper, we present the findings of a survey of 167 diverse users' collaborative web search practices, including the prevalence and frequency of such activities, the information needs motivating collaboration, the methods and tools employed in such tasks, and users' satisfaction with the status quo. We find an increased prevalence and frequency of collaborative search, particularly by younger users, and an appropriation of "old" technologies like e-mail as well as "new" technologies like smartphones and social networking sites, rather than the use of dedicated collaborative search tools. We reflect on how and why collaborative search practices have changed in the six years since the first survey detailing this phenomenon was conducted [22], and synthesize our findings to offer suggestions for the design of future collaborative search technologies.
- Amershi, S. and Morris, M. R. CoSearch: A System for Co-located Collaborative Web Search. Proceedings of CHI 2008, 1647--1656. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Amershi, S. and Morris, M. R. Co-located Collaborative Web Search: Understanding Status Quo Practices. CHI 2009 Extended Abstracts, 3637--3642. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bing Team. Introducing the New Bing: Spend Less Time Searching, More Time Doing. Bing Search Blog, May 10, 2012.Google Scholar
- Brenner, J. Social Networking. Pew Internet and American Life Project, March 29, 2012.Google Scholar
- Dybwad, B. Bing and Ping: Share Search Results on Facebook and Twitter. Mashable, Sept. 3, 2009.Google Scholar
- Efron, M. and Winget, M. Questions are Content: A Taxonomy of Questions in a Microblogging Environment. Proceedings of ASIS&T 2010. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Evans, B. and Chi, E. Towards a Model of Understanding Social Search. Proceedings of CSCW 2008, 485--494. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Farnham, S. D., Lahav, M., Raskino, D., Cheng, L., Ickman, T., and Laird-McConnell, T. So.cl: An Interest Network for Informal Learning. Proceedings of ICWSM 2012.Google Scholar
- Fidel, R., Bruce, H., Pejtersen, A. M., Dumais, S. T., Grudin, J., and Poltrock, S. Collaborative Information Retrieval. The New Review of Information Behaviour Research, 2000, volume 1, 235--247. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Flanagan, J. The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin, 51:327--358, 1954.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Foster, J. Collaborative Information Behavior: User Engagement and Communication Sharing. IGI Global, June 2010.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Greenberg, S. and Roseman, M. GroupWeb: A WWW Browser as Real Time Groupware. Proceedings of the CHI 1996 Conference Companion, 271--272. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Golovchinksy, G., Morris, M. R., and Pickens, J. Introduction to the special issue. Information Processing & Management, Special Issue on Collaborative Information Seeking, 46(6), November 2010. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Harper, F., Moy, D., and Konstan, J. Facts or friends? Distinguishing informational and conversational questions in social Q&A sites. Proceedings of CHI 2009, 759--768. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hecht, B., Teevan, J., Morris, M. R., and Liebling, D. SearchBuddies: Bringing Search Engines into the Conversation. Proceedings of ICWSM 2012.Google Scholar
- Horowitz, D. and Kamvar, S. D. The Anatomy of a Large-Scale Social Search Engine. Proceedings of WWW 2010, 431--440. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lampe, C., Vitak, J., Gray, R., & Ellison, N. Perceptions of Facebook's Value as an Information Source. Proceedings of CHI 2012, 3195--3204. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lee, U. Kang, H. Yi, E., Yi, M. Y., Kantola, J. Understanding Mobile Q&A Usage: An Exploratory Study. Proceedings of CHI 2012, 3215--3224. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Metts, S., Sprecher, S., and Cupach, W. R. Retrospective Self-Reports. In Studying Interpersonal Interaction (Montgomery, B. M. and Duck, S., eds.). The Guilford Press: 1991.Google Scholar
- Moraveji, N., Morris, M. R., Morris, D., Czerwinski, M., and Riche, N. ClassSearch: Facilitating the Development of Web Search Skills through Social Learning. Proceedings of CHI 2011, 1797--1806. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Morris, M. R. Interfaces for Collaborative Exploratory Web Search: Motivations and Directions for Multi-User Designs. CHI 2007 Workshop on Exploratory Search and HCI.Google Scholar
- Morris, M. R. A Survey of Collaborative Web Search Practices. Proceedings of CHI 2008, 1657--1660. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Morris, M. R., Fisher, D., and Wigdor, D. Search on Surfaces: Exploring the Potential of Interactive Tabletops for Collaborative Search Tasks. Information Processing and Management, 46(6), November 2010. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Morris, M. R. and Horvitz, E. SearchTogether; An Interface for Collaborative Web Search. Proceedings of UIST 2007, 3--12. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Morris, M. R. and Teevan, J. Collaborative Web Search: Who, What, Where, When, and Why? Morgan & Claypool, 2010. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Morris, M. R., Teevan, J., and Bush, S. Enhancing Collaborative Web Search with Personalization: Groupization, Smart Splitting, and Group Hit-Highlighting. Proceedings of CSCW 2008, 481--484. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Morris, M. R., Teevan, J., and Panovich, K. What Do People Ask Their Social Networks, and Why? A Survey Study of Status Message Q&A Behavior. Proceedings of CHI 2010, 1739--1748. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Morris, M. R., Teevan, J., and Panovich, K. A Comparison of Information Seeking Using Search Engines and Social Networks. Proceedings of ICWSM 2010.Google Scholar
- Paul, S. A., Hong, L., and Chi, E. H. Is Twitter a Good Place for Asking Questions? A Characterization Study. Proceedings of ICWSM 2011.Google Scholar
- Paul, S. A., Hong, L., and Chi, E. H. Who is Authoritative? Understanding Reputation Mechanisms in Quora. Proceedings of Collective Intelligence 2012.Google Scholar
- Pickens, J., Golovchinsky, G., Shah, C., Qvarfordt, P., and Back, M. Algorithmic Mediation for Collaborative Exploratory Search. Proceedings of SIGIR 2008, 315--322. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Purcell, K. Search and email still top the list of most popular online activities. Pew Internet & American Life Project, August 9, 2011.Google Scholar
- Rivlin, G. Does Quora Really Have All the Answers? Wired, May 2011.Google Scholar
- Shah, C. Collaborative Information Seeking: The Art and Science of Making the Whole Greater than the Sum of All. The Information Retrieval Series, Springer, 2012. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Shah, C. and Gonzalez-Ibanez, R. Evaluating the Synergic Effect of Collaboration in Information Seeking. Proceedings of SIGIR 2011, 913--922. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Smith, A. Nearly half of American adults are smartphone owners. Pew Internet & American Life Project, March 1, 2012.Google Scholar
- Smyth, B., Briggs, P., Coyle, M., and O'Mahoney, M. Google Shared: A Case Study in Social Search. Proceedings of UMAP 2009. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Taylor, R. S. Question-Negotiation and Information-Seeking in Libraries. College & Research Libraries, 29(3), 1968, 178--194.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Teevan, J., Karlson, A., Amini, S., Brush, A. J. B., and Krumm, J. Understanding the Importance of Location, Time, and People in Mobile Local Search Behavior. Proceedings of Mobile HCI 2011. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Thom, J., Helsley, S. Y., Matthews, T. L., Daly, E. M., Millen, D. R. What Are You Working On? Status Message Q&A within an Enterprise SNS. Proceedings of ECSCW 2011.Google Scholar
- Twidale, M. B. and Floyd, I. R. Infrastructures from the Bottom-Up and Top-Down: Can They Meet in the Middle? Proceedings of PDC 2008, 238--241. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wiltse, H. and Nichols, J. PlayByPlay: Collaborative Web Browsing for Desktop and Mobile Devices. Proceedings of CHI 2009, 1781--1790. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Collaborative search revisited
Recommendations
Collaborative web search in context: a study of tool use in everyday tasks
CSCW '14: Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computingRecent research efforts have led to the creation of a number of systems that provide specialised support for collaborative web search. However, the use of these tools has not been studied outside of the laboratory, and as collaborative search becomes ...
Embedding Search into a Conversational Platform to Support Collaborative Search
CHIIR '19: Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Human Information Interaction and RetrievalPopular messaging platforms such as Slack have given rise to thousands of applications (or bots) that users can engage with individually or as a group. In this paper, we study the use of searchbots (i.e., bots that perform specific types of searches) ...
Co-located collaborative web search: understanding status quo practices
CHI EA '09: CHI '09 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing SystemsCo-located collaborative Web search is a surprisingly common activity, despite the fact that Web browsers and search engines are not designed to support collaboration. We report the findings of two studies (a diary study and an observational study) that ...
Comments