skip to main content
10.1145/222092.222243acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicailConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

Obligations directed from bearers to counterparts

Published:24 May 1995Publication History
First page image

References

  1. And58.Alan Ross Anderson. A reduction of deontic logic to alethic modal logic. Mind, 67(1):100- 103, 1958.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. AS86.Layman Allen and Charles Saxon. Analysis of the logical structure of legal rules by a modernized and formalized version of hohfeld fundamental legal conceptions. In A.A. Martino and F. Socci Natali, editors, Automated Analysis of Legal Texts, pages 385-450. Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., New York, 1986.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. AS93a.Layman Allen and Charles Saxon. A-hohfeld: A language for robust structural representation of knowledge in the legal domain to build interpretation assistance expert systems. In J.J.Ch. Meyer and R.J. Wieringa, editors, Deonlic Logic in Computer Science, Normalive System Specification, pages 205-224. John .Wiley and Sons, Chichester, 1993. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. AS93b.Layman Allen and Charles Saxon. Controlling inadvertent ambiguity in the logical structure of legal drafting by means of the prescribed definitions of the a-hohfeld structural language. In Proceedings of the conference- Towards a Global Legal Expert System in Law, IDG, Florence, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Che80.Brian F. Chellas. Modal Logic - an Introduction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1980.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Cn70.Hector Neri Castafieda. On the semantics of the ought-to-do. $ynthese, 21:449-468, 1970.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Han70.Bengt Hansson. Deontic logic and different levels of generality. Theoria, 36:241-248, 1970.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Har82.Herbert L.A. Hart. Legal rights. In Herbert L.A. Hart, editor, Essays on Bentham, pages 162-193. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1982.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. HG93.Henning Herrestad and Groendijk. An incremental approach to legal drafting support. In JURIX proceedings, Lelystad, The Netherlands, 1993. Koninklijke Vermande BV.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Hil74.Risto Hilpinen. On the semantics of personal directives. In Carl H. Heidrich, editor, Semantics and Communication, pages 162-179. North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, 1974.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Hin69.Jaakko Hintikka. Deontic logic and its philosophical morals. In Jaakko Hintikka, editor, Models for Modalities, Selected Essays, pages 184-214. D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland, 1969.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Hin71.Jaakko Hintikka. Some main problems of deontic logic. In Risto Hilpinen, editor, Deontic Logic, pages 59-104. D.Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht- Holland, 1971.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. HK93.Henning Herrestad and Christen Krogh. The right direction. In Martino et al., editor, Towards a Global Expert System of Law, Firenze,, 1.-3. December 1993.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. HK95.Henning Herrestad and Christen Krogh. Deontic logic relativised to bearers and counterparties. In Jon Bing and Olav Torvund, editors, 25 years Anniversary Anthology NRCCL, pages 453-522. TANO publishers, CompLex series, Oslo, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Hoh66.Wesley Newcomb Hohfeld. Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in judicial Reasoning and other Legal Essays. Yale Univ. Press, New Haven- Conneticut, 1966. (Reprinting of the article printed in Yale Law Journal in 1913.).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. JS93.A.J.I. Jones and M. Sergot. On the charachterization of law and computer systems: The normative systems perspective. In J.-J. Ch. Meyer and R.J. Wieringa, editors, Deontic Logic in Computer Science, pages 275-307. john Wiley and Sons, Chichester, 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. JS94.Andrew J.I. Jones and Marek Sergot. A formal characterisation of institutional power. Prepublished as part of proceedings from MED- LAR II workshop in Rome, 08.1994, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Kan71.Stig Kanger. New foundations for ethical theory. In Risto Hilpinen, editor, Deontic Logic, pages 36-58. D.Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht- Holland, 1971. (Published as a privately distributed pamhlet in 1957).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Kan72.Stig Kanger. Law and logic. Theoria, 38(105- 132), 1972.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Kan85.Stig Kanger. On realization of human rights. In G. Holmstrom and A.J.I. Jones, editors, Action, Logic, and Social Theory, pages 71- 78. Acta Philosophica Fennica vol 38, Helsinki, 1985.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. KK66.Stig Kanger and Helle Kanger. Rights and parliamentarism. Theoria, 6(2):85-115, 1966.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Kor75.Carl R. Kordig. Relativized deontic modalities. In Alan Ross Anderson, Ruth Barcan Marcus, and R.M Martin, editors, The Logical Enterprise, pages 221-257. Yale University Press, New Haven, 1975.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Kro95.Christen Krogh. Obligations in multiagent systems. In Jan Komorowski and Agnar Aamodt, editors, Proceedings of the Fifth Scandinavian Conference on Artificial Intelligence (SCAI'95), Trondheim, May 29- 31 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Lin77.Lars Lindahl. Position and Change. D.Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht - Holland, 1977~Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Lin94.Lars Lindahl. Stig kanger's theory of rights. In D. Prawitz, B. Skyrms, and D. Westerst~hl, editors, Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science IX, pages 889-911. Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., New York, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Lyo69.David Lyons. Rights, claimants, and beneficiaries. American Philosophical Quarterly, 6(3):173-185, 1969.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Mak86.David Makinson. On the formal representation of rights relations. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 15:403-425, 1986.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. vW51.Georg Henrik von Wright. Deontic logic. Mind, 60:1-15, 1951.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Wal84.Jeremy Waldron. Theories of Rights. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1984.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Wel90.Carl Wellman. Relative duties in the law. Philosophical Topics, 18(1):183-202, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Obligations directed from bearers to counterparts

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            ICAIL '95: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
            May 1995
            337 pages
            ISBN:0897917588
            DOI:10.1145/222092

            Copyright © 1995 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 24 May 1995

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • Article

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate69of169submissions,41%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader