skip to main content
10.1145/2441776.2441832acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Working and sustaining the virtual "Disaster Desk"

Authors Info & Claims
Published:23 February 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

Humanity Road is a volunteer organization working within the domain of disaster response. The organization is entirely virtual, relying on ICT to both organize and execute its work of helping to inform the public on how to survive after disaster events. This paper follows the trajectory of Humanity Road from an emergent group to a formal non-profit, considering how its articulation, conduct and products of work together express its identity and purpose, which include aspirations of relating to and changing the larger ecosystem of emergency response. Through excerpts of its communications, we consider how the organization makes changes in order to sustain itself in rapid-response work supported in large part by episodic influxes of volunteers. This case enlightens discussion about technology-supported civic participation, and the means by which dedicated long-term commitment to the civic sphere is mobilized.

References

  1. Ahuju, M.K., & Carley, K. Network structure in virtual organizations, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3, 4 (1998).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, K. & Schram, A. Design and Implementation of a Data Analytics Infrastructure In Support of Crisis Informatics Research. In the 33rd Intl Conference on Software Engineering, (2011) 21--28. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Bowers, J. The Work to Make the Network Work: Studying CSCW in Action. Proc. CSCW 1994, ACM, (1994) 287--298. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. DeSanctis, G., P. Monge. Communication processes for virtual organizations. Organization Science, 10, 6 (1999), 693--703. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Dourish, P. & Bellotti, V. Awareness and Coordination in Shared Workplaces. Proc. CSCW 1992, ACM (1992) 107--114. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Drabek, T. E. Human Responses to Disaster: An Inventory of Sociological Findings. New York: Springer-Verlag, 198Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Dynes, RR. Organized Behavior in Disaster. Heath, 1970.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Finholt, T., Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. Communication and performance in ad hoc groups. In J.Galegher, R.Kraut and C.Egido, (Eds.), Intellectual teamwork (pp. 291--325). NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1990. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Fritz, C. E. & Mathewson, J. H. Convergence Behavior in Disasters: A Problem in Social Control, Committee on Disaster Studies, National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council, Washington DC, 1957.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Giddens, A. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. University of California Press, 1986.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Hess, C. and Ostrom, E. (Eds) Understanding Knowledge as a Commons: From Theory to Practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Hughes, A., L. Palen, J. Sutton, S. Liu, & S. Vieweg. "Site-Seeing" in Disaster: An Examination of On-Line Social Convergence. Proc. of Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management Conference (ISCRAM) 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Humanity Road. 2010 Annual Report. Humanity Road, Inc. (2011) Boydton, VA. Available at: www.humanityroad.orgGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Kendra, J.M. & Wachtendorf, T. Reconsidering Convergence and Converger: Legitimacy in Response to the World Trade Center Disaster. Terrorism and Disaster: New Threats, New Ideas: Research in Social Problems and Public Policy 11, (2003), 97--122.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Kreps, G. A. & Bosworth, S.L. Organizing, Role Enactment, and Disaster: A Structural Theory. Cranbury, NJ: Associated University Presses, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Kumar, S., Barbier, G., Abbasi, M.A., & Liu, H. TweetTracker: An Analysis Tool for Humanitarian and Disaster Relief. In Proc. of ICWSM (2011), 661--662.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Lervik, J.E., Fahy, K.M., & Easterby-Smith, M. Temporal dynamics of situated learning in organizations, Management Learning, 41, (July 2010), 285--301.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Malone, T. W., Laubacher, R. & Dellarocas, C. N., Harnessing Crowds: Mapping the Genome of Collective Intelligence (February 3, 2009). MIT Sloan Research Paper No. 4732-09.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Orlikowoski, W. J. The duality of technology: rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organization Science, 3, 3 (1992), 398--472.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Ostrom, E. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Preece, J., & Shneiderman, B. The Reader-to-Leader Framework: Motivating Technology-Mediated Social Participation, AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction, 1(1) (2009), 13--32.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Putnam, L.L., Nicotera, A.M., & McPhee, R.D. Introduction: Communication Constitutes Organization. In Building Theories of Organization: The Constitutive Role of Communication, Putnam, L.L. & Nicotera, A.M. eds., Routledge, New York, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Schmidt, K. & L. Bannon. Taking CSCW Seriously: Supporting articulation work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work Journal, 1, 1 (1992) 7--40.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Star, S.L. & Ruhleder. K. Steps towards an ecology of infrastructure: complex problems in design and access for large-scale collaborative systems. Proc. of CSCW 1994, ACM, (1994) 253--264. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Starbird, K. & Palen, L. "Voluntweeters:" Self-Organizing by Digital Volunteers in Times of Crisis. Proc. of CHI 2011, ACM, (2011) 1071--1080. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Voida, A. Harmon, E. & Al-Ani, B. Bridging between organizations and the public: volunteer coordinators' uneasy relationship with social computing. In Proc. of CHI 2012. ACM, (2012) 1967--1976. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Zerubavel, E. Patterns of Time in Hospital Life: A Sociological Perspective, University of Chicago Press, 1979.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Zerubavel, E. The Seven-Day Circle: The History and Meaning of the Week, Free Press, 1985.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Working and sustaining the virtual "Disaster Desk"

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CSCW '13: Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work
        February 2013
        1594 pages
        ISBN:9781450313315
        DOI:10.1145/2441776

        Copyright © 2013 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 23 February 2013

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate2,235of8,521submissions,26%

        Upcoming Conference

        CSCW '24

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader