Carson C. Woo
Frederick H. Lochovsky
Skip Abstract Section
Abstract
To improve the effectiveness of office workers in their decision making, office systems have been built to support (rather than replace) their judgment. However, these systems model office work in a centralized environment, and/or they can only support a single office worker. Office work that is divided into specialized domains handled by different office workers (where cooperation is needed in order to accomplish the work) is not supported. In this paper, we will present a model that supports office problem solving in a logically distributed environment. (In some systems, information is geographically distributed for performance purposes rather than for conceptual need. The term, logically, is therefore used to indicate the logical need of organizing information without having to worry about the physical location of the information.) In particular, cooperative tools that can be used to support office workers during the process of their problem solving is discussed.
- 1 BARBER, G.R. Office semantics. Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Electrical Eng. and Comput. Sci., MIT, Cambridge, Mass., 1982.Google Scholar
- 2 BARBER, G. R. Supporting organizational problem solving with a workstation. ACM Trans. Office Inf. Syst. 1, 1 (1983), 45-67. Google Scholar
- 3 BARBER, G. R., DE JONG, P., ANb HEWITT, C. Semantic support for work in organizations. In Proceedings of IFIP Congress (Paris, France, Sept. 19-23). North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1983, pp. 561-566.Google Scholar
- 4 Special Issue on Smalltalk. Byte 6, 8 (Aug. 1981).Google Scholar
- 5 DE JONG, P. The system for business automation (SBA): A unified application development system. In Proceedings of IFIP Congress 80 (Tokyo) 1980, pp. 469-474.Google Scholar
- 6 FIKES, R.E. Odyssey: A knowledge-based assistant. Artif. Int. 16 (1981), 331-361.Google Scholar
- 7 FIKES, R. E., AND HENDERSON, D.A. On supporting the use of procedures in office work. In Proceedings of the 1st Annual AAAI Conference (Aug.). Stanford Univ., Calif., 1980, pp. 202-207.Google Scholar
- 8 FIUME, E., AND BUXTON, W. A Concurrent Object-Based Model of Interactive Graphics Applications. Working paper, Computer System Research Institute, University of Toronto. 1986.Google Scholar
- 9 GARRISON, R. H. Managerial Accounting: Concepts for Planning, Control, Decision Making. Business Publications, Dallas, Tex., 1979 (Revised Edition).Google Scholar
- 10 GORRY, G. A., AND SCOTT MORTON, M.S. A framework for management information systems. Sloan Management Review 13, 1 (Fall 1971), 55-70.Google Scholar
- 11 HAMMER, M., AND SIRBU, M. What is office automation? In Proceedings of the 1980 Office Automation Conference (Atlanta, Ga., Mar. 3-5). AFIPS Press, Reston, Va., 1980, pp. 37-49.Google Scholar
- 12 HEWITT, C. Viewing control structures as patterns of passing messages. Artif. Int. 8, 3 (June 1977), 323-364.Google Scholar
- 13 HOGG, J., AND GAMVROULAS, S. An active mail system. In Proceedings of ACM SIGMOD Conference. ACM, New York, 1984, pp. 215-222. Google Scholar
- 14 HOG6, J., NIERSTRASZ, 0. M., AND TSICHRITZlS, D.C. Office procedures. In Office Automation: Concepts and Tools, D. C. Tsichritzis, Ed. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1985, pp. 137-166.Google Scholar
- 15 LOCHOVSKY, F.H. A knowledge-based approach to supporting office work. Datab. Eng. IEEE Computer Society 16, 3 (Sept. 1983), 43-51.Google Scholar
- 16 MCLEOD, R., JR. Management Information Systems. 2nd ed. Science Research Associates, Palo Alto, Calif., 1983. Google Scholar
- 17 MINSKY, M. A framework for representing knowledge. In Psychology of Computer Vision, P. Winston, Ed. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1975, pp. 211-227.Google Scholar
- 18 NIERSTRASZ, O. M., MOONEY, J., AND TWAITES, K. J. Using objects to implement office procedures. In Proceedings of the Canadian Information Processing Society Conference (Ottawa, Ont., Canada, May). Canadian Information Processing Society, Toronto, Ont., Canada, 1983, pp. 65-73.Google Scholar
- 19 PANKO, R.R. 38 offices: Analyzing needs in individual offices. ACM Trans. Office Inf. Syst. 2, 3 (July 1984), pp. 226-234. Google Scholar
- 20 POPPEL, H. L. Who needs the office of the future? Harvard Bus. Rev. (Nov.-Dec. 1982), pp. 146-155.Google Scholar
- 21 REICHWALD, R. Cooperation in the office--Office communication systems as a management tool. In Proceedings of the 2nd A CM SIGOA Conference on Office Information Systems (June). ACM, New York, 1984, pp. 212-218. Google Scholar
- 22 TSlCRmTZlS, D.C. Objectworld. in Office Automation: Concepts and Tools, D. C. Tsichritzis, Ed. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1985, pp. 379-398.Google Scholar
- 23 TSICHRITZIS, D. C., RABITTI, F. A., GIBBS, S., NIERSTRASZ, O. M., AND HOGG, J. A system for managing structured messages. IEEE Trans. Commun. COM-30, 1 (Jan. 1982), pp. 66-73.Google Scholar
- 24 TWAITES, K.J. An object-based programming environment for office information systems. M.Sc. dissertation, Dept. of Comput. Sci., Univ. of Toronto, Toronto, Ont., Canada, 1984.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Supporting distributed office problem solving in organizations
Comments